Paper ID #41857Essentials of the Nurse + Engineer: Integrating Systems Engineering ModelingDr. Daniel B Oerther P.E., Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE, BCEE, DLAAS, FAAN(h) joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving for ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Professor Oerther is internationally recognized for leadership of engineers, sanitarians, and nurses promoting the
Paper ID #38917Applying a Competency-Based Education Approach for Designing a UniqueInterdisciplinary Graduate Program: A Case Study for a SystemsEngineering ProgramDr. Amy Thompson, University of Connecticut Dr. Amy Thompson joined UConn in August 2017 as an Associate Professor-In-Residence of Systems Engineering and as the Associate Director for the Institute for Advanced Systems Engineering at the University of Connecticut. She currently teaches graduate-level engineering courses in model-based sys- tems engineering and systems engineering fundamentals, and coordinates the online graduate programs in Advanced Systems
whole picture, recognizing that individual elements are interconnected and that their interactions shape the behavior of the entire system. By embracing this holistic view, we gain a deeper understanding of complex problems and can identify underlying patterns and relationships that might otherwise go unnoticed. B. The Ability to Predict What Happens Next: Complex systems are characterized by nonlinear dynamics, where small changes can lead to disproportionately large effects over time. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anticipating the consequences of our actions and avoiding unintended outcomes. Systems thinking helps us identify the cause and effect within a system. By recognizing
competence in engineers," Eurpoean Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 119-131, 2006.[4] B. Blandin, "The Competence of an Engineer and How It Is Built Through an Apprenticeship Program: A Tentative Model," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 57- 71, 2012.[5] J. Trevelyan, THe Making of an Engineer, Taylor & Francis, 2014.[6] C. Rottmann, R. Sacks and D. Reeve, "Engineering Leadership: Grounding Leadership Theory in Engineers’ Professional Identities," LEadership, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351-373, 2015.[7] R. A. Atadero, C. H. Paguyo, K. E. Rambo-Hernandez and H. L. Henderson, "Building inclusive engineering identities: implications for changing engineering culture," Journal of
/TSSJ.V17I1.2752.[9] B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, “Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research,” Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, pp. 1–271, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.4324/9780203793206.Appendix 1WPI IRB Approval and ExemptionAppendix 2Copilot Prompts and ResponsesTeam 3 Team PerspectivesPrompt 1: Analyze the emerging themes for the 6 decolonization questions and present your analysis withclear summary of how themes emerged for each question I upload 3 set of these question and theiranswers.Thank you for sharing the questions and answers. I'll analyze the emerging themes for each question andprovide a clear summary.1. Who is driving this process?Emerging Themes: • Responsibility and
Paper ID #42775Control System Design for a Small-Scale Radio Telescope: A Senior DesignProjectZachary Martin, Penn State University Zachary Martin is a graduate student at Penn State Harrisburg specializing in Electronics, Electromagnetics, and Optics and has earned a BS in Electrical Engineering from the same institution. He is the Director of Engineering at RLC Electronic Systems and previously held student leadership roles as president of the Amateur Radio club and technical lead of the IEEE club. He is the recipient of the Electrical Faculty Outstanding Senior award and the IEEE Capstone Excellence award.Aaron Olsen
system (nodes and relationships) asked about. Identify feedback processes Identify a direct feedback loop (e.g., A to B to A). Identify an indirect feedback loop (e.g., A to B to C to A). Connect actions to outcomes Identify possible variables that positively and negatively affect the system in the dashboard. Confirm variables that positively and negatively affect the system in the dashboard. Elaborate causal reasoning Nodes and relationships in whole diagram. diagrams Amount of money collected. Number of donations received. Use system
. 8REFERENCES[1] J. Gibson, W. Scherer, W. Gibson, and M. Smith, How to do systems analysis: Primer and casebook. 2016.[2] B. Blanchard, W. Fabrycky, and W. Fabrycky, Systems engineering and analysis. 1990.[3] J. R. Grohs, G. R. Kirk, M. M. Soledad, and D. B. Knight, "Assessing systems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems," Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 28, no. September 2017, pp. 110–130, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.003.[4] J. L. Fleiss, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2d. New York: Wiley, 1981.[5] J. L. Fleiss and M. C. Paik, "The Measurement of Interrater Agreement," in Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, Third Edition, W. A. Shewart and S. S. Wilks, Eds
relate to the students’ exam performance.To answer this research question, we represented the distribution of the students’ examperformance and quality of the study sheet. In addition, we performed a t-test analysis toexamine the effect of the quality of study sheet on two groups of students (MCS and LCS).While the students in the MCS group obtained a median score (85) or above, the students in theLCS group obtained a score below the median score.Figures 1(a) and 1(b) displayed below illustrate the distribution of exam performance and studysheet scores, respectively. Although the distribution of students’ exam performance is somewhatnormal, the distribution of study sheet scores is not. (a
,develop the next generation of ethical engineers, and honor the community the dignity, respect,and justice it deserves.References[1] K. L. Schreiber, L. F. Rodríguez, A. P. Witmer, and B. Dill, “Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international engineering: A phrase mining analysis,” in 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2019. doi: 10.13031/AIM.201901425.[2] “INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook 4e 2015 07”.[3] I. F. Alexander, “A Better Fit-Characterising the Stakeholders.,” in CAiSE Workshops (2), 2004, pp. 215–223.[4] P. A. Laplante, “Stakeholder analysis for smart grid systems,” Penn State, 2010.[5] H. Sharp, A. Finkelstein