Electrical Engineering in 2020 and her BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from Shiraz University and University of Colorado Colorado Springs in 2011 and 2013 respectively. Her main area of interest is control systems, system identification and optimization. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Control System Design for a Small-Scale Radio Telescope; a Senior Design ProjectAbstract- This paper presents the management of a student-led initiative to launch an Institute ofElectrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) award-winning small-scale radio telescope as asenior design project. This challenge provided the students with the opportunity to develop
students. He has completed a master’s degree in mechanical engineering at the Uni- versity of Southern California. He also holds another master’s degree in engineering management at King Abulaziz University. Mohammed has previous experience in working on large projects in various engineering fields.Prof. Chris Buergin Rogers, Tufts University Chris is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University with research in engineering education, robotics, musical instrument design, IoT, and anything else that sounds cool. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work-in-Progress: Experimenting with a Systems Engineering Project in Elementary SchoolAbstractIf
undergraduate computer networking, observingpositive impacts on students’ understanding, especially in teamwork environments [8]. Theydiscussed strategies for integrating inquiry-based learning effectively but noted limitations relatedto remote collaboration difficulties and time constraints in projects. Each of these studieshighlights both the potential benefits and challenges of implementing inquiry-based andcollaborative learning methods in diverse educational contexts.Collaborative Learning highlights the importance of group interactions, enriching comprehensionthrough the exchange of collective ideas. Foldnes compared the effectiveness of the flippedclassroom model with traditional lectures, focusing on two flipped classroom implementations[9
courseAbstractThis paper presents an innovative educational approach used in a sophomore systemsengineering course, where LEGO Mindstorms robots are integrated to accelerate theunderstanding of complex systems engineering concepts. While hands-on learning tools likeLEGO Mindstorms are often used in engineering education, our approach uniquely emphasizesthe unpredictability and complexity inherent in real-world systems engineering. Rather thanfocusing solely on technology or project completion, we incorporate controlled disruptionsduring exercises, such as modifying project requirements, changing team compositions, orremoving key components from the kits. These disruptions simulate dynamic environments,requiring students to adapt, manage resource limitations
Paper ID #42422Student Goal Formulation in an Introductory Engineering Design Coursethrough Systems Thinking ScenariosDr. Andrea Goncher-Sevilla, University of Florida Andrea Goncher-Sevilla is an Instructional Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at the University of Florida. She earned her PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and focuses on teaching and learning projects in human centered design and humanitarian engineering.Dr. John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida John Mendoza Garcia is an Instructional Associate Professor at the Department of Engineering Education in the Herbert
Paper ID #38323Integrating Equity in the Systems Engineering Curriculum: A Pilot StudyDr. Julie Drzymalski, Temple University Julie Drzymalski is a Professor of Instruction and Director of the Industrial and Systems Engineering program. Her teaching interests lie in the areas of operations research and systems modeling. Current re- search pursuits are in the application of complex adaptive systems modeling to areas such as supply chains and human centered systems. Previously held industrial positions include various quality engineering, project and program management positions in the construction industries of the greater
teaches both an introduction to systems engineering course and Engineering andPublic Policy course. The former is heavy on engineering design with a blind eye to the reality ofthe civic society and the latter heavy on policy with overview of engineering design. There isroom for cross pollination and in this paper, we identify stakeholder analysis as the first SEprocess or tool and examine it with a decolonization lens. The goal of this paper is examinationand recommendation and not definitive statement. We also apply our examination to a systemsengineering project and student stakeholder artifact commonly used and developed anddemonstrate a simple exercise of decolonization.Additionally, there is a significant and growing trend of engineering
can both compliment and challenge the traditional systems engineering approach. 3 Choose an appropriate scope, define the purpose, and define the approach for a systems engineering project intended to leverage MBSE. 4 Describe the intent of SysML using the ‘4 Pillars’ rubric. 5 Construct and interpret semantically consistent SysML models. 6 Critique a project’s implementation of MBSE as captured in a SysML model.lessons learned based on feedback from the cohort, and discuss how the teaching of MBSE can befurther improved using active learning techniques and modern technology. The paper underscoresthe importance of fostering student engagement, critical thinking, and proficiency in MBSEpractices.2 ‘Model
support an engineering conceptdevelopment from cradle to grave. For SE students, that full life cycle planning and designhappens in their capstone course. The Systems Engineering Capstone class is usually taught asthe last course for any Master of Systems Engineering program. Within the class, students pursuea team project where they apply systems engineering methods to a specific problem. They thencreate the final deliverable with a systems engineering management plan. While students receivestrong technical training within this experience, ethical and justice-oriented skillsets andmindsets are lacking if not non-existent. For example, decolonization strategies – the ability tocritically examine systems and power differentials through systems
. Therefore, the course included several systems engineering topics: thesystems engineering process; conceptional systems design; design requirements; integration andprototyping; testing, evaluation, and validation; design for reliability; design for maintainability;and design for affordability. The remainder of the course was organized to focus on thefollowing topics: Logical foundations of systems thinking; the Causal Loop Diagrams (CLD)technique; systems thinking for control systems; and systems thinking applied to problemsolving. Course activities included homework assignments, in-class essays, group discussions,and a final research project. The following table shows how student performance was evaluated.What sets this course apart from other
Engineering Education in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, andDr. Andrea Goncher, University of Florida Andrea Goncher is an Assistant Instructional Professor in Engineering Education at the University of Florida. Her work focuses on teaching and learning projects in human centred design and humanitarian engineering. Her research interests include text analytics, international higher education, and engineering design education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Assessing Student’s Stakeholder Awareness Skills in an IntroductoryEngineering Design Course through Systems
was a member of the 2016 Frontier of En-gineering Education of the NAE and was elected as member of the Connecticut Academy of Science andEngineering in 2020. He has partnered with over 100 industry professionals and executives in generatingand managing funding for UConn that exceeds $40M leading to joint R&D, technology, patents, and pro-fessional training programs. He manages a portfolio of over $7M in research projects, while his Institutemanages active research funding that totals over $30M. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Applying a Competency-Based Education Approach for Designing a Unique Interdisciplinary Graduate Program: A Case Study for a Systems
, OntarioAbstractSurveys of bioengineering facilities within the bioeconomy highlight a limited diffusion ofsocio-technical knowledge and expertise about new innovations at the pilot and demonstrationscales, compared to technical knowledge. To improve on this, it is critical to develop awarenessamong new technology developers about different stakeholders within the bioeconomy, as wellas about the non-technical impacts of their work within a broader context. This paper describes aworkshop with graduate bioengineering researchers. The use of system mapping tools forimproving socio-technical knowledge diffusion at their bioengineering institute are evaluated.Participants were asked to describe the impacts of their research projects on non-technicalstakeholders using
actively participates in various professional organizations, including IEEE, IET, ASEE, ISA, IAOE, and the CLAWAR Association. He has chaired numerous conferences and workshops in these fields. Additionally, he has served as a program evaluator for ABET and is involved in assessing research and development projects for funding agencies across the U.S., Europe, and Australia.Jim Goodell, INFERable and IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Jim Goodell is editor and co-author of Learning Engineering Toolkit and Chair of the IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee. He is founder of INFERable, a Public Benefit Corporation. He was Director of Innovation at Quality Information Partners where he helps lead
solve introductory problems.Then, at the Analyzing level, students must examine their output to determine if it matches theexpected output of the test cases as well as analyze why either it did or did not. Finally, at theCreating level, students must combine multiple principles, such as nested for loops within afunction, to address real-world problems. Thus, this course’s assessments nourish criticalthinking, problem-solving, and coding principles.Assessments in this course are all hands-on and are designed to coincide with the topic beingpresented immediately. Furthermore, each Lab and Project has a premise, such as “Creating anOnline Business Customer Management Program,” to provide real-world context for a particularprogramming principle
application to object detection, tracking and pose estimation.Dr. Ola Batarseh, Dassault Systemes Dr. Ola Batarseh is Solution Architect Director in the Digital Transformation team at Dassault Systemes where she conducts internal projects to raise the model-based capability, competency, and capacity. She conducts regular client consulting efforts on enabling improved projects using model-based methods and analysis. She is an adjunct professor at UML where she instructs students from USAF, Raytheon, and other professionals in MBSE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrating Model-Based Systems Engineering and Systems Thinking Skills in Engineering
instruction. Excellent teaching style, course organization, and commitment to expectations of adult learning applied to real world problems. 3 We’ve done many project assignments related to every topic in environmental engineering like air pollution, water pollution, etc., so this is a strong benefit and aspect of the course for students. 4 Without getting into the weeds of computer models, this course teaches us a great overall understanding of the fundamentals of modeling and the key elements. I never felt like we got bogged down with the non-material problems, such as learning programs or
. He teaches and investigates the development of professional skills such as problem-solving, systems thinking, and design thinking. He worked in Industry before transitioning to academia.Dr. Andrea Goncher-Sevilla, University of Florida Andrea Goncher is an Instructional Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at the University of Florida. She earned her PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and focuses on teaching and learning projects in human centered design and humanitarian engineering.Dr. Mengyu Li, University of Florida Mengyu Li is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE) at the University of Florida (UF). She teaches numerous
Seagate Technology. His research interests are in STEM education and control of mechatronic systems.Dr. Laura Ochs Pottmeyer, Carnegie Mellon University Laura Pottmeyer is a Data Science Research Associate at Carnegie Mellon University’s Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation. She consults with faculty members and graduate students on implementing educational research projects. SDr. Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, Texas State University Dr. Karim Muci-Kuchler is a Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator at the Ingram School of Engineering of Texas State University. Before joining Texas State University, he was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director of the Experimental
Centre of Canada scaling up new materials and processes from the lab to manufacturing. In her 11 years at Xerox, Emily learned a great deal about leading teams and developing new products, becoming a manager and Principal Engineer. Emily then spent 10 years at Hatch, a global engineering firm serving the mining, energy and infrastructure sectors. Emily led international teams to develop new product and service offerings and to deliver major projects, first as the Director of Technology Development and then as Managing Director, Water. Emily was also the inaugural chair of Hatch’s Global Diversity and Inclusion efforts. Emily holds a Bachelor Degree in Engineering Chemistry from Queen’s University and completed a
?MethodStudy Participants and ContextThe participants for this study are second-year mechanical engineering students enrolled in an"Engineered Systems in the Society" course during the Fall 2023 semester at the college ofengineering of a southeastern university in the United States. The course employs contemporaryreadings, team projects, and experiential learning elements to enhance students' conceptual andpractical grasp of socio-technical systems. Additionally, the course introduces students to socio-technical complexity, guiding them in the conceptual understanding, systematic analysis, andholistic engagement with engineering settings influenced by social, cultural, economic, andecological factors.Data CollectionThree sections of the course were
initiation of the effort through the entire life cycle maturation. Model literacy—understanding what models are and how they work—is required to move into more advanced skills, from the ability to build a model us- ing appropriate tools, standards, and ontology to creating a modeling environment.G3 Digital Engi- Apply traditional engineering methods and processes in a neering and digital environment. Create new engineering processes and Analysis methods for a digital environment. Create digital artifacts throughout the project or system lifecycle. Use engineer
and reflection. Theseelements ensure that students move beyond passive learning to actively engage with the material.For example, in the paper airplane activity, students reflect on their design iterations to identifyimprovements, while in the Titan Submersible case study, they revise their stakeholderarguments based on peer feedback and initial outcomes. This process mirrors engineeringpractices, where iterative testing and stakeholder engagement are vital to project success.The scalability of these activities is another crucial feature of the framework. Designed to beadaptable to various classroom sizes and setups, the activities use low-cost materials, makingthem accessible to institutions with varying resources. For example, the wind-up
providestudents with dedicated time to develop their system maps, receive feedback from instructors andteaching assistants, engage in collaborative brainstorming, and interact with campus and externalexperts for valuable insights and guidance. These sessions also serve as platforms for peer-to-peer knowledge exchange and constructive feedback on project proposals and system maps. 1.3 Systems Thinking Process as a Conceptual Framework: A search for most fitting frameworks was conducted to best understand the connectionbetween ST process steps and the various ST skills. The ST Process as a conceptual framework[9] was chosen to maintain consistent analysis across various research work previouslyconducted on the topic of ST skill building [6, 7