Paper ID #32397Do Engineers Need A Code of Ethics?Dr. Raymond Edward Floyd, Northwest College Raymond E. Floyd (M’63 – SM’85 – LSM’03) He has a BSEE from Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL – 1970, an MSEE from Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL – 1977, and a PhD in Engineering Management from California Coast University, Santa Ana, CA - 2009. He spent 26 years with IBM, retiring as a Senior Engineer in 1992. He is currently a Visiting Lecturer at Northwest College in Powell, WY. He has published over 200 papers on a variety of topics. He most recently co-authored a text, Perspectives on Engineering
toengineering technology problems that require limited application of principles but extensivepractical knowledgec) an ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpretexperimentsd) an ability to function effectively as a member of a technical teame) an ability to identify, analyze, and solve narrowly defined engineering technology problems;f) an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical andnontechnical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literatureg) an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuingprofessional development;h) an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical
effectively as a member of a technical team (e) an ability to identify, analyze, and solve narrowly defined engineering technology problems (f) an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non-technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature (g) an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development (h) an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities, including a respect for diversity (i) a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvementCurricular Topics (a) Application of principles of geometric
domain area was developed (see Table 3). Table 3: Domain Areas (EVT, EI, & Sense of Belonging) Model 1st Domain Area (Initial code) 2nd Domain Area Expectancy-Value Theory Competence Belief Intellectual Development Engineering Identity Attainment Value Social Persuasion Sense of Belonging Interest (EVT) Mastery Experience Utility Value Attention to Human Ethical values Recognition Personal Integrity
learner capability maturity in foundational security con-cepts, tactics, techniques, and procedures; and formative credentialing solutions that increase the numberof capable professionals.Casey is the Technical Editor of five textbooks: Ethical Hacking & Systems Defense, Linux Server Fun-damentals, Information Security Fundamentals, Introduction to Scripting, and Networking Fundamentals.Casey earned a B.A. in Psychology from the University of St. Thomas and an M.A. in Psychology fromDuquesne University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Need for ABET Accreditation of Associate’s Cybersecurity Programs Rajendra K
Engineering Clinic I EGR 151 2 Freshman Engineering Clinic II EGR 152 2Precalculus (Inc. Trig, LA) MTH 130 4 Calculus I & Analytical Geometry MTH 118 4General Chemistry I w/Lab CHE 115/116 4 Humanistic Lit: Society, Ethics & Technology SOC 160 3College Comp I ENG 101 3 Intro to Mechanical Design MET 220 3Introduction to Computer Science CSE 110(*) 4 Artistic Literacy: ART/MUS/THR 101 3*Must be C++ or Java BasedTOTAL 17 TOTAL 15
., 2016.[17] I. Brdar and T. B. Kashdan, "Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates," Journal of research in personality, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 151-154, 2010.[18] J. Heron, Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. Sage, 1996.[19] N. W. Sochacka, J. Walther, and A. L. Pawley, "Ethical validation: Reframing research ethics in engineering education research to improve research quality," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 362-379, 2018.[20] S. Brookfield, "Using critical incidents to explore learners’ assumptions," Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning, pp
working with a faculty for at least 6 weeks at theirhome campus and spending 2 weeks with a second faculty on the University Park campus.In addition to research, the two weeks at University Park were designed to expose students toopportunities and available resources through programmed activity. The first week at UniversityPark included an arrival weekend orientation with a program information session, group icebreakers, campus scavenger hunt and a half day leadership challenge workshop at a nearbyuniversity recreational facility. During the weekdays, the participants met daily for 1.5 hourswith research program staff for professional development workshops (e.g., safety training,research ethics, communication skills, etc.) and laboratory tours
. H. Jan Reed, Appreciative Inquiry: Research for Action in Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009, pp. 631-645.[20] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, 1991.[21] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency," American Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 122–147, 1982.[22] E. Wenger, "Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity," Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.[23] M. C. Loui, "Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005
are encouraged; however, smaller teams can be accepted if the students demonstrate theyhave the appropriate discipline, work ethic and accountability to be successful. A faculty/staffselection committee will then evaluate the proposals in terms of quality, research interest, andresources required (e.g., expertise, time, supplies, equipment, funding, faculty advisor). Theselection committee is usually comprised of the MESA Center coordinator, grant directorsfunding the projects and an additional STEM faculty. Once selections are made, teams arenotified and required to attend an orientation where students sign agreements, liability waiversand other requisite paperwork. They also interact with other student researchers through team-building
information. 4.25 4.09 0.16 I understand science. 4.28 4.12 0.16 I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 3.84 3.97 -0.13 I have learned laboratory techniques. 3.78 3.76 0.02 I have an ability to read and understand primary literature. 4.06 4.12 -0.06 I have skill in how to give an effective oral presentation. 4.31 4.00 0.31 I have skill in science writing. 4.16 3.76 0.40 I have self-confidence. 4.22 4.27 -0.05 I understand how scientists
Services-Oklahoma State University, 4) Coordinator of the Women in Engineering Program-Oklahoma State University, and 5) Director of the Oklahoma State University Measurement and Control Engineering Center-Oklahoma State University.Prof. Claretha Hughes Ph.D., University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Dr. Claretha Hughes is Professor of Human Resource and Workforce Development at the University of Arkansas (UA. Her research interests include valuing people and technology in the workplace, tech- nology development, diversity intelligence, learning technologies, and ethical and legal issues. She has published numerous articles and chapters in peer-reviewed journals, books, and conferences and has 13 books. She serves as a book
of different backgrounds, and discovering topics that couldhelp impact the world. It helped me develop the skills that are needed in graduate school byshowing commitment, interest in learning, construct and developing plans on how to researchand do a specific topic, curiosity, work ethic, and reliability to the potential graduate schools thatI am ready for their research and to help impact the world positively. All the aside, in order forme to be able to do what I truly want to do, the career requires me to get a graduate degree.Student Experience: Isabel Bojanini, University of California, BerkeleyDuring my sophomore year at PCC, I joined the research group of Dr. Khuloud Sweimehthrough the Pasadena City College Early Career Undergraduate
Entering Mentoring curriculum. Topics discussed includedAssessing Understanding, Cultivating Ethical Behavior in Research, and Addressing Equity andInclusion.4.4. Weekly meetings and other activitiesThe REU students met weekly with the program leads to discuss progress in their researchprojects and to continue the Entering Research training, covering topics such as the relationshipand communication with their mentors and coping strategies. The meetings took place viaZoom, and the program director, based at Rice, visited the participants at UTEP and ASU tomeet with them in person and conduct the weekly meeting from their facilities.In addition, participants received training from the Rice Center for Written, Oral and VisualCommunication on how to
welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives 6. an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw