ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 271 - 300 of 588 in total

← Previous
1
2
…
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
…
19
20
Next →

An Exploration of Female Engineering Students’ Functional Roles in the Context of First-year Engineering Courses

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Juebei Chen, Shanghai Jiaotong University; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Tianyi Zheng, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

sympathy responses and help; express insecurity, personal confusion or depreciation of himself Special Cloak own prejudices in the stereotype for personal benefitUsing this typology as a framework, functional roles that female engineering studentstake on in group working can be effectively and efficiently detected.MethodParticipantsPurposeful sampling was employed in recruiting female engineering students asinterviewees. In order to guarantee the diversity of samples in different contexts, wechose two schools which offered the course of Introduction of Engineering in a leadingChinese university H. School A is composed of mainly Chinese students and faculty,while school B is a school that is cooperatively run by

Relevance Score: 0.03200375

Why Am I Learning This? Using Everyday Examples in Engineering to Engage Female (And Male) Students in the Classroom

Conference Session: WIED: Curricular Undergraduate Student Programs
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

with a question of a similar level of difficulty istested. During the Winter and Spring quarters of 2013, two examination period options wereprovided to the students although there was Table 2: Number of students who sat in each exam session.only one section each quarter, which meanttwo different exams were used both quarters. Count ofThe results of these two examination periods Students Total Female Maleare denoted with an ‘a’ or ‘b’ in the results, Sitting for thee.g. W2013-a and W2013-b. Exam W2011

Relevance Score: 0.031816456

Interdisciplinary Seminar Series: Increasing Awareness for Research, Recognition of the University, and Professional Development Opportunities

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jamie J Newman, Louisiana Tech University; Mary E Caldorera-Moore, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

Seminar Seriesb c d Figure 1. Flyer and brochures from the first four years of the Seminar Series. (a) 2012- 2013 was a simple word document flyer, (b) 2013-2014 had an image of DNA generated by a faculty member and student, (c) 2014-2015 was a purchased image, (d) 2015-2016 was illustrated by an art professor at the University who will oversee future covers created by students and faculty.supportive climate, enhancing promotion and leadership, and increasing retention of womenfaculty in STEM. Support for a seminar series that would increase faculties’ networkingopportunities and allow a young female to take on a leadership role in the organization of theseries was in

Relevance Score: 0.03180837

The Benefits of an Engineering Field Trip for Women Students

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Victoria E. Goodrich, University of Notre Dame; Taylor Maida, University of Notre Dame; Simran Moolchandaney, University of Notre Dame; Gabrielle Tanjuatco, University of Notre Dame; Caroline Lubbe, University of Notre Dame
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

both social and educational Use undergraduate students as leaders / organizers to foster engagement with near peersReferences[1] A. Evanoski-Cole, K. Catton, and B. Vermeulen, “Confidence of Undecided First-YearEngineering Students in Choosing Their Major and Implications for Retention,” 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, June 2017.[2] R. A. Hensel, J. Dygert, and M. L. Morris, “Understanding Student Retention inEngineering,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020.[3] A. Osta, J. Kadlowec, A. Papernik, and A. Ferreira Dias-Liebold,“ Work in Progress:Studying the Factors Affecting Women Recruitment and Retention in Engineering,” 2020 ASEEVirtual Annual Conference, June 2020.[4] S. Chopra, G. R. Bertoline, and C. M. Laux

Relevance Score: 0.03149758

Women, Engagement, Stress, and Worry: Do They Have to Go Hand in Hand?

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Denise Wilson, University of Washington
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

(0.069) Support * p <0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001One possible explanation of this result is that instructor contact may have a compensating effecton feelings of anxiety and discouragement among women. Female students may, in general, havenegative feelings about their engineering courses compared to male students, but when theyexperience meaningful interactions with TAs and faculty, these feelings may lessen. To explorethis possibility, instructor contact was organized into two (binary) categories: (a) high instructorcontact indicated by average Likert scale scores greater than 2.5; and (b) low instructor contactindicated by scores lower than 2.5. An independent samples t-test of gender

Relevance Score: 0.031494983

Girl Scouts STEM Day

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Douglas Eric Dow, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Joseph F. Santacroce P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

of autonomous vehicleSurvey QuestionsA survey was conducted to collect data right after students completed the workshop to evaluatethe content of the workshop. 169 female students participated in the Girl Scouts STEM DayElectrical and Computer Engineering workshops in the past two years and all of them took thesurveys. Following are the questions we asked students in the survey: Table 1: Survey Questions Computer Workshop Electrical Workshop 1. Did you learn something new during this 1. Did you learn something new during this activity? activity? (a) I learned a lot (a) I learned a lot (b) I learned some

Relevance Score: 0.03138031

Women in Engineering: Promoting Identity Exploration and Professional Development

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Maureen C Smith, San Jose State University; Jinny Rhee, San Jose State University; Belle Wei, San Jose State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

engineer, and 75% reported having support for their engineering/computer sciencecareer goals.Pre-Conference SurveyThe pre-conference survey asked participants to provide information on their demographics,conference goals, and engineering student identity. Demographics: Participants were asked to provide information on eight demographicvariables: (a) major, (b) first-generation status; (c) financial aid status; (d) personally knowing anengineer; (e) having support for their engineering career; (f) ethnicity; (g) attending a 2-year vs.4-year college; and (h) year in college. Goals for the Conference: Participants were asked four open-ended questions regardingtheir (a) reasons for wanting to be an engineer; (b) reasons for attending the

Relevance Score: 0.031227812

Why Pedagogy Matters: Faculty Narratives

Conference Session: Recruitment and Retention Topics
Collection: 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Michelle Camacho, University of San Diego
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

1999 Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, November 1999.5 Middlecamp, C. H. and B. Subramaniam, “What is Feminist Pedagogy? Useful Ideas for Teaching Chemistry,” Journal of Chemical Education, 76 (4), 1999, pp. 520-525.6 Riley, Robin L. and D. Lyden Murphy, “The multidisciplinary possibilities of feminist pedagogy,” in University teaching : a reference guide for graduate students and faculty, edited by Stacey Lane Tice, Nicolas Jackson, Leo M. Lambert, and Peter Englot; Syracuse, N.Y. : Syracuse University Press, 2005.7 Riley, Robin L. and D. Lyden Murphy, “The multidisciplinary possibilities of feminist pedagogy,” in University teaching : a reference guide for graduate students and faculty, edited

Relevance Score: 0.031200632

Managing Dual Academic Careers

Conference Session: Managing Dual Careers
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jill K Nelson, George Mason University; Lee Kemp Rynearson, Campbell University; Shannon Bartelt-Hunt P.E., University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Janet Callahan, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions: Electrical and Computer, Faculty Development Division, Women in Engineering

Paper ID #28612Managing Dual Academic CareersDr. Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Yuting W. Chen received the B.S. degree from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2007, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 2009 and 2011, all in Electrical Engi- neering. She is currently a Teaching Assistant Professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to joining ECE Illinois, she worked at IBM Systems Group in Poughkeepsie, NY in z Systems Firmware Development. Her current interests

Relevance Score: 0.031170104

Evolving Identities: Undergraduate Women Pursuing the Engineering Professoriate

Conference Session: WIED Olio
Collection: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder; Susan Jurow, University of Colorado at Boulder; Wendy C. Chi, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

. Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity Press.17. Stevens, R., O‘Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., and D.M. Amos. 2008. Becoming an engineer: Toward athree dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 355–68.18. Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.19. Nasir, N., Rosebery, A., Warren, B., and C. Lee. 2006. Learning as a cultural process. In The Cambridgehandbook of the learning sciences, ed. K. Sawyer, 489-504. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.20. CAHSI. Mentor-Grade Student Program. http://cahsi.cs.utep.edu/Initiatives/mentorgrad.aspx21. Miles, M., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook

Relevance Score: 0.031169098

Encouraging Young Women to Pursue Engineering: 25 Years of Summer Camp Successes and Challenges

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jessica J. Lofton, University of Evansville
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Ranking 4 or 5 The Speed Mentoring event 4.33 91.7 Team Building Activities 4.25 91.7 Tour A 4.67 100 Tour B 4.50 100 Tour C 2.08 00.0 Workshop A 3.42 58.0 Workshop B 3.83 58.3 Workshop C 3.50 50.0 Staying at the

Relevance Score: 0.031164821

Honing Interpersonal Communication Skills for Difficult Situations: Evidence for the Effectiveness of an Online Instructional Resource

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Amy Elizabeth Dawson, Arizona State University; Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University; Kerrie Wilkins, Arizona State University ; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

no. 56(3): 227-238.23. Bernstein, B. L. (2011). Managing barriers and building supports in science and engineering doctoral programs: Conceptual underpinnings for a new online training program for women. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(1), 29-50.24. Bernstein, B. L. & Russo, N. F. (2008). Explaining too few women in academic science and engineering Page 26.850.15 careers: A psychosocial perspective. In M. Paludi (Ed.), Series on The psychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce. Vol 2: Obstacles and the identity juggle (pp. 1 – 33

Relevance Score: 0.03085627

Impact of “Imagineer Day”, an Outreach Program, on K-8 girls and Women in Engineering

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Technical Session
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Hadil Mustafa, California State University, Chico; Shelby Ann Freese
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

well as undergraduate female Engineering students. In this section, werepresent the data collection method, data analysis and results from each group segment.Part A: Undergraduate Female StudentsA survey was administered to students who have been involved in organizing and running theoutreach event for a year or more. The students cover most disciplines of Engineering, includingElectrical, Computer, Mechanical, Mechatronics, Civil and Computer Science. The first part ofthe survey consisted of 6 questions and was constructed to evaluate the event’s effectiveness indeveloping the following skills [7]: (A) leadership skills (B) understanding of Engineering concepts (C) self-confidence (D) communication skills (E) presentation skills

Relevance Score: 0.030608794

Examining the Personal Nature of the K-14 Engineering Pipeline for Young Women

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jennifer S Gurski, Drexel University; Penny Louise Hammrich, Drexel Univeristy
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

2 3.5769 0.59832 0.653 Lower-middle income 4 3.5769 0.4594 Middle income 13 3.6568 0.4675 Upper-middle income 16 3.6683 0.47478 High income 5 3.9077 0.19911 a. Kruskal Wallis Test b. Grouping Variable: Would you describe your family as: (Mark one)MotivationGiven the respondents’ self-rating of average as compared to their peers, the researcher wasinterested in identifying university-level supports respondents utilized when they encounteredacademic difficulties. The small student-to- Table 10faculty ratio of 1:10 at

Relevance Score: 0.030227493

Peer Mentoring Program: Providing Early Intervention and Support to Improve Retention and Success of Women in Engineering, Computer Science, and Physics

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division: Retention of Undergraduate Students
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jennifer I. Clark, Montana State University ; Sarah L. Codd, Montana State University; Angela Colman Des Jardins, Montana State University; Christine M. Foreman, Montana State University; Brett W. Gunnink, Montana State University; Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University; Katherine Ruth Stocker
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

completing graduation requirements. · Assess and evaluate information for personal use.Together, the Mentors and Mentees had the following shared responsibilities: · Set the mentoring agenda (discussing clear expectations and boundaries). · Practice honest communication and interaction. · Accept the “take it or leave it” option without fear of diminishing the helping relationship.Over the summer, the Peer Mentors participated in group training sessions involving reading,writing and discussion-based assignments in order to prepare to be successful Peer Mentors.Training materials used for the Peer Mentors included: • Students Helping Students: A Guide for Peer Educators on Campuses, F. B. Newton, S

Relevance Score: 0.0301789

Promoting an Inclusive Lab Culture through Custom In-Person Trainings within an Engineering Department

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Lisa R. Volpatti, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Kara Rodby, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Gurleen Kaur Singh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Bianca Kaushal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ; Kelley Marie Adams, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Paula T. Hammond, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Sarah Rankin
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

indicate a useful aspect or takeaway of the training.Figure 1. Trainings were perceived well by participants in immediate post-training surveys. a) Extent ofsatisfaction of training content (n = 483), level of interaction (n = 484), facilitators (n = 487), and trainingoverall (n = 484). Percentages indicate the sum of “good,” “very good,” and “excellent” responses. b)Perceptions of amount of interaction (n = 490), level of content (n = 490), and length of training (n =485).Follow-up Survey ResponsesThe online follow-up survey was sent to the target population (graduate students, faculty, andstaff in the department) ~6 months after the last training. A total of 104 people completed thesurvey, 97 of whom participated in the training (although the

Relevance Score: 0.030081522

First-Year Women on the Engineering Pathway: Research Strategies to Support Retention

Conference Session: Recruitment & Retention of Women I
Collection: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Lauren Marie Glogiewicz, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

% 18% 15% 13% 10% 9% 5% 4% 1% 0% 0% A or A+ A- (3.5-3.8) B+ (3.2- B (2.9-3.1) B- (2.5-2.8) C+ (2.2- C (1.9-2.1) C- or lower (i.e., 3.9 or 3.4) 2.4

Relevance Score: 0.03004595

Gendering Engineering Leadership: Aspirations vs. Shoulder Tapping

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division: Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Annie Elisabeth Simpson, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

our findings. female 9% male 91% F IGURE 1 : S EX O F E NGINEERS I DENTIFIED A S E XEMPLARY L EADERS B Y E NGINEERING C OLLEAGUES We conducted a Chi-square goodness of fit test (non-parametric equivalent of a one sample t-test) and found a significant difference between engineers’ selection of exemplary leaders by sexX2 (1, N=148)= 99.78, p

Relevance Score: 0.029991027

Female Student Views About It Careers In High School And College

Conference Session: Issues of Diversity
Collection: 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Carol Burger, Virginia Tech; Soyoung Lee, Virginia Tech; Anne Laughlin, Virginia Tech; Peggy Meszaros; Elizabeth Creamer, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

1.05Parental Support College 1 80 29.50 (2, 58.82) College 2 22 28.77 High School 293 38.29 a Decision 7.52** College 1 80 26.24 b Orientation (2, 61.34) College 2 22 34.82 b High School 293 23.53 aAttitudes about 24.18*** College 1 80 21.40 b IT workers

Relevance Score: 0.02991731

Differences In Climate For Undergraduate And Graduate Women In Engineering: The Effect Of Context

Conference Session: Climate Issues for Women Students
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Sheila Edwards Lange, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

studies originated at the UW under her guidance and were conducted atUW for a number of years before she and Susan Metz got the undergraduate climate surveyfunded through WEPAN for a national survey. The graduate climate survey was also the productof Dr. Brainard’s work; she began it because there was so little research on the topic.This research was funded in part, by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SBE-0123442. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.[1] R. M. Hall and B. R. Sandler, "The classroom climate: A chilly one for women?," Project on the status and education of women

Relevance Score: 0.029910138

Board 137: Persistence of Women of Color in Undergraduate Engineering Programs

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Courtney S. Green P.E., University of North Carolina in Charlotte; Sandra Loree Dika, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; April C Smith, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

another career of study mightadd to the depth of exploration of experiences.Students’ experiences from this study suggest that professors should be mindful when assigninggroup work, to ensure women, and women of color in particular, are not relegated toadministrative tasks. Institutions should be more inclusive of their representations of “whois/can be an engineer” in all courses and academic clubs, not just affinity based ones. It isimportant for all students, especially White males, to be exposed to an academic engineeringenvironment that is diverse and inclusive.References1. M. Estrada, M. Burnett, A. G. Campbell, P. B. Campbell, et al., “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM,” CBE- Life Sciences Education

Relevance Score: 0.029903088

The Role of Empathy in Choosing Majors

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Eddie Jacobs P.E., University of Memphis; Amy L. de Jongh Curry, University of Memphis; Carmen Astorne-Figari, University of Memphis; Russell J. Deaton, University of Memphis; Wesam M. Salem, University of Memphis; Yonghong Jade Xu, University of Memphis; Shelby G. Roberts, University of Memphis
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

following criteria: a) traditional track students,b) self-identified as female; and c) enrolled in an undergraduate program at the University ofMemphis. The researchers utilized a campus information system available to advisers to create adata set from the pool of traditional undergraduate students according to the three identified focusgroups (i.e., engineering majors, non-STEM related majors, engineering majors who left to enrollin non-STEM related majors). Accordingly, the researchers sent a recruitment email inviting theundergraduate students on the generated list to participate in the focus groups. A total of tenparticipants, divided over three focus groups, accepted the invitation to participate in the focusgroups. The participants were

Relevance Score: 0.029732253

What Women Want: Female Friendly Faculty Recruitment

Conference Session: Women Faculty Issues and NSF's ADVANCE program
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Cheryl Schrader, Boise State University; Janet Callahan; Amy Moll, Boise State University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

and identification of barriers assists in identifying major opportunities foreffective change in policies, procedures and perceptions. Engineering continues to work closelywith Arts & Sciences faculty to share best practices; and the university is using the college’ssuccess in female-friendly recruitment as a proven foundation to achieve faculty diversity acrosscampus.Bibliography[1] Dougherty, F. Carroll, and Cheryl B. Schrader. (2005) “Professional Development Panel for Women Faculty:Pathways and Checkpoints.” June 15, 2005 live panel discussion portion, session 3292; CD-Proceedings of the 2005American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Portland, OR.[2] Congressional Commission on the Advancement of

Relevance Score: 0.029729258

Do Students Believe Girls Belong in Engineering? So What?

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Henriette D. Burns, Washington State University, Vancouver; Sean Palmer Marquardt Rice, Washington State University, Vancouver
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

perception of STEM and their interest in life-sciences and themore caring/social improvement areas. The work on inclusive suggests the ideal situation is abalance of independence and teamwork, and individuality and inclusivity [53]. Perhaps, since webelieve learning is socio-cultural, if boys attend after-school STEM classes with girls thepercentages of boys who think girls belong in engineering could increase.References[1] J. H. Falk, N. Staus, L. D. Dierking, W. Penuel, J. Wyld, and D. Bailey, 2016.“Understanding youth STEM interest pathways within a single community: The Synergiesproject,” Int. J. of Science. Educ., part B, DOI: 10.108/21548455.2015.1093670.[2] L. Vygotskiĭ, and A. Kozulin, 1986. Thought and Language (Translation newly rev

Relevance Score: 0.029692546

Women’s Unique Challenges in the Transitions to Engineering Work

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech; Francesca Giardine, Smith College; Robin Ott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Anne Kary
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

, vol. 95, no.1, pp. 25-37, 2006.[2] W. Faulkner, “Nuts and Bolts and People: Gender-troubled engineering identities,” Social Studies of Science, vol. 37, no.3, pp. 331-356, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706072175[3] E. Cech, (2014). “Engineers and Engineeresses? Self-conceptions and the Development of Gendered Professional Identities,” Sociological Perspectives, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 56–77, 2014.[4] A. Johri, & B. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning : Bridging Engineering Education Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011.[5] J. Lave and E. Wenger, “Situated Learning,” 1991.[6] E. Wenger, “Communities of practice: Learning as a social system,” Systems thinker, vol. 9

Relevance Score: 0.029618096

How Faculty Advisers and Counselors View their Role in the SWE Organization

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alexa Rihana Abdallah, University of Detroit Mercy; Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Stephanie G. Wettstein, Montana State University; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado, Denver; Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University; Christina Keenan Remucal, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

. 100 100 Counselors (n = 30) (a) Small (n = 32) (b) Advisors (n = 40) Medium (n = 26) Percentage in each category Percentage in each category 80 Both (n = 6) 80 Large (n = 18) 60

Relevance Score: 0.029495474

Why Girls with an Interest in IT in High School Do Not Choose IT Careers – An Extended Study

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tanya Stanko P.E., Innopolis University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

high-‐school level10. B. Overview of current studyThe study is focused on the follow-up survey of high-school girls who took extra classesin programming and programming related subjects. A large private Russian companyUnium, specializing in extracurricular pre-university education has provided us with thedata, which have been collected over 8 years. We identified the girls, who took classes inprogramming in addition to their school program and followed up with them toinvestigate whether they entered university for IT specialty and/or work in IT at the Page 26.1738.4moment. Those women who

Relevance Score: 0.0294336

Leaving Tenure Behind: Lessons Learned

Conference Session: Perspectives for Women Faculty
Collection: 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Stacy Birmingham, Grove City College
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

, J. J., Chou, K. C., Yates, J. K., and Stalnaker, J., Women Faculty in Engineering: Changing the Academic Climate, J. Engineering Education, 85, 45 (1996).5. Ambrose, S., Lazarus, B., and Nair, I., No Universal Constants: Journeys of Women in Engineering and Computer Science, J. Engineering Education, 87, 363 (1998).6. Trower, C. A., Women without Tenure, Part II: The Gender Sieve, January 25, 2002. Retrieved from the World Wide Web on January 17, 2006: www.sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/1400/women_without_tenure _part_ii_the_gender_sieve/ Page 12.1014.9

Relevance Score: 0.02942884

The importance of the disciplinary society in leadership skill development and advancement

Conference Session: Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM
Collection: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tamara Bush, Michigan State University; Laura J Genik, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

? Page 23.1214.6 4. a. Why don’t more women seek administrative positions? (Female group) b. In your experience, if you have offered a leadership position to a woman, what were the reasons she shared about why she did or didn’t take it? (Male group) 5. What are the advantages of being in a leadership role?Focus group resultsThrough the inclusion of the Chairs/Directors, Assistant/Associate Deans, and Deans, in focusgroups, some general information about titled leadership roles and differences between male andfemale leaders was obtained. Then, through the focus groups containing leaders in theirdisciplinary societies, more specific information about the value of involvement in suchorganizations was gathered. The