ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 421 - 450 of 588 in total

← Previous
1
2
…
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Next →

Effectively Advocating for Diversity and Excellence in Faculty Searches Using Film

Conference Session: Mini-Workshop on Bias in Faculty Searches
Collection: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Coleen Carrigan, University of Washington, ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

underrepresented groups in academia. She has communicated her findings in research papers, grant proposals, public presentations, short films and in journal publications. Her work is funded by the National Science Foundation, the Luce Foundation and the University of Washington Labor Center. She earned a Masters in Socio-Cultural Anthropology for her work on the historical and social relations of reproduction in Bahia Brazil. In her doctoral research in Socio-Cultural Anthropology at the University of Washington, she continues to engage feminist critical race theory and participatory, ethno- graphic methodologies in her examination of unexamined bias and politics of reproduction in cultures of technology

Relevance Score: 0.024795935

Supporting Women in Computing Through Regional Conferences

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division: Strategies Beyond the Classroom
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alka R. Harriger, Purdue University; Gloria Childress Townsend, DePauw University; Dawn Laux, Purdue University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

/ncwit_rcwic_inabox_web_0.pdf[10] Rockman et al. (n.d.). A Wide Web for Women (WWW.2). (Rockman et al Research and Evaluation) Retrieved February 1, 2015, from http://www.rockman.com/projects/projectDetail.php?id=308[11] Simons, C. B., Miller, M., & Lichtenstein, G. (2014). 2013 Evaluation & Impact Report. Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from http://gracehopper.org/wp- content/uploads/2014/04/2013-GHC-Impact-Report_Final.pdf[12] Townsend, G. C., & Sloan, K. ((accepted)). An Effective Alternative to the Grace Hopper Celebration. SIGCSE 2015. Kansas City, MO. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from https://www.openconf.org/sigcse2015/modules/request.php?module=oc_program&action

Relevance Score: 0.02471736

Effect of the Group Culture on the Leadership Opportunities for Female Engineering Students in Korea

Conference Session: WIED Poster Session
Collection: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Myongsook Susan Oh, Hongik University; Yookyung Bae, Seoul National University, Institute for Gender Research
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

AC 2011-1680: EFFECT OF THE GROUP CULTURE ON THE LEADER-SHIP OPPORTUNITIES FOR FEMALE ENGINEERING STUDENTS INKOREA.Myongsook S. Oh, Professor, Hongik University B. S. in Chemical Engineering, UC Berkeley Sc. D. in Chemical Engineering, MIT Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Texaco, Inc Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Hongik University in KoreaYookyung Bae, Institute for Gender Research in Seoul National University B.A. in Socioloy at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, Korea M.A. in Socioloy at Ewha Womans Uni- versity in Seoul, Korea M.A. in Curriculum and Instruction at The University of Texas at Austin Ph.D Candidate in Gender Studies at Seoul National University, Korea

Relevance Score: 0.02471736

Benefits of Utilizing Counseling Services Among Doctoral Women of Color in STEM

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Kairys Grasty, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Shivani Sakri, Arizona State University; Amanda C. Arnold, Idaho State University; Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University; Kerrie G. Wilkins-Yel, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Madison Natarajan, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University; Ashley K. Randall, Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

, findings, and conclusions, and recommendations expressed in thisreport are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] R. Sowell, Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion., Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools, 2015.[2] M. Ong, C. Wright, L. L. Espinosa, and G. Orfield, “Inside the double bind: A Synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 172–208, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2.[3] M. Cabay, B. L. Bernstein, M. Rivers, and N. Fabert, “Chilly climates, balancing acts, and shifting pathways: What happens to

Relevance Score: 0.024704881

The Impact of Work/Life Balance Policies on Faculty Careers

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division: Retaining and Developing Women Faculty in STEM
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Elsa Camargo, Virginia Tech; Ashley Wood, Virginia Tech; Margaret E. Layne, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

about work and family. Review of Higher Education, 34(3), 447-476.9. Mason, A.M., Wolfinger, N.H., Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter?: Gender and family in the ivory tower. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.10. Manchester, Leslie, & Kramier. (2013). Is the clock still clicking? An evaluation of the consequences of stopping the tenure clock. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 66(1), 3-31.11. National Science Foundation. (n.d.). Advance at a glance. Retrieved from the National Science Foundation website: http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/advance/index.jsp12. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Washington, DC

Relevance Score: 0.024683725

"It Kind Of Chose Me": Agency And Influence In Women's Decision To Major In Engineering

Conference Session: Effective Methods for Recruiting Women to Engineering
Collection: 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Eleanor M. Jaffee, Smith College; Donna Riley, Smith College
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

AC 2010-441: "IT KIND OF CHOSE ME": AGENCY AND INFLUENCE INWOMEN'S DECISION TO MAJOR IN ENGINEERINGEleanor M. Jaffee, Smith College Eleanor M. Jaffee is a Research Associate with the Liberative Pedagogies Project at Smith College, and a doctoral candidate in Social Welfare at the University at Albany.Donna Riley, Smith College Donna Riley is Associate Professor of Engineering at Smith College. Page 15.2.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 “It kind of chose me”: Agency and Influence in Women’s Decisions to Major in EngineeringIntroductionMuch of the research regarding

Relevance Score: 0.024619266

Moving Beyond the Double-Bind: WIE and MEP Programs and Serving the Needs of Women of Color in Engineering

Conference Session: WIED Poster Session
Collection: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lisa M Frehill, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

AC 2011-2430: MOVING BEYOND THE DOUBLE-BIND: WIE AND MEPPROGRAMS AND SERVING THE NEEDS OF WOMEN OF COLOR INENGINEERINGLisa M Frehill, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Lisa Frehill is the Director of Research, Evaluation and Policy at the National Action Council for Mi- norities in Engineering (NACME), a Senior Program Officer with the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine at the National Research Council, and a senior analyst at Energetics Technol- ogy Center. Since earning her doctoral degree Dr. Frehill has developed expertise in the science and engineering workforce with a focus on how gender and ethnicity impact access to careers in these fields. While she was an

Relevance Score: 0.024549514

Building Gender Equity Into Existing Programs: Perspectives From Professional Engineering Associations

Conference Session: Poster Session
Collection: 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Amy Bentow, American Society of Mechanical Engineers; Richard Blais, Project Lead the Way; Laura Bottomley, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; Catherine Didion, National Academy of Engineering; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering; Christina Vogt, National Academy of Engineering
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

represent key lessons learned from gender equity, engineering education,and project management research and “best practices” knowledge bases; and b) periodic live eventseither recorded or in real-time have been offered among and between experts, collaboratingorganizations and their members on specific and ad hoc issues. EEES targets teachers and faculty as away to reach students, therefore our outreach primarily focuses on providing them with the tools theyneed to be more effective and engaging instructors.Creating a successful online community is one of the most compelling yet elusive goals for web-basedapplications. Most online communities grow slowly in the beginning due in part to the need to createmotivation for contributing to the community

Relevance Score: 0.024471633

STEM Program for Female High School Students

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Douglas Eric Dow, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Weihui Li, Biomedical Engineering, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Lili Ma, New York City College of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

brightness changes. Depending on what pinthe pot is attached to (R, G or B), the LED will have that color. As the wiper ranges from 0 V to5 V, the LED should go from dark to bright.Step 7: Attach the other pots to the other 2 LED pins (so each R, G and B pins have their ownpot). Test adjusting the color using the 3 pots as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 RGB LED with PotentiometersTask 2: Write New Arduino Program to Read and Display Sensor ValueThe student volunteers used diagrams to guide this process of wiring. The girls were then shownhow to compile and download a base C program to the Arduino microcontroller. The base Cprogram had been developed by one of the student volunteers. It took four steps to finish thetask.Step

Relevance Score: 0.024444668

Understanding Female STEM Faculty Experiences of Subtle Gender Bias from Microaggressions Perspective

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Yang Lydia Yang, Ph.D., Kansas State University; Doris Wright Carroll Ph.D., Kansas State University
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304_digest.pdf3. Yoder, B. L. (2014, September). Gender and ethnic diversity. American Society for Engineering Education Prism. Available from http://www.asee-prism.org/databytes-3/4. Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women? Association of American Colleges, Washington, DC.5. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17, 369-386.6. Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271–286.7. Nadal, K. L. (2011). The

Relevance Score: 0.024386842

Gender Differences In The Attitudes Of Students In Freshman Engineering Courses

Conference Session: Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Self-Efficacy of Women Engineering Students
Collection: 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Foundation. 2009. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. TABLE B-9. Undergraduate enrollment in engineering programs, by sex, race/ethnicity, and citizenship: 1995–2006. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/tables/tabb-9.xls2. Gibbons, M.T. 2007. Engineering by the Numbers. American Society for Engineering Education. http://www.asee.org/publications/profiles/upload/2007ProfileEng.pdf3. Bielefeldt, A.R. 2006. Attracting Women to Engineering that Serves Developing Communities. American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition. Women in Engineering Division. June, Chicago, IL.4. Mihelcic, J.R., L.D. Phillips, and D.W. Watkins. 2006. Integrating a global perspective into

Relevance Score: 0.02437957

The Undergraduate Research Experience As It Relates To Research Efficacy Beliefs And The Imposter Phenomenon

Conference Session: Using Teams, Seminars & Research Opportunities for Retention
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: De'Jeune Antoine, Xavier University of Louisiana; Mica Hutchison, Purdue University; Deborah Follman, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Not At All Successf ul 2 Somewhat Successf ul 4 Ver y Successf ul Figure 1. Student rankings of their current success in the research program based on gender and IP status (average ratings: Men = 4.2, Women = 3.5, IP = 3.5, and non-IP = 4.3). " I am C o nf i d nent i n my A b il i t y t o Succeed i n t he r esear ch p r o g r am. " 0.6 no n-IP (n = 26

Relevance Score: 0.02437957

Engineering Curriculum Rooted in Active Learning: Does It Promote Engagement and Persistence for Women?

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago; Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago; Francisca Fils-Aime, Loyola University Chicago; Jana Grabarek; Pete Livas Jr, Loyola University Chicago
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

has demonstrated the value of active learning by characterizing activelearning pedagogy in the Loyola University Chicago undergraduate engineering program that thefreshmen experience. The Loyola University Chicago program provides a potential model toother engineering programs looking to improve their retention of women. 10 References1. Yoder, B. Engineering by the Numbers. 2010; ASEE: Washington, D.C., 37 p.2. Roy, J. Engineering and Engineering Technology the Numbers. 2020; ASEE: Washington, D.C., 86 p.3. Fouad, N.A. and R. Singh. Stemming The Tide: Why Women Leave Engineering. 2011

Relevance Score: 0.024347164

University Studies of Student Persistence in Engineering

Conference Session: Retention of Women Students
Collection: 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Kaitlyn J. Bunker; Nilufer Onder, Michigan Technological University; Raven Rachaun Rebb; Laura E. Brown, Michigan Technological University; Leonard J. Bohmann, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

to persist within a given major or switch to anotherare complex. The factors that affect student decisions can be broadly classified into three groupsas (a) academic resources, (b) internalization and perceptions of the major and career, and (c)climate and experiential effects. The academic resources include lectures, recitations, andlaboratories; faculty and teaching assistants; university services such as advisors and careerplacement; and academic services such as study centers and academic progress monitoring.Internalization refers to perceptions of the self including confidence, self-efficacy, anddetermination to succeed. Perceptions of the major and career include students’ interest inchoosing and retaining engineering as a major and a

Relevance Score: 0.024237247

Learning in Informal Environments through Engineering Activities through the Partnership with the Girl Scouts

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Carol L. Considine, Old Dominion University; Karina Arcaute, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa; Stephanie G. Adams, Old Dominion University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Further and Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 85-95, 2001/02/01 2001.[13] S. E. Shadle, A. Marker, and B. Earl, "Faculty drivers and barriers: laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments," International Journal of STEM Education, journal article vol. 4, no. 1, p. 8, April 13 2017.[14] K'Nex. (2018). Available: https://www.knex.com/[15] J. I. Glickman and M. F. Doepner, "Offset matrix adapter for toy construction sets," ed: Google Patents, 2010.[16] J. Glickman and M. F. Doepner, "Construction toy component," ed: Google Patents, 2007.[17] K. P. Hussa-Lietz, "Method of constructing a three-dimensional structure with a multi- part construction toy set

Relevance Score: 0.02422895

Impact of Non-technical Conferences in Female Engineering Students’ Self-esteem and Engineering Self-efficacy

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Mayari I. Serrano, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Rachel Ann Baker
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

inSTEM are that (a) girls are not as good as boys in math and (b) scientific work is better suited toboys and men.Recent work shows that these gendered stereotypes continue to persist. A 2016 study fromBanchefsky, Westfall, Park, and Judd 5 included showing photos of tenured/tenure track facultyfrom elite research institutions to a group of participants who were to rate the likelihood of theperson in the photo to be a scientist. Respondents, regardless of gender, used women’s genderedappearance, but not men’s, as indication that they were less likely to be scientists and more likely tobe teachers and journalists 5 .Similarly, Carli, Alawa, Lee, Zhao, and Kim 6 asked participants, undergraduate students from asmall single-sex college and a large

Relevance Score: 0.02422895

Gender And Race/Ethnicity In Engineering: Preliminary Findings From The Project To Assess Climate In Engineering

Conference Session: Retaining Women Engineering Students
Collection: 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Stephanie Jaros, University of Washington; Suzanne Brainard, University of Washington; Susan Metz, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

table was prepared October 2008.)4 Hooks, B. (1981). Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.5 Spelman, E.V. (1988) Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.6 Amelink, C.T. & Creamer, E.G. (2010). Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience thatinfluence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career. Journal ofEngineering Education, 99 (1), 81-927 National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. (2008). Confronting the ‘New’ American Dilemma,Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering: A Data-Based Look at Diversity. Executive Summary.8 Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. (2006

Relevance Score: 0.024089286

Attracting Women to Engineering through Service-Based Learning

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Celine Manoosingh, Georgia Southern University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

intendedobjective is to increase the support of, and participation in, the “BRIDGE” program at GeorgiaSouthern University. Another measure taken will be to encourage faculty to participate in communityactivities involving underrepresented groups. Additionally, the department plans to provide a nurturingenvironment for incoming freshmen through retention initiatives like the ‘Living LearningCommunity’. Progress will be measured by tracking enrollment, retention and diversity statistics, andidentifying the most prevalent recruitment avenues through the administration of a freshman survey. Page 26.268.4GOAL B: Prepare female students to function as high

Relevance Score: 0.024085071

Assessing the Networking Preferences and Resource Satisfaction among Engineering Faculty in the California State University System

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lalita G. Oka, California State University, Fresno; Kimberly Stillmaker P.E., California State University, Fresno; Constance Jones, California State University, Fresno; Arezoo Sadrinezhad, California State University, Fresno; Maryam Nazari, California State University, Fresno
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

with the other ethnicities, which included primarily African American andHispanic. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) describe the ethnicity distribution of participating faculty sortedby gender. These figures indicate that the women faculty group was more racially diverse than themen, as none of the men were African American nor Hispanic. It is important to note that mostCSU campuses are designated as an HSI, but that ethnicity was not very well represented in facultyresponding to the survey. (a) (b) Figure 1: Racial distribution among the participating facultyAs far as ranks of the faculty are considered, the number of tenure-track faculty (N = 40) washigher than tenured

Relevance Score: 0.02394421

On Or Off The Tenure Track: The Work Lives Of Women Engineering And Technology Faculty

Conference Session: The Academic Environment
Collection: 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Stacy Birmingham, Grove City College; Mara Wasburn, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

positions lead to better work life balanceand greater job satisfaction. The research examines the following: 1. Women faculty's evaluation of their work-life balance as a function of several interrelated variables: a. Whether they are tenure track or non-tenure track. b. Whether they engage primarily in teaching or research activities. c. Whether they are working in doctoral, masters, or undergraduate programs. 2. Whether women's perceptions of work-life balance influenced their choice of academic position (full-time, part-time, tenure track, non-tenure track.) 3. What aspects of women's academic careers they would change in order to improve their

Relevance Score: 0.023863785

Gender in the Workplace: Peer Coaching to Empower Women in the Classroom and as Professionals

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retention Programs for Diverse Students
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jennifer L. Groh, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics: ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

] deep within yourown thoughts, as opposed to recieving [sic] only guidance from someone.(F, 3) I am looking forward to getting more practice in coaching so I can be more comfortablewith the types of questions that I will ask.(B, 3) Coaching can certainly be applied in several areas in life. I can already see how coachingcan be extremely helpful and learning-promoting opportunity in a professional (work) setting. Iam looking forward to further improve my coaching skills.(G, 4) I am interested to see when/how I will use the coaching skills I have learned in this classthroughout my life and how they will help me.Coaching technique:(J, 1) After completeing [sic] my first coaching session, I found that it was more difficult than Iwas expecting it to

Relevance Score: 0.02386224

Understanding How Female Students Navigate through Undergraduate Engineering Programs via an Examination of Their Intended and Declared Majors

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Emily Fredette, Purdue University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

. IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–6.[11] M. Ohland and R. Long, “The Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development: an experientail case study of data sharing and reuse,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–25, 2016.[12] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, “Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259–278, 2008.[13] B. W.-L. Packard, J. L. Gagnon, O. LaBelle, K. Jeffers, and E. Lynn, “Women’s experiences in the STEM community college transfer pathway,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 129–147, 2011.[14] C

Relevance Score: 0.023856107

Student Perceptions of Their Abilities and Learning Environment in Large Introductory Computer Programming Courses – One Year Later

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Laura K Alford, University of Michigan; Valeria Bertacco, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

besuccessful in this course?” (Entry Survey) and, “Do you think you were successful in this course?”(Exit Survey)Figure 3: Distribution of responses to the statement, “I find computer programming intimidating.”Course 1 appears to be divisive for men: male students who were neutral in the beginning of thecourse grow to either actively like, or actively dislike, programming.Figure 4: Distribution of responses to the statement, “I believe that other students in computerprogramming courses will be welcoming of me.” (b) Intimidation by Programming.(a) Self-Efficacy. Between-subjects (gender) is (c) Inclusion.statistically significant.Figure 5: Summary of mixed model

Relevance Score: 0.023846637

How To Get Published – Tips From Journal Editors

Conference Session: How to Get Published: Tips from Journal Editors
Collection: 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bevlee Watford, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

paper enhance understanding of engineers orengineering?” and “What are the relationships among the technical and the nontechnicaldimensions of engineering practices, and how do these relationships changes over time and fromplace to place?”Along with its parent organization, the journal also seeks to (a) to help build and serve diversecommunities of researchers interested in engineering studies, and (b) link scholarly work inengineering studies to broader discussions and debates about engineering education, research,practice, policy, and representation. As such, it challenges authors to reflect on and anticipatehow their work might prove helpful to others elsewhere, both within the academy and beyond.The journal thus explicitly juxtaposes

Relevance Score: 0.023812678

Women Becoming WiSE: Gender, Professional Development, and Programming for Success

Conference Session: Faculty Career Development
Collection: 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sarah Miraglia, Syracuse University ; Sharon W. Alestalo, Syracuse University; Shobha K. Bhatia, Syracuse University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

baased ‘brain ddrain’ that coompromises thegoal of hiring h and rettaining the best b and brightest in STE EM fields, w whether in acaademia orindustry.Given thaat the male dominated d cuultures of research univeersities and iindustry possitions havecontributted to barrierrs to womenn’s success in n STEM fiellds, WiSE prrogramming operates at thepersonal level of thesse political teensions to prrovide suppoort to womenn as they forrmulate a caareerpath that furthers their professionnal and perso onal aspirations. Thus, w while the perrsonal is poliiticalmantra iss applicable to an undersstanding of th he status of women in STEM; the effforts of theWiSE pro ogram

Relevance Score: 0.023773879

Women: Support Factors And Persistence In Engineering

Conference Session: Climate Issues for Women Students
Collection: 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Yong Zeng, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign; John R. Duncan, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

inengineering? and (2) What are the factors that attract women to and help them to persist in acareer in engineering? The methods consisted of a search of related research to identify probablyfactors followed by qualitative interviews with program persisters and switchers. The mostfrequently cited factors were selected for inclusion in the interview protocol for the qualitativeportion of this study. They were: (a) faculty support, (b) class environment, (c) departmentenvironment, (d) attraction to another discipline, (e) parental encouragement, and (f) self-confidence. The result was an evaluation of the relative merits of the factors for persisters andswitchers. Additionally a new metaphor relating to force field analysis is proposed. Thismetaphor was

Relevance Score: 0.023758432

Promoting Women As Leaders For Engineering: The Role Of Individuals, Organizations And Professional Societies

Conference Session: Women Faculty Issues and NSF's ADVANCE program
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lisa Aultman-Hall, University of Connecticut; Britt Holmen, University of Connecticut
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

importantissues that affect our ability to increase the number of women engineering deansand department heads. For the engineering associations panel, the panelists werealso asked to comment on what they felt the role of these associations could be inpromoting women leaders within both academia and industry.Guidance from the Summit Panels can be divided into three types: a. Guidance specific to Individual Women Engineers – those seeking to be leaders and those who already are and want to be successful. b. Direction for how Engineering Organizations (industry, government and academia) can seek more women leaders or foster the culture that will encourage them. c. Views on the Engineering Profession and how Professional Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.023757637

Wisconsin And Hawaii Wit Partnership To Encourage Women And Girls In Rural Areas To Pursue Stem Fields

Conference Session: K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women
Collection: 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Firouzeh Keshmiri, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Ann Bloor, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Mary Jo Wellenstein, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

CompetitiveEdge in Science, Engineering and Technology. Sept. 2000.Howley, Craig B., Mathematics Achievement in Rural Schools, ERIC Digest, 2003, 1-8National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Women, Minorities, andPersons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2004, NSF 04-317 (Arlington, VA, 2004)National Science Foundation, Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication, SummaryReport on the Impact Study of the National Science Foundation’s Program for Women and Girls,NSF RED9452967, Arlington, VA December 2000USDA, ERS, Rural America at a Glance, 2003, Sept. 2, 2003,http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/rdrr97-1/lowres_rdrr97-1.pdf80-55 Development for Rural America, http://www.8055.org