Paper ID #10682Utilizing Concept Maps to Improve Engineering Course Curriculum in Teach-ing MechanicsRuben Pierre-Antoine, Stanford University Ruben is a senior undergraduate student at Stanford University studying Management Science & Engi- neering. He joined the Designing Education Lab in the winter of 2013. He has always had a passion for education and enjoys the integration of entrepreneurship into a curriculum. Ruben loves to play sports, videogames, and eat at new restaurants. He also explores entrepreneurship in his free time.Dr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor
Paper ID #10382Use of Concept Maps to Assess Student Sustainability KnowledgeDr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and biological waste treatment. Specifically, she
issues into the civil engineering curriculum and the use of data analytics to improve student retention.Dr. Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville Page 24.216.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Assessment of Systems Learning in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Course using Concept MapsAbstractAs part of ongoing assessment of student learning in a new undergraduate civil and environmen-tal engineering course, faculty members at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville have devel-oped a concept map instrument. A major goal of
) are currently Page 24.422.6being developed. It is expected that these joint modules will provide continuity to students andenhance their learning experience. For example, a common context will be developed for activelearning modules in ECIV 303 and 350 as well as the associated lab courses (ECIV 303L and350L). EFFECTs will be implemented in all four courses in Fall 2014.Student construction of nanotechnology-based concept maps will be used to facilitate linking ofthe EFFECTs. Concept maps, along with end products from each EFFECT, will be assembled toproduce nanotechnology-themed electronic portfolios or blogs. The e-portfolio content
. During this event, the students presenttheir findings and proposed solutions and their lessons learned from the course.Numerous forms of student evaluations were also conducted. Concept mapping, at the beginningand end of the course, was carried out to assess student learning of concepts related to systemsthinking and sustainability. Pre-concept knowledge (before students being introduced to coursecontents) and post-lecture quizzes were carried out and evaluated using a structured taxonomy toevaluate depth of knowledge on systems thinking and sustainability concepts [see17 for acomparison]. In addition to the teacher course evaluations (discussed in section 5) at the end ofthe course, exit interviews were also conducted with selected students to
surveys are most commonly presented, concept maps(cmaps) and the SOLO taxonomy are emerging tools that may provide a more direct andaccurate snapshot of student sustainability knowledge.Student SurveysStudent perceptions surveys are perhaps the most commonly used tools for examiningsustainability knowledge. Emanuel and Adams35 surveyed 554 undergraduates from institutionsin Alabama and Hawaii and reported that only approximately one-third of respondents indicatedthat they knew “a great deal” about sustainability. Azapagic et al.36 documented thesustainability knowledge of chemical engineering students world-wide to be “not satisfactory,”while only approximately 35% of University of Plymouth students in the United Kingdom were“very familiar” with
course completion rates in introductory MSE coursesare affected by a variety of programs and activities that are based upon best practices fromSTEM education research. A number of interventions and active techniques were used inthe classroom, at first, singularly and, as the project progressed, in various combinations.Additionally, a wide variety of faculty and student resources were created as part of thisproject. For example, test device MSE iPod applications were developed for iCollaborate:Concept Questions, Vocabulary, Basic Knowledge, Tune-Up, Material Properties,Composite Calculator, MSE Convert, and MSE Knowledge Tools and Review.Furthermore, a concept map based web site, which includes web applications of key iPodapplications is
time to share curricular designs and toidentify external professionals to act as mentors.Courses are offered in the fall and cover a mixture of standard topics (e.g. mess/concept maps,estimation & metrics, and communication skills) and locally determined content (e.g. socialentrepreneurship, research methods, human-centered design). Over the fall term students work inteams on projects responding to some aspect of the wicked problem. At the end of the term,students present their final deliverable in the format of a design review. The following spring,students may continue to work on the problem if they wish as part of their ESW chapter, orpotentially as part of a second course as an expansion of the WPSE Initative
hours Student assessment discussion 1 hour Individual lesson development 12 hours Concept mapping 2 hours Implementation issues discussion 2 hours Reflective summative discussion .5 hoursTeacher engagement with the conceptual base. Developing the teachers’ understanding of thefour engineering concepts began with a review and discussion of the four concepts, identified by Page
at Stanford University and.This data collected is a jumping off point for analysis of what engineering students say aboutengineering and design. Evidence of how design and engineering activities change over time aswell as how first-year Master’s students in Mechanical Engineering conceptualize design andengineering comes from a project-based learning course ME310 Global Design Innovation4 atStanford University. Students were queried at the beginning, middle and end of the course for 1)a concept map of their typical design process, and 2) representations of what a designer and anengineer do at work. Both items were given out in survey form and participants answeredquestions by hand. Approximately 30 questionnaires were collected at each stage
from Alice (www.alice.org), a 3D programming environment. • Development of a side-quest: In a three-page narrative, develop a character side quest based on your game world and the team of characters that you have created. How will game artifacts come into play? Explain how your character interacts with the world and what this character contributes to the team. Attach, on a separate page, a well-developed paragraph explaining why this side quest will be engaging to your audience. Also attach your concept map—that is, a diagram that maps the relationships among elements of the story.Finally, during the last five weeks, students develop their game design document as a group.2.2 Problem Solving with Computer
syllabi that met the criteria. Each team member was assigned to review 14(half of the syllabi), thereby reviewing each syllabus twice. Team members listed each outcomefrom all of the syllabi and developed a mind-map (or concept map) by grouping similar outcomesusing post-it notes on a whiteboard. In the event of similar outcomes (for example, Programmingin C++ and Computer Programming), group consensus was reached to determine whether theoutcomes were identical. If judged to be identical, or for cases of absolutely identical outcomes, acount was maintained.The intent of this initial search was to develop a framework to guide formation of initial questionsfor and analysis of results for the upcoming Delphi study. The final scheme evolved from
prepare a good invention disclosure. Page 24.1281.8 • Products: Each student prepares a mock invention disclosure. The session could result in an actual invention disclosure related to the center’s research. • Ideas: Potential patentable ideas developed through the brainstorming, developing, and critiquing process.Mind Mapping - This is an activity within the Systems Thinking skill block. The activity beginswith a short overview of concept mapping as a tool for organizing and understanding complexsystems11. Students are introduced to a basic mind mapping software (we used Xmind, but thereare numerous options available). The
spatial diagram representations, Memory & Cognition, 27, 288–308.8. Haugwitz, M., Nesbit, J. C., Sandmann, A. (2010), Cognitive ability and the instructionalefficacy of collaborative concept mapping, Learning and Individual Differences, 20,536–543.9. Baddeley, A. (2012), Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies, AnnualReview of Psychology, 63, 1–29.10. Bull, R., Scerif, G. (2001), Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematicsability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory, Developmental Neuropsychology, 19,273–293.11. Winn, W. (1989), The design and use of instructional graphics. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin(Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 125–144), Amsterdam, Elsevier.12. Larkin, J. H
related to content covered in new course sequence Provide students with Chemical Product Design concept maps that customer empathy skills measure students’ understanding of concepts involved in chemical product design (collected from sophomores and juniors in new course sequence and seniors in previous chemical product design class)We will assess this curricular innovation as it is rolled out in spring 2014 with the first offeringof the Introduction to Chemical Product
handed in Oct 6. 5 Oct 9-10 Teams completed hazard analysis of classroom in GD: list hazards, assess the consequences, investigate causes, and safeguards to reduce probability or severity of injury 6 Oct 16-17 Teams created a concept map used to investigate causes of an accident, and created a table to evaluate information sources 7 Oct 23-24 Each team did a brainstorming exercise using a single document in GD to record individual ideas, sort/rank ideas, and select top priority 8 Oct 30-31 Each team created an evaluation matrix. MEA1 due. 9 Nov 6-7 Each team responded to an ethical
sessionsInstrumental analytical chemistry Awareness; concept map; creativity(3,3)Physical chemistry (3) Interpersonal and group skillsChemical engineering self-directed learning; problem-solving strategythermodynamics (4,4)Heat transfer (4,3) Peer and self-assessmentEngineering economics (5,3) Successive approximation and optimum sloppiness; tacit knowledgeControlled release of drugs (6,3) Problem solving: Kepner-Tregoe approach Appendix D. Student scores on the 2-minute and the 5-minute presentation. Page
achievement is a difficult task for faculty. Faculty require students to gather evidence of their learning and to participate in oral examinations, in addition to using other methods of assessments such as practical examinations, concept maps, peer assessment, self-assessment, facilitators/tutor assessment, and written reports.References 1. Barrows, Howard S. "Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview." New directions for teaching and learning 1996.68 (1996): 3-12. 2. Gijbels, David, et al. "Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment." Review of educational research 75.1 (2005): 27-61. 3. Evenson, D. H., & Hmelo, C. E. (Eds.). (2000
develop competencies in a variety ofgraphical areas in order that they may apply them as cognitive tools (e.g., visualizationsketching and concept mapping), design tools (e.g., design sketching, 3D modeling,electronic publishing, and design analysis), or documentation tools (e.g., rendering,animation, and engineering drawings) (Figure 3). Page 24.654.8 Figure 3 - The Use of Graphics in Technology, Engineering & Design EducationTo develop these competencies, students have required courses in engineering graphics, 3Dconstraint-based modeling, architectural graphics, and imaging technologies (Table 2). Theyalso have electives available
Knowledge in selected learning subjects (concept map) Learning disposition measured through MSLQ(2) Collaborative learning Online discussion for collaborative learning 10 weeksthrough online discussion Students' Self-report on collaborative learning process Instructors' observation of students' collaborative learning(3) Post-tests and debriefing Learning disposition measured through MSLQ Two weeks Knowledge in selected learning subjects (concept map) Learning experience and Satisfaction, comments Results from Analysis of Collected Data The results of the mid-term
Principles of Product Development Flow. Redondo Beach, CA: Celeritas Publishing.12. Dow, S. P., Heddleston, K. and S. R. Klemmer. 2009. The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints. Source, Proc. C&C-09, Berkeley, CA, 165-174, ACM 978-1-60558-403-4/09/10.13. Jablokow, K. W. and M. J. Kirton. 2009. Problem solving, creativity, and the level-style distinction. Perspectives on the Nature of Intellectual Styles (L.-F. Zhang and R. J. Sternberg, Eds.), New York: Springer, 137–168.14. DeFranco, J.F., Jablokow, K.W., Bilen, S.G., and A. Gordon. 2012. The Impact of Cognitive Style on Concept Mapping: Visualizing Variations in the Structure of Ideas. Proc. of the ASEE 2012 Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX.15
behaviourally accurate sub-system assemblies. A key learning outcome was to make explicit the extent to which virtualmodels can be relied upon to accurately predict the performance of physical models. Inaddition, the course learning goals were to include engineering materials science and problemsolving and modelling. Concept maps around these goals were developed with relevantexperts and the online FC content was based on these maps. Lectures were to be replacedwith large (600 students) active learning workshops facilitating the development of design Page 24.618.5process knowledge through collaborative learning. Technical learning outcomes
aloudprotocols, concept maps, exams and written reports, as well as the evaluation of students’ finaldesign prototypes.12-17 Each of these methods also has well documented limitations. Combiningseveral methods to cross-validate results compensates for these limitations; however,triangulating and analyzing multiple sources of data require considerable time and resources.Most methods use open-ended questioning strategies about how to attack a new design problem.For example, in the study by Kilgore et al., first-year students were asked to perform engineeringtasks during timed sessions.17 One prompt was “Over the summer the Midwest experiencedmassive flooding of the Mississippi River. What factors would you take into account indesigning a retaining wall
. Page 24.241.10Table A1Instruments within the Knowledge Domain Knowledge ABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria Survey Binghamton University Circuits Concept Inventory Chemistry Concept Inventory Computer-Assisted Performance Assessments Concept Maps for Engineering Education Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism Control Systems Concept Inventory Creative Engineering Design Assessment - Revised Critical Engineering Literacy Test - Revised Critical Thinking Assessment Test Design Process Knowledge Instruments Determining and Interpreting Resistive Electric Circuit Concepts Test (DIRECT) Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations Survey Digital Logic Concept Inventory Draw an Engineer Test Dynamics
Education at Washington State University-Pullman. His research is positioned at the intersection of educational psy- chology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. Olusola’s current research focuses on the use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for evidence-based practice, cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia resources including animated concept maps and diagrams; and investigation of instructional principles and assessments in STEM education. Page 24.296.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
year to support the knowledge-building themes of thiscourse. However, all exams and supporting materials for the class (such as concept maps andexample problems) maintained the same topics and depth of mechanics content.Knowledge Forum WorkspaceKnowledge Forum is an online asynchronous environment where users can contribute theories,working models, plans, evidence, data and resources by posting notes to views that are accessibleto all community members. Both notes and views are multimedia spaces, supporting text,graphics, and videos. Supportive features of Knowledge Forum allow users to build-on, co-author, and annotate notes of community members and to create reference links with citations toother notes. The build-on notes generate arrows
from active in that when students engage in activities of aconstructive manner they are actually developing knowledge through the creation of outputs thattends to go beyond their existing knowledge or understanding. Whereas an active overt activitywould require students to merely highlight a given sentence, in the constructive realm theywould explain their understanding of the sentence and in so doing further develop theirunderstanding of the material. Overt constructive activities such as “drawing a concept map,asking questions, taking notes, comparing and contrasting cases and integrating text” [2] movesbeyond the simple physical activities as stipulated by active activities. Consequently, the use ofcognitive thought is higher when engaged
. Paretti, M.C., L.D. McNair, and L. Holloway-Attaway, Teaching technical communication in an era of distributed work: A case study of collaboration between U.S. and Swedish students. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2007. 16(3): p. 327-352.23. McNair, L.D., M.C. Paretti, and M. Davitt, Communicative Practices and the Development of Trust in Distributed Work Settings. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 2009, forthcoming.24. Borrego, M., C.B. Newswander, L.D. McNair, S. McGinnis, and M.C. Paretti, Using Concept Maps to Assess Interdisciplinary Integration of Green Engineering Knowledge. Advances in Engineering Education, 2009. 1(13).25. Paretti, M.C., L.D. McNair, Y. Li, and J. Terpenny, Work-In
suggest?”16. The appendix section offers examples of instructional assessmenttechniques that can be used in conjunction with a chapter as a teaching strategy, such as “whatare concept maps and how can we use them?”17.The Seven Principles, chapters 1-718. The underlined words represent the related topics used inthe class sessions.1. How Does Students’ Prior Knowledge Affect Their Learning?2. How Does the Way Students Organize Knowledge Affect Their Learning?3. What Factors Motivate Students to Learn?4. How Do Students Develop Mastery?5. What Kinds of Practice and Feedback Enhance Learning?6. Why Do Student Development and Course Climate Matter for Student Learning?7. How Do Students Become Self-Directed Learners?Figure 2 represents