Creating a Peer Advising Program to Increase Engagement with Pre-major Engineering Students (GIFTS)This GIFTS paper will describe how the Engineering Advising Center (EAC) within the Collegeof Engineering at a large mid-Atlantic university is actively creating a Peer Advising Program.The Peer Advising Program will serve as an innovative advising approach to increaseengagement of pre-major students within the College. Once admitted, Engineering students gothrough an entrance-to-major process and generally declare a specific major at the end of theirsecond year.The Peer Advising Program will meet the students’ need for information and provide a peersystem for this exchange. Peer Advisors will offer technical and low
., “Black racial identity theory,” in Black and White Racial Identity: Theory, Research, and Practice, J. E. Helms, Ed. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1990, pp. 9-32.[9] B. Tatum. "Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?" And Other Conversations About Race: Basic Books, 1997.[10] M.J. Ross, Success Factors of Young African-American Males at a Historically Black College, Westport, CT: Bergen & Garvey, 1998.[11] C. Steele, “Stereotype threat and student achievement” In Young, Gifted, and Black: Promoting High Achievement Among African- American Students, T. Perry, C. Steele, and A. Hilliard, Eds., pp. 109-130. Boston: Beacon Press, 2003.[12] K.W. Reid, Working Smarter, Not Just Harder: Three Sensible Strategies for
detached from such a situation. We intentionally developed activities thatchallenge students’ thoughts and beliefs, so they connect their actions as students to their lives asworking professionals.We first examine ethics on a global scale by considering engineers’ roles in promoting globalhealth and wellbeing through sustainability. Students learn about green design andmanufacturing strategies through assigned readings, a video on cradle-to-cradle design, andgameplay. Students play the In the Loop ® board game, which teaches players about the finiteresources necessary for devices such as LCD screens, MRI machines, and wind turbines [1].Throughout the game, players develop strategies to manage limited resources using circulareconomies. A reflective
communication. We use CATME’s Teambuilder software [2] to form teamswith students that span the different domains. The optimization can be set to favor groups withdissimilar Strengths domains among members.Students also complete assignments designed to effectively highlight the advantages of adiversity of strengths within their team and devise strategies for effective communication.Specifically, they receive training on how to understand, communicate with, and work withteammates who have varied strength profiles. Students recognize how their unique attributesposition them for meaningful and valuable contributions to their group. This understanding isexpressed through a question on the first page of the team contract as groups describe theirrationale
GIFTS: MAJOR exposure through engineering innovationsAs a first-year engineering instructor on the first day of class, someone invariably asks whatdiscipline of engineering they should go into. Not knowing the particular background of theseindividuals, it is difficult to give them meaningful advice on the spot. First-year students (andtheir parents) have an expectation that the first-year course will “help” them decide whatdiscipline the student should major in. However, introducing students to various fields ofengineering may not be the main foci of the course, as many first-year programs have evolvedtowards the inclusion of curricular content such as design, entrepreneurship, writing, and/orprogramming. This leaves little
people who define problems differently,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, 95(2), pp. 107-122, 2006.[5] D. K. Deardorff, “Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a studentoutcome of internationalization,” Journal of studies in international education, 10(3), pp. 241-266, 2006.[6] B. Hunter, G. P. White, & G. C. Godbey, “What does it mean to be globally competent?”Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), pp. 267-285, 2006.[7] Z. Skrbiš, “Coming to terms with cosmopolitanism, global citizenship and globalcompetence,” in IEAA national symposium: Fostering global citizenship and global competence,Melbourne, August 22, 2014.[8] UN General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for SustainableDevelopment
Paper ID #28004Work in Progress: Analyzing a Distributed Expertise Model in an Under-graduate Engineering CourseMs. Sara Willner-Giwerc , Tufts University Sara Willner-Giwerc is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at Tufts University. She is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, which supports her research at the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) on technological tools and pedagogical approaches for facilitating hands on learning in educational settings.Dr. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and
Full Paper: A Systems Engineering Approach to Conceptual Design in a 1st-Year Engineering Program1st-year engineering students engage in three projects over the course of the fall and springsemesters. In the fall semester students build, test, and present at an exposition an Arduino-basedgame. While students are provided the design for the game, they are strongly encouraged tomake creative modifications. Following this, students complete a reverse engineering activity ona simple household appliance or medical device. The result is a CAD model of the device and adetailed report, typically of about 40 – 50 pages. Students work in teams of three or four on bothprojects.In the spring semester work consists of a
Paper ID #28017Energy-Efficiency Assessment of Windows using Temperature SensorsDr. Brenda Read-Daily, Elizabethtown CollegeDr. Jean Carlos Batista Abreu, Elizabethtown College 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 GIFTS: Energy-Efficiency Assessment of Windows using Temperature SensorsThis Great Idea for Teaching, and Talking with, Students (GIFTS) presents a first-yearengineering student project dedicated to the energy assessment of windows in campus residencehalls, through the analysis of quantitative and qualitative data. This multi-week problem-basedlearning
Paper ID #28036Inquiry-based Learning for First-Year Engineering StudentsMrs. Tracey Carbonetto, Pennsylvania State University, Allentown Joining the Penn State engineering faculty five years ago, my professional interests as an instructor of engineering are developing and refining methods of engineering instruction that will allow students to gain confidence and to increase their own success. Previous experiences in the metals and piping industry as a principal engineer have allowed me to promote necessary skills which need to be developed in the classroom so that the students have success upon graduation
Paper ID #28074Sketching, Building & 3D Printing: Implementation of a Non-Discipline Spe-cific Making Activity in a First-Year Engineering Design CourseDr. Sarah C Ritter, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah C. Ritter, PhD, is an associate teaching professor in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs at the Pennsylvania State University and course chair for EDSGN 100, the cornerstone engineering design course. She received her BS degree from Louisiana Tech University and PhD degree from Texas A&M University, both in Biomedical Engineering. Her research focused on
Engineers and Entrepreneurial Thinking Frank T. Koe, Ph.D. Penn State University College of Engineering“The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed withoutchanging our thinking.” ~Albert Einstein~This GIFTS presentation acknowledges that engineering studies coupled with exposure toentrepreneurship training develops a mindset that contributes to innovation and creative solutionsto complex problems.Through exposure to entrepreneurial thinking, engineering students are encouraged to identifyneeds and solve problems that create positive change. Although engineering design is a
Paper ID #28071Probability and Statistics – Early Exposure in the Engineering CurriculumDr. Roger J Marino P.E., Drexel University Roger Marino is an Associate Teaching Professor in the College of Engineering at Drexel University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania. His home Department is Civil Architectural and Environmental Engineering. Dr. Marino has 30+ years of field experience, and is licensed as a Professional Engineer in the State of New Jersey. His primary focus at Drexel is in the Freshman and Sophomore curriculums teaching courses across all disciplines.Prof. Christopher M Weyant, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng
add-on script necessitatesthe use of easily-evaluated question types, including multiple-choice, matching, true/false, andshort answer. Student averages for the past three years’ assignments are: 2016-17 exam = 73%,homework = 66% (students given 2nd homework attempt = 84%); 2017-18 exam = 74%,homework = 68%; 2018-19 exam = 73%, homework = 71%.This consistent performance drop is troubling given all the afforded homework advantages. Inaddition to the homework’s aforementioned selected-response question style (most examquestions are free response), students are a) permitted to work with classmates, b) encouraged toask TAs and instructors for help, c) given a week to complete the assignment, and d) reminded toreview their notes and the fall
: The Engagement and Retention of Electrical Engineering Students with a First Semester Freshman Experience Course,” Proceeding of the 120 Annual American Society of Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[4] Paretti, Marie, and Kelly Cross, “Assessing First-year Programs: Outcomes, Methods, and Findings”, Proceeding of the 2011 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia.[5] Argow, et.al., “Introduction to Engineering: Preparing First-Year Students for an Informed Major Choice,” Proceeding of the 2012 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX.[6] Gartner, J. B., & Van Wie, B. J., & Reinkens, K. A., & Pitts, S. A. (2016, June
& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/304599. Freeman, S. F., & Pfluger, C., & Whalen, R., & Schulte Grahame, K., & Hertz, J. L., & Variawa, C., & Love, J. O., & Sivak, M. L., & Maheswaran, B. (2016, June), Cranking Up Cornerstone: Lessons Learned from Implementing a Pilot with First-Year Engineering Students Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.2659510. Wilczynski, V., & Zinter, J., & Wilen, L. (2016, June), Teaching Engineering Design in an Academic Makerspace: Blending Theory and Practice to Solve Client-based Problems Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New
. Specifically, students were asked to rate their competencies in the four areas: 1.a. Recognizes unmet needs that may be filled by making 1.b. Expresses curiosity about how things are made and how they work 1.c. “Hacks” and “tinkers” to learn how things are made and how they work 1.d. Evaluates the costs & benefits of making as an alternative to buying or hiringStudents who chose the FabLab project overestimated their competency by 5.6% difference, andgained 5.7% increase in their ability to identify the need to make. In contrast, students who choseany of the other projects overestimated their competency by 12.7% difference, and gained 4.5%increase in their ability to identify the need to make. A graph of the survey result
/potential to earn A or B in ENGR 289 during Pre-Calculus Fall 13-14 -Improve MPE to > 14 (for placement into M150 for Fall) M150 15-19 -Enhance fluency and confidence for M150 Pre-Calculus -Enhance preparation/potential to earn A or B in M 150 during Fall 20-21 -Improve MPE to > 21 (for placement into M151 for Fall) M151 22-33 -Enhance fluency and confidence for M151 Calculus -Enhance preparation/potential to earn A or B in M 151 during FallESBP Math Prep Seminar Philosophy & Methodology The instructors would like to acknowledge that amending the ESBP math seminar to
and B. K. Hofer, McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. (12th ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006.[3] Worldwide CDIO Initiative. www.cdio.org[4] P. Lynch, C. de Vries and D. Lewis, “Integrating an effective first year seminar into a freshman engineering design course.” First Year Engineering Experience Conference. Daytona Beach, FL 2017.[5] G. Lemons et al, "The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design," Design Studies, vol. 31, (3), pp. 288-309, 2010.[6] C. Dym et al, "Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, (1), pp. 103-120, 2005.[7] R. M. Abdulaal, A. M. Al-Bahi, A. Y. Soliman & F. I
optionalinterviews with a subset of students (N =26) in the first and final few weeks of thecourse. During these interviews, studentswere asked to complete several open-ended visuospatial tasks while explainingtheir reasoning, with a 3-minute limit foreach task and no assistance from theinterviewers. At the end of the secondinterview, students were also debriefed Figure 1: Screenshots of the apps for (A,B) theabout the course. Interview tasks were Surfaces and Solids of Revolution module, and (C) the Cutting Planes and Cross Sections module. Panelcreated based on the textbook topics to (C) shows what is displayed on the screen when thecover all of the
Paper ID #27996Creation and Implementation of a Project Framework to Improve Corner-stone Engineering DesignDr. Nicholas A Meisel, The Pennsylvania State University Dr. Nicholas (Nick) Meisel is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Design in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs (SEDTAPP) at Penn State and an affiliate faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He graduated from Virginia Commonwealth University in 2010 with his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and received his Ph.D. from Virginia Tech in Mechanical Engineering in 2015. He joined the faculty at Penn State in Fall
knowledge. Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference. [2] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., and Bogue, B., “LeavingThe course described is quite technically rigorous for a first- Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” Journal ofyear course, yet the breadth of the content covered means that Engineering Education, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 6-27.the material moves relatively quickly. Nonetheless, students [3] Santiago, L., “Retention in a First Year Program: Factors Influencingreport (as shown in Figure 3) that they enjoy all three aspects Student Interest in Engineering
they may be able to trackthe impact of the integrated project as students’ progress through the curriculum.References 1 Striebig, B., Ogundipe, A., and Morton, S. 2014. Lessons in implementing sustainability courses into the engineering curriculum. 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-18th, 2014, Indianapolis, IN. 2 Striebig, B. 2016. Applying US EPA sustainability criteria to capstone design. Engineering for Sustainability. ASEE SE Section Annual Conference, March 13-15, 2016. Tuscaloosa, AL. 3 Striebig, B. and Morton, S. 2016. A Sustainability Indicators Based Curriculum. Engineering for Sustainability. ASEE SE Section Annual Conference, March 13-15, 2016. Tuscaloosa, AL. 4 Striebig
, each. 3. Team – start creating content for the google site 5 1. Play escape rooms (~8-10 at one time) Escape Room 2. Run escape rooms with other classes Google SiteAppendix B: Northeastern’s Escape Room Project MilestonesMilestones:o MS1) In class you will present to the class about your planned project for up to 5 minutes.Must include: ● Summary of your puzzle ideas (at least 2 completely different puzzles). ● A description of both your 3D printed and fabricated object. ● Bullet points of your plan to make both objects and both puzzles. Include an estimate of
longerusable lifespan than these other solutions. Additionally, formal feedback will be solicited fromstudents and faculty to identify opportunities for increased ease-of-use and component quality inthe NBB system. Finally, a formal study will be conducted to investigate changes in students’design and manufacturing self-efficacy after exposure to the NBB system during a semester.5. REFERENCES[1] Huang, Y., and March, M. C. L., 2014, Frontiers of Additive Manufacturing Research and Education.[2] Simpson, T. W., Williams, C. B., and Hripko, M., 2017, “Preparing Industry for Additive Manufacturing and its Applications: Summary & Recommendations from a National Science Foundation Workshop,” Addit. Manuf., 13, pp. 166–178.[3] Hudson Valley
Entrepreneurship no. 1 (1):5–19.[3] Gerhart, A. L., & Melton, D. E. (2016, June), Entrepreneurially Minded Learning:Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery, Opportunity Identification, and Value Creation intoProblem-Based Learning Modules with Examples and Assessment Specific to Fluid Mechanics,Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.10.18260/p.26724[4] Bell-Huff, C., & Morano, H. L. (2017, June), Using Simulation Experiences, RealCustomers, and Outcome Driven Innovation to Foster Empathy and an Entrepreneurial Mindsetin a Sophomore Engineering Design Studio, Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27425[5] Zhu, H., & Mertz, B. E. (2017
Paper ID #28006Advice from a First YearDr. Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University Dr. Jarvie-Eggart is a registered professional engineer with over a decade of experience as an envi- ronmental engineer. She is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include online learning, active and collaborative learning, technology adoption, first year transition, sustainability and diversity in engineering.Miss Amanda Marie Singer 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28
Paper ID #28018EDSGN 100: A first-year cornerstone engineering design courseDr. Sarah C Ritter, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah C. Ritter, PhD, is an associate teaching professor in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs at the Pennsylvania State University and course chair for EDSGN 100, the cornerstone engineering design course. She received her BS degree from Louisiana Tech University and PhD degree from Texas A&M University, both in Biomedical Engineering. Her research focused on developing an optics-based system for long-term monitoring of relevant blood
GIFTS: Going Circular – Reusing a First-Year Design ProjectWe developed a first-year multidisciplinary design project, which compels students to think interms of circular economies. This project focused on introducing students to the design processand project management. We structured the project for teams of 4 or 5 first-year students,requiring 40-50 hours per student throughout the semester. The students are required to keeptheir vehicle battery charged with use of a photovoltaic module. The competition goalprominently features a measure of the reusability of components.The project requires technical work in mechanics, electronics, and programming in a context ofsystem design and sustainability. Most students find at least one
Paper ID #28046WIP - Living-Learning Programs: A Model for Student Success and Engage-mentEmily Sandvall, Baylor University - ECS Emily Sandvall Director of Undergraduate Programs, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Bay- lor University, Emily Sandvall@baylor.eduMrs. Sarah Miller, Baylor UniversityHannah Glisson, Baylor University - ECS Hannah Glisson Graduate Apprentice for Undergraduate Programs, School of Engineering and Computer Science Baylor University Hannah Glisson1@baylor.edu 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Work-In-Progress Living