engineers.policymakers, they do not emerge from the student perspective. B. Curriculum: theory vs. practiceA. Prototypical models In the curriculum, balance must be struck between theory National policymakers create, support, and view and practice. Engineering as a discipline struggles to find theengineering training institutions for different purposes. In ideal mixture of theoretical training, practical experience, andvarying geographic regions, cultures, resources, and practices; the essential but even more challenging classes that combinedifferent colonial histories, national allies, and populations; and
The primary contribution of this research is inestablishing meaningful benchmarks and boundary conditions for instruction. It lays thegroundwork for follow-up studies on how to promote the development of deep conceptualunderstanding and problem-solving skill.Bibliography1. Gereffi, G., Wadhwa, V., Rissing, B., & Ong, R. (2008). Getting the numbers right: International engineering education in the United States, China, and India. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 13-25.2. Larkin, J.H. (1981). Enriching formal knowledge: A model for learning to solve textbook physics problems. In J.R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 321-335). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.3. Larkin, J. H. (1983). The
GC 2012-5642: ON-LINE TEACHING AS A TOOL FOR GLOBAL ENGI-NEERING EDUCATION: FROM THE EXPERIENCES OF THE GLOBALEDUCATION CENTER FOR ENGINEERS, SOUTH KOREAHyungsub Choi Page 17.38.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Student DevelopmentOn-Line Teaching as a Tool for Global EngineeringEducation:From the Experiences of the Global Education Center forEngineers, South KoreaHyungsub Choi*a, Seung-Yeop Kwak*a, Sungzoon Cho*b, JinaKang*b, Hyun Joung No*c, Sung-Gul Hong*dhchoi1@snu.ac.kr, +82-2-880-1719*) Global Education Center for Engineersa) Department of Materials Science and Engineering, SeoulNational Universityb) Department of Industrial
GC 2012-5612: CROSS-CULTURAL ACTIVE LEARNING: PRELIMINARYRESULTS OF A CASE STUDY OF AN AMERICAN PROFESSOR TEACH-ING IN CHINADr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Coordinator of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineer- ing courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is active in the engineering education community
within a comprehensive approach to designprocess. This course will be based on instructor-delivered lectures and coaching of best-practicefundamentals that can be applied in any situation where creative design development, processand solutions are required. The course philosophy is based upon the idea that the fundamentalcreative tool of design is the visualization and simulation of ideas, concepts and solutionsthroughout the design process. It is the intent of this course to prepare the students to have attheir personal disposal four levels of design visualization and simulation tools and skillsapplicable to their creative design development. These four levels are: a)freehand/analog/physical 2D sketching and visualization, b) analog/physical 3D
The Boeing Company. Over his 26 year Boeing career he has worked on various defense programs in many different engineering groups; starting as an NC Programmer on the B-2 program to F-22 in structures, systems, tooling and many other manufacturing related groups. This is where his composites experience originated and then onto developing and teaching programming, relational design and composite modeling. In the last ten years, Barry’s focus has been on the ”supply pipeline” of our future technical workforce, where he and a colleague partnered to build several composite certificate programs with the University of Washington (UW) through their Aero and Astro department. Two of the largest programs are: Aircraft
, Hyderabad. Dr. Reddy’s Leadership is almost innumerable. He has attended a total of 42 National Conferences and 29 International conferences, has composed 12 monographs and published in 12 national /International journals, and supervised 15 sponsored research projects from various funding agencies. He has provided guidance to 12 Ph.D students. He holds life membership in many professional societies like Indian society for Technical Education, society for Mechanical Engineers, National Society of Fluid Mechanics and Fluid power, Solar energy Society of India, Indian Science Congress Association. He is also a Fellow and life member in the Institution of Engineers and Indian Institute of Plant Engineers. He is also