Paper ID #36380WIP: Adaptive Comparative Judgement as a Tool for Assessing First-YearEngineering Design ProjectsDr. Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest PhD in spatial ability and problem solving in engineering education from Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, Ireland. Graduated in 2017 from the University of Limerick, Ireland with a B. Tech (Ed.). Member of Technology Education Research Group (TERG).Mr. Gibin Raju, University of Cincinnati Gibin Raju is a doctoral student in Engineering Education at the College of Engineering and Applied Sci- ence at the
; Zurhellen, H. S. (1978). Student attitudes toward the grade contract. Improving College and University Teaching, 26(4), 239-242.[7] Frank, T., & Scharff, L. L. (2013). Learning contracts in undergraduate courses: Impacts on student behaviors and academic performance. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 36-53.[8] Hiller, T. B., & Hietapelto, A. B. (2001). Contract grading: Encouraging commitment to the learning process through voice in the evaluation process. Journal of Management Education, 25(6), 660-684.[9] Inoue, A. B. (2019). Labor-based grading contracts: Building equity and inclusion in the compassionate writing classroom. WAC Clearinghouse.[10] Carillo, E. C. (2021). The
Benchmarksfor Undergraduate Engineering Schools, Departments and Programs.” https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/2017-Engineering-by-the-Numbers-3.pdf (accessed May 27, 2022).[2] B. N. Geisinger and D. Rajraman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition fromengineering majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp.914-925, 2013.[3] L. A. Jackson, P. D. Gardner, and L. A. Sullivan, “Engineering persistence: Past, present, andfuture factors and gender differences,” Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 227-246, 1993.[4] R. A. Berkowitz and K. O’Quin, “Predictors of graduation of readmitted “at risk” collegestudents,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, vol. 8, no. 2, pp
Paper ID #36374WIP: Wrap-Around Advising: A Collaborative Effort Between FacultyMembers and Student Success ProfessionalsDr. Andrew Assadollahi, P.E., Christian Brothers University Dr. Assadollahi is a native Memphian and a 2005 graduate of Christian Brothers High School. Dr. As- sadollahi earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering with a concentration in structural engineering from Christian Brothers University in 2009. He also earned a B.S. in Mathematics from Christian Brothers University in 2009, concentrating in applied differential equations. He earned a M.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of Memphis in 2010 with a
Paper ID #36393WIP: The Student’s Perspective on CAD Software in a First-Year CivilEngineering Graphics CourseProf. Raymond Eugene McGinnis Jr., Christian Brothers University Professor McGinnis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Christian Brothers University in Memphis, Tennessee. He has thirty-nine years of experience teach- ing engineering courses. He has taught thirty-four years at Christian Brothers University. He teaches courses in Transportation Engineering and Construction Engineering. Required courses include: Civil Engineering Graphics, Geomatics and Lab
Paper ID #36353Work in Progress: Success and Retention Strategies for STEM GatekeeperCourses in a Community CollegeMs. Nada Veskovic, Lehigh Carbon Community College Nada Veskovic is an Associate Professor of Electronics at Lehigh Carbon Community College. She teaches a variety of electrical technology courses. Her interests include active learning approaches, peer learning, and strategies that focus on increasing retention and graduation rates. Before joining LCCC, she worked in the industry as an electrical engineer in project design and management roles. American c
Paper ID #36402WIP: Investigating the relationship between FYE students’ reflectionsand academic performance across genderMr. Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Ahmed Ashraf Butt is a doctoral candidate in the school of engineering education at Purdue University with a multidisciplinary research focus that combines theory and practice in the area of learning science, Human-computer interaction (HCI), and engineering education. His primary research focuses on design- ing and developing educational technologies that can facilitate different aspects (e.g., engagement) of the students’ learning and
collectionmodel and mitigate potential team conflict and seek potential leadership for team building. Theresearch question is: Could CATME help to identify team conflicts and leadership in a multi-disciplinary small-size team environment?Experimental MethodsTwelve undergraduate students (most of them were first-year students) were split into twoproject teams with even student numbers. Team A aimed to build a soft robotic gripper, whileTeam B aimed to build a voice-activated robotic arm. During the team formation stage, Team Aused an interest-driven approach to assign individual tasks, while Team B used a merit-basedapproach to assign individual tasks. In Team A, the students were allocated the tasks based ontheir own learning objectives. In Team B, the
.[10] L. A. Schreiner, “From surviving to thriving during transitions,” in Thriving in transitions: A research-based approach to college student success, L. A. Schreiner, M. C. Louis, and D. D. Nelson, Eds. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and and Students in Transition, 2012, pp. 1–18.[11] M. A. Hutchison, D. K. Follman, M. Sumpter, and G. M. Bodner, “Factors influencing the self-efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students.,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 39–47, Jan. 2006, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com.proxybz.lib.montana.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&A N=19552472&site=ehost-live[12] B. L. Yoder, “Going
by the rater, With the model’s conditional variance of .616,the model explains 61.6% of the variance in rating values.There was a statistically significant difference in values given to ratees when the rater and rateehad different genders (p=.006, b=-.025) and indicates that when raters and ratees had differentgenders, their values given to ratees would decrease by .25 points on the 9-point Likert scalecompared with raters and ratees of the same gender. For instances in which raters and ratees hada different race or ethnicity (p=.002, b=.024), values given to ratees would increase by .24 pointson the 9-point Likert scale compared with raters and ratees of the same race or ethnicity. Studentratees and raters being of different race
Increase Diversity in STEM Fields: A Review of theResearch Literature," The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 555-581, 2007.[3] C. R. Shadding, D. Whittington, L. E. Wallace, W. S. Wandu, and R. K. Wilson, "Cost-Effective Recruitment Strategies That Attract Underrepresented Minority Undergraduates WhoPersist to STEM Doctorates," SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 2158244016657143, 2016, doi:10.1177/2158244016657143.[4] W. Sandra, B. Kathleen, and H. Lahoma Jayne, "Communications Strategies to IncreaseRecruitment of Women to Engineering," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, SanAntonio, Texas, 2012/06/10 2012: ASEE Conferences, doi: 10.18260/1-2--21085.[5] Y. Ma, "Family Socioeconomic Status, Parental Involvement
. Slater, “Who Gets to Die of Dysentery? Ideology, Geography, and The Oregon Trail,” Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 4, Winter 2017, pp. 374-395.[3] B. Bigelow, “On the Road to Cultural Bias: A Critique of The Oregon Trail CD-ROM,” Language Arts, vol. 74, no. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 84-93.[4] S. Coffman-Wolph and J. K. Estell, “Playing in the Sandbox: Developing Entrepreneurial Mindset Communication Skills in Introductory Programming Students,” in Proc. 2022 ASEE North Central Sect. Conf., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Mar. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/39256[5] J. K. Estell and D. Reeping, “Providing Authentic Experiences in the First Year: Designing Educational Software in Support of Service Learning
Engineering and Engineering Economy. Elective courses include: Traffic Engineering, Heavy Construction Equipment and Methods, Construction Cost Estimating and Cost Control, Construction Management and Planning and Scheduling. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. His professional experience includes bridge inspection and evaluation, roadway and interstate design, traffic planning and the design of earth-fill dams. He serves on the Board of Directors of the America Society of Civil Engi- neers West Tennessee Branch. He serves as the Treasurer for the Memphis Area Joint Engineers Council. He serves as Treasurer of the Memphis Chapter of the Tennessee Society of Professional Engineers. He