join.References[1] Mui, R. H., Woo, S. J., Arbuckle, S., Al-Hammoud, R., & Walbridge, S. (2019),Architectural Engineering Starts with Design from Day 1. Paper presented at 2019 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--3210[2] Walbridge, S., & Al-Hammoud, R. (2020), Challenges and Opportunities Observed in theImplementation of a New Architectural Engineering Undergraduate Academic Program.Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online .10.18260/1-2--34267[3] Rennick, C., Hulls, C., Wright, D., Milne, A. J. B., Li, E., & Bedi, S. (2018), EngineeringDesign Days: Engaging Students with Authentic Problem-Solving in an AcademicHackathon. Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual
. Dina has won several awards including the 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Distinguished Scholar Award. Dina’s dissertation proposal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division D In-Progress Research Gala.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their
” chapter [23] o ASEE workshop on the “Foundations of Social Justice for Engineers” [24] • Specific case studies in fields o Case study bioengineering ethics “SUMO-1” [25] o Coded Bias documentary [26] o Nicholas Sakellariou’s “A Framework for Social Justice in Renewable Energy Engineering” chapter [27]This area is emerging. There are several scholars documenting their attempts at adding socialjustice to the engineering courses [28]–[31], though not yet in engineering research, and it is yetto be seen whether educational interventions in these courses will have a beneficial impact ondeveloping socially conscious engineers.A workshop was developed to give researchers the confidence and a framework
liberation.This theoretical framework and model provides us a basis from which to articulate a theory ofchange based on engineering and labor that spans multiple domains of power in engineeringeducation.A Theory of Engineering and LaborIn her 2019 JEE guest editorial, “Asking questions, we walk,” Alice Pawley drew attention to thefact that our hegemonic understandings of engineering are socially constructed and constrainedby a neoliberal mindset, binding engineers to techno-rational arguments [66]. As an example, shediscussed the culpability of engineering educators in worsening climate change by failing to“provide students with a moral language to think about engineers’ responsibility for climatechange” [66, p. 449]. Additionally, she explained that
theirassigned projects during the Engineering Expo and scored the oral presentations. We felt it wasimportant to include the Documentation competency, so it was added to the three taken from thecapstone design rubric. Table 1 below shows how each competency maps to both the currentABET student outcomes under Criterion 3 and to the student outcomes set to take effect duringthe 2019-2020 accreditation cycle.Table 1. Mapping of design competencies to current and future ABET student outcomes Competency Current ABET Student Outcomes 2019-2020 Student Outcomes System Design (c) An ability to design a system, (2) An ability to apply component, or process to meet engineering design to produce
currently investigating the use of the flipped classroom model and collaborative learning. His research in cyber security for industrial control systems is focused on high assurance field devices using microkernel architectures. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration to Understand First-Year Engineering RetentionAbstractThis Evidence-based practice paper documents the collaboration, research, and future work ofthe interdisciplinary research team, the Guild for Engineering Education, Achievement,Retention and Success (GEARS) at the University of Louisville’s J.B. Speed School ofEngineering. Over the last 9 years (2010-2018
Ethics and Societal Impacts," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[24] J. Lucena and J. Leydens, "From Sacred Cow to Dairy Cow: Challenges and Opportunities in Integrating Social Justice in Engineering Science Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[25] J. Davishahl, "Engineering faculty experiences teaching social justice to first year students," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Lincoln, NE, 2021.[26] B. Dewsberry and C. Brame, "Inclusive Teaching," CBE- LIfe Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. 2, 2019.[27] C. Brown, "The Importance, and the Challenges, to Ensuring an Inclusive School Climate," Educational Psychologist, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 322-330
)frameworks applicable to Ph. D. programs in engineering,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,2018.[5] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons forEngineering Educators,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x. 13[6] E. Holloway, K. A. Douglas, W. C. Oakes, and D. Radcliffe, “Research Experiences Instrument ScoringGuide,” p. 3, 2021.[7] E. F. Crawley and A. E. Hosoi, “Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation(NEET) program at MIT-Building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry,” 2019.[8] E. F. Crawley, “Redesigning undergraduate
Selection in Mechanical Design. Elsevier Science, 2016.[7] M. Ashby, H. Shercliff, and D. Cebon, Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing and Design, 4th ed. Elsevier, 2019.[8] https://www.ansys.com/products/materials/granta-edupack, “Ansys Granta EduPack.”[9] “https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls.”[10] S. A. Claussen, J. Y. Tsai, A. M. Boll, J. Blacklock, and K. Johnson, “Pain and Gain: Barriers and Opportunities for Integrating Sociotechnical Thinking into Diverse Engineering Courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.[11] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering education-is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?,” Australian Journal of Engineering Education, 2003, [Online]. Available: http
of 2020 report [5, p. 125], noting “The questionsof… how much specialization there should be at the undergraduate level, how to preparestudents for careers that include both technical and managerial tracks, and how to meet the needsand expectations of society all seem timeless.” This tension is echoed in a more recent 2018NAE report [6]. Bear and Skorton [7] state, “the notion that disciplinary specialization andtechnical depth are the only important prerequisites for employment turns out to be false.” Kingand Pister [8] also advocate for broadening engineering Bachelor’s degrees, and present a varietyof ideas to achieve this aim.According to data from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) [9] only asmall number of students
. The New Electronics Technology, Circa 2015, by Gary J. Mullett, Proceedings of the 2009 American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, Texas. 19. Verizon Nextstep Program, by Gary J. Mullett & William S. Mullett, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee.20. The Verizon NextStep Program – 15 Year Partnership, by Gary Mullett, Paper presented at the 2009 ASEE CIEC Conference, Palm Springs, CA.21. Who is Going to Teach the Skills Needed by the IoT Field Technician?, by G. J. Mullett, Proceedings of the 2019 American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa
Paper ID #32744High School STEM Teacher Perspectives on the Importance and Obstacles toIntegrating Engineering Ethical Issues in Their CoursesJake Walker Lewis, Graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder with a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineering and a master’s degree in civil engineering. Was involved with undergraduate research regarding ethics in engineering education, presented work in the form of a poster at the 2018 Zone IV ASEE Conference. Defended and published master’s thesis examining if/how ethics are being introducted in K12 STEM education in November 2019. Co-authored paper entitled ”Educating
, laboratory instructional materials were modified andintroduced to students in the Fall 2019 semester. One of the most significant modifications wasincluding more SPICE circuit simulations as part of the prelab assignments students completedbefore performing the lab exercises. The intent was to augment numerical calculations with thewaveform simulations that produced circuit output waveforms much like students would see withtheir breadboarded circuits. Another major modification was production of short videos thataddressed lab test equipment operation with emphasis on the oscilloscope. The lab instructionsthemselves were edited to improve circuit schematic diagrams, clarify procedures, and includemore comprehensive background theory.To help determine
needs to be performed to understand how different learningactivities and environments affect students' ideas about empathy. Therefore, this study aimed toidentify the constructs of empathy that were most salient in students before and after therehabilitation engineering course.Study ContextThe rehabilitation engineering course was piloted in Spring 2017. Preliminary research showedthat students developed aspects of design empathy, as well as recognition of the importance ofaccessibility and universal design [14]. The course was offered again in Fall 2019 and enrolled24 fourth- and fifth- year biomedical engineering and mechanical engineering students. Thecourse was co-taught by Dr. Lauren Cooper and Dr. Brian Self, mechanical engineering
program for the academic year of 2018-2019.Prof. Andre Schleife, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Andr´e Schleife is a Blue Waters Assistant Professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engi- neering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Research in his group revolves around excited electronic states and their real-time dynamics in various materials using accurate computational methods and making use of modern super computers. Schleife obtained his Diploma and Ph.D. at Friedrich- Schiller-University in Jena, Germany for theoretical and computational work on transparent conducting oxides. Before he started at UIUC he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher at Lawrence Livermore Na- tional
Paper ID #31478Panel: Busting a Career Move? When and Why or Why Not?Dr. Adrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is Dean of the College of Computing at Michigan Tech. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame and B.S. from Michigan Tech. Adrienne is a fellow of ASEE, fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), former President of the AES Electrophoresis Society, and a Michigan Professor of the Year Nominee, which illustrate her dual passion for research and education’s impact on individuals and societal advances. Adrienne’s research
, and D. M. Ferguson, “The influence of percentage of female or international students on the psychological safety of team,” presented at the 2019 FYEE Conference, Jul. 2019. Accessed: Jun. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-influence-of-percentage-of-female-or-international-students-on-the- psychological-safety-of-team[14] B. Beigpourian, M. Ohland, and D. Ferguson, “Effect of Psychological Safety on the Interaction of Students in Teams,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 34497. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 34497.[15] K. Lamb, K. G. Gipson, and S. C. Sullivan, “Assessing Levels of Psychological Safety and Teamwork Satisfaction
determination.9. References[1] T. Katbeh, G. Cieslinski, and H. Bazzi, “Promoting STEM Education through the Preparation of Multicultural National Robotics Teams in Qatar (Evaluation),” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore , Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023, p. 43987. doi: 10.18260/1-2--43987.[2] B. Cieslinski, M. Gharib, B. Creel, and T. Katbeh, “A Model Science-Based Learning STEM Program,” in Volume 5: Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Nov. 2019, p. V005T07A016. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2019-10352.[3] G. Cieslinski, T. Katbeh, and H. S. Bazzi, “Keeping Cool with Qatar Cool: A Pre-College Education Program Emphasizing Corporate Regional
K-12 outreach and research experiences for high school students, teachers, and undergraduates in this role.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor and Associate Head of Engineering Edu- cation at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing teams has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on
years of occupational experience, with her most recent experience being in teaching, research, and service. Dr. Ofori-Boadu is a dedicated instructor, advisor, mentor, and role model who has served over 1,500 undergraduate and graduate students. Andrea has received almost $2M from funding agencies to include the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Engineering Information Foundation (EIF), the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the National Housing Endowment (NHE), and East Coast Construction Services (ECCS). In 2019, she received her prestigious NSF CAREER grant to construct substantive theories that explain professional identity development processes in undergraduate architecture, engineering, and
to acknowledge the financial support of Writing Lab, Institutefor the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, in the production ofthis work and with funding for attending the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference.References[1] Rodriguez-Paz, M.X., Gonzalez-Mendivil, J.A., Zarate-Garcia, J.A., Zamora-Hernandez, I., Nolazco-Flores, J.A., “A Hybrid Teaching Model for EngineeringCourses Suitable for Pandemic Conditions”, (2021) Revista Iberoamericana deTecnologias del Aprendizaje, 16 (3), pp. 267-275.https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2021.3122893[2] Rodriguez-Paz, M. X., & Gonzalez, J. A., & Zamora-Hernandez, I., & Sayeg-Sánchez, G., & Nuñez, M. E. (2020, June),”A Hybrid Online/Lectures Teaching
; Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, June, 2019, p. 33030. doi:10.18260/1-2--33030.[3] J. Erickson, S. Claussen, J. Leydens, K. Johnson, and J. Tsai, “Real-world Examples andSociotechnical Integration: What’s the Connection?,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020, p. 35120. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35120.[4] J. Blacklock, K. Johnson, R. Cook, N. Plata, and S. Claussen, “Faculty Interpretations ofSociotechnical Thinking in their Classrooms: Techniques for Integration,” in 2021 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jul. 2021, p. 19.“Understanding theFormation of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Education.” [Online]. Available:https://www.mines.edu
, had a low self-efficacy.Almost all participants indicated that more exposure to engineering would help them becomemore confident with teaching engineering. In future work, we will investigate the impact ofparticipating in a class designed to provide students with more exposure to engineering on theself-efficacy and perceptions of pre-service teachers.References[1] NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.[2] E.R. Bannilower, P.S. Smith, K.A. Malzahn, C.L. Plumley, E.M. Gordon, and M.L. Hayes. Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Available: http://horizon-reserach.com/NSSME/wp- content/uploads/2019/06/Report_of_the_2018_NSSME.pdf [accessed Nov
Framework for Transition with Greater Fidelity in Artifacts Supporting Student Performance ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020, Conference Paper ID #28668.2. B. Pejcinovic, Design of Rubrics for Student Outcomes in 2019-2020 ABET Criteria International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2020.3. A. Battistini, Kitch, W.A., Make Assessment Straightforward: A Case Study on the Successful Implementation of ABET Student Outcomes 1-7 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2021, Conference Paper ID #34918.4. K.S. Grahame, Pfluger, C., WIP: A Comparison and Assessment of Capstone and Cornerstone Student’s Perceptions of the Application of ABET Design Criteria ASEE
~35% (12/34 students). To address thislimitation, we will collect end-of-course perception data from this year’s students. We will alsoadminister the survey to next year’s senior design cohort, which is projected to have ~60students. This year’s small cohort is atypical for our institution and is likely the result of theimpact of COVID (most students in our 2022-23 cohort were first years in AY 2019-2020). References[1] K. Jaeger-Helton, B. M. Smyser, and H. L. McManus, “Capstone Prepares Engineers for the Real World, Right? ABET Outcomes and Student Perceptions,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa
byInstructor 1 and in the Summer by Instructor 2 to our Electrical Engineering students. Thefollowing semesters’ data were used – Instructor 2 in Summer 2019 with 17 students, Instructor2 in Summer 2020 with 22 students, Instructor 1 in Summer 2021 with 29 students, Instructor 2in Summer 2021 with 20 students. There were still some pandemic restrictions at WentworthInstitute of Technology in 2021; Instructor 1 delivered their ELEC3150 Section online whileInstructor 2 was in-person. It should be noted that this shows that CBG worked for both theonline and in-person versions of the course.This course has been taught multiple times by both Instructors in the traditional method beforethis study. This traditional method used both summative (e.g., lab
demand data and desired peakreduction (power capacity). The program is designed for educational purposes but can also havepractical use in sizing ESSs.* E-mail address: jelio@asu.edu (J. Elio).1. Introduction Reducing electricity demand is commonly seen as one of the most promising solutions tomitigating global climate change [1]. This is for good reason, since electricity productionconstituted 25% of greenhouse gas emissions in 2019, totaling nearly 1,625 million metric tonsof carbon dioxide in the United States [2]. When electricity consumers run consistently, powergeneration plants can run consistently which leads to their highest efficiency and lowest carbonemissions. To explain, baseload power generation plants typically operate
. Table 2: Basic information of the eight cohorts Maximum possible Number of Number of number of Average number students who students who did Class exercise submittals of submittals completed course not resubmit work 2018 Spring 12 7.4 19 11 2018 Fall 15 9.3 23 5 2019 Fall 23 8.3 19 9 2020 Spring 18 8.9 18 3 2020 Fall 23
within CPI’s curation, including a library’s mobile maker lab, a communitycollege’s summer camps, a tech company’s mentorship program, among other programs.Preliminary results are additionally promising. Recently, CPI researchers examined growth incomputer programming attitudes among middle school CPI users (N=610; MeanAge = 12.07years, SDAge = .77 years, %female = 37.2%; 68.3% Hispanic/Latinx, 16.3% Asian/AsianAmerican, 4.9% Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 4.7% White/European American, 3.5% AmericanIndian or Alaskan Native, 2.0% Black/African American, 20.1% Other category) enrolled ineither the 2017-2018 or 2018-2019 academic year in minority-serving schools 25 . Even whenaccounting for existing differences in students’ math attitudes, there was
, Machine Design, Renewable Energy and Additive Manufacturing. His current research interests include Robotics, CIM, Sustainable Manufacturing, Micro Machining, Additive Machining and Engineering & Technology Education. He has published several papers, in these areas, in various national & international conferences and journals. He has worked in heavy and light manufacturing industries manufacturing pumps, motors, and CNC machine tools in the areas of system design, production planning and control and manufacturing. Edinbarough also served in paramilitary forces and in the Indian Air Force. He is a Life Member of the ISTE, a senior life member of the IE (India), a member of the ASEE & SME, and a licensed