. 17, nos. 1-2, pp. 179-183, 1997.[18] A. Richardson, Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension, Journal of MentalImagery, vol. 1, pp. 109-126, 1977.[19] R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,Engineering Education, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 674-681, 1988.[20] B. A. Solomon and R.M. Felder. Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire, 1991. Online:http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html. [Accessed August 16, 2013]. [21] S. M. Montgomery, Addressing diverse learning styles through the use of multimedia,Frontiers in Education Conference, Proceedings, November 1995, Atlanta, GA, pp. 3a2.13 -3a2.21, 1995.[22] R. E. Mayer and L.J. Massa, Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive
hard or much different. After remote learning she gave us more options for assignments and projects to make it easier on us while keeping the same level of learning.”● “gave us many options on how this class was going to be taught … so most of our time in class was not just a typical lecture setting.”● “effectively used breakout rooms, understand how difficult it is for students during this time, adjusted classes based on our energy level, encourage[d] us to turn our videos on and engage, used Slack as a communication platform, and had us present via zoom.”References[1] L. A. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, “Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote
minority in the field of engineering.Prof. Joshua M. Hamel, Seattle UniversityDr. Claire Strebinger, Seattle UniversityDr. Gregory Mason, Seattle University Gregory S. Mason received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. de- gree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the University of Washington in 1992. He worked in a robotics lab for the Department of Defense for five years after receiving his M.S.M.E. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Seattle University, Seattle, WA. His research interests are controls system and the use
; Productivity Press, Norwalk (Connecticut). 8. Banerjee, J.; The Gap Management; Journal of Computer and Industrial Engineering; 1997, v. 33, n. 1 - 2, pp. 173 – 178. 9. Dewey, J.; Experience and Education (60th Anniversary edition); 1998; Delta, Kappa, Pi; West Lafayette (Indiana). 10. Kuhn, T. S.; The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Encyclopedia of Unified Sciences); 1962; University of Chicago Press. 11. Banerjee, J.; “Integration of Mechanical Properties of Materials in an Undergraduate Course on Manufacturing Processes for both Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Students”; ASEE Annual Convention ( virtual), June 2020.12. Reif, R.; Tech Day Presidential Welcome Speech;2014; Massachusetts
Dimensional View of Engineering Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, July 2008.13. M. Hynes, C. Mathis, S. Purzer, A. Rynearson & E. Siverling, “Systematic review of research in P-12 engineering education from 2000–2015.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1), 2017, pp. 453–46214. Fabien, B., Vereen, K. “Implementing a Freshman Engineering Design Experience at the University of Washington,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. 2017, 1343-1352. doi:10.4995/HEAD17.2017.560315. Cunningham, C. M., Engineering in Elementary STEM Education, Teachers College Press: New York, 2018
]. Available: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_833/201103 /t20110308_117376.html. [Accessed March 5, 2021].[4] W. Bastalich, “Knowledge Economy and Research Innovation,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 845-857, Sep. 2010.[5] D. Hawkes, (2016). “Why do a professional doctorate? Evidence from prospective EdD students,” International Journal of Continuing Education & Lifelong Learning, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 34-46, 2016.[6] O. Tavares, C. Sin, and D. Soares, “Building bridges between industry and academia: What is the profile of an industrial doctorate student,” in Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education, S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, and C. Sin Ed. Cham: Palgrave McMillan, 2020, pp
the study was limited to a single institution type, the use of PLTL in the introductoryengineering courses showed significant change on survey results and participant feedback isoverwhelmingly positive. The investigative team will continue to track participants’ currentmajor, mathematics progression, and overall academic progress during future terms and willdisseminate the results for future researchers to adapt to new studies serving different studentdemographics.AcknowledgementsThis paper is based on the work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1712008. All opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s).References 1. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory
. 102-116, 2018.[7] D. Cameron, L. Dromerick, J. Ahn, and A. Dromerick, “Executive/life coaching for first year medical students: a prospective study,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 19:163, 2019.[8] S. Green, A. Grant, and J. Rynsaardt, “Evidence Based Life Coaching for Senior High School Students: Building Hardiness and Hope,” in Coaching Researched: A Coaching Psychology Reader, J. Passmore and D. Tee, Ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2021, pp. 257- 268.[9] M. Devine, R. Meyers, and C. Houssemand, “How can coaching make a positive impact within an educational setting?” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 93, pp. 1382-1389, 2013.Devine, Meyers, and Houssemand.
5, we notice that Cluster 2’s Control score is higher than Control scores ofClusters 1 and 3. We can say with certainty that there is a difference in Control score betweenCluster 1 and Cluster 2. Nonetheless, the Control scores in Cluster 2 and 3 are almost the same.Therefore, when there is ambiguity in the value in the table, we can use bootstrap analysis tohelp us determine if there is a difference in the control variable between Cluster 2 and Cluster 3. ```{r} # We just want Cluster 2 & 3 control % filter(Cluster != 1) # Setting up the functions and constants B
level compared to the other twocategories. Such results can help university policymakers in the early identification of morevulnerable students and providing them with financial and academic supports to boost theirengagement with the university.References [1] Doug Shapiro, Afet Dundar, Faye Huie, Phoebe Khasiala Wakhungu, Ayesha Bhimdiwala, and Sean Eric Wilson. Completing college: A national view of student completion rates–fall 2012 cohort (signature report no. 16). National Student Clearinghouse, 2018. [2] Leila Zahedi, Stephanie J Lunn, S Pouyanfar, MS Ross, and MW Ohland. Leveraging machine learning techniques to analyze computing persistence in undergraduate programs. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
, H.-C. Tsai, and H.-L. Wu, “Effects of online procedural scaffolds and the timing of scaffolding provision on elementary Taiwanese students’ question-generation in a science class,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 416–433, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14742/ajet.197.[8] A. King, “Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 366–381, 1989, doi: 10.1016/0361- 476X(89)90022-2.[9] A. L. Brown and A. S. Palincsar, “Inducing Strategic Learning from Texts by Means of Informed, Self-Control Training. Technical Report No. 262,” Illinois Univ., Urbana. Center for the Study of Reading & Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, MA
. References1. Freeman, S., et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics | Council of Graduate Schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014. 111(23): p. 8410-8415.2. Prince, M., Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 2004. 93(3): p. 223-231.3. Chi, M.T.H., Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2009. 1(1): p. 73-105.4. Menekse, M., et al., Differentiated Overt Learning Activities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2013. 102(3): p. 346
, 1985.[3] F. Rogers, Senate Statement on PBS Funding, May 1, 1969.[4] B. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay Co Inc., 1956.[5] R. Brooks, J. Koh, S. Polsley, and T. Hammond. “Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment of a High School Classroom Pilot.” 10.1007/978-3-319-64239-0_9. In Tracy Hammond (Ed.), Frontiers in Pen and Touch – Impact of Pen and Touch Technology on Education (pp. 125-136). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017.[6] Cal State TEACH: Technology Enhancement Project, 2012.[7] L. Nilson and L. Goodson, Online Teaching at Its Best: Merging Instructional
individually during pandemic, instructor suggests that working independently has improved student performance.References [1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” Journal of engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005. [2] R. V. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory instruction in engineering education,” Global J. Eng. Educ, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 2007. [3] T. Kotulski and S. Murray, “The national engineering laboratory survey,” Labshare Project. December, 2010. [4] D. Cucinotta and M. Vanelli, “Who declares covid-19 a pandemic,” Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis, vol. 91, no. 1, p. 157, 2020. [5] J. J. Park, M. Park, K. Jackson, and G. Vanhoy
Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2017. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17-310. Arlington, VA. [2] Blanchard S, Judy J, Muller C, Crawford RH, Petrosino AJ, White CK, Lin FA, Wood KL. “Beyond Blackboards: Engaging Underserved Middle School Students in Engineering”, J Precoll Eng Educ Res. 2015;5(1):2 [3] Thomas SW., Campbell SW., Subramanyam MD., Ellerbrock CR., “Contemporary STEM Issues: Engineering Training of Pre-Service Teachers for Middle School STEM Curriculum Development (Evaluation)”, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [4] De
Through the Co-curriculum Paper presented at 2020 ASEE VirtualAnnual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--34891[2] Bland, L.C., S.M. Kusano, and A. Johri, Engineering Competitions as Pathways toDevelopment of Professional Engineering Skills. Proceedings of the American Society forEngineering Education Conference, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016.[3] Simmons, D.R., E.G. Creamer, and R. Yu, Involvement in Out-of-Class Activities: AMixed Research Synthesis Examining Outcomes with a Focus on Engineering Students,Journal of STEM Education. Vol. 18.2, pp. 10-16, April-June 2017.[4] Kusano, S. and A. Johri, Student Autonomy: Implications of Design-Based InformalLearning Experiences in Engineering, Proceedings of the American
toolavailable across the U.S. and internationally. Academic libraries can support their engineeringschools by providing the resources their students need to prepare them for a professionalengineering career.References[1] National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES), History. [Online]. Available: https://ncees.org/history/. [Accessed Nov. 14, 2020].[2] M.C. Loui, “Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94(4), pp. 383-390. Oct. 2005.[3] S. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, and W. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[4] S.M. Palmquist, “Professional practice: Teaching the
lab was effective, the sample size shouldbe expanded to 30 or more to represent a more significant population and reduce error. Inaddition to evaluating more students, the user experience can be improved with additionalexperimental data and enhanced graphics with moving images or changing images. This wouldincrease engagement and visual association, which would be beneficial when the virtual lab isacting as a pre-lab to a physical unit operations lab. However, this preliminary study shows thatvirtual labs can effectively assist students in understanding fundamental fluidization theories. 9References[1] S. U. Rahman, N. M. Tukur, and I. A. Khan, “PC-Based Teaching Tools for Fluid Mechanics
of Education and Practice, 2020, doi:10.7176/jep/11-20-13.[6] Sahu, Pradeep. “Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on Education and Mental Health of Students and Academic Staff.” Cureus vol. 12,4 e7541. 4 Apr. 2020, doi:10.7759/cureus.7541[7] Frederick F. Patacsil , Christine Lourrine S. Tablatin. "Exploring the importance of soft and hard skills as perceived by IT internship students and industry: a gap analysis." Journal of Technology and Science Education (2017).[8] Di Xu, Shanna Smith Jaggars, Jeffrey Fletcher & John E. Fink (2018) Are Community College Transfer Students “a Good Bet” for 4-Year Admissions? Comparing Academic and Labor-Market Outcomes
: College and postcollege outcomes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 629–654, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<629::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-8.[12] G. Orfield, P. Marin, S. M. Flores, and L. M. Garces, “Charting the future of college affirmative action: Legal victories, continuing attacks, and new research,” Los Angeles. CA: The Civil Rights Project at UCLA, 2007.[13] G. A. Dietz, E. D. McCray, and E. P. Douglas, “Critical theories for unmasking the personal and structural racialized experiences of engineers,” Jan. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 21, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10097748-critical-theories-unmasking- personal-structural
student experiencewith regard to retention in the first two years of study will not only lead to lower attrition ratesand a rise in general student satisfaction, but also encapsulate specific course features that otherprograms may utilize in their own retention models.References[1] K. Eagan, S. Hurtado, T. Figueroa, & B. Hughes. “Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions” Paper Prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2- and 4- Year STEM Degrees 2014 (May), 1–27.[2] M. Gibbons. “Engineering by the Numbers.” American Society for Engineering Education, 2010. Available at https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college- profiles
: 10.1007/s11469- 020-00356-3.[9] C. Son, S. Hegde, A. Smith, and X. Wang, “Effects of COVID-19 on College Students’ Mental Health in the United States: Interview Survey Study,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.2196/21279.[10] J. W. Creswell, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th Editio. Boston, Massachussetts: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012.[11] Z. L. Duraku and L. Hoxha, “The impact of COVID-19 on higher education: A study of interaction among students’ mental health, attitudes toward online learning, study skills, and changes in students’ life,” 2020.[12] IAU, The Impact of Covid-19 on Higher Education
enjoy increased functionality, including the ability to collect student responsesin-book and provide integrated feedback through the platform. Data will be collected on theefficacy of the live textbook on student experience in the course. It is expected that thisinnovative textbook will increase student efficiency and improve overall experience in theintroductory coding course.References[1] S. Freeman et al., “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, 2014, pp. 8410–8415., doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
| Section 1. Strategies for Community Change and Improvement: An Overview | Examples | Community Tool Box. [Online]. Available: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/promotion-strategies/overview/exampl e. [Accessed: 04-Mar-2021].[21] E. H. Spicer, Human problems in technological change: a casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1974.[22] M. C. Ramírez, J. Plazas, C. Torres, J. C. Silva, L. C. Caicedo, and M. A. González, “A Systemic Framework to Develop Sustainable Engineering Solutions in Rural Communities in Colombia,” Systemic Practice and Action Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 95–116, 2011.[23] S. Glade, C. Karter, and K. Pagilla, “Case Studies from a Community-Focused
," Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 55-66, 2003.[11] R. Felder, G. Felder, and E. Dietz, "The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 3-17, 2002.[12] S. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby and W. Sullivan, Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field, Jossey-Bass, 2009.[13] L. Thompson, Making a team: A guide for managers, New York: Prentice-Hall, 2018.[14] J. Lipnack and J. Stamps, “Virtual teams: The new way to work,” Strategy & Leadership, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 1999.
,” Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal. 7(1):13-22, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256298200700103[6] P.G. Koles, A. Stolfi, N.J. Borges, S. Nelson, D.X. Parmelee, “The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance,” Acad Med. Nov;85(11):1739-45, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52bed[7] E. Haase, B.N. Phan, H.R. Goldberg, “Molecules and Cells: Team-based and Multi- modal Learning Improves Comprehension and Increases Content Retention,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28685[8] M. Ahmed, B. Indurkhya, “Investigating cognitive holding power and equity in the flipped classroom,” Heliyon, 6(8), e04672
a collaboration betweenLouisiana Delta Community College (LDCC) and Louisiana Tech University (LA Tech), withpilot partner Bossier Parish School for Technology & Innovative Learning (BPSTIL), to expandinstrumentation workforce pathways for high school students in Louisiana. This material is basedupon work supported by the National Science Foundation's Advanced Technological EducationProgram under Grant No. 1801177. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.This paper presents a detailed account of the course mapping process; a final table of learningobjectives that meet LDCC dual enrollment and
, 2013.11. Bleske-Rechek, A., D. Lubinski, and C.P. Benbow, Meeting the educational needs of special populations: Advanced Placement's role in developing exceptional human capital. Psychological Science, 2004. 15(4): p. 217-224.12. Warne, R.T., G. Sonnert, and P.M. Sadler, The relationship between advanced placement mathematics courses and students’ STEM career interest. Educational Researcher, 2019. 48(2): p. 101-111.13. College Board, Government and Politics. 2008.14. Eight Heads of Washington-Area Private Schools, Opinion: Our schools will get rid of AP courses. Here’s why., in The Washington Post. 2018.15. Guo, S. and M.W. Fraser, Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Vol. 11
within ZOOM with breakout rooms.6. Teaching presence matters. Establishing and maintaining a teaching presence, which is important for student learning, should be woven through the fabric of class time. The structure of TBL provides many opportunities for teaching presence during each class time, without the need for the traditional lecture (in TBL as in flipped classrooms, the lecture is provided on the LMS and viewed before class time). For example, providing brief feedback regarding the readiness assurance quiz questions is an opportunity to provide insight into the concept(s) covered. During team development, which consists of an ice breaker question and a question related to “how to become a highly effective team,” each