, D. J., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas K. (1997). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. In J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education II (p/. 1-32). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society and Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. 2. Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and epistemology (A. Rosin, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original Work Published 1970) 3. Tokgöz, E., Tekalp S. B., Tekalp E. N., Tekalp H. A. (2020), Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of University Students’ Ability to Relate Calculus Knowledge to Function Graphs, 127th Annual ASEE
Annual Conference & Exposition.Lande, M. (2020, June). Learning Trajectories through Undergraduate Engineering Curricula andExperiences. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference.Lande, M., & Leifer, L. (2009, October). Student representations and conceptions of design andengineering. In 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-2). IEEE.Lande, M., & Liu, Y. (2019, June). Design Process Geometries: Shapes and LearningTrajectories of Engineering Students’ Design Process Concept Maps. In 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition.Mosborg, S, R Adams, R Kim, C Atman, J Turns & M Cardella (2005). Conceptions of theEngineering Design Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals.Proceedings of American
Comprehension with Video Grading," Computers in Education (CoED) Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 28-39, 2014.[4] W. Schilling, "Assessing the effectiveness of video feedback in the computing field," in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oklahoma City, 2013.[5] W. Schilling, "Analyzing the impact of asynchronous multimedia feedback on novice computer programmers," in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference , El Paso, 2015.[6] R. Kay and T. Bahula, "A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON VIDEO FEEDBACK USED IN HIGHER EDUCATION," in Edulearn20 Proceedings, Online, 2020.[7] S. Ash, P. Clayton and M. Atkinson, "Integrating Reflection and Assessment to Capture and Improve Student Learning
the game would benefit from collaborationwith educators who can provide insights to a young student’s mind. Moving forward, the authors areworking with more teachers, especially those who do not have a background in aerospace, to obtainfeedback. Hopefully, approvals will be granted soon to allow students playing the game to be surveyed toobtain a richer set of feedback.AcknowledgementsSupport for this project was graciously provided by NSF project REvolutionizing Diversity OfEngineering (REDO-E) (project 1730693).References[1] Data USA: Aerospace Engineers. 2018.[2] Elam, M. E., Donham, B. L., & Soloman, S. R. (2012). An engineering summer program forunderrepresented students from rural school districts. Journal of STEM Education
Dynamics, pp. 449–464, 1998.[3] L. Carlson and J. F. Sullivan, “The integrated teaching and learning program: A pioneering learning environment for 21st century engineering education,” Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Conference: Realizing the New Paaradigm for Engineering Education, pp. 110–120, June 1998.[4] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, 1984, vol. 1.[5] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? a review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, pp. 223–232, 2004.[6] R. L. Matz, E. D. Rothman, J. S. Krajcik, and M. M. B. Holl, “Concurrent enrollment in lecture and laboratory enhances student performance and retention,” Journal of
Approaches of TeachersCommunicating Computational Thinking and Engineering Design to First Grade Students(RTP).” in 126th Annual Conference and Exposition ASEE, 2019.[3] J. Moon, J. Do, D. Lee, and G. W. Choi, "A conceptual framework for teachingcomputational thinking in personalized OERs," Smart Learning Environments, vol. 7, no. 1, Dec.2020, doi: 10.1186/s40561-019-0108-z.[4] J. M. Wing, "Computational thinking benefits society," 40th Anniversary Blog of SocialIssues in Computing 2014, vol. 26. 2014, Accessed: Mar. 07, 2021. [Online]. Available:http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/index.html%3Fp=279.html.[5] S. Grover and R. Pea, "Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field,"Educational Researcher, vol. 42, no. 1. pp. 38–43
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Demographic Leadership –A First of its Kind Diversity Leadership Online Course in a Tier-1 University Doctorate Degree ProgramAbstractThis first course in a professional doctorate degree program called the Doctorate of Technology(DTECH) on demographic leadership at a tier 1 university was premised on years of research,practice, and scholarship. The scholarship was conducted by asking the question “Why don’tyou like me?”“Why don’t you like me?” as a research question, is not about the author(s) individually, butabout each of us as individuals. It is about all of us. The question is really “why don’t
the data and survey the students. We would like to investigate whether students were morelikely to see the relevance of chemistry knowledge in their engineering work after completingthe individual projects in addition to the design challenge.More broadly, we will continue to study the impacts of redesigning course elements, both in thiscourse and in others, as our College continues its initiative to incorporate design and computingacross the curriculum.References[1] K. Goodman and S. T. Frezza, “Finding Möjligheter: Creativity and ill-structured problems,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28358.[2] M. Somerville et al., “The Olin curriculum: thinking toward the future
. Dennen, V.P., Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2004. 2(2004): p. 813-828.5. Marsh, H.W., The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational psychology, 1990. 82(4): p. 623.6. Beier, M.E., L.M. Miller, and S. Wang, Science games and the development of scientific possible selves. Cultural studies of science education, 2012. 7(4): p. 963- 978.
. 2, pp. 27–46, 2002.[6] S. Hurtado, M. Eagan, M. Tran, C. Newman, M. Chang, and P. Velasco, “‘We DoScience Here’: Underrepresented Students’ Interactions with Faculty in Different CollegeContexts,” The Journal of social issues, vol. 67, pp. 553–579, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01714.x.[7] C. J, “STEM with Family Engagement.”https://www.nsba.org:443/Perspectives/2019/STEM-Family-Engagement (accessed Mar. 08,2021).[8] T. Roberts et al., “Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in asummer informal learning experience,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 5, Sep.2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4.[9] J. Hess, B. Sorge, and C. Feldhaus, “The Efficacy of Project Lead the Way: A
.x[11] Shymansky, J.A., Hedges, L.V. and Woodworth, G. (1990), A reassessment of the effects ofinquiry‐based science curricula of the 60's on student performance. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 27: 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270205.[12] Hoyt, R.M. and Clemence, S.P. (1989). Uplift Capacity of Helical Anchors in Soil, InProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and FoundationEngineering, Vol. 2, pp. 1019-1022.[13] Hansson, Sven Ove and Grüne-Yanoff, Till, "Preferences", The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =.[14] National Society of Professional Engineers. “History of the Code of Ethics for Engineers,”https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code
Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 162-177, 2000/12/01 2000, doi: 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782307.[2] G. M. Rafique, K. Mahmood, N. F. Warraich, and S. U. Rehman, "Readiness for Online Learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of Pakistani LIS students," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47, no. 3, p. 102346, 2021/05/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102346.[3] AUTODESK. "Autocad." https://www.autodesk.com/education/home (accessed.[4] F. Shines. "Distance learning and student services." https://dlss.flvc.org/qm-about (accessed 2/2/2021, 2021).[5] Q. Matters. "Quality Matter." https://www.qualitymatters.org/ (accessed.[6] U. o. F. O. o. T. Excellence. "UF's pathway to
References[1] L. Starkey, M. Shonfeld, S. Prestridge, and M. G. Cervera, “Special issue: COVID-19 and therole of technology and pedagogy on school education during a pandemic INTRODUCTION,”doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2021.1866838.[2] W. Wagiran et al, "Online learning of mechanical engineering subject in the COVID-19 era:strategy, platform and media," Journal of Physics. Conference Series, vol. 1700, (1), 2020.[3] Watermeyer et al, "COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: afflictions andaffordances of emergency online migration," Higher Education, vol. 81, (3), pp. 623-641,2021;2020;.[4] Widarto et al, "Explanatory of learning models and vocational teacher perceptions ofmechanical engineering during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Physics
computational tools heavily (theclass used in this research was “Computational Tools”), will be another factor that needs to betraced in order to understand if learning with interactive books truly improves students’comprehension and applications ability. Being able to apply what is learned later in theiracademic career is a strong indicator of true mastery of a subject. 8Bibliography 1. Edgcomb, A., Vahid, F., Ferguson, R., Lysecky, R., and Lysecky, S., Getting students to earnestly do reading, studying, and homework in an introductory programming class SIGCSE ’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical
. Talesnick, B. Amadei, and T. Tal, “Integrating Sustainable Development into a Service-Learning Engineering Course,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 140, no. 1, p. 05013001, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000169.[6] D. Bourn and I. Neal, “The Global Engineer: Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers,” Engineers Against Poverty/Development Education Research Centre, 2008.[7] A. A. Stukas, E. G. Clary, and M. Snyder, “Service Learning: Who Benefits and Why,” Social Policy Report, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–23, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2379- 3988.1999.tb00039.x.[8] J.-L. Bertrand-Krajewski, S. Barraud, and B. Chocat, “Need for improved methodologies and measurements for sustainable
college students,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 75, pp. 249- 284, May/June 2004.[2] E. Warburton, R. Bugarin, and A. Nunez, “Bridging the gap: Academic preparation and post- secondary success of first-generation students,” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. NCES Report 2001-153, 2001.[3] S. Spencer, C. Steele, and D. Quinn, “Stereotype threat and women's math performance,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 4-28, Jan. 1999.[4] N. Fitzallen and R. Natalie, “Outcomes for Engineering Students Delivering a STEM Education and Outreach Programme,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 632–643, Nov. 2017.[5] R. Tillinghast
, all four teams ordered the parts and started working onthe projects in the second and third weeks of July. Since the MTSU campus was closed and theCOVID-19 cases surged in the summer, the students collaborated remotely using slack, Zoom,text messages, Discord, etc. Because the project involved writing code, some students also set upGitHub repositories in order to collaborate and perform version control. The faculty mentorshelped the students along the way by holding regularly status meetings and answering theirquestions.4. Project OutcomesAll four teams completed their projects by the end of July, and the last week was mostly used totinker and dabble. A final report detailing the design and outcomes was submitted by each team.Team #3’s work
day” for this question.” Respondents who chose something other than “almost every day” for thisresponse were coded as having failed the attention filter.7 The project is supported by funding from the National Science Foundation: “Collaborative Research: A Study ofInteractional, Organizational and Professional Mechanisms of Disadvantage in the Underrepresented andMarginalized STEM Workforce” (#HRD 1535385, 1665117). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.A question in both the ASEE-DIS and SIS surveys asked respondents whether they had any ofthe following (they could mark all that apply): “vison
largest manufacturer, is on the verge of using 3- D printing to make jet parts. MIT Technology Review,” Available Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/513716/additive-manufacturing/.[5] R. Agarwala and R. A. Chin, “Facilitating additive manufacturing engagement and outreach,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24086.
, Tseng, & Akarasriworn, 2013). Furthermore, several studiesfound that collaboration improves students’ performance by developing higher order-thinkingwhen students discuss their ideas in the group (Chung, 1998; S. D. Johnson & Chung, 1999;Mergendoller, Bellisimo, & Maxwell, 2000). Students will more engaged in learning when theyfeel they are an accepted group member (Willms, 2003). For example, girls have positiveperceptions about team processes when they are in a group comprised of other girls. As shown inprior research on SEEK, girls felt less positive about their team processes and were less engagedwhen they were in a co-ed team (Beauchamp, Edwards, Knight, & Lee, 2019). Thus, in additionto focusing on the outcomes (i.e
the other members of Senior Design Team 1078 at University of Texas at Dallas,Maria Valdez, Casey Hatfield, Jieun Kim, Taylor Beach, and Nicholas Swatchick for building thiseducation tool.Special thank you for the support from the Control Systems Department at University of Texas atDallas. References1. B. Balamuralithara and P. Woods, "Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab," in Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Wiley Online Library, 2008, pp. 108-118.2. D. Cook, S. Hamstra, B. Zendejas, J. Szostek, A. Wang, P. Erwin and R. Hatala, "Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education
of education. 5. The resuction in the number of schools and programs will facilitate the government s future stricter control and deeper involvement in 1 higher education.Another, ususally undiscussed objective that the government would like toachieve is by the application of these standards gently direct those schoolsunable to meet them, away from engineering towards technician and crafts-men educ·ation for which the need is much greater than for engineers. This"forced alternative" may appeal to the school owners once they see thewriting on the wall. This will however create other problems as technician 165education systems are even more capital intensive than those for enginee
.), Lessons Learned: Practical Advice For the Teaching ofPsychology (pp. 57-60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.Reid, K.J., & Gwinn, S. (1997). Administration and Results of Extra Credit Projects. AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Milwaukee, WI: Session1275.Wilder, D.A., Flood, W.A., & Stromsnes, W., (2001). The Use of Random Extra Credit Quizzesto Increase Student Attendance, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(2), 117-120.Wilson, M.L. (2002). Evidence that Extra Credit Assignments Induce Moral Hazard. AtlanticEconomic Journal, 30, 97. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference AppendixExtra
Engineering Education,Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 113-121, 2003.12- Chickering, A. W. and Gamson, Z. F., “ Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice inUndergraduate Education”, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 47, pp. 13-25, 1991.13- Bjorklund, S. A., Parente, J. M. and Sathianathan, D., “Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback onGains in Student Skills”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 53-160, 2004.14- Mazur, E. Interactive Teaching Video and Book, Pearson Prentice Hall, ISBN: 0-13-158030-2, 200715-Yearwood, D., from North Dakota University, Lecture at the University of St-Thomas, August 201016- McGraw Hill “Connect” web based system: http://mpss.mhhe.com/connectlinks.php.17- Tegrity, Video Capture system by McGraw Hill in
evaluated through this course. The evaluation results for first twosemesters are also presented. Based on the assessment results it was observed that improvementis needed to increase the ability of students to conduct experiments and critically analyze andinterpret data.References (1) Ohland, M.W., R.A. Layton, M.L. Loughry, A.G. , E B A P E R , J E E , 94(3), J 2005, . 319-326. (2) O , M. ., M.L. L , R.L. C , A.G. , D P E I is Si ,R , V P A S E E A Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2004
achievement, Oxford: Routledge, 2009 [5.] Henri, F., Computer conferencing and content analysis; A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp.115-136); New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992 [6.] Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T., Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, London: Prentice Hall Int., pp.1017−1044, 1996 [7.] Krathwohl D.R. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview; Theory into Practice, vol.41, pp.212−218, 2002 [8.] Kunen S., Cohen R., and Solman R. A levels-of-processing analysis of Bloom's Taxonomy; Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.73, pp.202−211, 1981 [9
://cvt.engin.umich.edu/ 4) Consortium for Nonproliferation Enabling Technologies (CNEC), https://cnec.ncsu.edu/ 5) Nuclear Science and Security Consortium (NSSC), https://nssc.berkeley.edu/AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy / National NuclearSecurity Administration under Award Number(s) DE-NA0003921.This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, byaccepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains anonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published formof this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US
the activities was on K-8 curriculum and waysthe CS concepts can be enacted with students via plugged and unplugged lessons. Thecurriculum focus also included numerous discussions about how to adapt provided curriculum tomake it appropriate for students with varied background experiences. During the last twoSaturdays for Cohort 1 (March/April 2020) and then for all of Cohort 2’s Saturdays (fall2020/spring 2021) an additional focus became discussing how to enact CS lessons in remotelearning environments, including asynchronously. Initially workshops were held in person,before COVID-19 pandemic required shifting to the online Zoom conferencing platform. Theworkshops were designed to be very interactive and discussion-based, with only
/. 1019. Somerville, M.H., Goldberg, D. E., Kerns, S. E. & Korte, R. (2010, October). A war of words: Using sticky language to effect change in engineering education. 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE: T3B-1-T38-2.20. Turley, J. (1981, August). Mobilization manpower: A credible force or an empty promise? Military Review, 2012.21. U.S. Continental Army Command. (1973, April 5). CONARC soft skills training conference. Proceedings of a conference conducted at the Air Defense School, 12-13 December 1972.22. Wang, X., Bendle, N.T., Mai, F. & Cotte, J. (2015). The Journal of Consumer Research at 40: A Historical Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 5-18.23. Whitmore, P.C. (1972, December). What are soft