Conference Session

Ethics and Technology

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Joseph Frey, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez; Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Marcel J. Castro-Sitiriche, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez; Fatima Zevallos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez; Denisse Echevarria, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Puerto Rico Seismic Network. She is currently employed as an undergraduate Research Assistant with the Graduate Research and Education for Appro- priate Technology: Inspiring Direct Engagement and Agency (GREAT IDEA) project. Zevallos is a native of Port au Prince, Haiti, and is fluent in Haitian Creole, French, English, and Spanish. She plans to return back to her hometown to share and apply her scientific knowledge in seismology.Denisse Echevarria , University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez Denisse Echevarria is a junior in mechanical engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez. Echevarria is currently employed as an Undergraduate Research Assistant with the Graduate Research and Education for Appropriate

Conference Session

Potpourri of First-Year Issues

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rod Paton, University of Auckland; Chris Smaill, University of Auckland; Gerard Rowe, University of Auckland

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

don’tconcentrate that much. I go to the lectures and they go through things once and they gothrough it pretty fast. Not like high-school. Where they take one week to explain stuff youcan get it already. And you can get good results. So like I wasn’t that good last semester and Iam going to catch up. I don’t have a plan yet. But I just have to do all the work that they giveus. The work they give us today I will have to do it tonight.” The above comments reflect theimportance of students viewing themselves as their own teachers, building on and extendingtheir pre-existing knowledge, skills and approaches.Peer AssessmentAnother ‘way into’ the subject was through effective feedback from formative assessment. In

Conference Session

Knowing our Students, Faculty, and Profession

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Winters, Virginia Tech; Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Ruth Streveler, Purdue Universtiy

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

4 4 8 2 9 5 3 3 4 2 Antagonistic (A) 1 4 4 4 0 5 1 3 2 3 4 2 Overall Trend S S/A A A S/N A N/A N/A S S A S Positive to Positive to Neutral to Positive to Negative to Summary Over Time Negative Negative Positive 1 Anna experiences extreme positive and negative experiences associated with her plans to change departments making her interview difficult to rate overall. Therefore, her second year interview is

Conference Session

POTPOURRI

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Information Systems

Conference Session

Build Diversity in Engineering Graduate Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiffany Simon, Columbia University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Conference Session

Administering First-Year Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Russell Korte, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; David Goldberg, University of Illinois, Urbana

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

afrequency and time determined by their members.iCheckpoint and iExpoThe iCheckpoint meeting was held at midterm (14 October 2009). After a box-dinner meal, thewhole community assembled briefly and then was broken into two breakout presentationsessions where the teams presented their organization, plans, and progress regarding (1) identityand social networking, academics and advising and (2) the world of work and service. TheiTeams conducted various social and academic events. For example there were skating parties,movie nights, including a gathering to watch TED.com presentations, trips to corporate sponsors,travel to Silicon Valley conferences, international service projects, helping with Habitat forHumanity projects, and more.The iExpo meeting

Conference Session

Nuts and Bolts of Cooperative Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

GPA greater than 3.0 and two students with a cumulative GPA lessthan 3.0. The interview protocol asked students about their short- and long-term career andeducational plans, confidence in solving ill-structured and well-structured problems, problem-solving experience, learning experience, and their development of problem-solving skills. Aspart of the protocol, students were asked to describe how they would solve two think-aloudproblems (a well-structured and ill-structured problem) as well as their approaches to problemssolving. All student names in this paper have been changed to pseudonyms.Findings A comparison of the responses of students with co-op or internship experiences andstudents without these experiences revealed

Conference Session

Knowing our Students, Faculty, and Profession

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Holsapple, University of Michigan; Donald Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University; Janel Sutkus, Carnegie Mellon University; Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan; Kelley Walczak, University of Michigan; Trevor Harding, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

BME Laboratory and Project Experiences

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Estefania Alvarez, Clemson University; Steven Saville, Clemson University; O. Thompson Mefford, Clemson University; John DesJardins, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

, a new „abstract‟ format was implemented in orderto incorporate a writing style and inquiry-based approach that will help the student in theirengineering careers.8 The design and planning of this course was based to meet the ABETEC2000 criteria. The foundation for the use of this criteria was to correlate and promote theundergraduate experience to be similar to other courses that have a similar set-up of a laboratoryclass that is mainly used to strengthen the concepts and principles learned in the lecture. Amongthe criteria met, this course included: the application of knowledge of math, science andengineering; the design and execution of experiments and measurements, analysis, andinterpretation of data from living systems; the ability to

Conference Session

Mentoring First Year Students

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan Budny, University of Pittsburgh; Alaine Allen, University of Pittsburgh; Jeremy Tartt, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

], thus, the freshman program has developedprocedures within our courses that establish an environment that reinforces the existing studentsupport system.ACADEMIC TRANSITIONSThe final transition that many engineering students encounter is within the academic milieu,which is often compounded by the additional challenges these changes elicit. As a studentmoves from high school to college he/she is channeled through the high school highly structureddaily schedule of planned activities. Upon entering college, the same student is now in charge ofcreating and implementing their own schedule that is typically different each day, may includenight classes, and also has free time throughout the day. In addition to time management, otherchanges that

Conference Session

Innovations in the ChE Laboratory

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Henry Lamb; David Ollis

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Paper Session

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Glenn Ellis; Susannah Howe; Donna Riley

deal of technical material. • Include More Positive Cases, to address concerns about ethics being discouraging or frightening. • Provide more structural frameworks/Analytical Tools to support case study work.IV. Curriculum DescriptionThe faculty had already begun working on many of the issues that arose in the focus groups,which served to reinforce much of our own efforts in this area. We have developed a vision foran integrated curriculum, in which structural frameworks for ethical analysis are taught in thefirst year, and revisited in several core courses and advanced electives. This plan is discussedbelow, in the typical order in which students might take the courses.A. Design-Based Introduction to Engineering.The first

Conference Session

Retention: Keeping the Women Students

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Rose Marra; Cherith Moore; Mieke Schuurman; Barbara Bogue

analysistogether with the plans and actions already under way to strengthen and add to our current resultsprovide a strong evidence that this instrument will be a useful tool for WIE directors to 1) trackthe progress of their students on important factors that impact the success of women studyingengineering and 2) provide data essential for understanding the effectiveness of the activitiesbeing offered at each institution. Page 9.233.15Proceedings

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Steven Beyerlein; Denny Davis; Yi Min Huang; Larry McKenzie; Michael Trevisan

the capstone design course; approximatelyone half of these outcomes (b, h, j, and i) are assessed significantly less than believed possible. Thedisparity between actual and potential assessment of outcomes may reflect early stages ofmodification. These findings suggest a lack of preparedness among faculty to effectively developand manage assessments of some of these outcomes. Many respondents commented on the surveythat they were in the process of revising, or planning an extensive revision of, their senior designprogram outcomes and associated assessment instruments.Confusion Surrounding Criterion 4. Fifty percent (50%) of the design constraint considerations (c, g,d, and h) were reported as being appropriate for assessment in capstone

Conference Session

Best of Computers in Education Division

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University; Melanie M. Cooper, Michigan State University; Kevin C. Haudek, Michigan State University; Jennifer Julia Kaplan, University of Georgia, Department of Statistics; Jennifer K. Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Paula P. Lemons, University of Georgia; Carl T. Lira, Michigan State University; John E. Merrill, Michigan State University, Biological Sciences Program; Ross Nehm, Stony Brook University; Luanna B. Prevost, University of South Florida; Michelle Kathleen Smith; Maryanne Sydlik, Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. Standard quantitative analysis methods will be used for survey and systematic observationdata; appropriate qualitative methods will be used for interview and general observations. Theevaluation staff will prepare data collection instruments and procedures, gather data, compile andanalyze data, and prepare reports. Evaluators will serve on the project management team. Page 24.565.13Figure 5: Evaluation Plan Logic Model4.5 Goal: Lay the foundation for sustainability There are opportunities for the application of these techniques to on-line and other systemswith which students interact directly. The current enthusiasm for Massively Open On

Conference Session

Nanotechnology

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Yi Kong, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

create MATLAB layouts of all their GUIs and accompanying flowcharts that explain the needed 6 X coding. This is the last submission before the coding of their X X actual GUIs begins. GUI Beta 1.0: Teams begin coding all of the content they 7 X have planned in previous milestones. X 8 X GUI Beta 2.0: Teams update their GUIs. X X GUI Final: Teams finalize their GUIs and executive 9 X summary

Conference Session

Laboratory Experiences with Signal Processing and Controls

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University (Tech.); Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Tech.); Radian G. Belu, Drexel University (Tech.)

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

for all the BSET majors. The course focuses on planning, development, andimplementation of an engineering design project, which includes formal report writing, projectdocumentation, group presentations, and project demonstrations. The goal of these courses is todemonstrate the ability to manage a major project involving the design and implementation ofproducts with a mixture of electrical and mechanical elements as a member of a productinnovation and/or development team. In these project-based courses, the students are expected toeffectively manage their time and team efforts to produce a working prototype of a product inthree ten-week quarters. Progress and formal reports, and oral presentations constitute integralcomponents of this course

Conference Session

Student Learning, Problem Solving, & Critical Thinking 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan M. Hicks, University of Florida; Amy Elizabeth Bumbaco, University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

critical thinking skills of minority engineering students: An exploratory study. J. Negro Educ. 437–453 (1995).122. Vogt, C. M. Faculty as a Critical Juncture in Student Retention and Performance in Engineering Programs. J. Eng. Educ. 97, 27–36 (2008).123. Michael, K. You talkin’ to me? Ieee Technol. Soc. Mag. 31, 5–U4 (2012).124. Socha, D., Razmov, V. & Davis, E. Teaching reflective skills in an engineering course. in Proc. 2003 Asee Conf. (2003).125. Blockley, D. I. Engineering from reflective practice. Res. Eng. Des. 4, 13–22 (1992).126. Rittel, H. W. & Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973).127. Pierce, C. et al. ‘Assessment of Environments for Fostering Effective Critical

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sigrid Berka, University of Rhode Island; Walter von Reinhart

Tagged Divisions

International

 Familiarization with the tumbling press, especially programming and control (seek assistance from respective members of staff)  Planning of practical experiments, experimental approach and materials  Conduct experiments  Documentation of fiber orientation by means of destructive and non-destructive testing  Continuous documentation (images and video)  Final written documentation (10 pages in German)  Presentation (15 minutes in German)Benefits for and beyond Student Gains Page 24.777.9The right match between a student’s major and the focus of the research institute can beespecially valuable if the research project

Conference Session

CAD Assessments, Trends and Applications

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Chirag Patel; David Joseph Tortoriello; Justin Baldacci, ASME Northeastern chapter; Jeffrey Speroni

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

, because we learned from students who have been on co-op and done SolidWorksdrawings for companies before. Their experience shone through and made everything wedid feel relevant and important. Especially the work with drawings and designing formanufacturability.”These comments are important in the sense they will help drive future upper-classmembers of ASME to continue the service to their fellow students providing themadditional access and training to a valuable engineering tool. In addition to and possiblemore importantly, they are providing first-hand knowledge of what to expect on their firstco-op.In the future, the undergraduate teaching assistants plan to refine and modify the modulesbases on the comments received from the assessment. Issues

Conference Session

Collaborations Between Engineering/Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Charles Feldhaus

Conference Session

Writing and Communication II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

John Anderson; Jeanine Casler; Bugrahan Yalvac; H. David Smith; Gulnur Birol; John Troy; Penny Hirsch

Conference Session

Teaching Design

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Goff; Jeffrey Connor; Jean Kampe

Page 10.631.2 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationsemester to the next (so we can envision hands-on implementation plans within these rooms).The classrooms are wide and shallow, and they are each currently furnished with three longtables that run nearly the width of the rooms, hence providing three rows per classroom. Seatsare individual stackable chairs that can be moved as needed. With 32 students per section, andusually four students per team for the hands-on activities, we can accommodate all sections ofthe course by providing the four classrooms each with eight sets of the needed

Conference Session

Undergraduate Research & New Directions

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Georgiopoulos

within the field ofMachine Learning, one of them at the Masters level in the field of communications). One ofthem chose to work in the industry and he has plans of enrolling at the Masters program at UCFwhen the opportunity arises. The last undergraduate student was an Army Officer and he wentback to his home base after graduating with a B.S. degree in the Spring of 2004. There were alsotwo graduate students in the CTML-II class that they are continuing to pursue their graduatestudies at UCF.6. Summary and ConclusionsWe have reported in this effort some of the work conducted towards the satisfaction of some ofthe deliverables of a funded NSF project entitled “Advances in Machine Learning forEngineering Education”. Our focus in this paper has

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research and Assessment I

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Frederick Berry; Patricia Carlson

was implemented in thecourse appears in Addendum A.Offered in the spring quarter (from 5 January to 21 May) of 2004, ECE 362 consisted of twosections, for a total of 55 students (12 women and 43 men). Both sections had the sameinstructor. In the college bulletin, the course is described as: System engineering, team projectinvolving conception, design specifications, conceptual design, scheduling, project management,business plan, market survey, and budgeting that culminates in a written proposal and oralpresentation requesting funds for development of a product.During the 10-week quarter, all students participated in six major CPR sessions. Table C givesadditional information on these writing assignments. Each is relatively standard in

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Computer Engineering Technology

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Dwight Egbert; Dave Williams

the enrollment was finalized at the start of instruction, a meeting washeld of all students enrolled and a mutually agreeable class schedule was devised. The smallenrollment in the pioneer offering of the course made this a viable plan of action. However, withlarger enrollments, establishing a set schedule in advance may be preferable.Western’s engineering curriculum is fully articulated to the College of Engineering at theUniversity of Nevada, Reno (UNR).3 Most notably, Western’s Computer Science classes haveadopted many of the instructional modules produced by the Combined Research-CurriculumDevelopment program in Computer Vision at UNR.4 These C++ instructional tools permitintroductory and intermediate programming students (CS1 and CS2) to

Conference Session

ECE Capstone and Engineering Practice

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Baladi; P. David Fisher

to the making of a profit and the turnover of good product. Time tomarket is constantly getting more and more difficult to meet as competition in the embeddedcomputer realm increases with more demand.Hierarchical Design ProcessThe design process of an embedded computer system will ultimately make or break a design. Forexample, the design process will affect the time-to-market, the reliability of the design, and theability to re-use portions product (IP) previously designed and tested. There are severalcomponents necessary to a successful design cycle. Organization of the design steps comes first.It should be easily understandable from many other life experiences that a successful design isone that is planned well. When designing a system of

Conference Session

Learning & Teaching Issues

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Kay C. Dee

Page 9.1045.7 Table 1, Continued. Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Helpful outside Tried to find Interested in Evaluated The course Provided The homework The text was: The The amount of the classroom out if material teaching and performance increased frequent was carefully instructor’s work was: was students accurately / knowledge, feedback planned / peformance understood fairly

Conference Session

Faculty Reward System Reform

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Stanford Thomas; Donald Keating

Conference Session

Technological Literacy I

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Robinson; M. Sami Fadali; Ann-Marie Vollstedt; Eric Wang

more creative because of the materials they are able to work with15.5. I don’t think so. All students can benefit from such a curriculum. A richer curriculum might help make up for the lack of outside experiences that more affluent children have.6. I did not use the 5E Model in a direct fashion. Most of the instruction was informal with small groups and one on one coaching and writing 5E Model lesson plans did not work well with Page 9.914.5 this. The exploration part of the 5E model fitted in with inquiry and problem solving when Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual