&Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.Budny, D., LeBold, W., & Bjedov, G. (1998). Assessment of the Impact of FreshmanEngineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 405-411.Chamberlain, J. Benson, L. & Crockett, E. (2008). Work in progress - first year engineeringstudent responses on exit surveys as indicators of program effectiveness. Paper presented at the38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY.Meyers, K. (2016). A Course to Promote Informed Selection of an Engineering Major Using aPartially Flipped Classroom Model. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research,17(3), 14-21.Zahorian, S., Elmore, M., & Temkin, K.J. (2013). Factors that Influence Engineering Freshmanin Choosing Their
and organize and facilitate ongoing research on retention. Ms. Bego is a registered professional mechanical engineer in New York State.Mr. Il Young Barrow, University of Louisville IL Young Barrow is the QEP specialist for assessment at the University of Louisville. He specializes in knowledge around national assessment instruments (e.g. NSSE, CIRP, CAAP), assessment of student learning outcomes, retention studies, and various data analyses related to student success. IL also has wide-ranging experiences in undergraduate teaching, academic advising, and graduate admissions and student services.Dr. Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the
FE Exam had student G.P.A.’s that were similar over all thesame years as shown in Table 3, and small changes in these do not seem to correlate with passrates. Subject areas that are typically covered in the 2000 level course are Thermodynamics,Fluid Dynamics, Heat Transfer, Statics, Dynamics, Materials, Mechanics of Materials,Engineering Economics, and Machine Design. For these reasons, we believe that the changesassociated with preparation for the 2015/2016 year affected the pass rate, and not the quality ofour students.Table 1: Overall pass rates of the Sophomore Assessment exam for the past four years. Year Number of Examinees Total Exam Average Pass Rate 2013 40 65% ± 9
science properties, including elastic modulus, strain, displacement, stress, yield, anderrors. The “Theory” section gives the students the opportunity to use the equation editor and toapply a general and consistent way to reference the equation(s) in the body of text. Similarlearning objectives are on adding a figure or drawing a new one using the drawing editor. The“Results and Discussion” section offers the students the opportunity to learn about datamanipulation and presentation, both in form of tables and graphs. Finally, the students learn howto refer and incorporate the necessary references.Two projects are usually assigned during this section. In the first one, the students receive anexample of a lab report without equations, figures
the blocking and tackling of process creation. The difficulty,however, comes during the process completion step of assigning resources. During this activity,true cross-discipline collaboration must occur. The resultant process flow may very well be apermutation with inefficiencies and additional costs if cultural and emotional considerationsmaterialize.While the above discussion provides meaningful insight into defining distance education as aprocess, and provides a methodology to do so, an area for further research would be to surveyseveral comparable universities to determine their peer organizational structures andsubsequently validate the methodology proposed above.References1 Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbec, E., Yilmazel, S., et al. (2015
Hydraulics Safety QuestionsBe able to identify the fundamental parts of a hydraulic system and safety issues relating tohydraulicsYou will explore some of the safety issues associated with hydraulic systems and the fluids usedin them.QUESTION 1) Have you ever worked with hydraulic systems within a as a professionprofessional career?Yes_____ No_____IF yes, how long and on which system:3 years 1~3 years < 1 year NoneQUESTION 2) Have you received any training on safety of hydraulic systems?Yes_____ No_____If yes, what was the format? (workshop, online training, etc.)QUESTION 3) List hazard(s) associated with the use of hydraulic systems.QUESTION 4) What are the general safety procedures for working on hydraulic
learned in previous courses into a realsystem integration project. This interaction would provide a deeper level of assessment of thestudent competencies related to control systems, material handling, industrial robots, andsystems integration within the modern manufacturing environment.References [1] Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., Palmer, B., & Luft, S. (2014). Why Problem-Based Learning Works: Theoretical Foundations. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3-4), 221–238. [2] Schwering, R. E. (2015). Optimizing Learning in Project-Based Capstone Courses. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19(1), 90–104. [3] Stevenson, W. J. (2015). Operations Management, (12th). New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill. [4
workforce threaten US economic leadership?. Innovation policy and the economy, 6, 123-157. 2. Douglass, J. A. and Edelstein, R. (2009). The Global Competition for Talent, The Rapidly Changing Market for International Students and the Need for a Strategic Approach in the US. Center for Studies in Higher Education.3. Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T. and Haghighi, S.(2012). Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes, International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 425– 435.4. Roberts E.B. and Eesley C., (2009) Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT – an Updated Report. http://entrepreneurship.mit.edu/article/entrepreneurial-impact-role-mit.5. Shartrand, A., et al. (2010
Rubble” (by S. Pfatteicher)2 Reliability)Risk and Week 3 Lecture 3 on risk assessment, Reflection on lecturereliability including nature of probabilistic risk Assignment on Failure assessment (PRA); case studies Modes, Effects and involving Challenger, World Trade Criticality Analysis Center, etc. Readings from “Lessons Amid the Rubble”Causes of Weeks 4- Lecture 4, parts 1-3, on causes of Reflections on lectures;failure and 6 engineering failure (including Directed reflection onfailure
contour recovery from corneoscleral indentation. Journal of biomechanical engineering 132, 071010, doi:10.1115/1.4001256 (2010).6 Gsellman, L. & Amini, R. Patients With Intravitreal Gas Bubbles at Risk of High Intraocular Pressure Without Exceeding Elevation of Surgery: Theoretical Analysis. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 57, 3340-3347, doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18010 (2016).7 Muller, C. L. & Kidd, C. Debugging geographers: teaching programming to non-computer scientists. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 38, 175-192, doi:10.1080/03098265.2014.908275 (2014).8 Freeman, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Engineering Engineering Honors Workshop, https://www.engineering.iastate.edu/engrhonors/, Accessed September 1, 2018. 3. Horan, S. (2001, June), Introducing Pre College Students And Teachers To Engineering Via A Summer Enrichment Program Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. https://peer.asee.org/9474 4. Chandler, J., & fontenot, D. (2003, June), Ttu College Of Engineering Pre College Engineering Academy© Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/12026 5. Salzman, N., & Ricco, G. D., & Ohland, M. W. (2014, June), Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First-Year Engineering Students Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual
course. 1 1 1 1 10𝑘𝑘Ω ∗ 0.1µ𝐹𝐹 1000 ∗ 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = =𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 + 1 1 1 𝑠𝑠 + 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝑠𝑠 + 1 𝑠𝑠 + 1000 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 10𝑘𝑘Ω ∗ 0.1µ𝐹𝐹The following four lines of code can be used to find the Bode plot:num = [1000];den = [1, 1000];TF = tf(num,den)bode(TF)1000--------s + 1000(h) – For analog communication Tutor TIMS software could be used. Thefollowing is an example of one of the experiments in my communication course.Figure 6. Example of TIMS in the Data Communication course.4- SUMMARYThis paper discussed software tools for online
-up research fund as well as GraceTsai’s SUT scholarship fund. Thanks to Dr. Joseph A. Morgan and Prof. Mike Willey forteaching this student group through capstone project courses. We would also like to thank NT^2capstone team for the initial floating buoy concept and its prototype.References[1] D. L. Hamilton, “Methods of conserving underwater archaeological material culture,”Conservation Files: ANTH 605. Conservation of Cultural Resources I. Nautical ArchaeologyProgram, p. 9., 1998[2] S. A. Unger, and A. P. Schniewind, and W. Unger, “Conservation of Wood Artifacts. AHandbook,” Natural Science in Archaeology, 2001.[3] N. H. T.ehrani, and et el., “Development, depth control and stability analysis of anunderwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV
. A., & Keller, M. W., & White, I. M., & Brummel, B. J., &Daily, J. S., & Cheville, R. A., & Wolk, J. (2012, June). The Wright State Model for EngineeringMathematics Education: Highlights from a CCLI Phase 3 Initiative, Volume 3. Paper presentedat 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.https://peer.asee.org/22113.[7] Berry, M.S. (2014). The effectiveness of extended orientation first year seminars: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 105.http://dx.doi.org/10.18297/etd/105[8] Kuep, J.R. (2006). The impact of curricular interventions on intended second year re-enrollment. Journal of College Student Retention, 7 (1-2).[9] Landis, R. B. (2013). Studying
] D. Aigner, Quality Revolution due at Universities, Orange County Register, July 25, B10,1993[6] R. Epstein, and S. MacLane. “Keep Mandatory Retirement for Tenured Faculty.”Regulation, pp. 85-96, 14(2), 1991.[7] N. Tymvios, and J. Hildreth, “Perceptions of Requirements for and Impediments to Tenurefor Construction Faculty.” In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17,Seattle, WA., 2015[8] A.T. Rose, A.L. Miller, M. Murad, R. Martinazzi, “The Spaghetti Factor” – A PeerLeadership Model for the “Sticking Together” of Untenured Faculty Prior to Their TenureDecision,” in 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 12 -15, Portland, OR, 2005[9] J.J. Lipscomb, “Acquiring Tenure In Engineering Technology,” in 1999 ASEE
, correlations for the all thetesting activities.This phase includes the breaking of the project/system in subsystems (test-sets) and the choice ofinterrelations/correlations between the subsystems.In this phase students will establish and organize the following test components:• Sequence(s) of tests• Scheduling of equipment (shakers, data acquisition system, etc.)• Fixtures’ design specifications (including attachments and miscellaneous hardware (bolts, nuts, probes, etc.)• Time-schedule for analysis, testing, re-testing, contingencies due to failures and delays.The overall structure of the testing is officially documented in the Architecture document. Thisdocument is reviewed by the testing team and the customer to validate the approach, schedule
Practice, 2005,doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:2(83).2 Phillip C. Wankat and Frank S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering (New York, McGraw-Hill,1993).3 Jakob C. Bruhl et al., “Accelerating the Development of Engineering Judgment in Studentsthrough Inquiry-Based Learning Activities,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition(Columbus, OH: American Society for Engineering Education, 2017).4 Jakob C. Bruhl, Joseph P. Hanus, and James Ledlie Klosky, “Let’s Break Stuff! A Refitof the Mechanics Sequence of Courses to Inspire Student Inquiry” in ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition (Columbus, OH: American Society for EngineeringEducation, 2017).5 James Ledlie Klosky and Reid Vander Schaaf, “‘Show Me the Money!’ Using Physical ModelsTo Excite Student
develop an updated CEBOK, the Second Edition ofthe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK2), which was published in 2008. In thesubsequent years, ASCE developed a plan for the long-term management of CEBOK on aneight-year cycle which led to the formation of the CEBOK3TC which began work in October2016. This paper concludes with a discussion on the update from CEBOK2 to CEBOK3.Why is this historical review and summary important to the civil engineering profession? Tomaintain the momentum of the educational and professional reform activities initiated by ASCEin the mid-1990’s (called the Raise the Bar Initiative), the successful processes of the past andthe associated “lessons learned” must be clearly communicated to future leaders and
& Sharma S, “Geometrical Tolerance Stack Up Techniques”, Chapter 52in DAAAM International Scientific Book, pp. 857-872, 2013. B. Katalinic & Z. Tekic (Eds.),Published by DAAAM International, ISBN 978-3-901509-94-0, ISSN 1726-9687, Vienna,Austria, 2013[2] Kenneth W. Chase, William H. Greenwood, Bruce G. Loosli, Loren F. Hauglund, Least CostTolerance Allocation for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection,Manufacturing Review Vol 3, No 1, pp 49-59, 1990.[3] He, J. R., and Gibson, P. R., “Computer-Aided Geometrical Dimensioning and Tolerancingfor Process-Operation Planning and Quality Control”, The International Journal of AdvancedManufacturing Technology, 7:11-20, 1992[4] Gavankar, P., and Bedworth, D., “Stacked tolerance
Commander V Fuel Injection Kit. We would also like to thank The ModalShop MTS Systems Corporation for supplying noise level testing equipment for this competition.9. References 1. N. Skillicorn, "What Is Innovation? 15 Experts Share Their Innovation Definition." 4 November 2016. [Online]. Available: www.ideatovalue.com/inno/nickskillicorn/2016/03/innovation-15-experts-share- innovation-definition/. 2. S. Foreman, "Best High Flow Catalytic Converter in the Market Today?" 31 July 2017. [Online]. Available: innovatecar.com/best-high-flow-catalytic-converter. 3. Ålander, "Particle Emissions from a Small Two-Stroke Engine: Effects of Fuel, Lubricating Oil, and Exhaust After treatment on Particle Characteristics," Aerosol
/Using_learning_outcomes.pdf] 3. European Commission (2015). ECTS Users’ Guide. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2015 — [last access 20 Jan. 2019: http://ec.europa.eu/education/ects/users-guide/docs/ects-users-guide_en.pdf] 4. Adam S (2004): Using learning outcomes – a consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing earning out- comes at the local, national and international levels, Scottish Executive. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/lifelong/tehea-00.asp 5. Beneitone, Pablo, César Esquetini, Julia González, Maida María Marty Maleta, Gabriela Siu , and Robert Wagenaar, eds. Re exiones y Perspectivas de la Educación Superior en América Latina
] Moved up [1]: Sample¶ Deleted: The program composition of Deleted: s Deleted: broke down this way
. "Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking."Teachers college record 104, no. 4 (2002): 842-866.[12]. Prabhu Gaunkar, Neelam and Mani Mina. “ Developing self-awareness in learningpractices: Designing and implementing a survival tool for freshmen in engineering .” InProceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.https://peer.asee.org/30312[13]. Bowden, John A., and Eleanor Walsh. "Phenomenography." Phenomenography (2000): v.[14]. Åkerlind, Gerlese S. "Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods."Higher Education Research & Development 31, no. 1 (2012): 115-127.[15]. Entwistle, Noel. “Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education.” Higher EducationResearch & Development
EducationAbstractHigher education, especially in the engineering milieu, is a complex activity. Many differenttasks need to be performed well to achieve high quality student learning. Significant learningexperiences require specific (and optimal) course design, and inculcation of relevant skills.The more common approach for course design is the ‘content-centered’ one. A list of topicsis decided (using well-established textbook/s), together with time slots and a testing scheme(number of quizzes, tests, etc). Though relatively easy, this methodology pays scant attentionto student learning outside of content knowledge. The more time and effort intensive‘learning-centered’ approach is more systematic and rewarding. Course design is based ondeciding what students can
Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2004.[12] J. Saunders, C. L. Nehaniv, and K. Dautenhahn, "Teaching robots by moulding behavior and scaffolding the environment," in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, 2006: ACM, pp. 118-125.[13] M. Panitz, K. Sung, and R. Rosenberg, "Game programming in CS0: a scaffolded approach," Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 126-132, 2010.[14] K. Wright, I. Milanovic, and T. Eppes, "Implementing collaborative projects using a National Academy of Engineering (NAE) grand challenge: provide access to clean water," in ASEE 125th annual conference & exposition, 2018.[15] L. S. Vygotskiĭ, Thought and
“outside” columns and working inward – for each criterion, first establish thehighest standard level, then the lowest standard level, and then fill in the middle level(s). Thisstyle of rubric can become more cumbersome to construct as the number of standards increases.It has been suggested to design rubrics with an even number of standards to avoid a “middle”option during evaluation.We have developed the rubrics for our Engineering 101 course by focusing only on two columnswithin the rubric, describing only the highest quality level (which earns full credit, an A grade)and the minimum acceptable quality level (which earns credit roughly equivalent to a C or C-grade). The other columns in the rubric are effectively left blank, but with a deliberate
.[2] H.E. Gunter, M.A. D’Avila, S. Sadeghpour, R. Vijaykumar, J.V. Bonventre, “Educational innovation inphysiology: Capillary filtration,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, TN,June 22-25, 2003.[3] J.L. Cezeaux, T.K. Keyser, “Introducing active learning strategies into an undergraduate engineering physiologycourse,” Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24-27, 2018.[4] A.L. Gerhart, D.D. Carpenter, R.W. Fletcher, E.G. Meyer, “Combining discipline-specific introduction toengineering courses into a single multi-discipline course to foster the entrepreneurial mindset with entrepreneuriallyminded learning,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference
speed controller powered by a 3S LiPo battery pack. Costs for the propulsion systemwere approximately $60 for the motor, controller, transmission shaft, and propeller with anadditional $30 for the battery pack. Parts were connected through machined couplers and shafts.These were made by students in the campus machine shop to increase student exposure to theequipment and reduce costs. These are expected to provide a speed of 4 MPH (1.8 m/s) and anendurance of 30 min. Future work will determine the real-world speed and endurance of thevessel.The environmental scientists currently use a package from Vernier Software and Technologyincluding a LabQuest 2 DAQ and three Vernier probes. The Vernier package is extremelyexpensive relative to the rest of
/ [Accessed February 1, 2020].[4] J. L. Wood, “Four Hiring Strategies for Increasing Faculty Diversity,” Available:https://diverseeducation.com/article/149878/ [Accessed January 15, 2020].[5] J. Briggs, “Perceptions of African-American Faculty at a Predominantly White College abouttheir Institutions Hiring Policies,” Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College, 2017.[6] E. O. McGee, W. H. Robinson, L. C. Bentley and S. L. Houston, “Diversity Stalled:Explorations into the Stagnant Numbers of African American Engineering Faculty,” 122 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Paper ID #11934, 2015.[7] M. Currie, “Success Factors of Black Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsFaculty at Predominantly White Institutions,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Mercer