the Context Canvas, teams of graduate students andfaculty were invited to participate in a workshop to redesign a project spine course inengineering. This design decision to have a combined team of faculty and students is at the heartof a CBPD approach to course design. Before attending the workshop, participants individuallyobserved different design courses of the undergraduate engineering curriculum to collect dataabout a current course. They observed class sessions, explored the syllabus of the course andinteracted with students and instructors of the course. The observations were documented byeach participant. Instructions about what to observe and how to document were not given to notinfluence participants and allow different observation
had a verypositive experience, and for some it even reinforced their decisions to pursue graduate school. BackgroundDifferent types of engineering and engineering technology undergraduate research experiences havebeen offered from the NSF Research Experiences for Undergraduate summer programs to smallindividual projects undertaken during the semester. Research indicates that numerous benefits fromundergraduate research accrue to the student as well as to the sponsoring faculty member.As noted by Zhan et al, faculty in engineering technology do not typically have access to graduatestudents for research, but they are expected increasingly to engage in greater amounts of researchand scholarly work.1
different times as compared to just one or two lump payments is preferred. o Training in group work is very helpful. Faculty mentors may also need to manage team dynamics when one or several group members is having difficulty working with the team. o Exposure to the graduate school setting is very helpful. Trips to other graduate schools shows how different they are in some ways, but also how similar in others. Such visits also demonstrate similarities between REU students and those already in graduate school. o Field trips, though not more than one a week and more towards the beginning than the end of an REU, are a real bonus in terms of seeing the real world and application of research to real problems. o Activities
alongside faculty mentors. Claudine has also co-facilitated multiple Conversations about Race and Ethnicity (C.A.R.E.) Circles and C.A.R.E. Speaks through the Office of Multicultural Affairs (OMA) to undergraduate students across the SU colleges and departments including RAs in an effort to impact demonstrative change in diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility on campus. Claudine is a licensed Social Worker (LMSW). She graduated from Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY) with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology and a minor in Communications, and later went on to pursue a Master’s degree in Social Work from Fordham University. Claudine began her social work career in the field of child
tracktowards completing general education and major requirements in the precise timeline for graduation.Focused advising is also provided to help students with career and graduate education decisions bymeans of a designated academic counselor. Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education 192 In addition to academic advising, SPSD students receive assistance with personal counseling.Existing MESA counselors help students to access the campus resources needed to work throughemotional, financial, and family difficulties to stay
while maintaining a balance with summer activities.With a 20-hour weekly commitment, the program ensures meaningful involvement in researchwhile respecting personal time, achieving a balance between academic development andindividual interests.Faculty members are encouraged to volunteer as mentors, proposing one or two projects withdetailed summaries. These are then presented to students, highlighting the diversity of researchopportunities available.Recruitment channels include email lists and faculty presentations, with communications clearlydetailing program expectations, application procedures, and participant stipends. Applicantsprovide contact and academic information, a statement of interest, and their preferred facultymentor choices
accelerated masters, combined BS/MS, and 4+1 options. It reduces the timeneeded for undergraduates to earn a graduate degree and exposes these students to research work.It provides a route for faculty to obtain quality graduate students and it builds enrollment for thedepartment. This paper discusses the structure and the implementation of the first program ofthis type at Missouri University of Science and Technology. The experience of the initialelectrical and computer engineering students in the Accelerated BS/MS program is described.While the number of students who participated is not large, the program provides a valuableoption to the curriculum.KeywordsCurriculum, Graduate Education, and Career PathsIntroductionEngineering undergraduates benefit
. Page 4.29.2Activity 2: Application Review/Interview/Select Students - At this point the student applications were distributed, collected, and the review process initiated. All eligible students were selected for an interview that was conducted by the faculty member and Career Center counselor. Based on the strength of the application and interview, the top ranked students were selected for an intern position.Activity 3: Match Students with Companies - The faculty member utilizing a simple matrix matched the selected students with the host companies.Activity 4: Students and Companies Notified - The students are notified of their selection as an intern
engagement in learning: layers of context, whatindividuals bring, mediating variables, task interpretation, personal objectives, SRL processes,cognitive strategies, and performance criteria. Interested readers may refer to relevant literatureto gain an in-depth understanding of Butler and Cartier’s model 19-21.Goal, Objectives, and Overall Framework of the REU Site ProgramThe overall goal of this REU Site program is to motivate and retain talented undergraduates inSTEM careers, particularly careers in teaching and STEM education research. The specificobjectives of the program include: Page 26.99.3 Expose REU students, especially those who might
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career pathways hasoften been limited, particularly for students in high needs schools. This study reports the resultsof a university-based professional development intervention for school counselors, whereparticipants engaged in training in academic preparation for engineering study, outreachopportunities, bridge programs, as well as the variety of engineering disciplines accessible tostudents. University faculty in engineering and science education designed and implemented theworkshop. Preliminary data from select counselor participants (N=11) indicated that few hadteaching experience before becoming a counselor, they advised an average of 251 students/year,they had little knowledge of the Next
and five local middle and high school teacherson campus for an 8-week research experiences working with different lab groups. Given therelatively small number of participants, we chose qualitative interviews as our primary source ofdata for assessing the effectiveness of this program.The participants identified numerous positive aspects of participating in the summer researchprogram. Students appreciated the sense of community they developed with both the otherparticipants in the research program and the other members of their lab groups. Although most ofthe participants did not report the summer research experience as having a strong influence ontheir decisions to pursue graduate school or careers involving research, they did report
and service as the major educational institution in the state vested with theresponsibility to educate and train students in the technical fields, and also because of theexistence and track record of its Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics andComputing (CEISMC). The Georgia Tech InGEAR staff convened an Advisory Committeeconsisting of over 20 Georgia Tech faculty and staff who were instrumental in designing andreviewing initiatives taking place on the Georgia Tech campus. It was crucial that this AdvisoryCommittee consist of members of the Georgia Tech community who had sufficient influence toeffect meaningful change. It therefore included senior representatives from the various Deans’offices, academic faculty, Human
upgrade the industrial experienceof the faculty. Internships should also be encouraged for the entire faculty.Conclusions Universities and colleges are having a difficult time filling funded positions andattracting quality candidates. The institutions need to take a serious look at the roadblocks theyhave set up that prevent the employment of talented persons. Some roadblocks are external butmany are created by the policies and attitudes of the schools themselves. Limiting the scope of the search, archaic standards and restrictive tenure policies aresome of the problems that the institutions can remove. Realizing that the available market hasbeen limited by graduates selecting advanced programs based on career decisions rather
thebox” from a student perspective, because students are unaccustomed to thinking about peoplethey know having colleagues on an international level, or that the person with whom they areworking might have only a handful of peers in the world.The professor author of the paper thinks faculty members sometimes see URP students as highlyeffective low-cost labor. They are very intelligent, highly motivated people, and capable of doingvery good work if carefully guided. Professors have to guard against this perspective. The URPparticipants need to have experiences that “inspire” them to take an interest in research work, toconsider graduate school, and to contemplate a career in research. “Gopher” treatment will notmake that happen.It is important for
Session 3515 Experience-Based Instruction in Engineering Education Ronald B. Meade, PhD, PE, Associate Professor Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, USAF AcademyStudents mature during their engineering education moving from being a student of science andtechnology to becoming an apprentice engineer. This process will occur regardless of thepractical experience held by the engineering faculty. However, maturation may be deepened bythe apt use of experienced-based instruction (EBI). This paper examines the usefulness ofengineering experience as a teaching tool.Assessment of student readiness
; specifically examining the impact of team interactions and gender. Arlisa's research interest includes issues of engineering recruitment, retention, and equity in science, engineering and technology,which stems from her personal academic and professional experience as an engineer. Before returning to graduate school to pursue a Doctorate degree, she worked as an engineer in the semiconductor manufacturing industry for ten years. In her current position, Director of Learning Support Services at Estrella Mountain Community College (EMCC)in Avondale,AZ, she utilizes her academic and professional background to prepare students for successful careers in the science, technology
Texas at Austin’s WE@UT program isa two-day residential program designed to increase participant knowledge and understanding ofengineering and technology through faculty presentations, student mentorship, and hands-on,technology-based team projects so well informed and solid educational and career decisions aremade. Rising high school senior women who have indicated an interest in engineering or thesciences and who are invited to The University’s Honors Colloquium, an on-campus honorstudent recruitment program, are invited to participate in WE@UT prior to the start of theHonors Colloquium. By limiting participation to this invited group of students, WEP is able to
change fast enoughto produce graduates who can meet the changing job requirements in industry.The Value of AdvisingThere are many ways faculty members can work together to improve educational productivitywithout sacrificing quality. Improvements in career counseling, teaching methodologies,curriculum, and student support programs all could shorten the time from matriculation tograduation. Another solution which is easily and inexpensively implemented is to encourage andtrain faculty to be proactive advisors, mentors, and coaches. Such an advisor takes a deep,personal interest in the development and success of his/her advisees. As the relationshipdevelops, it will go through stages starting at teacher/student where the advisor has virtually
similar sit[uations]in the future) This semester’s project gave a larger picture view of consequences of unethicaldecisions.”Faculty ReflectionThe MAX Scholars seminar is led by four faculty members and a graduate student, with diverseareas of expertise and backgrounds including engineering, engineering technology, computerscience, biology and experiential education. This team selected the ethical framework for theseminar and facilitated discussions with individual students and groups, as needed. Severalobservations were noted, which are overall consistent with student feedback.Working with actual topics rather than case studies appeared to be more engaging for students.They seemed to have an easier time making a personal connection with the
concept of teaching technological literacythroughout the curriculum. Page 15.1193.2IntroductionFirst year courses are an integral part of many engineering and engineering technology degreeprograms. These courses serve to introduce newly declared majors to careers in engineering andtechnology. A student taking such a course should come away with a foundation of knowledgeabout engineering and technology, about the different engineering disciplines, the work involved,and career prospects to be able to make an informed decision on whether they should pursuesuch a degree or not and what discipline would be the best match to their talents and
.[27] has revealed that developing an understanding of team members' emotions in virtual teamshelps them promote their team members' well-being. Therefore it is good to note that studentsidentified improving empathy as one of the improvement strategies.The intervention discussed in this study allowed the students to reflect on benefits, challenges, andstrategies to improve team communication. Reflecting on their experiences had the goal ofencouraging them to understand the team's functioning better and make effective decisions [28].Since the course follows cooperative project-based learning and students have been working anddelivering all their assignments in a group, we wanted them to develop rapport by making themaware of the role of
COVID-related issues as well. These workshops were followed in 2021 by another series focused onsocial justice: Anti-Racism Practice in Engineering: Exploring, Learning & Solutions (ARPELS)[3]. A key outcome of the ARPELS workshops was the concept of the equitable partnership.The mission of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC) is to enable MSI ECE programs toproduce more and better prepared graduates from groups that have been historicallyunderrepresented in ECE careers. We hypothesize that key to achieving this goal is more fullyengaging the students, staff and faculty at HBCUs, HSIs and TCUs in the broad ECE educationand research enterprise by building partnerships with PWIs, industry, government labs, etc.These partnerships must be
to take part in a summerteam project, working together on a team composed of graduate and undergraduate business andengineering students in industry. These projects are jointly overseen by a faculty member fromengineering and business. Some of these projects might involve placements in overseas locationsas well.IV. Global Intercultural Experience for UndergraduatesMany students are not prepared to make the commitment that the PGE and EGL programsrequire. But they may still have interest in learning about other cultures. The University ofMichigan has put in place the Global Intercultural Experience for Undergraduates (GIEU)program which aims at encouraging students to explore an overseas location for a short amountof time, together with a
2001, American Society for Engineering Educationengineering degree could assist their realization of career and/or lifelong goals, students formtheir impressions of careers after graduating with an engineering degree based on theirexperiences in lower division courses in science, engineering and mathematics as well asconversations with other students and faculty. In general, experiences in these coursesdiscourage students. Based on the work by Seymour and Hewitt1, lack of/loss of interest inscience, engineering and mathematics is principal concern mentioned most often as a factor thatencourages some engineering students to change their major to something different fromengineering. It is also one of the concerns mentioned most often by students
Paper ID #42108Board 295: HSI Planning Project: Integrative Undergraduate STEM Educationat Angelo State University (I-USE ASU Grant #2122828)Dr. Brittany Paige Trubenstein, Angelo State University Dr. Paige Trubenstein (or Dr. T) is an Angelo State alumna who graduated from ASU in 2015 with her Bachelor of Science in psychology. She attended the University of California, Riverside, where she obtained her master’s degree in developmental psychology in 2017 and her Ph.D. in developmental psychology in 2020. She eagerly returned to ASU as a faculty member in the fall of 2019, and she teaches multiple undergraduate and
advising, career guidance,and faculty support are frequently reported by students who leave an engineering program(Seymour et al., 1997, Meyer et al., 2014). Regardless of these challenges it is important forengineering programs to be aware of these realities when developing and implementing retentioninitiatives.Temple University’s Project SOARTraditionally, Temple University has responded to the issue of low rates of success and retentionin its engineering courses and programs by providing support interventions for strugglingstudents. In fact, at Temple we have robust student support services, including tutoring, examreview sessions for select courses, peer assisted study sessions, coaching on academic skillsdevelopment, a writing center, and
the First Year: A Mixed Methods ApproachAbstractFor any student in the first year of an undergraduate program, there are an overwhelming numberof decisions to make. One of the biggest of these is choosing what to study. This choice isinfluenced by many complex factors and is difficult to predict or fully understand. A betterrecognition of why a student opts into and stays in a major could yield a deeper understandinginto how students choose a major and what they expect from engineering careers. This paperexamines students who chose chemical engineering and completed a set of surveys administeredduring their first year of study. The surveys contained questions that were both quantitative andqualitative in nature. In
active member of ASEE since 1998. She joined as a graduate student, after working on an engineering education project and presenting that work and student chapter activities at annual conference. As a faculty member, she regularly publishes and presents at the ASEE Annual Conference. Her interests are in design education and assessment in mechanical and biomedical engineering. She previously served ASEE in leadership roles in the ERM and Mechanics Divisions and as PIC-III Chair.Miss Alissa Papernik Undergraduate Student at Rowan University’s College of EngineeringAmanda Ferreira Dias-Liebold, Rowan University Undergraduate Student at Rowan University College of Engineering American
personal attributes), the skills they mayneed to use, such as communication and collaboration, and how they enact their use of EM(shown under the process category). The working EM master concept map also captures“what” may be involved within having an EM as illustrated with the category branchbeginning with “knowledge & skills”. This branch includes elements that as faculty wewould think are necessary to develop in our students as we seek for them to build an EM.Examples of the concepts that fell under these higher-level categories include fields of studysuch as engineering, marketing, science, and liberal arts, as well as broader career preparationskills, which include leadership, creativity, professional skills, and having a global view
that course. While we recommend that faculty report on your academic progress, this reporting tool is optional for faculty members to use. If you have questions about your progress in classes without a status report, we encourage you to speak with each of your instructors directly. Academic Status Report System AcademicStatusReportSystem@asu.eduEmail #2: Engineering schools email to students who received an ASR From: academicservices@asu.edu Subject: Academic Status Report Dear «First» «Last», Academic Status Reports (ASRs) are a tool through which your instructors can provide early, personalized feedback regarding your progress in a class. The system allows faculty to identify under