than a minor change from the existing standards, and will require trial,assessment, and revision before it is ready for adoption. We plan to work with a number ofpartnering institutions to perform the requisite tests and assessment.While it is clear that there are two parts to making education attractive – content and pedagogy –our effort is aimed at only the content part of the equation. We do not wish to minimize theimportance of pedagogical innovation in making education attractive and accessible, but we notethat content has received far less scrutiny than the delivery methods, and thus we believeimprovements are more critical at this juncture.Our approach to revision of the undergraduate engineering curriculum involves six steps:1
. • Objectives should be appropriate to the instructional area and the philosophy of the school.The next step in understanding learning objectives is to realize their purpose and importance tothe many people they affect. The next section discusses the functions of learning objectives andtheir importance to education.The Importance of Learning ObjectivesWhen learning objectives are properly stated, they serve many purposes and assist many groupsof people.10 Some of the functions of learning objectives are as follows: • Provide a focus for instruction. Learning objectives provide a focus for instruction at both program and course levels in education.10 Clearly stated learning objectives create a framework for planning a successful
of the detailed design phase of the design process, including: a. Develop a product information package containing the detailed information necessary for producing the final project, including assembly drawings for the final product and subassemblies; part drawings for custom parts; purchase information for vendor supplied parts; schematic, piping and/or wiring diagrams for electrical, pneumatic, or hydraulic systems; block and/or logic diagrams for software systems; and similar materials necessary for unique projects. b. Develop and carry out statistically-based experimental plans for
, utilitypatents and intellectual property protection.The countries that consistently rank highly in the Global Competitiveness Report all haveexcellent higher education systems with a strong focus on technology and innovation. In 2011,the top ten ranked countries in order were Switzerland, Singapore, Sweden, Finland, UnitedStates, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Japan and the United Kingdom. Other notables includeIsrael (22nd), China (26th) and Ireland (29th).Barack Obama spoke to the issue of US innovation in his State of the Union Speech on 25January 2011. In this speech he outlined his plan: …to help the United States win the future by out-innovating, out-educating, and out-building our global competition....What America does better than
planning to be?” Other 11 “no one understands us” “I just want a better life...” “math class is like philosophy class for engineers” Table 1. Main findings and example tweets from each category from the first stage data analysis4.2 Second Stage Data AnalysisFrom the first stage of data analysis, we found that the major theme is students’ complaining Page 25.615.12about
impact of a different color roof (e.g., light vs. dark), and we have a two-story house in Texas with a dark roof and a ranch house in Oregon with a light roof, then one could do a two-sample t-test to compare their electricity usage. The team presents to the class their arguments for how to collect appropriate data.“Is Transportation Transportation Junior This module focuses on examining sustainability impactsSustainable?” Engineering associated with transportation planning and facility design. The
or non-use of a reference data card (RDC).The following sections describe the methods used by the authors to evaluate each of the areas.Evaluating PerformancePerformance was evaluated by comparing students’ mean scores on both within-term and finalexaminations from the fall term of 2010 (Term 11-1) for ten sections of students (n=184), all ofwhom were provided an RDC with similar examination data from 11 sections of students(n=201) that were not provided an RDC in the fall of 2011 (Term 12-1). The mean scores wereevaluated using a two-sample t-test assuming unequal variances. To determine whether themean scores were statistically significant, a 95% confidence level was used.Because this study was not a deliberately planned study, but rather
engineering education at31 four-year U.S. institutions. A disproportional, stratified random sampling plan was used toproduce a nationally representative sample of four-year engineering programs that offer two ormore ABET-accredited programs in six engineering disciplines (biomedical/bioengineering,chemical, civil, electrical, industrial, and mechanical). Because the P2P study was also designedto inform analyses of a closely related set of six case studies (one of which offered only abaccalaureate-level general engineering program), the sample was also refined to include threeinstitutions that offered a general engineering program in addition to their discipline-basedprograms. All faculty members, program chairs, and sophomore, junior, and senior
Puerto Rico Seismic Network. She is currently employed as an undergraduate Research Assistant with the Graduate Research and Education for Appro- priate Technology: Inspiring Direct Engagement and Agency (GREAT IDEA) project. Zevallos is a native of Port au Prince, Haiti, and is fluent in Haitian Creole, French, English, and Spanish. She plans to return back to her hometown to share and apply her scientific knowledge in seismology.Denisse Echevarria , University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez Denisse Echevarria is a junior in mechanical engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez. Echevarria is currently employed as an Undergraduate Research Assistant with the Graduate Research and Education for Appropriate
don’tconcentrate that much. I go to the lectures and they go through things once and they gothrough it pretty fast. Not like high-school. Where they take one week to explain stuff youcan get it already. And you can get good results. So like I wasn’t that good last semester and Iam going to catch up. I don’t have a plan yet. But I just have to do all the work that they giveus. The work they give us today I will have to do it tonight.” The above comments reflect theimportance of students viewing themselves as their own teachers, building on and extendingtheir pre-existing knowledge, skills and approaches.Peer AssessmentAnother ‘way into’ the subject was through effective feedback from formative assessment. In
4 4 8 2 9 5 3 3 4 2 Antagonistic (A) 1 4 4 4 0 5 1 3 2 3 4 2 Overall Trend S S/A A A S/N A N/A N/A S S A S Positive to Positive to Neutral to Positive to Negative to Summary Over Time Negative Negative Positive 1 Anna experiences extreme positive and negative experiences associated with her plans to change departments making her interview difficult to rate overall. Therefore, her second year interview is
afrequency and time determined by their members.iCheckpoint and iExpoThe iCheckpoint meeting was held at midterm (14 October 2009). After a box-dinner meal, thewhole community assembled briefly and then was broken into two breakout presentationsessions where the teams presented their organization, plans, and progress regarding (1) identityand social networking, academics and advising and (2) the world of work and service. TheiTeams conducted various social and academic events. For example there were skating parties,movie nights, including a gathering to watch TED.com presentations, trips to corporate sponsors,travel to Silicon Valley conferences, international service projects, helping with Habitat forHumanity projects, and more.The iExpo meeting
GPA greater than 3.0 and two students with a cumulative GPA lessthan 3.0. The interview protocol asked students about their short- and long-term career andeducational plans, confidence in solving ill-structured and well-structured problems, problem-solving experience, learning experience, and their development of problem-solving skills. Aspart of the protocol, students were asked to describe how they would solve two think-aloudproblems (a well-structured and ill-structured problem) as well as their approaches to problemssolving. All student names in this paper have been changed to pseudonyms.Findings A comparison of the responses of students with co-op or internship experiences andstudents without these experiences revealed
, a new „abstract‟ format was implemented in orderto incorporate a writing style and inquiry-based approach that will help the student in theirengineering careers.8 The design and planning of this course was based to meet the ABETEC2000 criteria. The foundation for the use of this criteria was to correlate and promote theundergraduate experience to be similar to other courses that have a similar set-up of a laboratoryclass that is mainly used to strengthen the concepts and principles learned in the lecture. Amongthe criteria met, this course included: the application of knowledge of math, science andengineering; the design and execution of experiments and measurements, analysis, andinterpretation of data from living systems; the ability to
], thus, the freshman program has developedprocedures within our courses that establish an environment that reinforces the existing studentsupport system.ACADEMIC TRANSITIONSThe final transition that many engineering students encounter is within the academic milieu,which is often compounded by the additional challenges these changes elicit. As a studentmoves from high school to college he/she is channeled through the high school highly structureddaily schedule of planned activities. Upon entering college, the same student is now in charge ofcreating and implementing their own schedule that is typically different each day, may includenight classes, and also has free time throughout the day. In addition to time management, otherchanges that
deal of technical material. • Include More Positive Cases, to address concerns about ethics being discouraging or frightening. • Provide more structural frameworks/Analytical Tools to support case study work.IV. Curriculum DescriptionThe faculty had already begun working on many of the issues that arose in the focus groups,which served to reinforce much of our own efforts in this area. We have developed a vision foran integrated curriculum, in which structural frameworks for ethical analysis are taught in thefirst year, and revisited in several core courses and advanced electives. This plan is discussedbelow, in the typical order in which students might take the courses.A. Design-Based Introduction to Engineering.The first
analysistogether with the plans and actions already under way to strengthen and add to our current resultsprovide a strong evidence that this instrument will be a useful tool for WIE directors to 1) trackthe progress of their students on important factors that impact the success of women studyingengineering and 2) provide data essential for understanding the effectiveness of the activitiesbeing offered at each institution. Page 9.233.15Proceedings
the capstone design course; approximatelyone half of these outcomes (b, h, j, and i) are assessed significantly less than believed possible. Thedisparity between actual and potential assessment of outcomes may reflect early stages ofmodification. These findings suggest a lack of preparedness among faculty to effectively developand manage assessments of some of these outcomes. Many respondents commented on the surveythat they were in the process of revising, or planning an extensive revision of, their senior designprogram outcomes and associated assessment instruments.Confusion Surrounding Criterion 4. Fifty percent (50%) of the design constraint considerations (c, g,d, and h) were reported as being appropriate for assessment in capstone
. Standard quantitative analysis methods will be used for survey and systematic observationdata; appropriate qualitative methods will be used for interview and general observations. Theevaluation staff will prepare data collection instruments and procedures, gather data, compile andanalyze data, and prepare reports. Evaluators will serve on the project management team. Page 24.565.13Figure 5: Evaluation Plan Logic Model4.5 Goal: Lay the foundation for sustainability There are opportunities for the application of these techniques to on-line and other systemswith which students interact directly. The current enthusiasm for Massively Open On
create MATLAB layouts of all their GUIs and accompanying flowcharts that explain the needed 6 X coding. This is the last submission before the coding of their X X actual GUIs begins. GUI Beta 1.0: Teams begin coding all of the content they 7 X have planned in previous milestones. X 8 X GUI Beta 2.0: Teams update their GUIs. X X GUI Final: Teams finalize their GUIs and executive 9 X summary
for all the BSET majors. The course focuses on planning, development, andimplementation of an engineering design project, which includes formal report writing, projectdocumentation, group presentations, and project demonstrations. The goal of these courses is todemonstrate the ability to manage a major project involving the design and implementation ofproducts with a mixture of electrical and mechanical elements as a member of a productinnovation and/or development team. In these project-based courses, the students are expected toeffectively manage their time and team efforts to produce a working prototype of a product inthree ten-week quarters. Progress and formal reports, and oral presentations constitute integralcomponents of this course
critical thinking skills of minority engineering students: An exploratory study. J. Negro Educ. 437–453 (1995).122. Vogt, C. M. Faculty as a Critical Juncture in Student Retention and Performance in Engineering Programs. J. Eng. Educ. 97, 27–36 (2008).123. Michael, K. You talkin’ to me? Ieee Technol. Soc. Mag. 31, 5–U4 (2012).124. Socha, D., Razmov, V. & Davis, E. Teaching reflective skills in an engineering course. in Proc. 2003 Asee Conf. (2003).125. Blockley, D. I. Engineering from reflective practice. Res. Eng. Des. 4, 13–22 (1992).126. Rittel, H. W. & Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973).127. Pierce, C. et al. ‘Assessment of Environments for Fostering Effective Critical
Familiarization with the tumbling press, especially programming and control (seek assistance from respective members of staff) Planning of practical experiments, experimental approach and materials Conduct experiments Documentation of fiber orientation by means of destructive and non-destructive testing Continuous documentation (images and video) Final written documentation (10 pages in German) Presentation (15 minutes in German)Benefits for and beyond Student Gains Page 24.777.9The right match between a student’s major and the focus of the research institute can beespecially valuable if the research project