., Meese, M., Malinowski, J., Gallagher, M., Efflandt, S., Hurley, J. and Green, C. “Assessing Students’ Understanding of Human Behavior: A Multi-Disciplinary Outcomes-based Approach for the Design and Assessment of an Academic Program Goal.” Teaching Sociology, Vol. 30, 2002, pp. 430-453.Author BiographiesKARL F. MEYERLieutenant Colonel Karl F. (Fred) Meyer is an Associate Professor and Civil Engineering Structures Group Directorin the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy (USMA) at WestPoint, NY. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. LTC Meyer received a B.S. degree from USMA in1984, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1993
bedifficult to sustain it for long time. (For comparison, the pumping power of human heart is about0.002 hp.) Of course, unit conversion plays an important role here; e.g., to convert from lbf.ft/sor N.m/s to hp. Bryan Allen, an avid bicyclist in top condition, sustained about 0.4 hp for near 3hours as he pedaled and piloted the human-powered Gossamer Albatross in June 1979 to crossthe English Channel. Point out the difference between burst and sustained amounts of power.Point out the different units of power used – hp for prime movers, kW for appliances, MW for2 Two excellent books that present and discuss different quantities (size, energy, etc.) in biological
Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.11. Development Dimensions International, Inc., , accessed September 27, 2004.12. Mickelson, S.K., L.F. Hanneman and T.J. Brumm, “Validation of Workplace Competencies Sufficient to Measure ABET Outcomes,” Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June, 2002.13. Development Dimensions International, , accessed September 27, 2004.14. Brumm, T. J., S. K. Mickelson, B. L. Steward and A. L. Kaleita-Forbes, “Competency-based outcomes assessment for agricultural engineering programs,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, in press
' server(s) busy SetOfQueues.Item(NodeID).QueueTrans = NextEvent End If If NodeID = 1 _ Then ' system arrival duddy = Source.NextTrans(Trans) ' schedule next system arrival Set NextEvent = Trans NextEvent.EventType = "A" NextEvent.Attr(AttrIndex) = 1 NextEvent.TimeStamp = CurrentTime + _ SetOfSources.Item(1).InterArrivalTime Call InsertInPEL End If End Sub Page 10.482.10Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
-Ecological Influences on Minority School Learning”, Language Arts, Volume 62, Number 8, December 1985[2] Fletcher, S., Anderson-Rowland, M. “Developing Retention Strategies for Women that Promote Student Success in Engineering and the Applied Sciences,” Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Conference Washington, D.C., June 2000. Page 10.271.15 Session 3170[3] Moller-Wong, C., Eide, A. “An Engineering Student Retention Study,” Journal of Engineering Education. January 1997, pp. 7-15.[4] Engineering Workforce Commission of the American Association of
. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Bean, J.P. (1986). Assessing and Reducing Attrition, in In Managing College Enrollments: New Directions for Higher Education, D. Hossler, ed. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.4. Kaplan, K.M. and J.J. Kaplan. (2003). Understanding the Numbers: Increasing the Number of Minority Engineering Students. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Educational Annual Conference & Exposition.5. Katz, S. et al. (2003). Gender and Race in Predicting Achievement in Computer Science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. Fall 2003.6. LeBold, W.K. and S.K. Ward. (1998). Engineering Retention: National and
://www.worldexpertise.com/global_status_of_engineering_edu.htm4. Lehto, S. (2004). TRANSFORMING ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURRY AS AN ENGINEERING R&D WORK BY USING THE SYSTEMS APPROACH, ASEE Proceedings, for the ASEE Annual Conference.5. Detert, K. (1999). New Engineering Curricula in Germany: an Attempt to Modernize and Globalize Engineering Education, Global Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, Australia.6. Doerry, E. et. al. (2004). The Global Engineering College: Lessons Learned in Exploring a New Model for International Engineering Education, ASEE Proceedings, for the ASEE Annual Conference.7. Frame, J. D. (1983). International Business and Global Technology, Lexington Books, Lexington, Ms.MORTEZA SADAT
; K.A. Smith, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, 2 Edn., Edina, MN, Interaction Book Company, 1998;2. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, Eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, National Academy Press, 2000.3. R.M. Felder and R. Brent, “Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Payoffs,” ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 377038 (1994), .4. R. Anderson, Beyond PowerPoint: Building a New Classroom Presenter, Syllabus Magazine, June 2004.5. R. Anderson, R. Anderson, B. Simon, S. A. Wolfman, T. VanDeGrift, and K. Yasuhara. Experiences with aTablet PC based lecture presentation system. In SIGCSE'04, pages 56-60, 2004.BiographyJoseph G. Tront is
Associate Administrator for Education described the current situation as anational crisis.2 The report of the Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry,chaired by former congressman Robert S. Walker, urged in November 2002 to “reverse immedi-ately the decline in the scientifically and technologically trained U.S. aerospace workforce andpromote its future growth.”3 In another chilling observation, an editorial in AIAA’s AerospaceAmerica noted that “80% [of aerospace workers] said that they would not recommend aerospacecareers for their own children.” In addition, enrollment in nation’s engineering schools steadilydeclines, while many undergraduate and graduate students are foreign nationals, which makesthem largely ineligible for
of IndustrialEngineering Technology at the University of Dayton. Prior to joining the faculty at UD,he retired from the U. S. Air Force after 30 years of engineering design, industrialengineering, and experience at various levels of management.Donna C.S. Summers, Ph.D. is a Professor of Industrial Engineering Technology at theUniversity of Dayton. Her major areas of concentration are Quality Assurance andHuman Factors. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from theUniversity of Cincinnati and a Master of Science in Industrial Engineering from PurdueUniversity. She obtained her Doctorate in Industrial Engineering from the University ofCincinnati
for Medical Devices,” Medical Device and Diagnostics Industry Magazine, March 1997.8. S. A. Shabalovskaya, (1995) “Biological aspects of TiNi alloy surfaces,” Journal de Physique IV, C8, 5, 1199- 1204.9. G. Freiherr, (1998) “Shape memory alloys offer untapped potential,” Medical Plastics and Biomaterials, March 1998.10. N. Rebelo and M. Perry (2000) “Finite element analysis for the design of Nitinol medical devices,” Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, 9(2), 75-80.11. D. Stoekel (2000) “Nitinol medical devices and implants,” Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, 9(2), 81-8812. W. L. Bernard, H. Kahn, A. H. Heuer, and M. A. Huff (1997) “A Titanium-Nickel Shape-Memory Alloy
loop interrupt loop Motor Position target Setpoint Setpoint PWM Feedback position Generator Scheduler Loop encoder motion controller setpoint schedule position profile t (s) setpoint θ
mightdownload copies. As a result, the validity of the instrument would be threatened. However,faculty members are encouraged to obtain a copy of either or both instruments, provide feedback,and use the instruments in their classes. Participation by a broad range of faculty members anddata from large number of students are needed to improve the instruments to measure conceptualgains in understanding these two new classes of materials.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumber 0088118. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliographic
Coalition for Advanced Manufacturing Industrial Transformation: Key to Sustainingthe Productivity Boom A White Paper (c) May 30, 20032000 L St., Suite 807, Washington D.C. 20036.Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act of 1992, S. 1146, 102d Cong. (1992).Biographical InformationDr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch is Professor of Applied Science and Technology and the State WideDirector of the CT College of Technology. She has been instrumental in facilitating theimplementation of the College of Technology and developing industry based curriculum usinglocal and national skill standards that have responded to industry needs in technology andengineering. She has over 23 years of experience in higher education, focusing on two yeartechnology and engineering
and Culture in thePostmodern Age. New York: Teachers College Press.Herkert, J. (2002). Continuing and Emerging Issues in Engineering Ethics Education, 2004). NationalAcademy of Engineering. Retrieved January 10, 2004.http://www.nae.edu/NAE/naehome.nsf/weblinks/MKEZ-5F7SA4Marshall, J. (2001). Character Education in Preservice Education: One Institution’s Response. Journal ofCollege and Student Values, 9.Palmer, P. (1998). The Courage to Teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.Pfatteicher, S. (2001). Teaching vs. Preaching: EC200 and the Engineering ethics Dilemma. Journal ofEngineering Education, 1, 137-142.Ryan, K., Bohlin, K. (2000). Teacher education’s empty suit. Education Week on the WEB. RetrievedMarch 29, 2000. http://www.edweek.org/ew
engineering and project management skills. From the level of creativity and quality ofthe resulting capstone design projects and students’ feed back it seems that the process issuccessful in meeting and exceeding its educational objectives. The process provides a road mapfor achieving the desired product attributes while allowing students to think freely and creativelyout of the box. It also provided design and project management experience, in teamwork setting,based on real life industrial practices of leading corporations.References1. ATILA, E., and JONES, J., “ The Engineering Design Process,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993.2. CROSS, N., “Engineering Design Methods,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989.3. PUGH, S., “ Total Design
variety of simple, non-threatening situations. Hisrequest of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Technology was to createa system that could display certain visual patterns on a Stimulus Box and record an individual’sresponse time to that visual stimulus by measuring the trigger pull on a training pistol. Toaccomplish this Dr. Hudson enlisted the assistance of two Electrical and Computer Engineeringgraduate students, Darwin S. David and Ross Loven.The Graduate StudentsThe graduate students were completing their second semester of their Master’s Degree study.Both students had completed their Bachelor’s degrees in Electrical Engineering at MinnesotaState University, Mankato in the previous year. The students had both completed
(transmission medium) USERb) TRANSMITTER RECEIVER ENCODER CHANNEL DECODER S U message signal noise signal+noise message’ FEEDBACK Fig. 3 – Adapted Shannon’s and Weaver’s Model of a General CommunicationSystem (as Physical Model); a) The Simplified Model, b) The Detailed Model He recognized that all these categories of problems are closely interrelated andoverlap in a “rather vague way”…Shannon
cost.A good example of that is when OEEP switched from mastering courses on S-VHS to masteringon DVD. When Pioneer came out with their DVD recorder that featured a one button “start” andre-writable media, OEEP purchased one unit and for one semester recorded in one studio. Itbecame evident, almost immediately, that the quality of recording was superior, the mediarequired less storage space and more rewrites per media were possible according to thespecifications. Hence all remaining monies at the end of the fiscal cycle were allocated toswapping out all mastering units, and the beginning of the next fiscal cycle expense money was Page
sampling of which are listed here: B. Lazarus, L. Ritter, S. Ambrose. The Woman’s Guide to Navigating the Ph.D. in Engineering & Science. IEEE, 2000. ISBN 0780360370. National Academy of Science. Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. National Academy Press, 1997. ISBN 0309063639. Page 9.879.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education R. Peters. Getting What You Came For: The Smart Student’s Guide to Earning
lectures themselves were restructured around specific objectives: learning skills,departmental overviews, rules/regulations, learning resources, career planning/opportunities,small group activities, and preparation for the field trip.Lecture modificationsTulane is on the semester system, and there were fourteen class lectures during the Fall semester.Each lecture was kicked off with an engineering joke to lighten the tone. There are several fromwhich to choose, and enough to populate the entire semester. A short period of announcementsfollowed (including upcoming student club activities, if informed), then the main lecture topic(s).Lecture topicsPrior art allocated one lecture day to each department/program for an overview of degreerequirements
software should also be representative of that which may beexpected in the workplace. Excel and Matlab are two suggested packages.References1. Clewley, R., “Old-Schooler Teaches New Tricks,” Wired Magazine, September 20012. Hodge, B. K., Taylor, R. P., “Factors for Change in Mechanical Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Session 2266, Milwaukee, WI, June3. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, Conventional Criteria I.C.6., Technology Accreditation Commission Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. 111 Market Place, Suite 1050 Baltimore, MD 21202 Telephone: 410-347-77004. Chapra, S. & Canale, R. (2002) Numerical Methods for Engineers, McGraw-Hill.5
. Women in Kerala 2001, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Kerala. 14. Robst, J., Keil, J., and Russo, D. (1998), “The effect of gender composition of faculty on student retention,” Economics of Education Review, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 429-439. 15. McIlwee, Judith S. and J. Gregg Robinson. 1992. Women in Engineering. Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. 16. AAUW(American Association of University Women). 1992. How Schools Shortchange Girls. AAUW Educational Foundation and National Education Association. 17. Orenstein, Peggy. 1994. School Girls: Young Women, Self-Esteem, and the Confidence Gap. New York: Doubleday. 18
Courses, Hull (1992).8. J. Parnaby, The requirements for engineering degree courses and graduate engineers: an industrial viewpoint, in Engineering Science and education Journal, Vol. 7, No 4 (1998).9. K. G. Stanga and R. T. Ladd, Oral communication apprehension in beginning accounting majors: an exploratory study. Issues in Accounting Education, 5, (2), pp180-194 (1990).10. S. K. Payne and V. P. Richmond, A bibliography of related research and theory. In J.A. Day and J.C. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding Communication, Beverly Hills, California, Sage Publications (1984).11. J. C. McCroskey, The communication apprehension perspective, in J.A. Daly and J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding Communication, Beverly Hills, California, Sage
presented in thefollowing illustrations. Fig. 5. Numerical results for the velocity magnitude distribution over a circular cylinder using FlowLab (Vh=35.8 m/s, Re=1.89E+05) 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 cp --> -1 -1.5 -2 EFD -2.5 CFD -3 AFD -3.5 theta (rad ) -->
Education, v. 90, n.1, pp. 105-107, January 2001.2. B. G. Davis, Tools for Teaching, Jossey-Bass Publishers, p.100, 1993.3. M. O. Haggler and W. M. Marcy, “Strategies for Designing Engineering Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 88, n. 1, pp. 11-13, 1999.4. http://webct.tntech.edu/webct/public/show_courses.pl?9949543395. J. E. De Leon and G. Winek, “Incorporating Rapid Prototyping Into the Engineering Design Curriculum,” Engineering Design Graphics Journal, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 18-23, 2000.6. S. Chiappone, “Applying RP Process to Educational Laboratories: Educating Future Engineers on Rapid Prototyping& Tooling Capabilities,” Proceedings of the 1999 SME Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing Conference and
recognition system) is installed onone workstation. The iris scan enrollment system is installed on the server. MATLAB has beeninstalled on all the computers and the server to allow algorithm development.IV. Field Tr ips & Speaker s Field trips and guest speakers were incorporated into the course syllabus. The first fieldtrip was to the Naval Academy’s Multimedia Support Center (MSC) so that the students coulddiscover the technology available to them that could aid in designing and creating the posters fora poster project. This tour of the MSC introduced them to such things as Adobe Photoshop, videoediting software, scanning, and large-format print graphics. All of the other field trips were off-site, including a trip to the National
.” ASCE News, ASCE 25(1), 6. 6 Koehn, E., (2004). “Enhancing Civil Engineering Education and ABET Criteria through Practical Experience.” Accepted for publication in the journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 7 Koehn, E. (1997). “Engineering Perceptions of ABET Accreditation Criteria.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 123(2), 66 – 70. 8 Long, R. P. (1997). “Preparing Engineers for Management.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 13(6), 50 – 54. 9 Rosenberg, F. (2003). “What Students Say.” American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc, One East Wacher Drive, Chicago, Illinois. 10 “What Does the Future Hold for C.E.’s? (2000). ASCE
disagreementbetween employers and employees. However, the data and comments also suggest thatpractitioners do not believe that the attributes, in general, reflect all the skills and knowledgerequired for some, especially entry level, engineering positions. Nevertheless, the informationindicates that the graduating seniors believe their coursework has given them a strongbackground in the 11 educational outcomes required by ABET. For comparative purposes, thefindings of this investigation could be utilized by other institutions and departments that maywish to study their curriculum and/or develop a system of evaluation to measure the achievementof ABET objectives.AcknowledgmentThe authors wish to recognize Mr. Mandaleeka S. Parthasarathy for his assistance