significant changes, particularly in the wayengineering schools are adopting problem-based instruction to meet the changing demands ofpractice. Increasingly, engineering schools are requiring students to work on team projects that areopen-ended with loosely specified requirements, produce professional-quality reports andpresentations, consider ethics and the impact of their field on society, and develop lifelonglearning practices. While there exist numerous implementations of courses adopting these methodsto purportedly improve student learning, measuring the impact of problem-based instructionremains challenging. The existing evidence generally suffers from methodological shortcomingssuch as reliance on students’ self-reported perceptions of
Session 3142 THE GLOBETECH INTERNATIONAL SIMULATION: PRACTICAL TOOL TO TRAIN ENGINEERS - LEADERS FOR THE GLOBAL ECONOMY Roxanne Jacoby, Jean Le Mee The Albert Nerken School of Engineering, Cooper UnionAbstractThe 21st century will require engineers not only technically well prepared in their chosen fields, butalso able to understand the managerial, ethical, financial, etc. implications of their work. They willhave to become effective leaders in the context of a complex, fast changing, highly competitiveglobal economy. To achieve this, more emphasis should
communication outcome portfolio. The Department of Civil Engineering at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, in determining our goals, has developed one outcome associated with the skill of communication. This outcome is: Page 5.361.2Table 1. SIUE graduate outcomes by category. Category (Portfolio) Graduate Outcomes Communication • an ability to communicate effectively Design • an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs • an understanding of professional and ethical
and express information and ideas logically and convincingly. 3. Develop students' understanding of fundamental scientific principles, with a strong emphasis on ecological science, which serve as a sound basis for the synthesis of knowledge leading to rational solving of problems involving ecological systems. 4. Develop students' knowledge and ability to employ engineering methods including analysis, computation, modeling, experimental techniques, and design to solve engineering problems involving ecological systems. 5. Develop students' understanding of their legal, ethical and professional relationships with society to prepare them for the professional practice of ecological engineering.Figure 1
Design,” Earth Ethics: Evolving Values for an Earth Community, Vol. 7, No. 1, Fall 1995, pp. 11-12.[2] Technology Management and Policy web page, http://vlead.mech.virginia.edu/classes/tmp.html[3] Technology and Product Life Cycle course web page, http://vlead.mech.virginia.edu/classes/classes.html.[4] Graedel, T. E. and B. R. Allenby, Design for Environment, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1996.[5] Rosen Motors web page, http://www.rosenmotors.com/[6] Carlson-Skalak, S., J. P. Leschke, M. Sondeen, and C. Lovecky, “Shape, Inc.’s Videocassette: A Nearly Sustainable Design,” submitted for publication in Interfaces, contact the authors for information.[7] Mehalik, M. and M. Gorman, “DesignTex Fabric Case Study,” Division of
) Provide a structured opportunity for students to reflect critically on their experience, 5) Articulate clear service and learning goals for everyone involved, 6) Clarify the responsibility of each person and organization involved, and 7) Provide feedback and assessment mechanism to all involved.ConclusionsCommunity service and academic excellence are not competitive demands to be balancedthrough discipline and personal sacrifice by students, but rather are interdependent dimensions ofgood intellectual work.When effectively structured, facilitated, related to discipline based theories and knowledge,community based service learning experience ensures the development of graduates who willparticipate in society actively, ethically, and
interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processesd. Apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectivese. Function effectively on teamsf. Identify, analyze and solve technical problemsg. Communicate effectivelyh. Recognize the need for and possess the ability to pursue lifelong learningi. Understand professional, ethical and social responsibilitiesj. Be cognizant of contemporary professional, societal and global issues and be aware of and respect diverse culturesk. Have developed a commitment to quality, timeliness and continuous improvement.Analysis and Results:The results of the survey and the evaluation of the data have been given in tables 1 through 5
in the ABET-accredited civil engineering program at the United States MilitaryAcademy, West Point. CE400A was developed three years ago, in response to the programdirector’s judgment that the civil engineering program lacked emphasis on professional practiceissues. The course objectives, formulated to address this deficiency, are as follows: • Explain the characteristics of a profession. • Explain the roles and responsibilities of the members of the CE project team—Owner, Design Professional, Constructor, and Project Manager. • Apply the ASCE Code of Ethics to the solution of an ethical problem in civil engineering. • Demonstrate an understanding of the multi-faceted challenges facing
of this paper. Thesecond course in the track may be either one of two courses taught by our Ocean EngineeringDepartment. These two courses are described below:EN411: Ocean Environmental Engineering I (2-2-3). Introduction to the basic principles andcurrent issues in environmental engineering as applied to the ocean environment. Principal focusis on Marine Pollution: Its Causes, Effects and Remediation. Topical coverage includeschemical and biological considerations in water quality; wastewater treatment and discharge;diffusion and dispersion in estuaries and oceanic environments; maintenance dredging andmaterial disposal; engineering methods used to analyze and mitigate the effects of marinepollution; and environmental ethics, economics and
impact onretention rates goes beyond the academic realm, extending to students' overall well-being. Bycreating an environment that values and addresses their beliefs, educators contribute significantlyto students' holistic success and fulfillment in their educational journey [25-27].Ethical Considerations: Certain beliefs, especially those entrenched in ethics, morality, andreligion, can be deeply ingrained and highly sensitive for students [28, 29]. Faculty memberswith a nuanced understanding of these beliefs are better equipped to navigate discussions andteachings related to these delicate topics. Recognizing these matters' sensitivity enableseducators to approach them with the utmost care, ensuring a respectful and inclusive
with the easeof access to such Gen AI tools have raised a lot of questions about ethics, authorship and academicintegrity [25], [27]. While academics are still exploring the possible applications of Gen AI in education [27], severalresearchers agreed that Gen AI literacy is essential in education [28], [29], [30]. Some educators andresearchers argue that several AI tools like the writing assistance tools may enhance the learningexperience by providing automated assistance [31]. AI has also been explored as a creative collaboratorin various fields, such as game level design and computational tools for creative writing, where it is seenas a potential source of new ideas and support for designers' goals [32], [33], [34]. Providing
research and teaching interests in mechanics, including nonlinear structural analysis, computational mechanics, and biomechanics. He is also active in engineering education and engineering ethics, particularly in mechanics education and appropriate technology. At UPRM, Papadopoulos serves as the coordinator of the Engineering Mechanics Committee, which manages the mechanics courses taken by all engineering majors. He also co-coordinates the Social, Ethical, and Global Issues (SEGI) in Engineering Program, and Forums on Philosophy, Engineering, and Technology.Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has de- grees
be compared with the actualcitations in the formal reports. Please refer to Appendix 1 for the worksheets containing thethree sets of questions. The questions were designed to be readily comprehensible by students,and also to yield data that would be of interest to both librarians and instructors.The ethical review application for this study is currently being processed as a “minimal risk” Page 22.1682.5application by the Behavioural Research and Ethics Board at UBC. All students have beenassured that the study is voluntary. Participants cannot be identified and those who do notparticipate will not be penalized.Signed consent forms and the
the areas of engineering ethics and engineering education. Page 22.583.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Engineering Education and the Entrepreneurial Mind at Baylor UniversityAbstractOur current economy is facing many new challenges, including the challenge of technologicalcompetition from other countries. Engineering educators face the challenge of how to motivateour students to become competitive in a global marketplace. The challenge is how to bringinnovation back into the engineering disciplines, when many of our faculty have never worked inindustry, and so are not necessarily
engineers have always practiced.The main objective of this paper is to present the approach used to integrate sustainabilityengineering content into the engineering curriculum at our University. The approach involvesoffering a multidisciplinary class in sustainability engineering which was offered to junior orsenior engineering students as a technical elective class with no prerequisites. The class wasdivided in four main modules which are Life Cycle Assessment, Energy Management, Designfor Sustainability, and Ethical Consumerism.A team teaching approach was used to teach the class with faculty members from thedepartments of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems EngineeringDepartment. In the class, students were required
involve diverse stakeholders. The pilot projects in this group integrateengineering and liberal arts topics, and in some cases students and faculty, and direct thestudent’s attention to the “problem formulation” phase of design. They challenge students todevelop innovative and ethical approaches to complex, wide-ranging problems.By deliberately keeping the challenges broad, and asking students to consider each problem frommany perspectives, these projects encourage students to develop a better understanding ofengineering in context and the need for knowledge of other disciplines. Faculty from sixinstitutions will work on introductory course projects. The mix of institutions, including threeinstitutes of technology, two liberal arts colleges, and
whet the students’ appetites for subsequent courseswhere similar problems are addressed in far greater detail and sophistication. Students begin toappreciate the creative and innovative nature of engineering practice through exposure to “realworld” problems wherein they must justify their choice among many feasible solutions.Measurements addresses professional engineering issues by presenting case studies in projectmanagement and engineering ethics to stimulate class discussion.III. Format and StructureMeasurements is a 3-credit course that includes two 50 minute lectures and one three-hourlaboratory period per week for 14 weeks. The lecture sessions have a maximum of 30 studentswhile the laboratory sessions have a maximum of 20 students. The
.” Journal of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 121 (4), 260 – 261.7. Koehn, E. (1991). “An ethics and professionalism seminar in the civil engineering curriculum.” Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 117 (2), 96 – 101.8. Major, M. M. (1994). “Surviving the crunch.” ASEE Prism, American Society for Engineering Education,3 (7), 14 – 19.9. McCuen, R. H. (1994). “Constructive learning model for ethics education.” Journal of Professional Issuesin Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 120 (3), 273 – 278.10. Weingardt, R. G. (1993). “Engineers need a broader perspective and a better Image.” ASCE News, American Society of Civil Engineers, 18 (6), 7, & 11.BiographyEnno “Ed” Koehn
of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 121 (4), 260 – 261.7. Koehn, E. (1991). “An ethics and professionalism seminar in the civil engineering curriculum.” Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 117 (2), 96 – 101.8. Major, M. M. (1994). “Surviving the crunch.” ASEE Prism, 3 (7), 14 – 19.9. McCuen, R. H. (1994). “Constructive learning model for ethics education.” Journal of Professional Issuesin Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 120 (3), 273 – 278.10. Weingardt, R. G. (1993). “Engineers need a broader perspective and a better Image.” ASCE News, 18 (6), 7 – 11.BiographyEnno “Ed” Koehn is Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering at Lamar University
current with today’s technological advances. One solution, that has receivedattention during the 1990’s, is the university-industry partnership. Liaw4 believes thatstrong industry ties add breadth, depth, and continuity to the undergraduate education.Along with the benefits, these partnerships can create ethical concerns. Such concernsinclude the rights of both parties, approaches that are fair to all, and the need to avoidconflict of interest5. To address these concerns, guidelines that direct the actions ofpartners have been promulgated by such bodies as the U.S. Office of Science andTechnology 6.In this paper, we present a partnership and collaboration that has recently been createdbetween University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES), Lab-Volt
includes chemical and biological considerations in water quality, wastewatertreatment and discharge, diffusion and dispersion of wastewater in estuaries and oceanicenvironments, maintenance dredging and material disposal, and engineering methods used toanalyze and mitigate the effects of marine pollution. Students also gain familiarity withenvironmental laws, ethics and economics as they pertain to the marine environment.Most class lectures are adapted from a conventional environmental engineering text such asMasters’ Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science4. Readings from Laws’Aquatic Pollution5 and other marine-related references are assigned to supplement class lectures.The research project requirement of the initial “issues
already struggling to survive past their limit to afford energy and goods?Food for the hungry is another consideration. A strong outcry has erupted over the use of foodproducts (such as corn) for the production of ethanol to be used as a fuel.4 Thus, discussions ofboth ethics and economics should clearly be part of any decision to convert from the use of coalto alternative fuels in new designs for power plants.Project SpecificationsJunior MEs taking Thermodynamics are introduced to many of the fundamental principles (work,heat, quality, enthalpy, entropy, and efficiency) and components (piston-cylinder, throttle, nozzle,diffuser, compressor, pump, boiler, condenser, and turbine) which are incorporated into energyproduction. Energy-producing
formulation and implementation.Case studies are included as well as computer simulation of business enterprises. 3. Oral and Written Communication (3 credits)The social context of scientific writing; recording as the basis for writing; the importance ofdigital electronics; a professional approach to writing; collaborative writing; your audience andaims; organizing and drafting documents; revising for organization and style; developinggraphics; searching the literature; documenting sources; memos, letters and e-mail; progressreports; journal articles; oral presentations; instructions, procedures, and computerdocumentation. 4. Legal and Ethical Issues for Engineering Managers (3 credits)Introduction to ethical and legal issues as applied to
realistic constraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics and social impact.Implicit in this understanding of Figure 1. Navajo Bridge in the Grand Canyon Nationalengineering design is that need is Park7something that is established by non-engineers or engineers working outside of engineering practice and is communicated in anover-the-wall approach to the engineers. Non-engineering factors such economics, safety,reliability, aesthetics, ethics, and social impact are relegated to a plethora of systematizedapproaches often known as Design for X If engineering design is merely the application ofalready well defined knowledge then there indeed
preparingstudents to become engineers in the 21st century and the importance of integrating all elements ofsuccessful engineering practice in engineering education. In addition, they wrote a shortdescription of an idea or plan for implementing innovative techniques in their classroom. On thebasis of these ideas, they were preliminarily placed in one of four affinity groups that stemmedfrom Educating Engineers: design education, engineering fundamentals and analysis, laboratory/project/ experience-based learning, or ethics/society/broader engineering skills. Attendees wereable to attend more than one affinity group session at the symposium.The organizers strove for a mix of formal and informal networking opportunities, small groupdiscussions, and panel
the EET program fullfills more strongly theABET outcomes related to: • Demonstrate that students are able to function on multi-disciplinary teams, • That students show a strong ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems • That students are able to understand professional, social, environmental and ethical responsibility.Due to this collaboration EET faculty and IAB members agreed that the senior design courseexperience could be greatly enhanced if the students could work in projects related to solveproblems that engineering industries face every day. Giving students experience with a real-world design project that involves managing tasks, people, budgets and deadlines. The projectsalso
during the endurance event. The students in the past built Kevlar supported body panels to prevent piercing. 6. Have an understanding of the professional and ethical responsibilities. Each designer knows the ramifications of their designs since a fellow student will be operating the vehicle. Each team member also functions appropriately knowing that each information or data generated or recorded by them has to be the most accurate not only for safety but also for ethical responsibilities. 7. Have an ability to communicate effectively. The BAJA team members need to communicate verbally in the meetings and in the laboratories. They also may need to write memos and e
solutions are generated andevaluated. The most reasonable one is modeled, tested, and modified. Students, as well asworkshop participants, need to explain their design in terms of available resources, performance,and possible modifications. In addition, students are responsible for engineering their ownmeaningful tests. Engineering “habits of mind”, based on NAE and NRC references, are generally thought of as(1) systems thinking, (2) creativity, (3) optimism, (4) collaboration, (5) communication, and (6)ethical considerations. The “Building a Better World” project incorporates all of these. Housingsolutions embody systems thinking since they are impacted by a complex mix of culturalimperatives, material resources, and natural events. Good design
, technical writing, speech, accounting, or ethics.Three of the programs requiring a course in ethics are at church related schools. Table 9. Other required courses Number Percent of of Other courses programs programs General Education electives 90 98% English 79 86% Economics 38 41% Technical Writing
, technical writing, speech, accounting, or ethics.Three of the programs requiring a course in ethics are at church related schools. Table 9. Other required courses Number Percent of of Other courses programs programs General Education electives 90 98% English 79 86% Economics 38 41% Technical Writing