designers still need surface modelling? Birmingham, England: Delcam.(Access date January 12, 2002). URLhttp://www.mcadcafe.com/TECHNICAL/Papers/DelCam/SurfaceModelling/index.html.12. Christman, A. & Naysmith, J. (2001, September). Trends in CAD/CAM for mold makers.MMS Online. (Accessdate January 12, 2002). URL http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/040106.html.13. PTC. (2000). White Paper: Behavioral modeling: The next generation of mechanical design automation.14. Luby, S. (2001). Why a CAD model must deliver more than geometry. CAE/Computer-Aided Engineering, 20 (11),68.15. Greco, J. (2001). Getting smart: Knowledge-based software captures ideas and expertise from your company’sengineers. Computer Graphics World, 24 (11), 38-43.16. Versprille, K
SystemsEngineering Inc., an engineering consulting company. His research interests are in the area of light-framestructures.DONALD S. PETKAU, MBA, P.Ag., P.Eng., is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Biosystems Engineeringat the University of Manitoba. Apart from his teaching duties in the Department, he is the Manager of Engineeringof MESH Technologies Inc., an engineering consulting company. His research interests are in the area of processengineering and berry harvesting. Page 7.261.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002
Session 2342 The Role of Masters degrees in Technology & Business to promote CPD for Engineering Professionals B R Dickson Department of Chemical & Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.AbstractThere is an increasing realisation that the MBA approach to career development is not the mostrelevant form of education & training for engineers. During the mid 1990’s, the UK’sEngineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) funded over 20
development of biotechnology research centers.Strategic plans to implement these are underway with collaboration of all stakeholders. Eventhough major barriers have been addressed, the future presents opportunities to develop thebiotechnology area to position the Island as the preferred site in the world for the biotechnologyindustry and entrepreneurs.Bibliographical information1. Burril G. S.2001. Biotech 2001 Life Sciences, Genom ics, Proteomics and More. The Biotechnology Industry Annual Report.2. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, 2000. Pharmaceutical Industry Profile3. Morell L., Vélez Arrocho J.I., Buxeda R., Johnson W., Irizarry M. and Davis I. 2001. Strategic Alliance with Industry to Enhance Undergraduate
of the 1998 Annual ASEE Conference, Jun 28-Jul 1, 1998, Seattle, WA, USA.[6] Tilbury, D., Messner, W., “Controls education on the WWW: Using MATLAB for controldesign, simulation and visualization,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASME International MechanicalEngineering Congress and Exposition, Nov 15-20 1998, Anaheim, CA, USA, pp. 65-70.[7] Villareal, S., Wynn, C., Eastwood, D., Zoghi, B., “Design, development and evolution of Web-based materials featuring computer-animated simulations,”Proceedings of the 1998 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. Part 2 (of 3), Nov 4-7 1998, Tempe, AZ, USA, pp. 588-593.[8] Lim, C. I, Metzger, R.P. Jr., Rodriguez, A. A., “Interactive Modeling, Simulation, Animationand Real-Time Control (MoSART) twin
effectiveness of the web experiments in promotinglearning of key concepts and interest level in the subject materials.(VII) References[1] Chang, T.N., Chang, D., ``Graduate Engineering Student Performance Assessment:How learning pattern affects test scores," Proceedings of the ASEE2000, St. Louis, Mo,June 18-21, 2000.[2] Aktan, B., Bohus, C.A., Crowl, L.A., Shor, M.H, “ Distance learning applied tocontrol engineering laboratories,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 39, pp 320 –326, Aug. 1996.[3] Shen, H. Xu, Z., Kristiansen, V., Strom, O, and Shur, M, “Conducting LaboratoryExperiments over the Internet,” IEEE Transaction on Education, Vol42, pp. 180-185,August, 1999.[4] Exel, M., Gentil, S., Michau, F., Rey, D., “Simulation workshop and
Laboratory Experience for Introductory Engineering Students, 2001.4. Freeman R. and Whitaker K., “Mobile Robots as an Instructional Tool for CELTS,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2793, 2000.5. Ramesh S.K., Fujita M., Kumar P., Haas S., Lindsay A., and Raley E.G., “An Interactive Workshop for High School Teachers to Develop and Teach Pre-engineering Curricula,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, p. 2793, 2001.6. Carley, L.R., and Khosla P., “Experimental Context for Introduction to Electrical and Computer Engineering,” McGraw-Hill, NY, 1997.7. URL: http://www.mission-technology.com/nsfrobot/ “A Low Cost Hands-On Laboratory Experience for Introductory Engineering Students”8. Skubic M
Session 1464 Materials Characterization by Digital Microscopy G. J. Filatovs, S. N. Yarmolenko, D. M. Pai and J. Sankar Department of Mechanical Engineering and NSF Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures, NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411AbstractMaterials characterization and analysis is the central theme of materials science. While computer-based methods greatly extend the scope of characterization techniques, these methods areassociated with their own set of implementation issues in terms of image processing, statistical,and mathematical problems. Classical metallography does not
according to the size of the library’s journal collection and the amount of timethat can be devoted to the task by staff member(s). Up until this time we did not have ourelectronic journals listed in our OPAC. The desire to make the linking project worth the effortwas just the incentive we needed to finally add these records to the OPAC. I did not have thetime to begin this process until two months after phase two was completed and is still underwayat date of publication. The real power of the linking to the OPAC feature is using the OPAC as acentral point to reach other electronic resources without having to open the OPAC and conductan additional search.Phase 4Phase four is to include our other online commercial databases into the linking chain as
2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” [4] Widnall, Sheila E. (2000). Digits of Pi: Barriers and Enablers for Women in Engineering. The Bridge Magazine Volume 30 [5] Koppel, N., Cano, R., Heyman, S., “An attractive engineering option for girls”, Proceedings for the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, Nov, 2002 [6] Cano, R., Kimmel, H., Koppel, N., Muldrow, D., “A First Step for Women into the Engineering Pipeline”, Proceedings for the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV, Oct. 2001 [7] Abrams, L.M., Fentiman, A.W., “An Integrated Program to Recruit
of including ethics in a Control Systems course, it seemed adaunting task, since the lectures were already crammed tight with technical material. Moreimportantly, since the course is a senior-level technical elective, the topics are rather abstract,making it even more difficult to establish linkages with real-world problems. However, as Ibegan to ponder on this during the Ethics Across the Curriculum Workshop, it quickly becameclear that an exposure to ethics could also provide the mechanism to make this material moreconcrete. So I began searching for a pertinent case study that would highlight the importantethical dimensions of control system design. After some searching, I found references for theBART case study from the 1960’s, which
analysis of particle dynamics using work-energy and impulse-momentum methods, analysis of impact events; (4) analysis of a system of particle using work-energy, impulse, linear and angular momentum; (5) kinematics and kinetics of rigid bodies analyzed in various reference systems; (6) additional analysis of rigid body dynamics using work-energy and impulse- momentum; (7) inertia quantities. Computational techniques will be incorporated into several design projects throughout the semester to illustrate alternative solution methods.Textbook(s): Engineering
Council 3.1 Masters Degree Requirements D. Research Contracts, Grants, 3.2 Doctoral Degree Requirements & Gifts 3.3 Doctoral Examinations E. Sample Degree Plans 3.4 Graduate Course OfferingsThe self-study document includes copious amounts of data regarding production of M.S. andPh.D. degrees, examples of placement of Ph.D.’s, student credit hour generation, teaching loads,frequencies of course offerings, and general budgetary considerations. Page 8.554.5Weese & Anand: External Review of Texas A&M University’s ME Doctoral
Means 3.90 3.48Team Project Ratings (All Categories) 4.08* 3.26*Team Project R a t i n g s 4.25* 3.30*(Innovation Category Only)*P< .05At the University of Pittsburgh, one focus has been on Product Realization (ENGR 1050) aninterdisciplinary course that considers the product development process. Multidisciplinary teamsof engineering and business students must take a product from concept to manufacturingprototype. Each student team may either develop a product design of its own choosing or workwith an industrial partner of the Swanson Center for Product Innovation. Some funding isavailable for students to make conceptual prototypes and mock-ups as part of their business
, grading of communications assignments in engineering courses involves writtencomments from the instructor(s) designed to give students feedback on their work. Thus, forwritten assignments the instructor writes comments in the margins and/or general summativecomments at the end or beginning of the paper. Similarly, oral presentation assessments oftenconsist of feedback sheets on which the instructor has written comments during and/or after thepresentation.The ultimate aim of these procedures is of course to improve students’ competence inprofessional communications. However, it often seems doubtful that this goal is achieved. First,written assessments are time-consuming for the instructor, which can cause faculty to be reluctantto give many
. Peterson. Mathematics, 6th edition John Wiley and Sons, Danvers, MA 11. Otung, I.E., Reassessing the mathematics content of engineering education, Engineering Science and Education Journal, v10, August 2001, Institute of Electrical Engineers 12. Posamentier, Alfred S. and Jay Stepelman, Teaching Secondary Mathematics, 5th edition 1995 PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. 13. Smith, Karl J., Problem Solving, 1991, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA 14. Usiskin, Zalman, Anthony Peressini, Elena Anne Marchisotto, and Dick Stanley, Mathematics forHigh School Teachers 2003 Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. 15. Willamowski, Jutta, Francois Chevenet, and Francois Jean
-Manufacturing, 99-02. He has published various papers,and has research grants and contracts over $2MRAJIV. S. MISHRARajiv Mishra is a full time Assistant Professor of Metallurgical Engineering Department at UMR. Hecurrently serves as coordinator for the School of Mines and Metallurgy in the Manufacturing EngineeringEducation Executive Committee (MEEEC) at UMR. He is a Research Investigator at the IntelligentSystems Center and the Materials Research Center at UMR.ANTHONY. C. OKAFORAnthony C. Okafor is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at UMR. He currently serves asthe Coordinator of the BSME-Manufacturing Option Program in Mechanical Engineering at UMR. He is aResearch Investigator at the Intelligent Systems Center at UMR. His teaching
Community, A New Future for Architectural Education and Practice”, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1996.[3] Nicol, D., and Pilling, S., “Changing Architectural Education”, E & FN Spon Press, 2000.[4] Boyer, E. and Mitgang, L., “Building Community, A New Future for Architectural Education and Practice”, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1996.Daniel DavisDr. Daniel Davis, AIA. is an Associate Professor and Director of the School of Architecture at the University ofHartford. He is a Registered Architect in both NY and CT and has over 20 years experience as a Design Architect.Davis is also an Associate with Fletcher-Thompson, Architects and Engineers, where he is the Director of Design oftheir Hartford
, and it is expected thatongoing evaluation and formative assessment will drive continued program improvement.AcknowledgementThe support provided by the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12Education Program under award #DGE-0139307 is gratefully acknowledged.Bibliography1. National Science Foundation, “NSF Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12) ProgramSolicitation”, NSF 01-114, http://www.nsf.gov.pubs/2001/nsf01114, 2001.2. Project Lead the Way, http://www.pltw.org.3. The Junior Engineering Technical Society, http://www.jets.org.4. L.J. Bottomley, E.A. Parry, S. Brigade, l> Coley, L. Deam, E. Goodson, J. Kidwell, J. Linck, and B. Robinson,“Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a GK-12 Grant
Session #1601ConclusionIn schools of engineering and technology, standards and practices for assessingstudents’ communication abilities are evolving. The approach discussed here has thepotential to provide useful results while taking into account the amount of time andthe levels of expertise that faculty members can dedicate to all forms of assessment.We need to make continued efforts to overcome the obstacles to effective technicalcommunication assessment. The impetus provided by accrediting organizations canprovide us with opportunities to improve the communication abilities of engineeringand technology students and to improve E&T faculty members’ abilities to teachstudents to “communicate effectively.”Bibliography1. Cerri, S. “Effective
, vol. 16, no. 2, 2000, p.97-103. 2- Engineering Criteria 2000, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, available at http://www.abet.org 3- R. Natarjan, The Role of Accreditation in Promoting Quality Assurance of Technical Education, Int. J. Engng.16, 2, 85-96, 2000. 4- D. Q. Nguyen, The Essential Skills and Attributes of an Engineer: A Comparative Study of Academics, Industry personnel and Engineering Students, Global Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, 65-76, 1998. 5- D. Thom, Engineering Education and the New Industrial Revolution, Int. J. Engng. Ed.,14, 294, 1998. 6- S. Florman, The Civilized Engineer, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1987, pp. 76-77. 7- E. Ferguson, The
Coordination a & Management p t e Data r Transformation Web Server s Distribution Queuing & Persistence Message Transport ERP Applications Data warehouse
gave students theopportunity to develop these skills in a real world environment. Students needed to learnhow to communicate with one another and to work effectively with other team memberswith whom they have little in common. Students learned that attention to detail isparamount when developing a product. Students became aware of the economic andfinancial side of building a product for a business. Students who participated in this classexperienced first hand the internal intricacies of the software industry and its inherentproblems. These students will be better equipped to compete for the best jobs and start ona path to a successful career upon graduation.BibliographyTQM for Computer Software-2nd Edition, Robert H. Dunn and Richard S. Ullman
in all courses of the respective program appearing to violaterequisite(s) e.g., a student who was registered for CSc 102: Introduction for Computer 25 21.1 20 17.1 15 10 8.8 8.2 8.5 7.2 5 4.2 3.8
the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. Vol. 5 p. 2775-2778. 1998.2. Boaventura, C., Cordeiro, M., Couto, C., Morais, R., Salgado, P., and Serodio, C. “Solar Data Acquisition Wireless Network for Agriculture Applications.” 19th Convention of the Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel. P. 527-530. 1996.3. Kostic, M. “Instrumentation with Computerized Data Acquisition for an Innovative Thermal Conductivity Apparatus.” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Session 2659. 1998.4. Lekas, S. “Searching for the Right Data Acquisition Software.” Evaluation Engineering. vol. 35, no. 12, p. 14-20. December, 1996.5. McDonald, D., and Mahajan, A. “Data-Acquisition Systems: An Integral Part of Undergraduate
/lower cost. If the projects are better, we allwin, we get better products, and the engineer probably will get promoted before those who do not thrive inthe long distance environment.”Should this class be offered again in this format? Yes, this is exactly the kind of courseengineers practicing in industry want. They are seeking practical courses focused onbusiness issues. Was the second on-line version better than the first? Yes! We havelearned what works, and what doesn’t. The next time will be even better.References[1] Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S. D. Product Design and Development Second Edition. Irwin-McGrawHill, New York, 2000.[2] Bolanos, H. and Lewis, D. Entrepreneurship and Small Business: How to make money with YourIdeas The Big Purr
Teaching,” in New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 27-35. 7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982), “Intrinsic Motivation and Effective Teaching: A Flow Analysis,” in New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 15-26. 8. Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1982), “Intrinsic Motivation to Teach: Possibilities and Obstacles in Our Colleges and Universities,” in New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 27-35. 9. King, F. G. and Schimmel, K. S., (2001), “A model for faculty
graphically simulate and operateconstruction process in a simple, accurate, safe, and effective way. The practice of class projectsgive students the encouragement to pursuit the research related to computer graphics. Also, moreadvanced construction simulation and integration concepts might be created with the solidfoundation developed in this course.References Page 8.1018.8Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposisition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationOualline, S, Practical C++ Programming. O'Reilly & Associates; ISBN: 0596004192; 2nd edition
, matrix material and 2particle size, and tableting pressure effect a tablet’s physical 1 M = 2 DC s Ct tproperties [3], (4) investigate the release kinetics of the drug 0 0 0.5 1 1 .5 2 2.5from the matrix and to determine whether Higuchi kinetics [2] Tim e 1/2 1/2 (h
their families, friends, and colleagues; and• to generate new and unique ideas for technological changes and developments that would be of benefit to women and families.We have held five such workshops at Santa Clara University, each time including severalwomen from the community. We invited women through several community connections wehave. Each workshop is relatively small, involving only twenty to thirty participants. We ensurea balance by insisting that the participants register early, and limit the number we can accept.We have included women ages 12 to 86, with educations from eighth grade through Ph.D.'s, andbackgrounds including technical and non-technical fields, laborers and professionals. Thewomen included full-time moms, moms