program(s) holds the title of Chair, followed by 15% Director, 13%Head, 11% Dean, 5% Coordinator, and 3% classified with some other title. In 38% of the two-year schools, the person in charge is classified as Chair, in 27% Dean, in 15% Coordinator, in6% Head, in 2% Director, and in 12% this person holds some other title. In summary, the typicalfour-year engineering technology program is housed in a university and directed by a department Page 5.673.2chair. The average two-year program is most often housed in a community college and led by achair or a dean.Bachelor of Science programs in 75% of four-year schools are divided into departments
laboratory work is one method forgetting the practical education needed to be a successful ceramic engineer.VI. BibliographyFurther information about the principles, procedures and properties related to the experiments outlined in this papercan be found in several texts, including the following:1. J. S. Reed, Principles of Ceramic Processing, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1995.2. Engineered Materials Handbook, Volume 4: Ceramics and Glasses. ASM International, 1991.3. W. D. Kingery (ed.), Ceramic Fabrication Processes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1963.MOHMAED N. RAHAMANMohamed N. Rahaman is a Professor of Ceramic Engineering at the University of Missouri-Rolla, where he hastaught Ceramic Engineering courses at the undergraduate and
. Wilson (Eds.), Women and mathematics Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985, 123-150.2. Ibid.3. Ibid.4. Ibid.5. Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R.D. & Blumenfeld, P. “Age And Gender Differences In Children's Self- And Task-Perceptions During Elementary School.” Child Development, 64, 1993, 830-847.6. Byars, A.M., & Hackett, G. “Ethnic Identity Attitudes, Academic And Career Self-Efficacy, Interests And Career Consideration.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Page 5.683.8 New York, August 1995.7. Sadker, M., Sadker, D. & Klein,S., “The
-204.11. Adams, M. “Cultural Inclusion in the American College Classroom.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Spring 1992, 49, pp. 5-17.12. Anderson, J.A., & Adams, M. “Acknowledging the Learning Styles of Diverse Student Populations: Implications for Instructional Design.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Spring 1992, 49, pp. 19-33.13. Carr, S. “Engineering First: Evaluation of the Courses, Spring Quarter 1999.” E-mail to the authors, 24 Aug. 1999. Page 5.698.7BARBARA L. SHWOMBarbara L. Shwom, a University Distinguished Lecturer, has been a faculty member in the Writing Program atNorthwestern University
programs; Template for s-net pic programs in Tanglewire project; The minimum requirements are listed in BOLD typeMATCH equ 40*2 ;match address = your specific address *2 ;this program will match an address of 40; put variable definitions here. You can use registers 12-19 for your functions in a PIC16C84; you can use additional registers if you do not include math or LCD routines org 0 goto start org 4 include “snet_int.asm” ; interrupt routine and initialization routine found in Appendix Auser_int return ; can place a user interrupt routine here, finish with a return, not retfiestart ;initialize TRIS
problems.Bibliography[1] Stice, J., "Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning," Engineering Education, Feb. 1987, pp. 291-296. Page 5.74.7[2] Montgomery, S., "Addressing the Variety of Learning Styles of Chemical Engineering Students Using Multimedia, 1995 ASEE Annual Conference, American Society for Engineering Education.[3] Felder, R., and Silverman, L., "Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education," Engineering Education, April 1988, pp. 674-681.[4] Zeid, O., and Tanyel, M., "Innovation in Teaching Mechanical Engineering Applications," 1994 Frontiers in Education Conference
Construction, Inc. LRFD Manual of Steel Construction, Second Edition, AISC, Inc. Chicago, Illinois, 1998.2. Beer, F. P. and Johnson, E. R., Mechanics of Materials, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992.3. Gere, J. M., and Timoshenko, S. P., Mechanics of Materials, Third Edition. PWS-Kent, Publishing Company, Boston, 1990.4. Muvdi, B.B. and McNabb, J. W., Engineering Mechanics of Materials, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc, New York, 1980.5. Roark, R. J., and Young, W. C., Formulas for Stress and Strain, McGraw Hill, 1975, pp. 104-113.KAMAL B. ROJIANIKamal B. Rojiani is an Associate Professor in the Charles E. Via Jr. Department of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He earned a Bachelor of
old and Orville was32, they had their first successful flights, the longestbeing 852 ft for 59 seconds (Fig. 8).The Wrights built their second improved airplane and tested it in 1904. Its longest flight was 2.8miles for over 5 minutes. Their first truly practical flying machine was completed in 1905, their Page 5.659.5third powered aircraft. Fig. 8. “First Flight” on December 17, 1903. 40 ft wingspan, 6½ ft. chord.The Final Step, communication of the designThe Wright brothers failed miserably with this final step of the design process. When they pro-posed to sell their aircraft and design to the U. S. government, they offered no
Page 6.979.102. Francine Toder and Carolyn S. Hartsough, J. College Student Development 34, March 1993, 159-160.3. Janice Sutera Wolfe, J. College Student Development 34, September 1993, 321-326.4. Astin, A.W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Publishers.5. Bagayoko, D. & Kelley, E.L. (1994). The Dynamics of Student Retention: A Review and a Prescription. Education, v. 115 n1, 31-40.6. J. Johnson, Commuter College Students: What Factors Determine Who Will Persist and Who Will Drop Out?, College Student Journal. v31, 323-332.Daniela CastanedaDaniela is an undergraduate pharmacy major and ACES Team staff member. She has worked in ACES fortwo years.Rosa GomezRosie has been
11 V 11 00 00 11 11 00 11 00 Q 00R 11 P 00 11 S 00 11 x a a+h (1) ¼´ µ (2) ´ µ
demonstrating it to be based upon sound principles. Once derived this new methodologymay be applied readily to both axial and torsional stress problems. When compared totraditional methods of analysis the transformed-section method will give the students a way ofsolving statically indeterminate, composite member problems, of the sort illustrated here thatmay be quicker, simpler and more visually oriented. In the future testing and sampling to verifythis hypothesis will be conducted. The future will also include the expansion of this theory tocombined stress consideration.Bibliography1. S. Timoshenko, Strength of Materials, Part 1, Elementary Theory and Problems, 3rd ed. (Princeton, N.J.: D. VanNostrand, 1955), pp. 218-221.2. Ferdinand P. Beer and E
convection heat transferincludes “magical” formulae containing non-dimensional numbers raised to strangepowers and affording little, if any, physical insight. Transient conduction involvescomputing non-dimensional numbers and then looking up other non-dimensionalnumbers on charts made in the 1940’s specifically because no one had a computer sittingon their desk! Heat exchanger design and analysis again uses charts “canned” in the firsthalf of the 20th century, because no one other than a few bright academicians could solvethe problems at the time. The result is a course that may be boring for the students,especially the better ones. For some instructors teaching heat transfer is a frustratingexperience; while others may jump at the chance to teach a
/npcontexts_119.html )2. Merton, R. The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action, American Sociological Review, Vol. 1, Dec., 1936, pp.894-904 (see also: http://www.thepoint.net/~usul/text/merton.html )3. Gillon, S. That’s Not What We Meant To Do: Reform and It’s Unintended Consequences in Twentieth- Century America, W.W.Norton and Company, New York, 20004. Healy, T. The Unanticipated Consequences of Technology, Second Annual Ethics and Technology Conference, Loyola University, Chicago, Il, June 6-7, 1997 (http://www.scu.edu/SCU/Centers/Ethics/publications/submitted/healy/consequences.shtml)5. Dorner, D. The Logic of Failure: Why Things Go Wrong and What We Can Do To Make Them Right, Metropolitan Books, New York, 1989
lab-based sections. Similargenerators could be developed for teaching any problem-based technical course on the Internet.Bibliography1. Paull, T. A., Jacob, J. M., Herrick, R. J., Automated Homework in Electrical EngineeringTechnology, 1999 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Charlotte,NC.2. Seward, S., Developing a Dynamic Study Guide using Excel’s Visual Basic, DecisionSciences Institute 1998, Las Vegas, NV.THOMAS LACKSONENThomas Lacksonen is Associate Professor in the Industrial Management department andProgram Director for the M.S. Management Technology program at the University ofWisconsin-Stout. He received a B.S. degree from the University of Toledo, a M.S. degree fromUniversity of South Florida, and a Ph.D
curriculum betterprepares our students to study materials engineering. That fact, coupled with the new content andteaching methods we are using in the materials courses, indicates that the students appear to be learningmore about materials engineering than they were previously.V. Bibliography1. Jordan, William and Norm Pumphrey, Development of an Integrated Materials Engineering Course, Presented at the ASEE annual meeting, Saint Louis, June 2000. In CD-Rom Proceedings (no page numbers).2. Nelson, J. and S. Napper, Ramping Up to an Integrated Curriculum to Full Implementation, presented at the November 1999 Frontiers in Engineering Education Conference.Biographical informationWILLIAM JORDAN is an Associate
transducers, thermocouples and barometers.The manufacturing option offers an additional course, Design for Manufacture, which alsoincludes a laboratory. To support the manufacturing option, students will be introduced toFlexible Manufacturing Cell (FMC). The FMC will enable the students to learn and identifyrobots, computer numerical control (CNC) machine, conveyer, parts pallets and templates. It A&S of Gas Automatic Turbine Controls DATA ACQUISIOTION INSTRUMENTATION
Update, Engineering Technology Leadership Institute,” October 21-24, 2000.3. Neff, G., Scachitti, S. and Zahraee, M., “Continuous Improvement of Engineering Technology Programs – Coming Soon to a University Near You," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, St. Louis, Missouri, (June 18-21, 2000), Session 3148. Available on-line at http://www.asee.org/conferences/search/20097.pdf. The T4 form is at http://www.abet.org/tac/tac%5Fforms.html.4. Langdon, Danny G., “A New Language of Work,” Quality Digest (October 1994):44-48.5. Brawer, EB, Anderson, TJ, Zorowski, CF, Serow, RC and Demery, J, “Closing the Loop: Using Qualitative Assessment in Continuous Quality Improvement of the SUCCEED Coalition,” ASEE Annual Conference
: Total Credits: Total Credits:FALL ____ Credit WINTER ____ Credit Credit Course hrs Course hrs Course hrs Total Credits: Total Credits: Total Credits:FALL ____ Credit WINTER ____ Credit Credit Course hrs Course hrs Course hrs Total Credits: Total Credits: Total Credits:Course(s) student must repeat:Advanced Science elective:Additional notes:NOTE: The student is ultimately responsible for
capital. What is an appropriate MARR for this firm?PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE CONCEPTS Understanding of the notions of product life cycle and the technology life cycle areessential for understanding the evolution of product designs and the total cost effectiveness ofa set of engineering decisions. Three tools are important for this understanding; product lifecycle curves, S Curves and Learning Curves. These tools are well documented in the literatureand can also be taught in terms of case studies.PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS The last topic for inclusion in an effective course in engineering economics isprofitability analysis. Engineers must understand how the overall performance of the firm ismeasured and how their engineering decisions ultimately
. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 21(2), 60-69.Blackburn, R. T., O’Connell, C., & Pellino, G. (1980). Evaluating faculty performance. In P. Jedamus, & M. W. Peterson (Eds.), Improving academic management: A handbook of planning and instructional research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Bowen, H. R., & Schuster, J. H. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.Bowman, C. C. (1988). The college professors in America. New York: Amo Press.Duff, J. M. (1988). Tenure and promotion: A response. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 25(2), 70.Dutton, J. C., & Addy, A. L. (1986). Clearing the hurdles along the tenure track. Engineering Education, 63(5), 660-663.Jones, M. S
Science and Engineering for the 1990’s. National Research Council Committee on Materials Scienceand Engineering, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 19892) Report on the Evaluation of Engineering Education, ASEE, Washington, D.C. June, Journal of EngineeringEducation, 46, 6, 1955 (L. Grintner, Chair , 1952-55)3) Wankat, P. and Oreoviscz, F., Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 19934) Grayson, L., The Making of an Engineer – An Illustrated History of Engineering Education in the United Statesand Canada, John Wiley and Sons, 19935) Engineering Criteria 2000, The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore, MD, 19976) Pieri, R. and Nicholls, D., Teaching Failure Analysis to Undergraduates, Proceedings of the
the project, the project encourages the cadets to becomeindependent learners. For example, cadets from the current team have independently learned theC programming language as well as how to use the C cross-compiler on their own. As for theintellectual curiosity educational outcome, again, the project proved to meet the goal. As alludedto earlier, the cadets from both the past and the current teams have studied books and articlesrelated to mobile robots which indicates their intellectual curiosity of the subject. Finally, thepursuit of excellence for each facet of the project is desired educational outcome number seven: amilitary officer who performs excellence in all s/he does. CONCLUSIONThis paper
Session 3520Fire-Fighting Robot: The United States Air Force Academy Experience D. J. Pack and S. A. Stefanov Department of Electrical Engineering United States Air Force Academy USAFA, CO 80840-6236 ABSTRACTIn this paper we present an overview of the ongoing study on fire-fighting robot projectsat the United States Air Force Academy. The main objectives of this paper are: 1) todemonstrate the usefulness of a fire-fighting robot project as a tool for students tointegrate their undergraduate knowledge and 2) to present the
Quantification of Environmental Effect during Product Life”, Annals of the CIRP, vol. 41(1), pp. 473-476, 1992.4. Ishii, K., and Mukherjee, S., “Post Manufacturing Issues in Life Cycle Design”, ASME: Design for Manufacture, vol. 51, 1992.5. Suh, N. P. The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, 1990.6. Moss, M. A., “Designing for Minimal Maintenance Expense”, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 1985.7. Life cycle Engineering Group, Stanford University, “LASeR 1.0: Life-cycle Assembly, Service and Recycling Software and User’s Manual”, 1994.8. Ishii, K., “Design for Recycle Modularity”, http://mml-mac-9.stanford.edu/MMLWeb Doc.stanford.edu/MMLWebDocs/research/projects/summary/dfe/dfe.html, 1996.9. "EIFA", http:/dfe.stanford.edu/eifa.html
before leaving the University.REFERENCES1. Omaggio,A. 1986. Teaching Language in Context: Proficiency Oriented Instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, p.472. Grandin, J.M., K. Einbeck, and W. Reinhart. 1992. “The Changing Goals of language Instruction” in Languagesfor a Multicultural World in Transition, Heidi Byrnes, Ed. Lincolnwood, IL NTC, pp 150-1513. Krashen, S. D. and T. Terrell. 1983. The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Hayward,CA: the Alemany Press, pp. 32-33.Biographical NotesProf. RICHARD P. LONG, (Ph.D. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) is a Geotechnical Engineer, who has been amember of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty at the University of Connecticut for thirty years. Hehas served as a
USTGrowth of students in the current degree programs has been following the typical performancecurve for a need, which is beginning to be met by new technology. The signs were clear that a Page 3.337.4new S-curve was upon us, Figure 2. 4 Performance Curves for Two Generations of Technology High New Technology Performance Old Technology
as an example in the “Ethics Across the Curriculum” Workshop, an NSF-sponsored workshop held at IIT’s Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions (CSEP), July, 1997.4. J. Bebeau, K. D. Pimple, K. M. T. Muskavitch, S. L. Border, and David Smith, Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research, Cases for Teaching and Assessment, page 25 (The Jessica Banks Case), pages 37-38 (The Charlie West Case), Indiana University, December, 1995.5. “Data Control and Management”, pp. 1-12, Research Integrity, A Semi-Annual Newsletter. Volume I, No. 2; J. A. Reyes, editor, published by Office of Intellectual Integrity, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, Fall, 1996.6. William I. Rosenblum, “What is an Author? The
movement. The intent of these courses was to providestudents experiences that would allow them to introduce and teach students this (these) subject(s)in the public schools of the state. Early courses consisted of fine and applied arts, simplewoodwork, bent iron, and mechanical drawing. The mechanical drawing course included“projection of shadows, instrumental perspective and plane geometry.”Early inclusion of CAD/CAM concepts were taught via Tektronix CRTs, digitizing tablets,joysticks, binary tape preparation devices, customized 2-D software, very early versions of NCsoftware, all with output provided by a B-size plotter. By the early 1980s the CAD operation wasupgraded to a large mainframe computer with remote dumb terminals located in
ofinternational collaborative student teams and design projects. THE IUT - PENN STATE ALTOONA CONNECTIONThe University d’Artois is a new university in northern France. It is composed of four campuseswhich until the early 1990’s were part of the University of Lille. Today the University d’Artoishouses programs in engineering, engineering, technology, and management at its Bethunelocation, liberal arts and related disciplines at its campus in Arras, natural and applied sciences inLens, and law programs in Douai . At the Bethune location the engineering programs areorganized into the Institut Universataire Technologie (IUT) for the technology programs and theInstitut Universataire Professionelle (IUP) for the engineering programs. As a
statistical analyses.References1,2,3,4,5,6 King, J.R., Probability Charts for Decision Making, Technical and Engineering Aids for Management,Tamworth, NH, 1971, Revised 1981, pp, 266, 1, 267, 9, 13, 15, respectively.7 Figliola, R.S., Beasley, D.E., Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements,” John Wiley & Sons, 1991, p. 14.8 Aitchison, J. Brown, J.A.C., The Lognormal Distribution, Cambridge at the University Press, 1966, p 9.9 Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., Distributions in Statistics, Continuous Univariate Distributions - 1, Houghton Mifflin,Co., 1970, p. 14.10 Sachs, L., Applied Statistics - A Handbook of Techniques, Springer-Verlag, 1982, p. 107.11, 12 King, J.R., Probability Charts for Decision Making, Technical and Engineering Aids for