;SrchMode=2&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VNa me=PQD&TS=1258783964&clientId=13118 [3] Godinez, M. ; Hechler, E., Koenig, K., Lockwood, S., Oberhofer, M., Schroeck, M. (2010). The Art of Enterprise Information Architecture: A Systems-Based Approach for Unlocking Business Insight. Indianapolis, Indiana: IBM Press. Retrieved From http://pqtechbus.safaribooksonline.com/book/databases/business- intelligence/9780137054947/enterprise-information-architecture-operational- model/ch06lev1sec1#searchlist[4] Longman, C. (2008). Why Master Data Management is Such a Challenge. DM Review, 18(11), 18-20[5] Loshin, D. (2008). Master Data Management. Morgan Kaufmann, CA: San
construction management education. Proceedings, The Associated Schools of Construction. Accessed 23 December 2013, URL: http://ascpro.ascweb.org/main.php4. Bowen, W.G., Chingos, M. W., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2012). Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from Randomized Trials, Ithaka S+R, Accessed 23 December 2013, URL: http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/interactive-learning-online-public-universities-evidence- randomized-trials Page 24.151.105. Chan, Y. M. (2010). Video Instructions as Support for Beyond Classroom Learning. Procedia Social and
role of contextual exercises and adaptive expertise on cad model creation procedures. In Kurosu, M. ed. Human-Computer Interaction Part II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 408-417.[18] Atman, C.J., Adams, R.S., Cardella, M.E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S. & Saleem, J., (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96 (4), 359-379.[19] Bhavnani, S.K., James H. Garrett, J. & Shaw, D.S., (Year). Leading indicators of cad experienceed.^eds. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Computer-aided architectural design futures, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States: North-Holland Publishing Co., 313-334
Industrial Engineering at thelarge private university in South America partially supported this exploratory study.Bibliography1. Allen, D., et al. (2008). “Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report.” Grant X3-83235101- 0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.2. Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, J., Mihelcic, J., and Vanasupa, L. (2008). “Civil and environmental engineering education (CEEE) transformational change: Tools and strategies for sustainability integration and assessment in engineering education.” Proc. ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.3. Koehn, E., Patel, D., and Khonde, S. (2009). “Introduction of sustainability to civil and
table. The list of fourteen features proposed tobe tracked for ranking of ET programs are marked with a (). The ETC leadership has the ability to organize a task force from the ET communitycharged to design a set of relevant features and work with the ASEE in implementing a datacollection, tracking and publication process. The availability of national data that is centrallycollected by the ASEE will eventually lead to ranking. Ranking discussions may be contentious,but by concentrating on the positive, rankings can also be quite valuable to faculty andadministrators seeking to improve and expand their programs.On Graduate ET Programs: the natural growth direction The 1980’s controversial debate on the need for master’s degrees in
change in the 21st century. Journal of Experiential Education, 1999. 22(2): p. 91-98.8. Savage, R.N., K.C. Chen, and L. Vanasupa, Integrating project-based learning throughout the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Materials Engineering, 2007: p. 1.9. Fruchter, R., A/E/C teamwork: A collaborative design and learning space. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 1999. 13(4): p. 261-269.10. Goedert, J.D., S. Rokooei, and R. Pawloski. Virtual Interactive Construction Education: A Project-based Pedagogical Model for Construction Engineering and Management. in Higher Education Pedagogy Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference, Virginia tech University. 2012.11. Goedert, J., et al., A
, S.W.A., (1997). Simple scale models for daylighing design: Analysis of sources of error in illuminance prediction. Lighting Research and Technology, 29: 135-142.8. Ng, E.Y.Y., L.K. Poh, W. Wei and T. Nagakura, (2001). Advanced lighting simulation in architectural design in the tropics. Automation Construction, 10: 365-379.9. Kurian, C.P., V.I. George, J. Bhat and R. S. Aithal, (2006). ANFIS model for the time series prediction of interior daylighting illluminance. AIML Journal, 6: 35-4010. Seward, A. (2011). Light meter. Eco-structure, 9: 21-24. Page 24.222.14
Polak, P. (2008). Out of poverty: What works when traditional approaches fail. San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.12 Mehta, K., Morais, D. B., Zhao, Y., Brannon, M. L., & Zappe, S. (2011). “Milking the Rhino -‐ Innovative Solutions Showcase: Promoting Ethics Education, User-‐Centered Design and Social Entrepreneurship in the Global Context.” American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 13 Nelson, Lindsey. (2013) “Assessing Student Design Work in Social Entrepreneurship Projects” American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition
Academies Press, 2010.6. Allen Phelps, Career Pathways for STEM Technicians, Chapter 3, University of Central Florida, 2012.7. Elizabeth Teles, Career Pathways for STEM Technicians, Chapter 2, University of Central Florida, 2012.8. Paul Illich, Darrell M. Hull, and Paul Ruggiere, Industry Demand for Two-Year College Graduates in Optics and Photonics Technology: An Industry Survey of Current and Future Demand for Two-Year Degreed Photonics Technicians, Waco, TX: OP-TEC Monograph, 2012.9. Darrell M. Hull and Robert S. Gutzwiller, “Two-Year College Enrollment and Completion Rates: An Estimation of Workforce Supply for Technicians in Optics, Photonics, and Laser Technology,” OP- TEC Working Paper Series, Working Paper #5, 2008.10
based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-1151019. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of Nishant Kochhar,an undergraduate research assistant working on this project, the MEDLEE research group, andthe Purdue graduate students enrolled in the “Social Construction of Knowledge: Analysis ofVideo Data” course for their input and feedback on this project.References[1] Powell, A.B., J.M. Francisco, and C.A. Maher," An analytical model for studying the development of learners' mathematical ideas for
teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 123-138.[6] Mills, J.E. & Treagust, D. (2003). Engineering Education – is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australian Journal of Engineering Education. http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills-treagust03.pdf [Last retrieved 01/04/2014].[7] Lehmanna, P., Christensena, X. Dua & M. Thranea. (2008). Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 33, Issue 3, 2008.[8] Smith, K., Speppard, S., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2005). Pedagogies of Engagement
Shift, in Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, S. Vosnidou, Editor 2008: Hilsdale, NJ.9 B.S. Bloom and D.R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1984.10 Krathwohl, D.R., A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 2002. 41(4): p. 212-218.11 Burgher, J.e.a., New Hands-On Fluid Mechanics Cartridges and Pedagogical Assessment. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.Appendix Interview ProtocolConcept Questions AskedFlow Regimes A) What are the main regimes of flow? B) Can
Weerakoon, P. (2001) The role of computer-aided assessment in health professional education: a comparison of student performance in computer-based and paper-and-pen multiple-choice tests. Medical Teacher, 23(2), 152-157.3. Russel, M. (1999). Testing on computers: A follow-up study comparing performance on computer and on paper. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7, 20.4. Clariana, R. and Wallace, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factor associates with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 593-602.5. Ozalp-Yaman, S. and Cagiltay, N.E. (2010). Paper-Based versus Computer-Based Testing in Engineering Education. IEEE EDUCON Education Engineering 2010
the students in this study would be relatively constant overtime as well. It would be useful to examine the GPAs of these students in light of the research todate to see if this trend is observed. In addition, one might expect that, in the future, if theseindicators change with time, it could be indicative of substantial changes in the K-12 curriculumand/or some other contributing factor(s) that the students experience prior to enrolment in first-year engineering. This longitudinal study may also provide a foundation for assessing the successor failure of initiatives that are being undertaken or those that may be proposed in the future toimprove the success and retention of first-year engineering students at our institution
build better relationships between universities andcompanies by opening communication between faculty and engineers.References[1] Cox, M.F., Zhu, J., Ahn, B., London J.S., Frazier, S., Torres-Ayala, A.T., and Guerra, R.C.C.“Choices for PhD’s in Engineering: Analyses of Career Paths in Academia and Industry”.Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2011[2] Cox, M.F., Zhu, J., London J.S., Ahn, B., Torres-Ayala, A.T., and Ramane, K.D.“Recommendations for Promoting Desirable Characteristics in Engineering PhD’s: Perspectivesfrom Industry and Academia”. Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.2012[3] Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering – Phase 1: Synthesizing andIntegrating Industry
another is for a hypothetical environmental spill at aconvenient geologic site identified by the students for an independent geologic field trip. Page 24.640.5Table 1. Matrix Map of Learning Objectives to Evaluation Tools for Acceptable Evidence of Learning Desired Results: Students should be Acceptable Evidence Value Learning Experience(s) able to Proj Wk Case HW Tests demonstrate understanding of basic applications of geology to civil/environmental engineering by
provide challenges they want addressed. Page 24.646.12References1 Hart, S. and B. Spittka. The Goethals Infrastructure Challenge: A Proposal for a New Student Competition. in ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition: Frankly We do Give a D*mn, June 23, 2013 - June 26, 2013. 2013. Atlanta, GA,United States: American Society for Engineering Education.2 Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Rittel, Horst W.J. and Webber, Melvin M.1973, Policy Sciences, pp. 155-169.3 Friedman, Thomas L. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. NewYork : Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2006.4 Barry, B., K. Meyer, K. Arnett, and B. Spittka
beincorporated in the new programs relating to disaster & emergency management and solarenergy at the undergraduate and graduate level.References1. Doyle S. Rice, “Report: Climate change behind rise in weather disasters,” USA TODAY, October 10, 2012.2. Jennifer Leaning, and Debarati Guha-Sapir, “Natural Disasters, Armed Conflict, and Public Health,” National England Journal of Medicine, November 2013.3. The World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/4. Munich Re, Leading Experts on Risk Solutions Worldwide. http://www.munichre.com/en/homepage/default.aspx5. William R. Young, Jr., “History of Applying Photovoltaic to Disaster Relief,” FSEC-CR-96, Prepared by Sandia Laboratory, 1996.6. Solar PV emergencies & Resilience
these specifications it would be nearly impossible to havesuccess in the successive steps due to the vagrancies of a poorly written objective. The followingrepresent the SMART specifications: Specific – target a specific area for improvement. Measurable – quantify or at least suggest an indicator of progress. Assignable – specify who will do it. Realistic – state what results can realistically be achieved, given available resources. Page 24.672.5 Time-related – specify when the result(s) can be achieved.Figure 3Portion of the LDP’s X-Matrix
Service. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 139-150. [2] Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., & Cardella, M.E. (2012). Students' ways of experiencing human-centered design, Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28-59. [3] IDEO (2009). Human centered design toolkit, 2nd Edition, IDEO. [4] Design resources: The wallet project, 10 October 2013. [Online]. Available: https://dschool.stanford.edu/groups/designresources/wiki/4dbb2/. [5] Use our methods: What? How? Why? https://dschool.stanford.edu/wp-content/themes/dschool/method- cards/what-why-how.pdf. Accessed 2/15/14. [6] https://www.designheuristics.com. Accessed 1/5/14. [7] Ash, S. L., Clayton, P. H., & Moses, M. G. (2009). Learning through
like to acknowledge support from National Science Foundation–Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education (NUE) grant 1042110.References:1. M. Agarwal, M. E. Rizkalla, H. El-Mounayri, S. Shrestha, J. A. Simpson, and K. Varahramyan, “A Novel Model for Integrating Nanotechnology Track in Undergraduate Engineering Degree Programs,” J. Nano Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 135–141, Dec. 2013.2. “Moore’s Law and Intel Innovation,” Intel. [Online]. Available: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/history/museum-gordon-moore-law.html. [Accessed: 30-Dec-2013].3. “Nanomedicine.” [Online]. Available: https://commonfund.nih.gov/nanomedicine/index. [Accessed: 30-Dec- 2013].4. H. F. Tibbals, “Emerging National and Global Nanomedicine
MinorityParticipation (LSAMP) program (1993-2018) and the New Mexico Legislature through aResearch and Public Service Project (1996-present).A Statewide Partnership in New Mexico The New Mexico AMP is a partnership representing the State’s 20 public two-yearinstitutions, including two federally funded institutions serving American Indian students, andthe seven state-supported four-year universities. New Mexico AMP is aligned with other federal-funded programs in New Mexico who share a common vision, such as the College AssistanceMigrant Program (CAMP), Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM), and the STEM Talent ExpansionProgram (STEP). Collectively, these and other programs have resulted in a statewide networkthat has become part of the fabric of higher education
university? Future Benefits: 15. In what way(s) do you think your degree with help you in the future? 16. What are your plans for the future? Recommendations: 17. What advice would you give high school students who are thinking about pursuing a college education? Page 24.862.11 18. What do you recommend for the university to do to best support you and your educational goals?
LAES students were able to serve as informed and responsible citizens in aglobal culture and seemed to remain involved with learning and helping society improve.Many of the respondents commented on the students’ ability to work efficiently, noting that thestudents seemed to be well prepared for work. One employer stated that s/he found the LAESstudents to be “very bright individuals and excellent at creating new ways to make our office andproduction and distribution more cost effective. Great insight and skills come from their coursesfrom which they have taken at Cal Poly. I think all of the students that I have hired from CalPoly in other majors have all contributed their own style and knowledge to the company.”Another employer noted that the
societies in the 21st century. In New perspectives on service-learning: Research to advance the field (M. Welch & S. Billig, eds.) (pp. 3-22), Greenwich:Information Age Publishing.Lima, M. and W. Oakes. 2006. Service-Learning: Engineering in Your Community. Great LakesPress, Okemos, MI., ISBN 1-881018-94-6 (book was purchased by Oxford University Press in2011; 2nd edition will be published in June, 2013).E. Tsang, Editor. 2000. Projects That Matter: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning inEngineering, AAHE’s Series on Service-Learning in the Disciplines. AAHE Press,Zlotkowski, E., Ed. 1998. Service-Learning in the Disciplines. 20+ volume series on service-learning in various professions; entire series available athttp://styluspub.com/Books
, "Practical Proposals for Motivating Students" In R. J. Menges and M.D. Svinicki (eds.), College Teaching: From Theory to Practice. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, no. 45.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass4 Wyckoff, S. C. (1999). The academic advising process in higher education: History, research, and improvement.Recruitment & Retention in Higher Education, 13(1), pp. 1-35 Habley, W.R. and McClanahan, R., 2009, “What works in Student Retention”, American College Testing6 PLTL Progressions Newsletter v3, 12, p10 and v4, 11, p77 Quitadamo, I.J., Brahler, C.J., Crouch, G.J., 2009, “Peer-Led Team Learning: A Prospective Method for IncreasingCritical Thinking in undergraduate Science Courses”, Science Educator, 18, 1 (Spring), 29-39
of Innovation: A Cross-Curricular Perspective on Instructional and Curricular Change in Engineering." American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.9. Bowen, D.M. (2007). "Engineering Education Innovations: Modeling the Influence of Organizational Context and Faculty Behavior." The Acceptance and Diffusion of Innovation: A Cross-Curricular Perspective on Instructional and Curricular Change in Engineering, R. Spalter-Roth, N. Fortenberry, and B. Lovitts, eds., American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.10. Ambrose, S. (2007). "Exploring the Role of the Reward System in the Diffusion of Innovation in Engineering Education." The Acceptance and Diffusion of Innovation: A Cross-Curricular Perspective
Work, 22(1-2), pp. 213-225, 2002. 4.) W. Oakes, J. Duffy, T. Jacobius, P. Linos ,S. Lord, W.W. Schultz, and A. Smith, “Service Learning in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November, 2002. 5.) E.J. Coyle, L.H. Jamieson, and W.C. Oakes, “EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), pp. 139-150, January 2005. 6.) Andrew T. Jeffers, Angela G. Safferman, and Steven I. Safferman, “Understanding K–12 Engineering Outreach Programs,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(2), pp. 95- 108, April 1, 2004. 7.) G. Padmanabhan and D. Katti, “Using Community-Based Projects in
models and reduce or eliminate grading time. Automatic grading can be used toassess many different modeling criteria, including but not limited to the proper selection andplacement of features, feature order, and use of constraints to capture design intent. The criteriaused to check the solid model can be selected to assess both procedural and strategic knowledge.Future work will involve implementation of automatic grading for quizzes, homework exercisesand/or online tutorials. We will design a range of skills assessments using the Precision LMSsystem and evaluate improvements in the students’ modeling skills. Grading of dynamic systemsmay also be investigated.Bibliography1 Lieu, D. and S. Sorby (2008), Visualization, Modeling, and Graphics for
this extremely rewarding eventand build a closer bond with their students.Bibliography[1] Bosworth, K. and Hamilton, S. J., editors, Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 59, 1994.[2] Felder, R., How Students Learn: Adapting Teaching Styles to Learning Styles, Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, 489-493, 1988.[3] Gabelnik, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., and Smith, B.L., editors, Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty, and Disciplines, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Jossey- Bass, 1990.[4] Higley, K. A. and C. M. Marianno, “Making Engineering Education Fun,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol