literature thatinformed the conceptualization of this paper: student development theories in higher education;and literature on engineering competencies. Then, we will outline the methodology we used inour review and analysis, including selection criteria and the coding schemes. We will present thefindings from our review in light of student development perspectives in higher educationliterature and discuss the scholarly and practical implications of our findings to engineeringeducation and research. Our paper will contribute to enhancing the capacities for research onstudent-focused issues in engineering education.Starting Point: Student Development Theories and Engineering Competencies Our exploration began with attempts to connect student
career decision making. Journal of College Student Development, 46(1), 13-27.14. Creamer, E. G., Lee, S., & Laughlin, A. (2005). Self-authorship as a framework for understanding life decision making among college women in Korea: Manuscript submitted for publication.15. Dryburgh, H. (2000). Underrepresentation of girls and women in computer science: Classification of 1990's research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2), 181-202.16. Fassinger, R. E. (1990). Causal models of career choice in two samples of college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 225-248.17. Felsman, D. E., & Blustein, D. L. (1999). The role of peer relatedness in late adolescent career development. Journal of
firmshould apply to select an academic collaborator to optimize its payoff from its R&Dinvestment. We also analyze the criteria a research team should apply to select aresearch project from a firm to advance its stock of knowledge. In our model, a firm links to a university to form a R&D research consortiumto conduct an innovation R&D project. The firm provides the investment, which isthe cost of project conduction carried out at the university. The university receivesthe investment and conduct the research for the project. The outcome of theseprojects, in the form of stock of knowledge and preparation for students, benefitsboth sides and gives a win-win situation: the firm uses the new innovation to reduceits production cost; the
, American Society of Mechanical Engineers and American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Mawasha has received numerous honors including Omicron Delta Kappa (Leadership), Pi Tau Sigma (Mechanical Engineering), Pi Mu Epsilon (Mathematics), and Tau Beta Pi (Engineering). His research interests include thermo-fluids sciences, bioengineering, applied mathematics, and engineering education.Kumar Yelamarthi, Wright State University KUMAR YELAMARTHI is a Ph.D. student. He holds the MSEE from Wright State University. He serves as the lead Graduate Teaching Assistant for the Freshman Engineering and Computer Science Program. He was honored as the most outstanding graduate student in 2004, outstanding
studies from Old Dominion University in 2015. Isaac’s consultancy, HEDGE Co., focuses on working with formal and informal educators to grow the numbers of females pursuing engineering or technology careers. Additionally, she is a conferred Fellow of the Society of Women Engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Does How Pre-College Engineering and Technology Role Models See Themselves Relate to Girls' Engagement in the Fields? [Research to Practice]IntroductionSince the Equal Pay Act in 1963, female participation in engineering has increased only eightpoints, from less than 5 to 13% [1], while, in the fields of medicine, female participation
education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses na- tionwide, and is co-PI on several NSF grants to explore gender in engineering, design education, and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design.Jacob Preston Moore, Virginia Tech Jacob Moore is a PhD candidate in the Engineering Education PhD program at Virginia Tech. His re- search interests include developing better digital textbooks for engineering and using Rapid Prototyping in education.Deirdre Annaliese Nicole Hunter, Virginia Tech Deirdre Hunter is a doctoral student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Syracuse
Student Exchange, Faculty Exchange, and Faculty Collaboration – both instructionand research and development. We then share some of the key characteristics that make eachpossible and successful. Key factors, such as timetable matching and course equivalencymapping for accreditation and time-to-degree considerations, will be described and exampleprocedures and documents to these ends will be shared.This paper provides, not a conceptual exploration of what might be, but rather a practical, reality-based sharing of best practices that derive from our two institutions’ more than two year effort toevolve sustainable linkages. We are reporting on lessons learned from the real experience ofadministrators, faculty and students, not only exchanging but
, particularly for international students. He aims to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by interventions, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection to promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group. He served as the ASEE Purdue Student Chapter President from 2022-2023, the Program Chair of ASEE Student Division, and Purdue ENE Graduate Committee Junior Chair.Dr. Moses Olayemi, University of Oklahoma Moses Olayemi is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Pathways at the
technology, may not have the training orexperience necessary to think about the social, political, and ethical implications of their workand so may not be technologically literate.”2 As any engineering educator can attest, many of ourstudents express that one of the reasons they gravitate to a technical field is that they are moreinterested in what they perceive to be the “concrete and objective” world of technoscience, andwould like to minimize their contact with the fuzzier world of social, political, and economicconcerns. Heretofore, engineering education has largely obliged these students by concentratingthe curriculum on technical analysis. I have hope, though, that the winds have changed. WithABET’s new requirements for inculcating an
list emphasizesaptitude for leadership across professions, including roles such as educating policy debate. Theeducator’s challenge is to translate the above guidance into practical steps in the curriculum.There is debate among NAE experts on the need to push the first engineering degree out to a fifthyear; however, barring this development, one must assume that the time available to impart thenew, broader, deeper education to the 18-year-olds of 2016 will be the same as that available toeducate 18-year-olds now.Clearly, all of the above cannot be “taught” in courses within any reasonable time. It has to belearnt by students. The learning will occur from many sources, of which classroom instruction isat best the most important. The change from
enterprise. Furthermore, we should study andformulate the fiscal benefit policy and legal security measures for enterprises to engage in thetalent training, ensure multiple rights and interests of enterprises, schools and students in thejoint cultivation process of universities and enterprises and form a sustained nurturingmechanism for the cooperation between enterprises and schools. We ought to identify theresponsibilities and duties in talent training of the manufacturing innovation center (industrialtechnology research base) and major projects planned by “Made in China 2025”. Meanwhile,we should also encourage universities to actively participate in the knowledge updatingprogram for specialized technicians, undertake the training tasks for
Kolmos 1989 [15] Du 2006 [4] Gender and knowledge in engineering Bringing new values into engineering Topic education - Women's approach towards education - Gender and learning in a PBL engineering environment Time 1985-1989 2003-2006 - Reasons for mens’ and women’s choice - What are the learning experiences of of engineering students of both genders when studying Research questions - Whether women do bring in another engineering in a PBL environment
, need to fill the knowledge gap, time and effort commitment, and defined values are among factors that impact the collaboration effectiveness. The findings also show that collaborative efforts can be differently interpreted based on the students’ structured criteria. The results of this study will contribute to the body of knowledge by providing inputs for construction administrators and educators to design and develop collaborative settings in which students are led to develop their managerial skills and effectively perform in larger multidisciplinary teams and organizations. Keywords: Collaboration, Teamwork, Construction, Education
positiveattitude during their collaboration activities. The data set was provided by the Shark Lab at CSULong Beach and we gratefully acknowledge the support we received from the shark expertsthere, in particular the director, Dr. Chris Lowe, and Graduate Student, Patrick Rex. References1. M. LaalSeyed, and M. Ghodsi (2012) “Benefits of collaborative learning” Elsevier Proceedings - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 31, Pages 486-490.2. E.F., Barkley, K.P. Cross, and C.H. Major (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.3. D.W Johnson, R. Johnson, and K. Smith (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.4. D. Kantor (2010
of the dissection and modeling process in IE305 to providecontext for the motor costs analysis needed in IE 302. Additionally, students were given somedirection to reasonable web sites where basic shipping information could be gathered (Figure 6). Figure 6. Example of basic relevant shipping data (screen shot from https://www.searates.com/reference/portdistance accessed 12/3/17).A senior undergraduate student researcher who took the engineering economy course theprevious year worked with the course instructor to interface with the IE 305 course teachingteam and undergraduate researchers of other courses involved in the launch to
,Signals and Systems, and Microcomputers I, through which students gain solid foundation beforestudents take on senior design projects. Lab modules with open-ended design learning experience through using a lab-in-a-boxapproach were developed to allow students to solve lab problems with multiple approaches thatallow problem solving independently and collaboratively. Because this innovative lab designallows problem solving at various cognitive levels, it is better suited for concept exploration andcollaborative lab learning environments as opposed to the traditional lab works with a“cookbook” approach that tend to lead students to follow certain procedures for expectedsolutions with the absence of problem exploration stage. In addition to
), the OSGCis one of 52 national consortia that compose the Space Grant Program. OIT is one of 18 OSGCaffiliate members across the state of Oregon that includes higher education institutions,community colleges, and informal educators. In support of NASA’s mission to explore anddiscover and to inspire the next generation of explorers to meet the growing workforce need,OSGC is tasked with providing educational and research opportunities to students in aerospace-related disciplines including STEM education.Space Grant’s mission is to: • Establish a national network of universities with interest and capabilities in aeronautics, space, and related fields. • Encourage cooperative programs among universities, aerospace industry, and
definition, and problem solving discourse among students, faculty, and practitioners. Dr. Olewnik is also the Director of Experiential Learning for the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.Dr. Randy Yerrick, Fresno State University Randy Yerrick is Dean of the Kremen School for Education and Human Development at CSU Fresno. He has also served as Professor of Science Education at SUNY Buffalo where he Associate Dean and Sci- ence Education Professor for the Graduate School of Education. Dr. Yerrick maintains an active research agenda focusing on two central questions: 1) How do scientific norms of discourse get enacted in class- rooms and 2) To what extend can historical barriers to STEM learning be traversed for
land. The 3-student teamat UMD was responsible for researching and developing/redesigning the engine, power train and fueland air systems of the Gator for the new mission. Figure 9. eMeeting in HorizonLiveVirtual meetings were crucial to the success of the project. The team leaders from each of the schoolsand two project managers (one from GT and one from John Deere) met weekly to discuss design issuesrelating to the interfaces between the team subsystems. This was accomplished using HorizonLive toshare a virtual desktop or ProductView to collaborate on a virtual CAD model. The entire team alsomet weekly to handle general administrative tasks such as learning the basics of PDM or how to useskeletons in ProE
20 declines to participate, we will fill with a similar schoolthat meets the same selection criteria. Figure 2. Map of Institutions Targeted for RDI participation.The diversity of partner institutions – large land-grant universities, major private institutions,minority-serving institutions, all located across the USA - provides a broad range of uniqueperspectives and experiences that can be shared and modeled. In the fourth year, we will develop a network of institutions hosting RDI interventionsand ‘train-the-trainer’ sessions with the initial collaborating institutions. Throughout the first fouryears of the project, our team will research doctoral students’ transition into graduate schoolbased on the nationwide RDI
Paper ID #37174Centering Equity and Inclusion in Engineering Collaborationand WritingJennifer C Mallette (Associate Professor) Jennifer Mallette is an associate professor of English at Boise State University, where she collaborates with engineering faculty to support student writers. Her research builds on those collaborations, examining best practices for integrating writing into engineering curriculum; she also explores women’s experiences in engineering settings through the context of writing. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
students illustrating the connection between the arts and the sciences, to catalyze interest in STEM/STEAM.Mr. Brandon G Morton, Music Technology as a Vehicle to STEM for High School Students Brandon Morton is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at Drexel University. He received his B.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in 2009 and his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Drexel University in 2011. He was an NSF GK-12 fellow from 2011 to 2013. Currently he is researching methods for detecting influence between musical artists.Dr. Youngmoo Kim, Drexel University Youngmoo Kim is Director of the Expressive & Creative Interaction Technologies (ExCITe) Center and
thinking, problemsolving, and critical thinking.7MethodsResearch DesignThis study involved twenty-five students from one class, adopting pre-tests, mid-tests andpost-tests in a single-sample experimental design. The research instruments, analyticalmethods and administration times are listed in Table 1. The independent variable wasinstructional strategy with two multidisciplinary PBL projects: an Underpass Flooding project(Project 1; P1) adopting a competitive approach to PBL and a Floating Garden project (Project2; P2) emphasizing interdependence and collaboration. Both projects addressed real-worldand local problems occurring in very close proximity to the living environment of the students.Projects were completed in teams for both PBL approaches
]. Inthe spirit of presenting research findings in ways that promote adoption of evidence basedinstructional practices by STEM education practitioners, this project employs UCD tools toanalyze and present project results in an easily accessible and memorable usage model format.The purpose of this paper is to present an approach for using student data to construct contextualstudent “usage models” [10] using common UCD tools. This paper expands on related work inSTEM education [9, 11] that explored the use and/or implementation of singular UCD tools (i.e.,personas) for curricular design and student-focused communication among curricularstakeholders. By implementing a multi-faceted usage model that uniquely combines multipleUCD tools (i.e., personas
course, and students satisfy thisrequirement in a variety of ways. A large proportion of students participate in real-world,industry-sponsored projects. Nearly all programs have a strong connection with industry at thecapstone level, leveraging their geographical location both to identify design projects and toinvolve people from industry as adjunct faculty in the classroom. In addition, there is interestamong some faculty and administrators in allowing student credit for activities such asundergraduate research or competitive design projects sponsored by student organizations.At the ASU Polytechnic campus, the Bachelor of Science in Engineering (B.S.E.) degreeprogram enrolled its first students in fall of 2005 and graduated the first cohort of
integrationof students is pivotal in their ability to persist to graduation [1]. The theory of socialinterdependence [2], [3] elaborates that inclusive, cooperative work is characterized by studentsbeing highly committed. During the Fall 2017 semester of Purdue Polytechnic Institute’sintroductory video game development course (CGT Game Dev I), a course design emphasizingcollaboration among students was employed; an extremely collaborative atmosphere and anunusually high lab attendance rate was then observed. The following year (Fall 2018), the designof CGT Game Dev I was altered to emphasize a more individualized curriculum; decreasedattendance was then observed until end-of-semester groupwork began [4].The problem addressed by this project is that
his/her graduate research project, each student willstudy, design, or create experiences for people with disabilities that will empower them toovercome existing obstacles or barriers in their lives and learning. The findings are expected tobroadly impact learning among students.Overall Program StructureLWD was initially created as a concentration among four of WSU’s existing Ph.D. programs:BioMedical Sciences (BMS), Engineering (Eng), Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), andHuman Factors and Industrial/Organizational Psychology (HF/IO). While these programs reflectdifferent methodological and theoretical traditions, there are many potential points ofoverlapping interest and intersection that favor an interdisciplinary approach. For example
design and construction projects [1]. Many AE graduates areconfronted with these fragmentation problems in real-world construction projects, such as poorcommunication and lack of cooperative consciousness or experience [2]. Compounding this, the problemof fragmentation also exists in the education field that leads to certain consequences and a cyclic educationdeficit problem. Studies from researchers illustrate that most engineering students were taught technicalknowledge via isolated and, thus domain-specific courses with limited to no teaching of integratedapproaches. This limited educational focus causes a lack of knowledge and experience in collaboration forstudents entering the workforce [3]. Moreover, the education model of the AEC
sociocultural dimensions of engineering education.Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park Andrew Elby’s work focuses on student and teacher epistemologies and how they couple to other cognitive machinery and help to drive behavior in learning environments. His academic training was in Physics and Philosophy before he turned to science (particularly physics) education research. More recently, he has started exploring engineering students’ entangled identities and epistemologies.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Assistant Research Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in
-academia partnership in the area of Software Verification and Validation. In his current role he serves as the University’s Sponsored Research Officer, manages research grant applications/awards, supervises all international programs, and teaches undergraduate software engineering and graduate engineering management courses. Dr. Acharya plays an important role in international students recruitment at his University.Jennifer Creamer, Robert Morris University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Opening the Doors for International Students - Are we Ready? AbstractHigher Education Institutions in the United States are facing the effects of the