FOUR: 12 – 15 August, 2013 Teachers worked collaboratively and with curricula development coaches to finalize lessons. Consolidation Emphasis was placed on reviewing the vertical integration of learning goals among disciplines and grade levels. Participants also developed a range of assessment materials that reflect learning within the Common Core State Standards.Students Provide Beta Testing and Teachers Receive Two Levels of Feedback: Participating teachers spenta portion of their day crafting and field-testing small learning units for a group of 350 gifted-and-talented (G/T)students attending co-located summer enrichment programs that mirrored the learning activities being
pulmonologist from Drexel College situation. The first question helped the faculty respond quicklyof Medicine taught students the basics of cystic fibrosis and to student frustrations—either individually or to the entirelung function testing, allowing the students to practice reading class. The second question enabled students to reflect on theirreal patient lung function tests. For the laboratory component, own experiences. The third question tested student depth ofpig lungs from the slaughterhouse were treated in various knowledge, and showed that only a few students could relateways to replicate obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. concepts learned in the module to a new situation.Students then inflated the
turned out to be as strong asexpected, the presence of a relationship and its direction are evidence for the effectiveness ofproject based learning in groups for better academic performance. One possible reason for theweakness of these relationships is the size of the class. Therefore, the instructor intends tocontinue applying this type of participation level questionnaire in the future courses to increasethe cases included in the analysis. Another reason for the grades to reflect the effort put in theteam projects only to a certain extent might be the anomalies observed in two groups. Therewere two groups where one team member put a big effort and the rest of the members did not.The consequence of this approach was that the individual that put
. However, the curriculum at mosttraditional Western universities does not necessarily reflect these new dynamics.” The majorityof chemical engineering programs today do not leave room within their curriculum for studentsto be able to adequately explore the concept of chemical product design and how novel ideas canbecome the basis for new businesses. In fact, out of the 158 ABET accredited chemicalengineering programs in the US, only 25 offer chemical product design classes. This state ofaffairs presents a stark contrast with mechanical, industrial, and even bioengineering programs,where product design has been a routine part of the curriculum for decades.In response to this need, the chemical engineering program at the University of Pittsburgh
through the use of conceptquestions in core curriculum courses like Material/Energy Balances, Thermodynamics, TransportPhenomena, Kinetics and Reactor Design, and Materials Science. Concept questions, both asConcept Inventories and as ConcepTests, are available to help lower the barrier of using concept-based instruction and assessment. This instruction and these assessments can be used to promoteand evaluate student learning in real-time. The instructor can then adjust the pace of lecture inresponse to student understanding, spending more time on more difficult concepts. This tool alsoallows for reflective assessments such as the “muddiest point.”A Student Mobile Application is being developed to make it easier for students to submitanswers and
described as a process of “enculturation,” in which the learners arelike apprentices learning to use domain-specific knowledge as tools as they develop anunderstanding of the rules and culture rooted in the community of practice. Thus, the learningprocess should resemble the ordinary practices of the culture, which usually involvecollaboration, interaction, and social construction of knowledge. Herrington and Oliver’s [10]critical elements of situated learning provide a useful framework to analyze the learning process,which include: (1) authentic contexts, (2) authentic activities, (3) access to expert performancesand modeling, (4) multiple roles and perspectives, (5) collaborative construction of knowledge,(6) reflection, (7) articulation, and (8
, Utah State University: Logan, UT.23. Dym, C.L., J.W. Wesner, and L. Winner, Social dimensions of engineering design: Observations from Mudd Design Workshop III. Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(1): p. 105-107.24. Mehalik, M. and C. Schunn, What constitutes good design? A review of empirical studies of the design process. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 22(3): p. 519-532.25. Adams, R.S., J. Turns, and C.J. Atman, Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 2003. 24(3): p. 275-294.26. Schön, D.A., The reflective practitioner1983, New York, NY: Basic Books.27. Davis, D.C., et al., Engineering design assessment processes and scoring scales for
communication and managementI have discussed the details about students working on the two projects. In addition to designingand building a functional product, students were also trained in terms of communication andmanagement skills. To enhance team performance, team members signed a team contractincluding goals, expectations, policies and procedures, and roles. At the beginning of eachproject, teams were required to turn in a plan of work including a work breakdown structure andschedule. Throughout each project, there were also teamwork self-assessment and peerevaluations to promote collaboration. About two weeks into a project, team members filled outself-assessment forms reflecting on teamwork, with questions including “What are we doing wellin
success efforts have been developed across the country. This paperdocuments the flipped classroom technique incorporated into a pilot electrical engineering courseat Texas A&M International University (TAMIU). The paper also presents feedback results andbriefly discusses future plans.II. Flipping the ClassroomIn a traditional lecture, students often try to capture what is being said at the instant the speakersays it. They cannot stop to reflect upon what is being said, and they may miss significant pointsbecause they are trying to transcribe the instructor’s words [5]. On the other hand, in an invertedclassroom, typical class-lecture time is replaced with laboratory and in-class activities. Outsideclass time, lectures are delivered over
response may be sufficient ifplacement information is provided even though other survey items such as starting salary orforwarding address may not be provided. Thus, a qualified use of RR2 can be appropriate. Asthe cohort of graduating students is a clearly defined population, UH + UO is zero in thissituation.As noted above, response rates vary significantly and are often much lower than desired. Whenresponse rate goes down, the probability that the survey data will reflect an accurate picture ofplacement goes down. To illustrate this, a simulation of survey responses was performed. A Page 24.131.3dataset of 300 graduating students was created with
Asynchronous, Collaborative Learning Environment.” ETR&D, v. 54, no. 4, p. 331- 354.9. Wan, J., et. al. (2008). “A Study on the Use of Cooperative Learning Strategies in a Computer Literacy Course” College & University Media Review, v. 14, p. 21-6310. Morgan, B. M. (2003). “Cooperative Learning in Higher Education: Undergraduate Student Reflections on Group Examinations for Group Grades.” College Student Journal, v. 37, no. 1, p. 40-4911. Terenzini, P., Cabrera, A., Colbeck, C., Parente, J., Bjorklund, S. (2001) “Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students’ Reported Learning Gains,” Journal of Engineering Education, p. 123-13012. Micheal Prince, R. F. (2007). “The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning
progress of students andmaking continuous improvements to the modules. Highlights of this data along with a summaryof the incremental changes to the modules will be presented.Introduction Reflection on the educational landscape in the US has become an increasingly commonsubject of political and household discussion as economic constraints call into question the valueand return on investment provided by higher education. While scrutinizing higher educationwhich has been central to the cultural and technological advancement of civilization solely on amonetary basis might seem irreverent or myopic, the vigorous ongoing debate on education hasundeniably spurred action and innovation. The creation of new educational technologies inresponse to
affected by theexternal influences of employers with particular workforce needs20 and the expectationsof their accrediting agency21.A significant body of research suggests that a faculty member’s academic field, andimplicitly their experiences in that field, influence curricular and instructional decisionmaking22-24. The Academic Plan reflects these findings in its attention to the role ofacademic discipline, both as the unit (department) level and the individual (faculty) level.Accounting for discipline, personal characteristics such as gender and prior experiencesmay also shape instructional choices25-27. For example, engineering faculty members’experiences in industry may shape their approach to teaching, encouraging instructionalprocesses that
platform for growth ofthe BME Community through small group discussions. The online small group discussions (6students per virtual table) help students develop their communication skills through postingelectronically on discussion boards. EVS is built to be a lightweight intervention atop thedemanding traditional course load. We have found a balance between substance and Page 24.512.3accessibility through introducing 6 modules each semester, which permits 2 weeks considerationand discussion for each module topic. The last two weeks are left for self-reflection as studentswrite a personal reflection essay and compile portfolios, both of which
intraditional co-ed engineering classrooms. While their study is not conclusive, they did find thatwomen felt discouraged to participate in what they call ‘thinking oriented’ engineeringclassrooms and that this lack of participation hampered their learning.11 Typical surveycomments reflected fears among women of being rebuked and criticized by their professor andpeers and general anxiety from an overly-competitive atmosphere among the students.11 In this study, we aim to add to this body of literature regarding engineering pedagogy asit relates to the attraction, retention, and ultimate success of women in the field by providing onereal-world model. Acknowledging the view that more than simple participation of women isnecessary to challenge the
discussed codes for each interview until we agreed unanimously on all codes to reduceindividual variation in perceptions about students’ statements. Second, after theme development,we conducted peer debriefing where we asked two peers with knowledge of the course redesignproject and of relevant qualitative methods who were uninvolved in the study to debrief with uson our themes from the interviews. Through this process, we uncovered any interpretive leaps wemade during theme development and further refined our themes. Third, we carried out memberchecking by sharing a complete draft of the manuscript with the interviewed students and askingwhether it accurately reflected their experiences in the course. All students approved thepresentation of their
problems, to work effectively in multidisciplinary teams, and to consider non-technical perspectives, long before the characteristics of the “Engineer of 2020”1 was everdefined.This paper discusses the EPP program over its four decades and how the program integrates withthe traditional engineering programs. We discuss the curriculum over time, the course selectionsstudents make, and the benefits our alumni receive from the program. We will give an overviewof our capstone EPP Projects course, a truly interdisciplinary teamwork situation addressingcurrent technology issues. Finally we reflect on how the program achieves the ABET (a) through(k) outcomes and work in the ABET system, and how the program has been successful these past40 years.We do not
, conference papers from 2008-2012, and a pedagogic research statement for the field, (2) personal reflections on three related conferences and a study relevant PhD theses; and (3) meeting notes of an engineering education research special interest group from 2009 – 2013. The final outline includes 13 first-level terms and 43 second-level ones.Outcome: From the three commissioned keyword outlines, Access Innovations (the nation’s largesttaxonomy creation firm) created a draft taxonomy. They integrated and refined the outlines, normalizedterms, and worked to consolidate the two-level structure into a more hierarchical one. The resultingtaxonomy (version 1) included 1,079 keywords arranged in 13 branches and seven levels.Mapping the
-oriented society, some researchers 4,5,6, haveargued that the development of autonomous learners is fundamental. Coto describes autonomyas: … the ability to take charge of one’s own learning. It means to have the responsibility for setting learning goals; identifying and developing learning strategies; developing study plans; reflecting on learning; identifying and selecting relevant resources and support; and assessing one’s own progress7.In a research study conducted at the National University of Costa Rica with the goal ofproducing a curriculum shift from a teacher-centered approach toward a student-centeredapproach, it was concluded that this shift is not going to be an easy one. They pointed out theimportance of
innovation. Faculty could have students practice Socraticquestioning during team projects and presentations. Teachers could also take two minutes in thebeginning of each class and have the students observe a picture and list all ideas, opportunities,and observations they make. Educators could have their students practice reflecting on theirquestions from the discussions in class and post follow up questions on a blog page.Acknowledgments Page 24.354.8 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering Education Program under Grant No. 1150874. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or
solar path finder are shown in Figure 3. Page 24.364.6Figure 3. Solar path calculator systemThe Solar Pathfinder™ is located at the proposed array site, leveled, and oriented to true southwith the built-in compass and bubble level. (The compass reading may require adjustment formagnetic declination.) Looking straight down from above, the user observes reflections from thesky superimposed on the sun path diagram and traces the outlines of any obstructions onto thediagram. Students draw shading areas in different locations and identify obstructions around thesolar modules. Students are required to submit a detailed report with suggestions for the
technology subjects that were comparable to the classicalacademic subjects challenged the nature of technical education in Ireland [15]. As a resulttechnology subjects were redeveloped to reflect more academic constructs. This is evident inthe introduction of senior cycle Technical Drawing as a state examinable subject in 1969.This syllabus attempted to make the subject more academic and as a result concepts andtopics were deliberately addressed in more abstract terms in an effort to distance itself fromthe applied, vocational nature of its origins [16]. However, recent years have seen a shift infocus for technology education, and in particular graphical education, within the Irish highschool level system. Design and Communication Graphics (DCG) was
(i.e., average) to thequestions were 8%, 11%, and 9%, respectively, in the accumulative responses of the surveys.However, strong disagreement responses (i.e., poor) were negligible in most questions, anddisagreement responses (i.e., below average) were ranged between 0% and 5%, respectively.Active learning is generally defined as any instructional method that engages students in thelearning process.11-12 These survey-results reflected the effectiveness of learning modules invarious lab activities.15-17Some negative responses were to be considered in Questionnaire 2 which measured a level of thecomprehension of the learning modules for the POGIL lab activities. Such negative responsesshowed that students, who had limited experiences in POGIL
trends in Science and Engineering do not reflect this segment of the population.Latinos constitute 3% of employed doctoral scientists, and 2.8% doctoral engineers. TheAmerican Dilemma is “this nation’s failure to educate and develop a growing proportion of itspotential talent base –African Americans, Latinos, and American Indians- as its need for peoplewith skills in science and engineering is escalating.” Engineering education literature is very scant of studies addressing, in depth, themisrepresentation of Hispanics in engineering. This study reviews existing literature in this andother related areas (e.g., diversity in higher education, STEM studies) and sheds light into thecauses that hinder the growth of Hispanics in the engineering
. Page 24.808.4 2. Any course that is taken to satisfy required courses or university core requirements for the Bachelor of Science degree in IE cannot be used to meet the cognate requirement. This requirement simply ensures students do not attempt to double count credits and then fail to meet the overall degree credit requirements. 3. At least six (6) credits of the cognate must be at the 300-level or above. This requirement ensures that students move beyond superficial topics and obtain some depth in their chosen area of interest. 4. The credits must represent a coherent area of study relevant to some aspect of IE as a discipline or practice. This reflects the very definition of cognate and helps ensure that
for assigning materials.This discussion would not be complete without defining criteria that would determine thesuccess of a rendering. A successful rendering should be able (1) to convey the design intent, (2)highlight important architectural elements, (3) reflect realism in material color and texture, and(4) portray light and shadows adequately. Design intent is a concept that is best defined by thedesign team; we hence use criteria 2, 3 and 4 to analyze the rendered images. Renderings in V-Ray (figure 4) and Twilight (figure 5) show a view of the building highlighting the trusses whichform one of the key architectural elements of the structure. Renderings in kerkythea (figure 7)and 3DS Max (figure 8) show an entire façade view which gives
both the student (and instructor) would have liked to have more time to complete theproject, that is, get that ‘second try or test’ in to answer questions or concerns learned in the firstround of ‘evaluation and testing’. However, with a 15-week project and graduation imminent,choices were made to get the ‘best’ results with the scope of this design project and 3-creditcapstone course. So reflecting on the three parts of this project, i.e., the materials selection,fabrication and testing, the student experience incorporated previous engineering knowledgefrom courses, practical hands-on experience, and moved into the realm of independent life-longlearning needed throughout an engineering career. The advisor also hopes this example can beused to
of electric power system in the U.S.The evolution of the electric power regulations reflecting various energy policy acts up until theEnergy Policy Act of 1992 that opened the way for the emergence of competitive marketsotherwise known as electric power industry deregulation are discussed. The gradual transformationof the electric power grid network from the vertically integrated to horizontally integratedinfrastructures is covered. Modeling of renewable energy resources as distribution generations(DGs) and how deregulation has facilitated the integration of renewable energy sources to thetraditional grid network via DGs are presented in this module. Also covered are the challengesfacing deregulation and how they can be mitigated.3. Course
additional content analysis of thetweets, both within and outside of the conversational strands. Post-course surveys will also beadministered to each student enrolled in the course.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.Grant No. 1243510, PIRE: Context Sensitive Implementation of Synergistic Water-EnergySystems. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Page 20.40.9BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Trotz, M.A., Muga, H.E., Philips, L.D., Yeh, D., Stuart, A
something is. Some students build alarm clocks, others build games, such ascomparing how quickly competitors can repeatedly tap a force-sensing resistor.The next two labs introduce alternative ways to store, retrieve and present data, along with volt-age-varying and count-based sensors. Presenting data that reflects current state is central to mostaudio players’ interface: to display which track is currently playing, or up next, or power andvolume status. But for the third lab, the task is to create a digital Etch-A-Sketch, using a graphi-cal LCD instead of the original device’s aluminum powder panel, and having the ability to saveand retrieve sketches. Students frequently draw inspiration from elements of the Etch-A-Sketch’sinterface, including