professionaland personal life is chronicled. In It’s Not Luck, Thinking Processes for conflict managementand market segmentation are described. In Critical Chain, shortfalls of executive MBAprograms are discussed.While asked to write a book report on The Goal, the students are asked to support the TOC inshortening the production cycle and problem solving by Thinking Processes by mapping causeand effect relationships and selling the solution to a hostile audience who will not trust you.Students are asked to explain how the TOC and Thinking Processes work equally well inbusiness, politics, and family disputes—offering peace or profit without compromise. In mostbusinesses, pressures mount as managers strive to achieve local optima instead of company
. Page 4.302.3q Give each student "firm" the assignment to prepare and present an oral presentation of specified duration. Students should be encouraged to use computer-generated visual aids and handouts.q Prepare/obtain evaluation forms for the students to use in evaluating and ranking their competitor student "firms" marketing presentations. Students should ask questions during the presentations to simulate an actual firm-client selection committee interaction.q Student teams should be encouraged to contact their real "firm" counterpart via web page, e- mail, and phone/fax, to aid in their presentation preparation.q Provide ample time for follow-up discussions and constructive peer critique of this exercise.Leadership
statements and in developing their presentations. All group members arerequired to participate in the writing of the paper and in the delivery of the oral presentation. Thebasis on which they are to be graded both in their written reports and their oral presentations isstated up-front.Beginning two weeks later, the groups begin their presentations, which are spread across thesemester, but correspond generally to the material being discussed in class. The recitation periodis used for the oral presentations; the groups submit their written reports on the day of theirpresentations.III. Content and GradingThe papers and presentations have relatively simple requirements. They are to provide thegeneral background to the problem (its context), an
isused to describe the proposed assessment model. An algorithm (Figure 1.) for modelimplementation is also shown. Finally, a block diagram (Figure 2.) depicting the closed looprelationship between the assessment process and instructional process is presented.II. Goals and ObjectivesPursuant to the mission of the College of Sciences and Technology, which is derived from themission of Savannah State University, the educational goals of the college are: • to produce graduates who can successfully complete graduate studies in the Sciences, Engineering Technology, and other closely related fields. • to produce graduates that are capable of competing in the work place among peers. • to inculcate in its graduates the
improve their communication skills. Inthe Fall semester, the students are required to a make an oral presentation of their projects totheir fellow classmates. Whereas in the Spring semester, the students are required to participatein the Rice Undergraduate Research Symposium (RURS) poster competition. The results fromthese presentations will be counted as a portion of their final course grade.Further Improvements. Two additional modules are planned for future implementation. Onemodule deals with scientific research ethics. Topics in this module may include experimentaltechniques and the treatment of data, conflict of interest, publication and openness, fair use ofsources. The second module is targeted to improve the students’ scientific writing
winds down and prototypes are delivered, closing the semester with thoughtfuland specific communication to clients is important. Students write thank you notes to theirclients, and these are delivered in person, or by mail. We have also created a survey to gatherfeedback on the clients’ experiences. Questions focus on communication frequency from thestudent team; program coordinator, EGR 101 instructors, and the Program Director. The surveyalso asks about the prototype feasibility, feedback for the student team, and if they want to serveas a client again. Finally, there is an opportunity to share any open feedback about theirexperience. The survey is not anonymous. Greater than 70% of clients who responded to oursurvey said they would like to
professional development, the Career Development team providescomments and conversation to every student’s reflection, fostering an ongoing discussionsurrounding the steps required to pursue their goals. This dialogue enables students to makesmall or large adjustments to their academic, professional, and life goals, depending on theirindividual needs.In the third mini session, we discuss another course assignment, given at the end of each sectionof the course, hereafter called “modules.” Each module has a distinct focus, ranging fromresearch to the design process, and students are asked to write a short reflection about theirexperience with each when they end. These reflections ask students to evaluate what they got outof the module, what they liked
female group, in a male dominated engineering technologyinstitution, encouraged us toward a co-mentor to each other “a friend with whom oneshares mutual assistance.” Our group engaged in a series of interactions to discussvarious aspects of teaching/scholarship/service and professional development inacademe. We shared our individual and interdependent teaching goals/materials,observed each other’s classroom activities for peer review, inspired each other withscholarship and creative endeavors, and consulted each other for constructive critiqueduring their major academe career advancements.How did we build a community of learners? Our group shared knowledge, ideas, andpractices involving common issues about teaching and student learning
expansion. In addition to meeting ABET's major design experiencerequirement, this design experience also achieves the following:• The major design experience is integrated throughout the program with minimal interruption to the more traditional curriculum.• Students can gain a perspective of how different levels of their learning and knowledge contribute to a real-world civil engineering project.• Students develop a good rapport with peers in their class and other classes and foster a mentoring relationship.• The project forges more (perhaps better) interaction and communication among engineers, faculty, and students.As the civil engineering program matures and the class size increases, we plan to require theproject team to
related to the application of fuzzy logic to intelligent toys were given as references.During week six, each group presented a written and oral proposal of its project. Feedback fromfaculty and peers was given in order to ensure an even set of projects with the same complexitylevel. During weeks seven and eight students worked in the simulation part of their projects.This means that before starting to build their real toys, students simulated their intelligentbehaviors using the Fuzzy Logic Package. During week nine, written reports and oralpresentations were given by each group, in which they presented the results of theirsimulations. Starting week ten, students began to build their intelligent toys and to write theprograms to implement the
submit a structured summary of a potential educationdevelopment project. A three-page structured summary describes the project in six half-pagesections: (i) project overview, (ii) potential adopters, (iii) development activities, (iv) broaderimpact plan, (v) propagation and evaluation plan, and (vi) project timeline. During the workshop,participants used information and exercises from the DSA book, the DSAAAI, and feedbackfrom peers and the project team to revise their summaries. Attendees provided feedback that thematerials and workshops helped them think about propagation differently and that theseexperiences resulted in positive feedback on grant proposals.Since both propagation and institutionalization share the goals of expanding adoption
and modeling.Dr. Mehdi Shokouhian, Morgan State University Dr. Shokouhian is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University. His research focuses on performance-based design of structures made of high performance steel and concrete using theoretical, numerical and experimental methods. He has participated in many research projects and has published several peer-reviewed journal papers since 2004.Dr. Kathy Ann Gullie, Gullie Consultant Services LLC Gullie Consultants Services LLC, Owner, Dr. Kathy A. Gullie Ph.D. Dr. Kathy Gullie and her associates at Gullie Consultant Services LLC have been in education, assessment, program development and evalu- ation in New York State for
Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conferenceassessment including student surveys during and at the end of the course, self-reflection entriesin journals, self-reflection papers, alumni surveys, notebooks, log books, student written user’smanuals, exit surveys, and assessments by a consortium of faculty.Gloria Rogers, ABET's Managing Director of Professional Services, writes extensively on thetopic of assessment. In an article entitled “When is Enough Enough?”8, she says that datacollection activities must be examined in light of good program assessment practice, efficiency,and reasonableness. She says several questions need to be asked, such as, “Is there a clear visionof why specific data are being collected?” She answers
knowledge and skills, such as communications and interpersonal skills, businessstrategy and applications, team/organization and management, general problem solving andcritical thinking, as well as self-regulated lifelong learning skills3, 4, 14, 16-18. Employers report thatemployees are not well prepared in terms of global knowledge, writing, critical thinking,adaptability, self-knowledge, oral communication, or quantitative reasoning19. However, thequestion remains: how to effectively design the curriculum to ensure that both discipline-specificand cross-disciplinary skills are sufficiently covered? To address this question, we need toexplore the issue from multiple angles: (1) gaps in education perceived by faculty, (2) gaps ineducation perceived
compelling observations made by James Duderstadt in his 2010essay “Engineering for a Changing World”, collected in Dominico Grasso’s and Melody BrownBurkins’ Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology, we find this: “Today we have asociety profoundly dependent upon technology, profoundly dependent on engineers who producethat technology, and profoundly ignorant of technology” (p.31). Such profound ignorancereveals a profound social need. Writes Duderstadt: “Perhaps the most urgent need of our societyis a deeper understanding and appreciation for technology on the part of all college graduatesrather than only those seeking engineering degrees” (p.21), and also proposes that the study ofengineering or technology be included under the umbrella
engineering students aware of the role of their professions in society. The importance of such an understanding has been reinforced by the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000, which require that engineering programs demonstrate that their graduates have "the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global societal context." The IQP is by design interdisciplinary. Students obtain practice in dealing with unstructured, open-ended, interdisciplinary problems, opportunities to work independently with peers and extensive experience in writing about previously unfamiliar concepts utilizing new terminology.The second project is completed in the fourth year of study and for engineering majors
descriptive statistics to understand patterns in graduate programs, job titles, andindustry sectors. We found that even when positions did not include “engineer” in the job title,many alumni remained in engineering-related sectors or reported that their positions were relatedto engineering. We also leveraged Sankey diagrams to represent the “flow” of individuals acrossdifferent positions. These diagrams revealed the breadth of career pathways, with alumni movinginto and out of engineering positions. Second, we performed a content analysis on write-inresponses in which alumni expanded upon their survey answers. Within the interpretive limits ofthe data, we observed two general ways in which alumni framed their careers. In “positive”presentations
founder of STEM Through Guided Discovery, a robotics program for K-12 students. The success of his program has received international attention and has been adopted abroad. Jawaharlal has more than 20 years of industrial, academic, and entrepreneurial experience. Before joining Cal Poly, Pomona, Jawaharlal founded and developed APlusStudent.com, Inc., an online supple- mental K-12 education company. He also served on the faculty at Rowan University, N.J., and Kettering University, Mich. Jawaharlal is passionate about education and focuses on K-12 STEM education. He writes education columns for the Huffington Post
in the United States in the1950s was attributed to the scientific andtechnological advances during that decade. In 2005, a survey was conducted by the NationalAssociation of Manufacturers and the Deloitte Consulting Company to gain an understanding ofthe demands associated with the economic reality and employability of the US manufacturingworkforce in the current decade. Results indicated that manufacturing companies would look tohire workers with proficient reading, writing, and communication skills, the ability to work in ateam, strong technology-related skills, the ability to translate drawings, diagrams or flowcharts,strong math skills and innovation/ creativity skills.7 Top growing service occupations in the US
very fewof them will have spent much time listening to audio-only pieces, and almost certainly none ofthem will have done any critical analysis of such pieces.) The class thus initially proceeds downtwo tracks: hands-on “laboratory” sessions in which students use audio gear and software togather, edit and structure sound; and intensive group listening sessions, in which the class as awhole listens to a wide variety of audio pieces, analyzing them closely in order to understandwhat makes them effective (or not). Individual writing assignments complement this work,giving students the opportunity to focus on particular aspects of radio production andstorytelling.At the beginning of the semester students need first to develop their ability to
science,as well as learn practical hands-on technology skills such as soldering and debugging circuits.Students then interface their sensors with computers, write programs to gather raw signals,implement calibration curves, and perform data manipulation and data logging. In later modules,students program their own communications protocols for wireless transmission of the sensordata and connect their computerized sensor stations together to form a distributed wireless sensornetwork. Additional modules explore the use and implications of this technology for biosciencesand environmental research.SENSE IT modules give students an opportunity to acquire and then use STEM skills while atthe same time providing a real-world application of science
engineering and science education for K – 12 students, as well as assess the learning outcomes of these programs. Post-graduation, Rebecca has continued to explore her interest in K-12 engineering education by participating in the ACE (Architecture, Construction and Engineering) Mentoring Program, during which she teaches high school students about the concepts of engineering and sustainability.Pamela L.B. Clark, PLB Clark Consulting LLC Consultant who works with local and national non-profits for grant writing, evaluation, and technical assistance. Board member of the National Foundation for Teen Safe Driving and NJ State Contact for Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD). Twenty years of experience in program
Paper ID #19140A Real Report from the Trenches of a PhD Dissertation: Exploring the Inher-ent ”Messiness” of Engineering Education Research Through an Audit TrailDr. Rachel K. Anderson, Clemson University Rachel Anderson recently earned her PhD in Engineering and Science Education from Clemson Univer- sity. She is now the Assistant Coordinator for Clemson’s Peer Assisted Learning program. Her research interests include cross-disciplinary teamwork, student development, and program assessment. Rachel re- ceived a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University and a B.S. in Physics from Baldwin- Wallace University.Dr
graduate students in theCollege of Engineering to gauge need for community and student interest in creating a GraduateWomen in Engineering (GradWIE) group. Results from the survey indicated that students lackedcommunity and had an overwhelming desire to be involved in a graduate women in engineeringgroup. As such, we felt compelled to form an official student organization for the engineeringcommunity, GradWIE. GradWIE welcomes people of all gender identities to support thepersonal and professional well-being of graduate students through peer support, the creation ofsafe spaces, social events, and diverse resources. In its first year, the organization has sponsoredseveral community-building events, reaching over 150 students across all departments
chemical engineering students setlearning goals toward new discipline-specific content, including forming peer groups ornetworks, interacting with chemical engineering professors, and developing appropriate learningapproaches. COGNITION MOTIVATION/AFFECT BEHAVIOR CONTEXTFORETHOUGHT, Set task-specific goals Goal orientation* Plan time and effort Perceptions of taskPLANNING, ANDACTIVATION Prior knowledge Efficacy judgments** Plan self- Perceptions of observations context Metacognitive Ease of learning (EOL
Paper ID #36879Strategies to Optimize Student Success in Pair Programming TeamsDr. Ayesha Johnson, University of South Florida, College of Nursing I am an assistant professor of statistics in the College of Nursing at the University of South Florida. My research interests include educational methods, and health equity. I have experience in data analysis for various types of research designs.Dr. Zachariah J Beasley P.E., University of South Florida Dr. Zachariah Beasley received his Ph.D. in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of South Florida with a focus on sentiment analysis in peer review. He is the
,apply standards, create a conceptual design, select appropriate materials, identify applied loadingscenarios, perform the design analysis, check design calculations from another team, createdesign drawings, estimate the cost, and write a design report.In order to accomplish all this in a course like strength of materials, which is laden with analysis,the project must be well organized and accompanied with web-based tools. This paper discussesdesign of the design project, course content that is beyond the traditional strength of materialscourse coverage, and development of web-based tools that make this possible. The web-basedtools provide guidance on: the design process with interactive examples, analysis andsimulation, materials properties and
entering and matriculating with an engineeringdegree. Current efforts to improve graduation rates have exacerbated the achievement gap forfirst generation degree seeking students, who trail behind their peers by 13% [16] Within theirengineering courses, first generation students are .15 to .2 GPA points behind their non-firstgeneration counter parts in core classes with some achievement gaps as high as 1.02. The samegaps are seen with women in engineering courses [2]. When the CSU and the UC systems arecompared there is a greater mismatch in degree production. The CSU offers its 480,000 students73 accredited engineering programs housed at 16 of its regional campuses compared to 54 degreeprograms offered to the 222,000 undergraduate UC students
socioeconomicbackgrounds, social positioning influences peer-to-peer relations and their status within anengineering team. Furthermore, we aim to explore how this position relates to their engagementwith engineering concepts, practices, and habits. We expect the rich examples of how K-12students experience status in collaborative engineering projects to inform curriculum design andinstructional practice.The methods applied follow a case study approach where video-recorded observations of peerinteractions and one-on-one interviews comprise the data in this case. The case is a two-weeksummer engineering camp for students in grades 6-8. In this case study, we conducted interactionanalysis of the video data by coding peer-to-peer exchanges and the associated impact
environment has traditionally been dominated by alecture format, with students passively listening to the course instructor. This format has beencriticized as an ineffective way to learn and many strategies have been suggested to improve this,including that of blended learning. Blended learninga is defined as “the organic integration ofthoughtfully selected and complementary face-to-face and online approaches and technologies”.3By integrating these complementary approaches in the classroom, it provides students with theopportunity for increased interactions with course materials, instructors, and peers, creatinga The term “flipped classroom” is a form of blended learning where the student is exposed to new concepts outside of class and class time is