proposedsolutions and helped redefine program-level student learning outcomes.Eventually the committee agreed on changes and developed an implementation plan. At thispoint courses and programs were developed into a proposal and passed on through the universitycourse and curriculum approval process.Key Artifacts of the ProcessThis paper will not attempt to present all of the brainstorming ideas, diagrams, and artifactsproduced during the process. However, a few key artifacts may help the reader understand thecontext of the revised curriculum: Mission Statement We educate students from Kansas and the Midwest, transforming them into capable, ethical members of the computing profession. We provide Kansas and Midwestern
engineering students should possess to successfully enter the labormarket. In the systematic review of Passow and Passow [4], planning and time management,problem-solving, communication and teamwork were identified as highly important byengineers. Identified as less, but still important, were ethics, lifelong learning, taking initiative,thinking creatively, and focusing on goals. Does this mean that engineering students needmore teamwork skills than lifelong learning skills? Or do students need to finish theireducational program with an advanced level mastery of lifelong learning and an expert levelmastery of teamwork? These questions raise the need to not just investigate the importanceof the competencies but also of the competency levels required
construction. As the leaders of change in fundamental civil engineeringprocesses, it is the responsibility of civil engineering departments nationwide to lead themovement toward sustainable civil engineering development through research and education oftheir students.” 1 Sustainability is one of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) fourkey programs 2. It is also part of Canon 1 of the ASCE Code of Ethics, “Engineers shall holdparamount the safety, health and welfare of the public and shall strive to comply with theprinciples of sustainable development in the performance of their professional duties.” 3Robinson and Sutterer cited as barriers to sustainability in education that many civil engineeringfaculty are not knowledgeable about
ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives 6. an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions 7. an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies [1].In addition to the student outcomes, ABET’s program
-definedtechnicalandnon- technicalenvironments;andanabilityto identifyanduseappropriatetechnical literature Ethical, Social, Global, and Professional Criterion 5, Curriculum: curriculum must Development includetopicsrelatedtoprofessional responsibilities,ethicalresponsibilities, respectfordiversity,andqualityand continuousimprovementThe desired skills developed by the two-semester senior design sequence and listed in Table
,and engage in professional development activities such as workshop on Application to GraduatePrograms, Resume Building, Ethics in Engineering and Science, etc.I. IntroductionUAVs have potential of replacing manned aircraft for many dull, dirty, and dangerous missions.Applications include traffic and infrastructure monitoring, surveillance of and search and rescuein disaster-hit areas, environmental gas monitoring, package delivery, aerial photography, borderpatrol, and precision agriculture. UAVs are cheaper than manned aircraft and pose no risk tohuman operators. The UAV industry is one of the fastest growing sectors of aerospace industries.However, there is a lack of professionals entering the workforce for UAV related jobs. There isalso a
related to classroom instructors’ feedback onsite leadership performance including areas of management, supervision, their ability to givefeedback, professionalism, work ethic and problem solving skills. These results will then becompared to the classroom instructors interest outcomes on the SEEK program. The implicationsof this research include better understanding the role of leadership during short-term, out-of-school (OST) engineering programs such as training and professional development and otherpotential best practices.INTRODUCTIONOut-of-school time (OST) programs including after-school, before-school, and summer-basedactivities assist with narrowing the achievement gap and increasing interest in STEM forstudents of color. OST programs
Qualitative Reasoning Information Literacy Engage in Culture, Cultural Engagement Values, and the Arts Arts Engagement Ethical Engagement Communicate Written Communication Oral Communication Visual Communication Integrated Communication3.2 ParticipantsStudents enrolled in the new program’s ePortfolio course were required to participate in theresearch as part of their assignment. Six students completed the assignment including 4 femalesand 2 males. All participants were
these processes successfully exceptSACSCOC and we started offering the curriculum courses from 2015.Laboratory ModulesLaboratory modules are used for teaching, research and outreach, and the design of laboratory modulesreflect these uses. We use two different laboratory settings for our cybersecurity concentration courses –virtual and face-to-face.The virtual laboratory is from the NDG NetLAB+(https://www.netdevgroup.com/content/cybersecurity). This platform provides our students withlaboratory experiences on number of cybersecurity and computer science topics in an onlineenvironment. Our students conduct experiments in NISGTC Security+, NISGTC Network Security,NISGTC Forensics, NISGTC Ethical Hacking, CSSIA CompTIA Security+. This laboratory
, x xscience, and engineering,b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as x xwell as to analyze and interpret data,c. an ability to design a system, component, or x xprocess to meet desired needs,d. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams x xe. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve x x xengineering problems,f. an understanding of professional and ethical x x xresponsibility,g. an ability to
Update al Report Meeting Minutes 69 3/31 Session 9: Working in VMH 1415 Dr. Linda Casual Peer Evaluation 2 Multidisciplinary Teams Schmidt Meeting Minutes 710 4/7 Session 10: Ethical Action VMH 1415 Corporate Business Meeting Minutes 8 sponsor Casual11 4/14 Session 11: Preliminary VMH 1415 QUEST Business Meeting Minutes 9 Results Presentations Alumni Profession
theirclassroom knowledge of IPv4 and its ancillary components to the realm of IPv6 and in so doinglearned valuable lessons for the Coast Guard at large while improving the infrastructure of theAcademy’s engineering educational network.The Course: Capstone Projects in Electrical EngineeringThe fall semester course description reads [7]: This is the first of two capstone courses in Electrical Engineering during the senior year. The focus of this course will be taking students through the first half of the Engineering Design Cycle. Classroom discussions will focus on the engineering design process including needs identification, system requirements, system design process and engineering ethics. Additional lectures will center on
Science Foundation S-STEM (Scholarshipsin Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) grants on undergraduate minorityengineering transfer student retention and development during the period 2007-13 in the Collegeof Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The programs were designed toovercome known barriers to persistence of transfer students from community college, includinglack of engagement on campus, underdeveloped professional work ethic and goals, deficientstudy habits, fewer opportunities to gain practical competence/reflection on learning, andworking for pay. The elements of the programs included cohorting, team-building, mentoring,tutoring, and advising, as well as monetary support in the form of scholarships
preparedness of STEM graduatesMany researchers have approached the question of what makes a globally competent STEMgraduate by identifying lists of requisite knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs).28,29.Parkinson’s30 survey of experts from industry and academia identified the attributes of aglobally competent engineer, including an ability to appreciate other cultures and tocommunicate across cultures; familiarity with the history, government and economic systems ofseveral target countries; an ability to speak a second language at a conversational level and at aprofessional (i.e. technical) level; proficiency working in or directing a team of ethnic andcultural diversity; ability to effectively deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or
hours of technical coursework leaving little roomto add new courses, especially those that integrate soft skills.1 The workforce demands technicalskills, and the changing work environment and competitive global market also drives demand forteamwork, ethics, problem solving, and communication within the engineering curriculum.1Previous research2 detailed competence in college graduates and the demands of the workplace,but also noted that a skills gap is present between the technical training and experience ofstudents and the responsibilities of the job. Although other researchers3 reported employersatisfaction with employee skills, it is likely that there is still room to improve upon the skillsstudents acquire in their higher education programs
Advisory Committee company. The learning objectives are to:1. Develop managerial and ethical skills as they relate to an actual project.2. Prepare complete detailed estimate and specification analysis.3. Prepare complete detailed construction schedule.4. Prepare construction contracts, project manuals and project administration documentation.5. Develop work package and project start-up procedures.6. Understand and utilize construction resources & databases.7. Prepare and deliver a professional presentation.8. Provide an independent assessment of individual student skills and knowledge.A project binder is completed by each student during the last week of the semester whichprovides a summary of their work for grading.In addition to the
% 35 39% Free electives 26 28% 22 25% Accounting 24 26% 16 18% Ethics 17 18% 21 24%Table 9 shows a notable drop in the percent requiring accounting and an almost equal increase inthe percent requiring a course in ethics. With all of these findings, it is important to note thatthese topics (especially ethics) can be within other courses. Page 26.277.8Total number of creditsFor 73 programs, I have the number of credit hours in 2005
Education student learning outcomes4 Upon graduation from an accredited ACCE 4-year degree program, a graduate shall be able to: 1. Create written communications appropriate to the construction discipline. 2. Create oral presentations appropriate to the construction discipline. 3. Create a construction project safety plan. 4. Create construction project cost estimates. 5. Create construction project schedules. 6. Analyze professional decisions based on ethical principles. 7. Analyze construction documents for planning and management of construction processes. 8. Analyze methods, materials, and equipment used to construct projects. 9. Apply construction management skills as a member of a multi-disciplinary team. 10. Apply electronic-based technology
was conducted at California Polytechnic State Universitybetween Civil and Environmental Engineering (CE) 587 - Geoenvironmental Engineering andMaterials Engineering (MATE) 232 - Materials, Ethics, and Society students. Both classesseparately received a devoted lecture module on the environmental implications ofnanotechnology. The different perspectives on synthesis of nanomaterials were highlighted in theproject with regard to material performance (MATE 232 students) and with regard to fate in theenvironment (CE 587 students). The students in CE 587 were asked to provide guidance andrecommendations to groups of students in MATE 232 for developing environmentally friendlymethods for the synthesis of silver nanomaterials. Each student group in
ensuring aspects of quality and validity ininterpretive research in engineering education for capturing the social reality under study17. Thisframework serves as a guide for both “making the data” and “handling the data” in qualitativework, establishing measures for process reliability and theoretical, pragmatic, procedural,communicative, and ethical validation17. An in-depth examination of our quality considerationsfor “making the data” can be found in our previous paper8. We are also currently developingquality assurance steps for “handling the data,” and will describe these steps in a futurepublication.Our qualitative research utilizes a one-on-one, semi-structured interview method8 derived fromMcIntosh’s “serial testimony” technique18,19. We
communicating (within a team and with the customer), timemanagement, and engineering ethics. Table 1 – Results from surveys in IE 212 (N=51) Question Pre-module Post-module P-value Significance survey survey Importance of investigating the market 2.4 ± 1.1 2.7 ± 1.0 0.02 Yes Identify an opportunity 2.0 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 1.0 0.01 Yes Analyze solutions 2.4 ± 1.1 2.5 ± 1.0 0.12 No Identify supply chains and distribution 1.9 ± 0.9 2.3 ± 0.9 0.004 Yes opportunities Evaluate technical feasibility 2.1 ± 1.1 2.3
, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability.”• (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context.2Some of the ABET criteria are proposed for revision in 2016-2017, but the following draftdefinition of “Engineering Design” shows ABET continues to continue the connection betweenengineering and public policy: Engineering Design – Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs, specifications, codes, and standards within constraints such as health and safety, cost, ethics, policy, sustainability, constructability, and
confidence, respect and motivation is useful inall kind of working fields; specially women undergraduate engineers are more confident whencompared with males of other discipline groups. Khazanee (1996) referred to female engineers,such as less aggressive attitude towards colleagues than males, tendency of listening more andacting not spontaneously, and being more attentive, accurate, and organized. Additionally,successful ability writing in math and science by females, can prove advantageous in allacademic fields (Halpern et al. 2007), while introduction of unique and important perspectivesand priorities will conclude into positive social outcomes and greater ethical accountability(Eagly and Carli 2003). Females are characterized as high self
information literacy Personal Maintains a positive self-image and possesses positive self-confidenceOf note, the collective stakeholders from the focus groups felt that the following needed to beemphasized or added to the list for engineers to be successful in the global context3: • Cultural sensitivity / tolerance to other people and perspectives • Open-mindedness and ability to adapt • Ability to behave ethically across cultures / social responsibility • Research, analytical thinking, problem-solving, and improvement capabilities • Innovation and entrepreneurshipGiven Cross-Cultural attributes missing from the top eight list, and the observations of the focusgroups, the missing Cross-Cultural attributes, of importance to this
relate to participation in various co-curricular (e.g., clubs andorganizations) and curricular (e.g., internships) programs and activities.Additionally, the NSSE questionnaire includes a set of items that elicitinformation about students’ perceived learning gains, making it suitable forthe present study. For instance, one item asked: “To what extent has yourexperience at this institution contributed to your knowledge, skills, andpersonal development in analyzing quantitative problems?” Responseoptions ranged from 1 (very little) to 4 (very much); other items asked aboutcommunication skills, working on a team, and ethics, to name a few. To date,more than 600 colleges and universities have participated in the nationalsurvey.A web-based approach
clear expression of ideas in writing. ISLO 2: Critical Thinking “A habit of mind” characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion. ISLO 3: Information Literacy The ability to know when there is a need for information, to be able to identify, locate, evaluate, and effectively and responsibly use and share that information for the problem at hand. ISLO 4: Ethical Reasoning Ethical reasoning to reasoning about right and wrong
have coursework thataddresses diversity and culture as well as social and ethical issues. A course focused ondeveloping global competencies can certainly overlap with these established requirementsproviding an opportunity for a course that meets both sets of needs.Downey [6] described a framework of educating globally competent engineers in terms ofknowledge and abilities related to cultural and national differences as well as a developedpredisposition of respect toward others. Klein-Garner and Walker [7] report on dimension ofglobal competence that also reflect knowledge, ability and attitude, including: the ability tocommunicate across cultures, the ability to appreciate other cultures, the ability to understandimplications of cultural
effectively as a member of a technical team (e) an ability to identify, analyze, and solve narrowly defined engineering technology problems (f) an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non-technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature (g) an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development (h) an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities, including a respect for diversity (i) a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvementCurricular Topics (a) Application of principles of geometric
identified eight outcomes of thefirst-year engineering program at the southwestern institution: (1) Teamwork, (2) EngineeringProfession, (3) Ethics, (4) Engineering Communication, (5) Engineering Design, (6) Math andPhysics Modeling, (7) Problem Solving, and (8) Algorithmic/Computational Thinking. Figure 2shows the engineering enculturation outcomes. Figure 2. Engineering enculturation outcomes in the first-year engineering programC. Taxonomies of Engineering EducationWith the growing areas of research and with the purpose of avoiding duplication of effort andfragmentation of the field, a team of engineering education researchers elaborated a taxonomy,entitled Engineering Education Research Taxonomy (EER Taxonomy) (Finelli, 2018
DevelopmentSystems thinking is the ability to view problems and develop solutions from a systems levelperspective, understanding the complex technical, industrial, social, and ethical implications. Webelieve this to be essential to a researcher’s ability to transform fundamental research intocomplete engineering systems [6]. The transformation of fundamental research into completesystems, known as translation, is a priority to the advancement of nanotechnology according toNSF [7] and a key focus area of the Centers. However important, systems thinking is not theonly skill necessary for success.A range of other professional and career skills are also valuable and are well articulated in theNational Academy of Engineering publication, The Engineer of 2020 [4