Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nina Miville, University of Miami

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering Division (IND)

Dirani, and A.L. Manrique, “The European Project Semester: Auseful teaching method in engineering education,” Project Approaches to Learning inEngineering Education; The Practice of Teamwork, 15-28, 2012.[10] C. Berggren and J. Soderlund, “Rethinking project management education: Social twists andknowledge co-production,” International Journal of Project Management, vol 26, 286-296, 2008. [11] S. Cicmil and H. Gaggiotti, “Responsible forms of project management education:Theoretical plurality and reflective pedagogies,” International Journal of Project Management,vol 36, 208-218, 2018.[12] J. Thomas and T. Mengel, “Preparing project managers to deal with complexity-Advancedproject management education,” International Journal of Project

Collection

2013 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

John Paulino; Jesús García; Joshua Lohse; Hector Prado; Atul Balani; Sridevi Lakshmipuram; Cheng Chen; Amelito G. Enriquez; Hao Jiang; Hamid Mahmoodi; Wenshen Pong; Hamid Shanasser

, S. Mitra. “Experimental study of gate oxide early-life failures,” IEEE International, Reliability Physics Symposium, 2009.[4] H. Nan, L. Li, K. Choi. “TDDB-Based Performance Variation of Combinational logic in Deeply Scaled CMOS Technology,” 13th International Symposium, Quality Electronic design (ISQED), 2012.[5] B. Afzal, B. Ebrahimi, A. Afzali-Husha, H. Mahmoodi. “Modeling read SNM considering both soft oxide breakdown and negative bias temperature instability”[6] M. Choudhury, V. Chandra, K. Mohanram, R. Aitken, “Analytical model for TDDB- based performance degradation in combinational logic”, Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), pp. 423-428, 2010

Collection

2013 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Antonella Sciortino; Lisa Star; Tesfai Goitom

Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Shaw-Courter, S., S.B. Millar, and L. Lyons, 1998. "From the Students' Point of View: Experiences in a Freshman Engineering Design Course". Journal of Engineering Education v 87, n 3, p 283-2875. Hoit, M., and M. Ohland, 1998. "The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention". Journal of Engineering Education v 87, n 1, p 79-85.6. "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2013-14" Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 2012. http://www.abet.org7. Budny, D., and C.A. Paul, 2004. "Integrating Peer Mentoring Into the Freshman Curriculum". Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education

Collection

2013 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

David B. Lanning

number of times a course was repeated. However, this cannot be assumed tobe the number of repeats required for a successful result. Many of these courses were neversuccessfully passed, since many poor grades occurred during the final semester(s) at ERAU. Table 13: Number of times a course was repeated for students who left ERAU Repeats for one course Single repeat 80 Double repeat 9 Triple repeat 6 Quadruple repeat 1Similar to earlier sections of this paper, Table 14 provides details of each attempt, and Table 15documents the improvement upon each

Collection

2013 GSW

Authors

Amir Karimi; Randall D. Manteufel

, “Does Problem Solving Recitation Session Improve Student Retention and Success?,”  ASEE 2002-2793, ASEE Annual Conference, June 16-19, Montréal, Quebec Canada8. Karimi, A., 2001, “Implementing a New Mechanical Engineering Curriculum to Improve Student  Retention,” ASEE 2001-1566, ASEE Annual Conference, June 24-27, Albuquerque, New Mexico.9. Karimi, A., Bench, S., and Hodges, Suzan, 2001, “Improving Engineering Student Retention in an Urban  University,” Annual Meeting of the Gulf-Southwest Section of ASEE, March 28-30, College Station, Texas.10. Manteufel, R.D., 1999. "Student Learning and Retention Initiative at UTSA in Thermodynamics," ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Dallas, TX

Collection

2013 GSW

Authors

Gustavo Narez; Sarah Hussein; Bernd Chudoba; Amit Oza

a procedure in the parameterization of thepropeller blade. Literature ReviewThe intention of the Messerschmitt Bf 109 is to replace the current line of fighter planesat the time in the 1930’s, which for the German nation at the time included the Arado Ar68 and the Heinkel He 51 as shown in Figure 3. The Arado Ar 80 design was a relativelyconservative open-cockpit monoplane, with the characteristic (Nicolai 2010) forward-setvertical fin. On the other hand, the Heinkel He 112 was a relatively portly aircraft,featuring the Günther brothers' signature elliptical wing planform as first seen on the He70. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference

Collection

2013 GSW

Authors

Edward E. Anderson

errors areentered into their respective fields. The title for the graphic construction panel is entered into theGraphic Title field. Correct answer equations for all the unknown and post-calculation variables,separated by #’s, are entered in the Answer Equations field.  These answers are given labels, such as ans1 and ans2, using standard equation notation. These equations can only useexpressions involving constants and any random variables in the question statement. The correctanswers statement, including any correct answers from the “Answer Equations” field, is enteredin the last field. These correct answers are denoted by their label. This form is saved as an xmlfile in the same directory and with the same file name as the problem statement

Collection

2016 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

John M. Santiago; Jing Guo

system level and from a variety of perspectives before coming up with atechnical solution. The system-level thinking builds upon the specialized technical skills fromother courses found in CTU’s graduate engineering programs. The capstone course attempts toprovide a right mix of technical merit, system engineering thinking, and improvedcommunication skills.References1. Blanchard, S. Benjamin, Wolter Frabrycky, System engineering and Analysis (Fifth Edition), Prentice Hall, NewJersey, 2011, pg. 37 (Vee-Model)2. Buede, Dennis, The Engineering Design of Systems – Models and Methods (Second Edition), Wiley, 2009, pg.10-123. Sage, Andrew P. James E. Armstrong, Jr., Introduction to System engineering, Wiley, 2009, pg. 78.4. SPCA, "Shelter Intake and

Conference Session

Energy Conversion, Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roxana Maria Melendez-Norona, Florida Atlantic University; Maria Mercedes Larrondo-Petrie, Florida Atlantic University; Eduardo David Sagredo Asesor, Ministerio Energia y Minas Dom. Rep.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion

Science Platform. [Online]. Available: https://osf.io/dvgu4/. [Accessed February 6,2023].[3] Z.Li, M. Shahidehpour and F. Aminifar, “Cybersecurity in Distributed Power Systems”,Proceedings of the IEEE vol. 105, Issue: 7, July 2017.[4] MathWorks, “MATLAB”. [Online]. Available:https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html .[Accessed January 3, 2023].[5] L. Yong and S. Tao, “Economic Dispatch of Power System incorporating Wind PowerPlant”, International Power Engineering Conference (IPEC), 2007.[6] M. Ding, Zhang, Y.Y., M.Q. Mao, Q. Yang and X.P. Liu, ''Operation Optimization forMicrogrids under Centralized Control'', The 2nd International Symposium on Power Electronicsfor Distributed Generation Systems, 2010.[7] Mullen,C., Wade,N., “State

Collection

2005 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Stephanie Ivey; Anna Lambert

of Engineering Education, January 1997, pg. 7-15. 12. see Ref. 1 13. Harb, J.N., Durrant, S. O., Terry, R.E., “Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, 82, 2, pg. 70-77, 1983. 14. Felder, Richard. “Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education,” Journal of College Science Teaching, May 1993, pg. 286-290. 15. Stone, R., and McAdams, D. “The Touchy-Feely Side of Engineering Education: Bringing Hands-on Experiences to the Classroom,” 35th American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section Conference Proceedings, Omaha, Nebraska, April 2000. 16. Felder, Richard

Collection

2004 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Christopher C. Ibeh; Marjorie Donovan; Oliver Hensley; James Otter

Pittsburg State University.The EKE Protocol The essential knowledge elements (EKE) protocol for rating of programs andcourse/ instructional delivery uses the rating form as per Table I. The form of Tables I,III and IV, as the case may be, is given and explained to the participant at the beginningof the semester or program. CUES-AM via the EKE form solicits input and activeparticipation from the participant(s); this constitutes a form of quasi-empowerment, andbestows on the participant a level of limited partnership with the faculty or programadministration. Empowerment and partnership imply responsibility for learning andunderstanding of the course or program materials. Participants are typically the focus ofany program or course, and their

Collection

2004 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Julia Morse; Jung Oh

professional performance. Figure 5’s timelinenot only summarizes major instructional initiatives, but displays their evolution. Thisinformation is another way of communicating the process of teaching and professional growth. VIII. Major Teaching/Learning Strategy Changes over the Period 1999 Developed CHM 210 diagnostic placement test Implemented K-State Online Adopted new textbooks to be same as Manhattan campus 2000 Introduced students’ periodic table project and portfolio assignments Expanded in-class problem session and K-State Online features Utilized multimedia companion on textbook 2001 Administered IDEA

Collection

2018 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Edgar C. Clausen; James T. McAllister

. Eng. Educ. 92(4): 337-343. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00778.x.Griffioen, J., Seales, W.B. and Lumpp, J.E. Jr. (1999). “Teaching in real-time wirelessclassrooms.” J. Eng. Educ. 88(4): 397-402. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00465.x.Hawkins, S., Coney, M.B. and Bystrom, K.E. (1996). “Incidental writing in the engineeringclassroom.” J. Eng. Educ. 85(1): 27-33. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00204.x.Howstuffworks. (2018). “10. The shoe pile: 10 worst corporate icebreakers.”‹https://money.howstuffworks.com/business-communications/worst-ice-breaker1.htm› (May 28,2018).Ing, M. and Victorino, C. (2016). “Differences in classroom engagement of Asian Americanengineering students.” J. Eng. Educ. 105(3): 431-451. doi:10.1002/jee.20126.Kashy, E

Collection

2017 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Nathan M. Schneider; Mark Janzen; Eylem Asmatulu

Conventional diesel 0.815-0.870 Viscosity mm2/s LDPE oil 1.89 Conventional diesel 2.0-5.0 Kinetic viscosity cSt LDPE oil - Conventional diesel 2.0-5.0 HHV MJ/kg LDPE oil 38-39 Conventional diesel 46.67 Pour point °C LDPE oil - Conventional diesel 6 Flash point °C

Collection

2017 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Abu Asaduzzaman; Farshad Mashhadi; Manira Rani

experience inSTEM education. Learning in groups has additional advantages; it helps reduce the demand forresources such as development boards and software licenses.References [1] Asaduzzaman, A., Asmatulu, R., and Pendse, R. (2013). “Thinking in Parallel: Multicore Parallel Programming for STEM Education.” American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section Annual Conference, Salina, Kansas. [2] Auchincloss, L.C., Laursen, S.L., Branchaw, J.L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D.I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C.M., Pelaez, N., Rowland, S., Towns, M., Trautmann, N.M., Varma-Nelson, P., Weston, T.J., and Dolan, E.L. (2014). “Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting

Collection

2010 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Dave Sly; Daniel Bumblauskas; Frank Peters

Collection

2010 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Dona Steffens Davidson; Kevin P. Drees

Quarterly.[Online]. 46(1), pp. 45-55.10. T. Bottorff, R. Glaser, A. Todd and B. Alderman. (2008, Oct). Branching out: communication and collaborationamong librarians at multi-campus institutions. Journal of Library Administration. [Online]. 48 (3/4), pp. 329-363.11. S. A. Ware and C. L. Young, “Virtual reference teams: collaboration and knowledge sharing across time anddistance,” in Proc. 2007 ACRL 13th National Conf., Baltimore, MD, 2007, pp. 79-82.12. T. Volkening, personal communication to authors, July 29, 2010.13. C. L. Borgman, D. Moghdam, and P. K. Corbett, Effective online searching: a basic text. New York: MercelDekker, Inc., 1984.14. Dialog (2008, Dec.) EI Compendex, EI Compendex 1990 (File 288), EI Compendex 1970 (File 278

Collection

2010 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Douglas R. Carroll

, then they cannot be recognized on the Host Campus transcript as an honors student or as having earned a minor and they are not eligible to participate in NCAA athletics at the Host Campus.References 1. Egbert, R. I., Stone, L.H. and Adams, D.L. “Characteristics, Similarities, and Difference Among Four-Year Cooperative Engineering Programs in the United States”, in review for ASEE Prism, Please contact the author for a copy of the paper.Biographical InformationDr. Douglas R. Carroll PhD PE is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the MissouriUniversity of Science and Technology. He recently became the Director of the CooperativeEngineering Program, a cooperative program between Missouri S&T and Missouri

Collection

2011 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

JIM SHIH-JIUN CHEN; ALANI INTINTOLO

. ABET Student Outcomes, http://www.foundationcoalition.org/home/keycomponents/assessment_eval/ ec_outcomes_summaries.html2. Mastascusa, E. J., Snyder, W. J., & Hoyt, B. S. (2011), Effective Instruction for STEMDisciplines: From Learning Theory to College Teaching, Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.3. Meriam, J. L. & Kraige. L.G. (2010), Engineering Mechanics – Statics, 6th Edition,Wiley.4. Steif, P.S. & Dollar, A. (2005), “Reinventing the Teaching of Statics,” Int. J. Engrg.Ed., Vol.4, pp. 723-329, Templus Publication. 174Appendix A. Bloom’s Taxonomy used in Engineering StaticsAppendix B. Student Feedback and Comments on DPT:What aspects of the course or the instructor’s approach contributed most

Collection

2010 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Alfred A. Scalza

they apply to college students today. These theories are Classical Conditioning,Operant Conditioning and Social Learning. We will all recognize the learning patterns of ourstudents in all three theories. Classical Conditioning Classical Conditioning grew out of experiments to teach dogs to salivate in response to the ringing of a bell, conducted in the early 1900’s by Russian Psychologist Ivan Pavlov.4 This study connects an unconditioned stimulus to a conditioned stimulus and eventually to an unconditioned response. But students seldom learn as a response to a stimulus so this theory doesn’t really apply to college learning. Operant Conditioning Operant Conditioning is much more applicable to

Collection

2010 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Barbara E. Mizdail

. Larson, Janelle M., Stephen M. Smith, David G. Abler and Carolina Trevelli, An Economic Analysis of Land Titling in Peru, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture. 42(1):79-97, 2003.8. Waks, S. and Sabag, N., Technology Project Learning versus Lab Experimentation, Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 333-342, Sept. 2004.9. Boyer Commission (1998), Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. Stony Brook, New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.10. Nicholas Basta, Opportunities in Engineering Careers, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2003.

Collection

2010 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Christopher L. Reitsma

, but not on GPA, because there are more grades that exceed100% that provide no benefit to a GPA increase. Spring 2010 currently has a 94.2% average,while Spring 2009 had an 87.1% average, Spring 2007 had an 86.5% average and Spring 2008had an 88.9% average. Partly contributory to Spring 2010’s higher grade is the incoming GPAof the students. Furthermore, the first midterm exam was completed with an 84.8% averagewhich significantly reduced their course average at this point. The reduction of requiredassignments has hindered the student’s ability to complete an exam satisfactorily within a timelimit due to lack of practice. This was also demonstrated in EE462 Electronic Design thissemester based on the first midterm exam and the removal of

Collection

2011 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Pawan Tyagi; Christine Newman

B in this ABET accredited EI program make them eligible toget three JHU college level credits.Acknowledgment: PT thanks Michael Karweit for designing engineering innovation program andnurturing it. PT also thanks Kathleen Dowell of EvalSolutions for the data analysis.References: 1. ASEE First Bell September 2, 2011 News Letter and http://www.ajc.com/opinion/strong-u-s-needs-1155439.html 6502. US News Education Blog by Jason Koebler September 28 2011, http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/high- school-notes/2011/09/28/survey-stem-engagement-begins-early & http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2011/sep11/09

Collection

2008 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Adam J. Czekanski; David-Michael P. Roux

converted to grade point averages on a 4.0 scale. The block(s) of instruction each mid-termexamination covered is/are in parenthesis. The differences between the mid-term scores and the population CGPAsfrom Table 1 are also shown. Mid-Term 1 Difference Mid-Term 2 Difference Population GPA from GPA from (Block I) CGPA (Blocks II/III) CGPA Raising Hands

Collection

2007 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

John C. Giordano; J. Scot Ransbottom

learning styles, approaches to learning (deep, surface, andstrategic), and levels of intellectual development. (at http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Understanding_Differences.pdf)[5] Army Regulation 25-1: Army Knowledge Management and Information Technology. Headquarters,Department of the Army, Washington, DC. 15 July 2005.[6] Ekstrom, J.J. and B. Lunt. Education at the Seams: Preparing Students to Stitch Systems Together;Curriculum and Issues for 4-Year IT Programs CITC4’03, October 16–18, 2003, Lafayette, Indiana.[7] Sobiesk, E. J., Blair, J. R., Cook, J. D., Giordano, J. C., Goda, B. S., and Reynolds, C. W. 2006.Designing an interdisciplinary information technology program. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference onInformation Technology

Collection

2007 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Carol Siri Johnson

. Kahlenberg, ed., The Century Foundation: New York, p. 17-57, 2004.3. Spears, A.K., "Institutionalized Racism and the Education of Blacks," Anthropology and Education Quarterly 9(2): p. 127-136, 1978.4. Hsu, C., "Not Worth the Price," in U. S. News & World Report: Washington, 2003, p. 70-71.5. "How to Get Your Share of the $90 Billion Scholarship Jackpot," in Ebony 2003, p. p. 83A, 84, 84A, 84B, 85, 85A, 86, 86B.6. "Top Dollars for Black Scholars: How to Finance Your Educational Choice," in Ebony 2006, p. p. 178, 180, 182-176.7. Hoover, E., "Pushing the Envelope," in The Chronicle of Higher Education: Washington, 2003, p. 39-42.8. Bayiokos, C., "Uncle Sam Wants You! To Apply for FAFSA," in

Collection

2007 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

K. A. Narh; R. N. Dave

Poster presentations. Please be creative but also try to be clear in presenting your main results. Part C This portion should focus on your overall experience of the listed REU activities. You will be provided a print out survey form that you need to fill out and hand-in separately (without your name). In this part, please address any issues that were not covered in the survey. You may also suggest aspects of the REU Program you would like to see improved. Include any item(s) that you would like to be included in future REU activities. In addition, you may be asked questions that may contain similar topics as above.Fig. 3. A sample of Final Project Report Guidelines given to REU students

Collection

2007 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Paul Stanton; Duane Fairfax

Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Payoffs,” ERICDocument Reproduction Service Report ED 377038, (1994).8. Cooper, J., Prescott, S., Cook, L., Smith, L., Mueck, R., “Cooperative Learning and College Instruction: EffectiveUse of Student Learning Teams,” California State University Foundation, 1990. Proceedings of the 2007 Middle Atlantic Section Fall Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education

Collection

2006 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

William E. Kelly; Theodore A. Bickart; Richard J. Forselius

student design projectThe ABET requirement for engineering standards is in Criterion 4 and specifically calls for the use of standards in design. TheCanadian requirement is broader although it is also focused around design.Relevant standards should be consulted early in the design process and since it is reasonable to assume many companies will wanttheir products to be accepted in the global market, students could be expected to look to see if their product is likely to be covered by aEuropean Union (EU) Directive [10]. According to the most recent report by the U.S. Trade Representative, the EU continues to bethe U.S.’s largest trading partner and, as such, is a large market for US goods and services.The National Institute of Standards and

Collection

2006 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Chong Shen; Zhongwei Zhang; David Lai

introductory computer science lec- tures, SIGCSE ’00: Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (New York, NY, USA), ACM Press, 2000, pp. 134–138.[10] Mark A. Holliday, Animation of computer networking concepts, J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 3 (2003), no. 2, 1–26.[11] Gianluca Iannaccone, Martin May, and Christophe Diot, Aggregate traffic performance with active queue management and drop from tail, SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 31 (2001), no. 3, 4–13.[12] G. Krasner and S. Pope, A description of the model-view-controller user interface paradigm in the smalltalk-80 system, Journal of Object Oriented Programming 1 (1988), no. 3, 26–49.[13] Scot F. Morse and Charles L. Anderson, Introducing