reduce stress and anxiety and to provide moral support, WELA members receivedexamination survival packs 6 .In celebration of the successful first year of WELA, an Inspirational Students booklet waspublished featuring the first WELA members. Professional photographs were taken of the Page 23.1180.4WELA members, and each member wrote a self-reflective article on what it meant to be a part ofWELA, and of the engineering world, as well as what they had learnt and gained during theirfirst year as WELA members 6. Special awards were given to acknowledge and celebrateacademic and other achievements of WELA members.2.1.2 WELA Senior programmeThe WELA
are EFFECTs?The Environments for Fostering Effective Critical Thinking, or EFFECTs, are modular inquirybased tools designed to stimulate critical thinking and collaborative teamwork while improvingthe transfer of core knowledge in engineering.1 The pedagogical framework for EFFECTs linkstwo critical elements, active learning and reflective writing, within the context of a realisticengineering design problem. Lipman2 defines critical thinking as “skillful, responsible thinkingthat facilitates good engineering judgment because it relies upon criteria, is self-correcting, andis sensitive to content.” The EFFECT framework is designed on the basis of this definition.EFFECTs begin with a driving question that is embedded in a decision worksheet
Virginia-Minnesota which promotes learning in the context of engineering projects, professionalism and reflection (metacognition). His research in the area of engineering education is focused on project-based learning, design and innovation, professionalism and self-directed learning.Mr. Eric Diep, Minnesota State University, Mankato Page 23.1388.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Works in Progress: Developing an Integrated Motion Capture and Video Recording System for Pediatric Biomechanical Studies1. Project OverviewA kinematic understanding of gait has numerous
reflection on how the coding functions and process students are learning relateto their future careers.Lab time during each project was used to introduce students to the relevant coding functions they neededto complete each project and as work time where groups could meet to work on their projects. In the firsttwo weeks of each project, the instructor provided a template Jupyter Notebook with a similar dataset tothe project and demonstrated how to code specific sequences needed to complete the project for about onehour of the lab. The second hour of lab was reserved as time for students to try to apply the concepts totheir project datasets with their groups and the instructors and teaching assistants were available to debugand answer questions. For
set ofsix-piece chicken nuggets they can produce within 15-minutes. The points serve as a metric forthe overall productivity of the country and world during the game. The game is played twicewithin a 65-minute class session. The first game does not have any tariffs imposed and thusrepresents a liberalized trade environment. The game is then run a second time under a scenarioin which one country has invaded another country and in response multiple countries haveimposed import tariffs on each other. Students also spend five-minutes reflecting on what theylearned about international trade. While the specific results change each time new student teamsplay the game, the general results that a) there are winners and losers from tariffs and b
projects, reflect on their social identities, and consider the broader societal contexts of their engineering work. The goals of his research are 1) to develop tools and pedagogies that support engineers in achieving the positive societal changes that they envision and 2) to address systems of oppression that exist within and are reproduced by engineering education and work environments. He earned his B.S. in Engineering Sciences from Yale University, with a double major in East Asian Studies, and earned his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan. He also holds a Graduate Certificate in Chinese and American Studies, jointly awarded by Johns Hopkins University and Nanjing University in China.Prof
proven to nurture learning via practical projects,promoting collaboration, communication, safety consciousness, and critical thinking. Guidelinesof the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and the High-QualityProblem-Based Learning Organization (HQPBL), which include, but are not limited to:“Intellectual Challenges and Accomplishments”, “Authenticity”, “Public Product”,“Collaboration”, “Project Management”, and “Reflection” are followed. For this manuscript, ourprimary focus lies on “Authenticity”, which emphasizes the significance of PBL projects thatgenerate tangible benefits for individuals and communities beyond the educational environmentsof classroom and school. Our objective is to fulfill all necessary ABET criteria
data from table 1. Question 3 and 4 are the goals for junior Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUyear, which to get students ready and be confident to move on the Capstone project. Question 5should reflect the result of Capstone project, which has not happen for this group of students. Itis reflecting their confidence rather than an evaluation of their skills at this point. Clearly fromthe table, all the skills were improved during the junior year, especially the design and solveproblem aspects. Following figures gives better view about the improvement of the skills overjunior year. Figure 1: Questionnaire results4. ConclusionThe goal of engineering education is to
. Retrieved April 15, 2005 from http://galenet.galegroup.com3. Castronovo, R. “From Emerson to King: Democracy, race, and the politics of protest.” Modern Language Quarterly v60n1, March 1999. Retrieved August 13, 2005 from http://newfirstsearch.oclc.org/ second paragraph.4. Carey, W. B. “Emerson-the importance of adaptability.” Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. V25i5p382(1), October 2004. Retrieved August 13, 2005 from http//web6.infotrac.galegroup.com/ fourth paragraph5. Delbanco, A. “The renewal of literature: Emersonian reflections”, The New Republic, Review of book, “Renewal of literature: Emersonian reflections” by Poirier, Richard, 1987, Retrieved April 15, 2005 from http
The journey to build a 21st century faculty-librarian relationship: A retrospective case study“Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together issuccess.”-Henry Ford1This paper will reflect on how faculty and librarians built and fostered a successful cross-disciplinary relationship. The authors examine their journey to nurture an informationfluent learning environment. How did we foster the connectedness as a group? How didour diverse personalities impact the relationship? How did we create a win-winrelationship based on personal strengths? How did we benefit from social capital? Howdid we build co-mentorship? How did we practice being a community of learners? Howdid we employ
engineering science courses.This paper is a discussion of assessment measures that are employed by the GeneralEngineering Department at UW-P and raises questions about what more could be done.Assessment is an integral part of the academic process. It requires and reflects a long-termcommitment to the program and its constituencies, viz., the students, alumni and industrypartners. Like most engineering programs, we have had a long history of self-assessment and 2improvement. However, we have had little documentation of processes already in place.Although we are in the middle of an ABET accredited cycle, there has been significant pressurefrom the campus administration to document
meaningful feedback to your peer related to his or her syllabus. Providemeaningful feedback to your peer related to classroom observations of his or her teachingstrategies. Provide meaningful feedback to your peer related to the evidence of student learningthat your peer collects from his or her students.Task 2: Attend group meetings with your PRT leader.Task 3: Write three reflective essays per semester, based on your goals and feedback fromyour peer. The essays must be completed no later than the last day of the semester. The threeessays (not to exceed one page) should be based on: 1.) discussions with your peer related toyour syllabus or outcomes for the class that is being reviewed, 2.) discussions with your peerrelated to the teaching
(Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Consisting of five statements that respondents rate based on Recent Events Replaced their level of agreement using a 7-point Likert scale ranging with Satisfaction with Life from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The statements Scale are general in nature and reflect a person’s overall satisfaction with life. Underrepresented Status Impact of one’s minority status within the STEM discipline. (Revised) Likert Scale from 1 (Almost Always) to 5 (Never). How frequently participants experienced micro-affirmations Perspectives on
Environment)• Scaffolding of instruction supports students who have different starting points in their academic preparation, background, and experience.• Graduate student feedback is collected and utilized to support the program in the assessment, reflection, and evaluation.Body of Knowledge Demographic Data – Subject Matter Experts Type of organization Disciplinary backgroundRole on the NSF IGE grant Job focus Terminal degreeBody of Knowledge Process• Collected and refined learning objectives (LOs) for five graduate chemical engineering courses covering six topics: • Thermodynamics, Kinetics and Reactor Design, Transport
country are placing growing emphasis on programs that allow students to gainwork and research experience and are beginning to define success by more than just academic learning. Theseprograms, referred to in this proposal as practice-oriented experiential education or POEE, comprise co-op jobs,internships, apprenticeships, undergraduate research and other methods that integrate experience in the world withexperience in the classroom. These approaches are becoming increasingly relevant in a work culture characterizedby the need to continuously reflect and learn from ongoing experience [29]. A 1998 census of cooperative educationfound that approximately 250,000 U.S. students were placed in cooperative education jobs that year [28]. Accordingto the
in Figure 2 below, could leave someof the original color of the material showing between pathways making a square that almostlooks the same as the original material, but is slightly darker. Overlapping the pathways almostentirely, as shown in Figure 3, could leave the material black, charred, etched, or may be entirelynecessary depending on the reflectivity or light absorbing properties of the material beingmarked. The heat being retained by the material will become evident as line spacing is exploredfurther. Figure 2: spacing - normal view vs close-up view of large line separation Figure 3: spacing - Full coverage close-up viewRepetitionOne great thing about marking objects is that none of it has to be
students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the environmental engineering program at the University of Georgia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Academic help-seeking as a stand-alone, metacognitive action: An empirical study of experiences and behaviors in undergraduate engineering studentsAbstractContemporary research investigating academic help-seeking behavior (HSB) is predominantlyK-12 in focus. Few studies have
closely related to teaching conceptions and beliefs aboutknowledge, education and teaching47–50. It follows from such observations that changing beliefsand conceptions of teaching are critical for any substantive change in teaching51,52. Efforts toinfluence beliefs through courses and interventions that seek to challenge individual beliefs havemixed outcomes53,54. De-contextualized evidence-based teaching models that are prevalent inthe literature have also been shown to offer limited support for teachers to change theirpractice55. Many researchers consider reflective practice, in which a teacher frequently engagesin reflection on their ongoing practical experiences, as having more potential in helpingpracticing teachers change their
approaches to meet the needs of diverse sets ofstakeholders [1, 2]. Although the value of empathy is clear, how it can be attained or strengthenedis less well-defined. The learning activities that educators in STEM fields may employ vary fromapproaches utilizing role playing to offering service-learning experiences [3]. One potential wayto cultivate empathy is the use of story-driven learning (SDL), defined as the intellectual processof creating, telling, and listening to reflective, evidence-based stories [4].Storytelling is beneficial for inquiry and knowledge construction and is key to promotingcommunication, psychosocial development, and a humanistic approach to others [5–8]. Beyondpersonal narratives and relaying events, storytelling has been
of a problem through use of applicable knowledge and critical thinkingskills. Interest is the student’s desire or curiosity to learn about engineering: an example of this iswhen a student goes above and beyond to gather understanding on the topic. Finally, recognitionis separated into three subfacets, which reflect the deep work done by Carlone and Johnson onrecognition in science identity: lack of recognition, social/teacher recognition, and self-recognition. While Hazari’s work touched on the idea of self recognition, the focus on areasother than recognition by others have not received as much attention as the identity model hasbeen adapted into engineering. In this work, we seek to renew attention to performance,competence, and interest
something works but how the learning environmentfunctions by considering interactions and processes [56]. Following Sandoval [63], we haveconceptualized our design research with conjecture maps. Conjecture mapping is “a means ofspecifying theoretically salient features of a learning environment design and mapping out howthey are predicted to work together to produce desired outcomes” (p. 19). It illustrates the aim ofthe design, distills particular features of the design and what they are expected to do, andspecifies what they should produce. As we have engaged in research over the past two decades,we have modified and revised our conjecture maps to reflect our learning. By adhering to theprinciples of DBR, with ongoing data collection, testing
of this engineering design project. Thus, this case study exploreshow elementary teachers reflect on implementing an engineering project that integrated science,engineering, and computational modeling in two different classroom contexts. By doing so, thispaper aims to expand our understanding of how teachers’ beliefs may amplify certainopportunities for students within curricular materials or potentially filter opportunities withinengineering design projects.MethodsWe consider teachers’ reflections on implementing the engineering curriculum in order to givethese elementary teachers a voice, and we report their beliefs in their own words when possibleto preserve their perspective. Specifically, we use an embedded, single case study (Yin, 2018
. Thepurpose of this qualitative investigation is to examine how first-year engineering students at alarge public Mid-Atlantic university describe their engagement and interest in an engineeringdesign project with a nontraditional theme. Data for this study are drawn from student responsesto a collection of short answer questions as well as several reflection assignments completedduring the project. In combination, these encompass the affective, behavioral, and cognitivedimensions of student engagement. Together, these three dimensions provide a comprehensiveview of how students engage with the project itself, their teammates, and others in theclass. Furthering the understanding of how students view and engage with a nontraditionalproject may expand
) researchers must begin to study human cognition and affect as it relates toteaching and learning NDM methods. Following review, Justin reflects on the experience of beingan NDM learner in the second author’s class, more specifically how the Tyler’s class compared tothose themes above. To end, Tyler responds to Justin’s review and reflection from the viewpointof an NDM practitioner and researcher. There Tyler provides their thoughts as they relate toteaching and learning NDM, and thoughts relating to the future of NDM engineering educationmore broadly.1. IntroductionNondestructive evaluation (NDE), testing (NDT), and inspection (NDI) – nondestructive methods(NDM) for brevity – describe the process of inspecting the conditions of a part or material
argue, “theanalogy between ethical problems and design problems is also very much connected with virtueethics and the proper reflection on the nature of engineering as a human activity” [19]. This isfurther compounded by Roeser’s observation that design is not value-free; thus, design forcesengineering students to confront their values [20].Also discussed in the literature is the timing and frequency with which students should bechallenged with ethical situations within their engineering course of study. In some programs,the discussion of ethics has been relegated to a capstone design course with a “one and done”approach. While we agree that capstone design courses offer a powerful opportunity tostrengthen engineering ethics education, we
sent to approximately 476 students enrolled in one (or both)of two engineering courses: a remote synchronous first-year seminar, and a hybrid remotesynchronous/remote asynchronous introductory programming course for non-computer sciencemajors; both of these courses were offered at University Park, the largest Penn State campus.Both courses were taught by the same instructor, who initiated the present study. Theengineering program at Penn State is one of the highest ranked in the country, with highlycompetitive admission standards, and enrollment patterns that reflect a significant percentage ofstudents from outside of the state and country (29% of overall student body in 2020). As is characteristic of many undergraduate engineering
degrees of access to decision-making power.” [15]ASCE’s Vision 2025 can only regain momentum if it identifies, recruits, and develops leadershipat all levels, based upon a constituency (professional members who are activated) from amembership community (members who are concerned but not active) and then facilitating theengagement of membership at higher and higher levels of leadership until the pinnacle ofchampionship is reached. “Thus, the ladder of engagement reflects a process “whereby individuals take on more and more leadership” (Sinnott & Gibbs, 2014, p. 28). The lower rungs are occupied by supporters and leadership prospects who support the cause but have not assumed ongoing roles or commitments
that when given theopportunity to choose their own paths through the course, students do indeed take advantage ofthis opportunity. Specifically, we observe multiple pathways through the course via theExploration and Engagement Modules, explained below. Student survey responses andself-reflection within the Personal Action Plan assignment further suggest that students deepenedtheir self-understanding through the course. Ultimately, this research suggests that incorporatingchoice in first-year engineering courses may be a useful alternative to a “one size fits all”approach, given that the former allows students to explore their different interests and goals withrespect to engineering.MotivationAs part of the Foundational Course Initiative, a
] areevaluated.2. Program ElementsThe program is conducted across two institutions with a total of three black diaspora graduatestudents in the process of model development, reflection and narrative inquiry. These elementsand the participant recruitment process are detailed in the following sections.2.1 Model DevelopmentThe research strategy is to generate an integrated framework that evaluates the role of anticipatory cognition in the research tasks that the students conduct. In other words, while the students focuson the research topics for their dissertation, data on their reflections through narrative enquiry arecollected. For example, the students address modeling efforts related to how
betweentechnologies, the users of these technologies, and those upon whom technological artifacts haveinfluence. Technologies and technological artifacts have an influence upon the lived experience ofthose who employ them and upon the lived experience of those upon whom the artifacts are used.According to Rosenberger all postphenomenological studies share three main components:understanding the roles of technologies in the human technology-world experience, usingexperimental cases to reflect this experience, and the construction of an analysis of the co-shapingor co-constitution of human and technology to create the human-technology connection.”[25] Thecase based method developed here employs the postphenomenological framework and style ofanalysis to bring