engineering pedagogy as well as topics in the fields of optimal control and artificial intel ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Session XXXX Using Projects to Improve Student Engagement and Retention in a First-Year Engineering Course Matthew S. Kuester and Paul R. Griesemer Computer Science, Engineering, and Physics Department University of Mary Hardin-Baylor AbstractThe first-year engineering course at the
- resentative, and served as the Chair of ASEE Zone III (2005-07). He chaired the ASEE-GSW section during the 1996-97 academic year. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Uses and Misuses of AI-Assisted Writing in Engineering Reports Randall D. Manteufel, R. Lyle Hood, Alifer D. Crom, Amir Karimi Mechanical Engineering Department University of Texas at San Antonio AbstractArtificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming more widely used by engineering students especially withwriting reports. This paper focuses on the use of AI writing
Paper ID #44776Utilizing Fundamental Concepts of Engineering Design and Theory to TeachThermo-fluid ApplicationsSaman Aria, West Texas A&M UniversitySanjoy Bhattacharia, West Texas A&M University Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX-79016Dr. Swastika S. Bithi, West Texas A&M University Assistant Professor of Engineering College of Engineering West Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Utilizing Fundamental Concepts of Engineering Design
Paper ID #44708iBMEntored Buddy Program for First-Year International BME DoctoralStudentsProf. Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Cullen Trust for Higher Education En- dowed Professorship in Engineering #1 at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Professor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD AndHuiliang Wang, University of Texas at Austin Huiliang (Evan) Wang is an Assistant professor at the Biomedical Engineering department at the Univer- sity of Texas at Austin (UT Austin). His research is on neuro-engineering
of Biomedical Engineering and Cullen Trust for Higher Education En- dowed Professorship in Engineering #1 at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Professor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD AndEdward Castillo, University of Texas at Austin ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Session XXXXWelcome to the Evan & Eddie Show!: Conversations about career journeys Huiliang Wang, Mia K. Markey, Edward Castillo Biomedical Engineering Department The
research study examined the following research questions about Blackengineering students at a specific predominantly White university in the United States: “(1) Whatare the retention rates in the Engineering College for Black students, and how are they changingover time?; (2) How do interventions and programs figure in their navigating the university andtheir major?; (3) What aspects of student experience are related to students’ decisions to stay orleave?”[1]. The other authors of this paper (Auguste and Hampton) were members of the five-person research team for that study. All members of the research team conducted semi-structuredinterviews with the 24 current or formerly-enrolled Black engineering student participants
calculus Traditional Original No lecture Foundational placement pedagogy Math Courses process Traditional classrooms12/15/2023 3 • Research: success in undergraduate mathematics • Math = Key indicator for success in STEM majors & programs [1]. • Influences persistence and completion of engineering degrees more than other courses[2]. • Our data mirrors these trends • 79.8% of first year students are successful in mathematics. • Negatively impacts retention and persistence
at Dayton and WiE at Purdue have developed a collaborative relationship wherethey have shared tips and strategies to develop mentoring programs as they standtoday.We will start with a brief description of our programs and then talk about ourcollaboration and transferability of mentoring components.Research shows that mentoring works. In particular, longitudinal research is beingconducted by the Purdue team through and initial results indicate that students in thementoring program graduate at higher rates than their peers not in the program.Reviewer 1 stated: “Oftentimes, in academia especially, mentorship programs are usedas a superficial band-aid for systemic inequities and toxic cultural norms.”We acknowledge that there are systemic
water resources engineering from the University of Texas at Austin (UT-Austin), and her PhD in STEM education from UT-Austin. Before graduate school, she worked for an industrial gas company in a variety of engineering roles. Her research in engineering and STEM education focuses on career pathways within engineering and issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Teaching Equity throughAssets-Based Journaling:Using Community Cultural Wealth to Guide Student Reflections Gabriella Coloyan Fleming, Jessica Deters, Maya Denton 1
thriving incomputing careers. 1 Positionality- Before diving into our presentation today, each of us will give a brief positionality statement to situate our perspectives in this work.- Hello, my name is Alia Carter. My pronouns are she/her. I am an able-bodied, cisgender Black woman living in the United States. I am a research scientist in the electrical and computer engineering department at Duke University. I have worked in informal and formal STEM education for the past 15 years including serving as the director of science engagement at a science center and teaching math and 2
) • “My parents/relatives/friends see me as a physics person; my teacher sees me as a physics person.” (Godwin et al., 2013) • “Do the following people see you as a mathematics person?:” Parents/relatives/friends/mathematics teacher. (Cribbs et al., 2015) • “Do the following see you as an engineering person: (1) yourself and (2) the engineering instructor” (Prybutok et al., 2016) • “My parents see me as an engineer. My instructors see me as an engineer. My peers see me as an engineer. I have had experiences in which I was recognized as an engineer.” (Godwin, 2016) • “I see myself as an engineer.” “My advisor sees me as an engineer.” “I have
developspatial skills and interest in engineering through play, which may ultimately encourage them topursue engineering pathways in the future.IntroductionThere are many research reports and studies that highlight the gender gap between men andwomen in engineering fields [1]. In 2018, 22.2% of bachelor’s degrees in engineering wereearned by women [2]. Additionally, in 2019, among those with science and engineering (S&E)degrees, 15.98% of women worked in S&E occupations (compared to 35.38% of men) [2]. Thegap between the number of women and men earning engineering degrees as well as the numberof women pursuing science and engineering careers suggests the need to improve and supportwomen’s participation in engineering fields.One factor that may
to utilize computing tools or technical skills,like programmingPerformance - a student’s ability to utilize knowledge to complete a taskRecognition - ways a student acknowledges themselves as the type of personthat does computing and/or how others see the student as a computing person 16 Activity 1Now, we will transition to our first activity of the presentation. 17 Activity 1: Mentimeter Directions for Activity: 1. Visit Menti.com on your laptop/tablet/phone 2. Type in code 6594 5841 3. Submit your answer to the
studentattendance at events (less ghosting) from those who had signed up for them. 9The five program recommendations from the Needs Assessment process were:1. To create a student leadership board for current student programming.2. Create a physical lounge space for WE@RIT (& ECCO);3. Pilot a peer mentoring program for older and newer students;4. Collaborate with ECCO and other diverse constituencies in KGCOE for some programming;5. Engage a wider range of corporations in programming. 10The Leadership Board was implemented in the Fall of 2021 and has continued everysemester since. Their scope
education research over engineeringeducation practice. Other journals launched (e.g. Advances in Engineering Education) todisseminate engineering education practice. Ultimately, though, we have learned that research topractice translation is important and so is practice to research translation. Figure 1 grounds thismotivation to recognize that back-and-forth translation between educational practice toeducational research is essential to transformative education and learning. Figure 1: Visual of research to practice translation to support transformative engineering education. (Karlin et al. 2016)In this paper, we highlight the journey of launching a brand-new engineering program with afounding chair who is both an
include STEM transfer students. Wang’s (2021) workprovides valuable insights into these distinct obstacles with the broader context of the transferexperience reviewed above. While also highlighting the gap that exists between the aspirationsand realized goals of students aspiring to transfer, it is particularly pronounced in the STEMdisciplines.Wang (2021) identifies four critical challenges that impede the progress of STEM transferstudents: 1) financial barriers, 2) issues related to degree programming and course offerings, 3)challenges within the teaching and learning environment, and 4) deficiencies in academicadvising. Notably, financial constraints are found to persistently hinder transfer students,particularly those pursuing STEM degrees
, structural, and pedagogical changes needed to transform their institution’s College of Engineering...” 4 This project was created in response to an updated NSF BPE solicitation, specifically a Track 4, phase 1 grant with the aim of creating a Center for Equity in Engineering.Phase I projects are focused on establishing the infrastructure necessary to“stand up” the CEE within their College of EngineeringNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018.★ Expected to have a duration of at least 24 monthsGraduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The★ Proposed budget not to exceed $1.2M.National★ RequireAcademies Press
. The students start to presenttheir updates using the project summary sheet (Figure 1) from the middle of the first semester tothe end of the course. These summary sheets give a high-level view of the project's evolutionand provide students feedback on their projected completion versus actual completion. Thecohort format allows the teams to learn from one another and see how other teams progress.Figure 1. Project Summary SheetTeam FormationThe project teams are formed using CATME Team-maker[1] to be random with weighting forsimilar weekly course schedules and no isolation of female students. This process allows theteams to be quickly formed after the students complete the information surveys. Once the teamsare formed, the first task is to
Students; Case Study; Learning Communities; Professional DevelopmentI. IntroductionGraduate student well-being is a concern for universities and colleges globally. The growing crisis of depression, low self-esteem, and fatigue amongst graduate students is ubiquitous across disciplines and degree programs [1]. Reasons for thesemental health issues are rooted in financial pressures [2], adviser expectations [2] and relationships [3], work-life balance [4],unstated expectations (hidden curriculum) [5], and, for many students, institutional or departmental discrimination [4], [6].However, academic institutions and/or individual departments can promote student well-being by facilitating social support anda healthy departmental climate [6].Community
robotics hardware, we sought tobridge the Robotarium with K12 computer science education. In this paper, we will describe thedevelopment of a block coding interface, and the piloting of the interface in high schoolclassrooms using a remotely facilitated instructional module.Introduction:Computation is of growing importance in K12 education as technology and technologyintegration advance throughout our lives, and the consequent workforce development needsbecome more evident [1]. In K12, computer science education may begin as early as elementaryschool and continue into middle and high school, and incorporates experiences in robotics,physical computing, web design, game design, and software development [2]. Although accesshas increased over the
scienceand simulation technology.IntroductionDeveloping machine learning projects for engineering education is of paramount importance inpreparing the next generation of engineers for the challenges of the modern world. These projectsoffer students a unique opportunity to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practicalapplication, a vital component of their future careers. Machine learning, with its ability to makesense of complex data and make predictions, has become integral in engineering fields. It equipsstudents with the skills needed to address real-world engineering challenges, enhancing theirproblem-solving abilities and fostering creativity [1, 2].Poisson's ratio is a dimensionless parameter that characterizes how a material
problems. This new course emphasizes Excel software rather than handcalculations and introduces use of Excel Solver and other data analysis tools.KeywordsQuantitative Methods, Linear Programming, Optimization.IntroductionExpectations for graduates entering the engineering profession are changing and intensifying tomeet the complex needs of society. Global issues, technological innovation, blending ofdiscipline boundaries, and increased professional complexities are transforming how engineersanalyze problems and provide effective solutions. Societal demands require engineeringgraduates possess strong technical knowledge and the ability to think creatively and critically,effectively communicate, and work in teams to solve challenging problems [1
project. In Fall 2023, students started the project by touring the on-campus powerplant. Then students worked in groups to design a vapor cycle to integrate into an existing gascycle to create a combined cycle. The project included formative assessments to help studentslearn more about the design process before completing summative assessment of a final report.In addition to teaching about the engineering design process, the format of the project alsoyielded a deeper understanding of the material.MotivationAt the 2022 Annual ASEE Conference, Andrew Lutz presented the Rankine Cycle design projectthat he created and implemented in class [1]. He used this assignment to assess ABET StudentOutcome 1, “an ability to identify, formulate, and solve
. These evaluations aimed to establish benchmarks for the impact of the newmaterial on students' academic performance and overall satisfaction. The findings indicate anotable enhancement in student performance and satisfaction levels among those whoutilized the new lab manual, underscoring the efficacy of this innovative educational resourcein the realm of digital design education.IntroductionA significant development in this digital education era is the concept of Open EducationalResources (OERs). These resources are essentially teaching, learning, and research materialsthat are freely available in the digital sphere, often situated in the public domain or releasedunder an open license [1]. The essence of an OER lies in its open nature, granting
and his colleagues from around the nation developed, implemented, refined, and assessed online resources for open courseware in Numerical Methods. This courseware receives over 1 million page views (https://nm.MathforCollege.com), 1.6 million views of the YouTube lectures, and 90,000 visitors to the ”numerical methods guy” blog annually. This courseware is also used to measure the impact of flipped, blended, and adaptive settings on how well engineering students learn content, develop group-work skills, and perceive the learning environment. Professor Kaw has written over 120 refereed technical papers, and his opinion editorials have been featured in the Tampa Bay Times, the Tampa Tribune, and the Chronicle of
ahead to the topic of that day’s lecture.Table 1 shows the learning objectives or the topic of the day along with the song played beforethe Mechanics of Materials class. For example, to connect to the Mohr’s Circle concepts, asstudents enter the classroom, an instructor plays a song with the word ‘circle’ in its lyrics, such as“Circle in the Sand” by Belinda Carlisle; or “Draw Me a Circle” by Barbara Streisand tostimulate learning and build students’ enthusiasm about Mohr’s circle. Before the start of the firstday of class, “Here I go Again” by White Snake is played signifying the students’ struggle withconcepts such as trusses, frames, 3-D equilibrium.Table 1. Song played before class in Mechanics of Materials Topic /Learning Objectives of
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Safe Space Warm Embrace: Building Blocks to Support Black & Brown STEM Scholars Presenters: Dr. DeAnna Katey, Virginia Tech & Terrance Harris, Drexel UniversityThese presentation will be presenting two types of programs that are designed toassist with creating a safe space for Black and Brown STEM students at two PWIs:Drexel University and Virginia Tech. Drexel is in the University City section ofPhiladelphia, while Virginia Tech is in the town of Blacksburg. 1 About Dr. DeAnna Katey Mr. Terrance Harris • Director of Undergraduate
). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Scripts of Whiteness in Engineering: An Analysis of the LiteratureIntroduction In this paper, we argue that scripts of whiteness in engineering are detrimental for Black,Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) because they keep racialization in engineering spacesin perpetual motion through the guise and myth of colorblindness and meritocracy. By scripts wemean the cognitive dynamics (i.e., assertions, attitudes, ways of being and doing) that involve theschemas and frames of reference that build one’s engineering identity [1]. We posit thatindividuals in engineering spaces, white and those with a proximity to Whiteness (proximity toWhiteness refers to having access to certain forms of
for Engineering Education, 2024 Self-Advocacy Professional Programming as a Framework to Support Liberatory Outcomes of STEM PhD Graduate Education Using the framework of servingness as conceptualized in research of Hispanic ServingInstitutions (HSI), measures of student’s success can be characterized using academic and non-academic outcomes (i.e. liberatory outcomes) [1]. Academic outcomes are commonlyinstitutional quantitative measures such as GPA, time to graduation, retention, etc. However,within the framework of servingness of an institution, there are additional indicators, includingidentifying the experiences of students and their non-academic outcomes. Some examples ofnon-academic outcomes are academic self
environments,universities in the US have increasingly prioritized equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI)initiatives, reflecting a broader societal commitment to equity and social justice [1]. Thisparadigm shift has prompted universities to engage in numerous initiatives aimed at creating amore inclusive environment for students. The benefits of EDI efforts in higher education arewell-documented, ranging from enhancing innovation to improved academic performance andretention rates among underrepresented student populations [2], [3]. As the US grapples withshifting notions of equity and justice, recent Supreme Court decisions in SFFA v. Harvard andSFFA v. UNC which have effectively eliminated affirmative action have added a significant layerof