biomedical engineering, career opportunities for biomedical engineering graduates, andthe educational opportunities available in biomedical engineering at the host institution.IntroductionSummer engineering outreach programs are used as a recruitment tool for potential students aswell as to introduce students to the various engineering fields. Many engineering schools acrossthe country offer either residential or day programs that provide junior high or high schoolstudents the opportunity to investigate engineering as a college major and career choice. Theseprograms generally expose students to multiple engineering fields during the program.Although engineering summer programs are ubiquitous, those concentrating entirely onbioengineering or
no internship experience. “Once, having an internship or two on your resumemade you a real standout in the marketplace. Today, internships are really the only wayto make sure you get on the career track of your choosing.” 2Engineering programs and the hosting industries also benefit in many ways. “Theprograms possess several advantages and provide benefits to all stakeholders.” 3 TheInternship program is a perfect vehicle to network into many different types of businessesand industries. This working relationship often results in program benefits such as state-of-the-art equipment donations, sources of student scholarships, recruiting tool for currentindustrial employees wishing to upgrade their skill set, a job placement highway forgraduates
engineering that has todo with cleaning up the effects built systems have had on the environment. Sustainable design“focuses on design that requires fewer natural resources, produces less (or no) waste, andreduces, reuses, or recycles waste produces (p. F1c-2).” One university defines sustainabledesign as having four components, technical, financial, environmental, and societal and these arereinforced throughout the students’ career in a series of courses spanning freshman to sophomoreyear7. James Madison University defines environmental sustainability as an approach to the engineering of processes, products, and structures which has, indefinitely, a less negative, neutral, or benign effect on all environmental systems. Sustainable
Innovation Center at the Ohio State University and Professor Emerita of mechanical engineering-engineering mechanics at Michigan Techno- logical University. She recently served as Program Director within the Division of Undergraduate Educa- tion at the National Science Foundation. She began her academic career on the faculty at Michigan Tech in 1986, starting first as an instructor while completing her Ph.D. degree and later joining the tenure-track ranks in 1991. Sorby is the former Associate Dean for Academic Programs in the College of Engineering and the former Department Chair of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech. Her research interests include graphics and visualization. She has been the Principal
implementing a comprehensive support system toenhance the academic success and career pathways of Hispanic and Low-income college students,specifically those who commence their education at a state college and then transfer to FAU topursue bachelor's degrees in Electrical Engineering (EE), Computer Engineering (CE), andComputer Science (CS), aligning with their career aspirations. The emphasis on Computer Scienceis particularly significant due to its profound impact across various sectors of society, industries,the economy, national security, and the educational landscape.The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered substantial shifts in higher education, altering instructionaldelivery methods for thousands of college students and necessitating the widespread
Scholars Program: Students’ Perceptions Across Three YearsAbstractThis work seeks to understand students’ perceived value of their participation in a multi-year co-curricular program, the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP), at Arizona State University(ASU) and explore how these perceptions vary between students at different class levels.Students in the GCSP engage in multidisciplinary, entrepreneurial, multicultural, research, andservice learning activities throughout their undergraduate collegiate career, in order to gaindiverse perspectives about global challenges related to a Grand Challenges theme (Health, Joy ofLiving, Security or Sustainability). At ASU, GCSP students are also encouraged to connect withtheir peers
). He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. He recently joined OSU after having served as an Associate Professor in The Polytechnic School within Arizona State University’s Fulton Schools of Engineering (FSE) where he was the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems & Design (EESD) Ph.D. Program. He is currently a Deputy Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education and co-maintains the Engineering Education Community Resource wiki. Additional career highlights include serving as Chair of the Research in
research is meaningful and impactful for individualsboth within and outside academic circles. The authors stress “becoming engaged in communitiesis ensuring that institutions, their faculty, and their students are prepared with the skills necessaryfor their work with the public.” This value of community engagement has even been highlightedin many funding agencies. More notably, NSF Faculty Early Career Development Program(CAREER) [6], states three important criteria to include: 1) performance of innovative research at the frontiers of science, engineering, and technology that is relevant to the mission of the sponsoring organization or agency, 2) community service demonstrated through scientific leadership, education or
a chemical engineer, it is$106,260 [1]. This 30% difference in yearly income holds more significant implications overone's lifetime. This marked difference in earning potential serves as a key factor influencing ashift in career trajectory, occurring either before or after undergraduate studies. Unfortunately,many students overlook crucial aspects such as job salary and availability when selecting theirundergraduate major. While personal interest often guides this choice, studies reveal that familialand peer pressure also plays a substantial role [2,3], leading students to pursue majors that maynot align with their passion or offer favorable job prospects and income. While more than 30%of undergraduate students regret their initial major
Development of an Engineering Sales Program with Industry Dr. Dave Sly, Dan Bumblauskas, Dr. Frank Peters Iowa State UniversityAbstractIowa State University recently established a program in technical sales for engineers. Todevelop the program, faculty and administrators reached out to an industrial advisory committeecomprised of organizations with a vested interest in the program; the organizations that hirestudents from the College of Engineering for career tracks in technical sales and marketing.The instructor used a combination of various sales techniques and strategies, from establishedtechnical sales programs to frame the syllabus for the course. A detailed course
researching small animal PET/MR scanning in collaboration with labs affiliated with the UC Davis Medical Center Department of Radiology. She is keen on advancing the field of multimodal medical imaging in the pursuit of exploring MR based therapeutic biomarkers in neuro-oncologic disease.Dr. Xianglong Wang, University of California, Davis Dr. Xianglong Wang is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in Biomedical Engineering at the University of California, Davis. He is the principal investigator of the cube3 lab. The cube3 lab actively performs research in community building and gender equity in engineering, as well as problem-based learning in core biomedical engineering courses. Before joining UC Davis, he was a career-track
. Page 22.117.2 1Research on the value of mentoring reports those who have mentors often have more jobsatisfaction, career satisfaction, promotion, better compensation, and are awarded more grantsthan those who are not mentored. 3,4 Mentoring can particularly buffer women from the setbacks to them personally and to their career from the negative effects of gender bias.5,6 Peoplewho have been protégés find it easier to find mentoring relationships than those people who havenever been a protégé.1 These mentored individuals recognize the value of mentoring and havethe skills to initiate and maintain mentoring relationships. They proactively look for
strategies that provideglobal perspectives and international experiences to help their graduates excel in their futurework environment” [1]. Despite this need, only few students are able to or willing to have a studyabroad experience. The 2013 Open Doors report from the Institute for International Educationshows that nationally only 3.9% of engineering students studied abroad during theirundergraduate career [2]. In addition, despite the growing awareness of the benefits of studyabroad by students, the challenges preventing students from studying abroad are numerous andcomplex [2]. According to the IIE Generation Study Abroad White Paper Series, the primarychallenges for many U.S. students can be grouped into to three overarching categories: cost
States. The Department’s founder, Bernie Sarchet, knew that many engineerseventually progressed to management positions during their career. This is still true today.However, most engineers did not have the benefit of studying management or business in themidst of a rigorous engineering curriculum. Graduate school, or trial by fire seemed to be theonly options for those engineers. However, Professor Sarchet came to UMR, a campus thatat the time did not have a school of business, and proceeded to develop a curriculum thatblended the rigors of a traditional engineering and science degree with courses that provideda strong foundation in business and management. Many who have knowledge ofEngineering Management at UMR believe that if a business
Academy of Engineering’s (NAE) Changing theConversation (CTC) findings, while the other cohort actually received the messagingintervention. Engineering attitudes were measured on two dimensions (―knowledge ofengineering as a career‖ and ―interest in engineering‖) at the beginning and end of the academicyear. These results were compared with a qualitative analysis of the Draw-an-Engineer Test. Theresults showed that all students significantly improved on the ―knowledge of engineering‖dimension over time, with the engineering messaging intervention significantly impacting thegirls in the study. The results from the ―interest in engineering‖ construct were more complex.The DAET study revealed that gender of the Graduate Teaching Fellow had
roach was used toexplore what topics were discuss ssed in each article and how these related back to the purpose ofthe study. From here each articlecle was examined again to determine the key argu gument, findingsand purpose of the research. Arti rticles with similar purpose statements or findingsgs were groupedtogether, and this iterative proces ess continued until all articles had a place in onee of o fourcategories: identity, socialization on, culture and career intentions. These are shown wn graphically inFigure 1
public schools. Page 24.1209.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Effects of Single vs. Mixed Gender Engineering Enrichment Programs on Elementary Students’ Perceptions of EngineersAbstractAlthough there is much debate about the relative effectiveness of single-gender education,previous research comparing aspects of our female-only summer enrichment programs toequivalent mixed-gender programs has shown our female-only programs to be particularlyeffective in reaching young girls, influencing their perceptions of engineers and attitudes towardengineering as a career. The addition
Paper ID #5835Observations on startup and operational challenges for US engineering pro-grams in the Middle EastDr. Wilhelm Alexander Friess, University of Maine Dr. Friess holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautical Engineering and a B.Sc. in Physics from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1997), and currently is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering with the University of Maine and Director of the Brunswick Engineering Program. Previously he has spent 5 years in Dubai as faculty of RIT Dubai and Dubai Aerospace Enterprise University. Dr. Friess’ industrial and academic career spans a variety of consulting and entrepreneurial
Robotics Competition (FRC), a high school robotics contest focused on inspiringstudents to enter STEM careers. Mentor involvement within these robotics teams are comparedto establish end points, and characterized to find where the remainder mentor visions fall withinthis spectrum. Our research questions are: How do mentors define their roles? How do theamount of mentoring levels differ when comparing with the other robotics teams? What are thevarious student behaviors under these mentoring roles?Mentorship Literature Review The difficulty of research obtaining an overall clear definition of mentoring is due todefinitions changing based on the context mentoring exists in. An effort to define mentoring hascaused an overlap of definitions that
Preparation for three years; Manufacturing Technology Advisory Group Board of Directors for seven years; and three National Science Foundation Review Committees for manufacturing and engineering-related NSF grants. Brown also served as a conference committee member of the National Career Pathways Network and serving on a number of state and local boards and skills standards committees. She has taught at the secondary, community college and university levels as well as been a research associate at IC2 Institute in Austin, Texas. Brown attended the University of Texas at Austin for her Ph.D. work in Higher Educational Administration; Northern Arizona University for her M.A. in Curriculum and Assessment and Arizona State
Tour - cleanroom 4.4 Lecture – careers in nanotechnology 4.3 Table 1. 2005 camp survey results of topics Likert scale 1-5 with 1= least favorite and 5= most favoriteIn 2006 and 2007, we used the 2005 and 2006 survey results to restructure the summer programsto include more hands-on activities and less lectures by Georgia Tech faculty. The averageevaluations for these two summers remained very similar to those of 2005 with the averageranging between 3.0 - 4.5. The written comments included similar responses: Page 23.1340.4 “Make the camp harder and
”3rd year, “Working in an industrial “I plan to pursue a career in “…my supervisor was able to “The entire process Stand-alone internshipfemale setting helped me to see the the biomedical engineering provide me with constructive required eportfolio, includes direct applications of field in the future. My criticism that helped improve my collaborations resume, Prezi scientific information professional aim is to further knowledge … This internship between different presentation on compared to my previous advance my studies in allowed my intellectual ability
as the Coordinator of Pre-College Programs at Virginia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity. She also worked as a global engagement specialist in the Office of Global Engineering Engagement and Research at Virginia T ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Pre-college, Race/Ethnicity, Gender, EngineeringRevisiting Assessment Tools Used to Measure the Impact of Summer Program Interventions on Perceptions and Interest in Engineering Among Underrepresented Pre-College Students – A Work in ProgressAbstractStudents start their education in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)fields with the aim of having STEM-related careers. However, many
graduatesis not keeping up with this demand [2]. One significant factor in this gap is the number of students who leaveengineering before earning a degree, more than 40% [3]. As a result, student retention and graduation ratesin engineering have received considerable study in recent years, in hopes of identifying ways to improvestudent persistence and help students obtain their educational and career goals.There are a wide range of factors correlated with student retention and graduation in engineering, includingacademic preparedness, financial stability, student belonging and engagement, quality of advising, andsupport systems for developing time management and study skills [4-7]. It is well known that math readinessin particular is one of the most
infrastructure decision making to promote sustainable development. She studies complex real-world systems and develops infrastructure decision support systemJennifer Kaiser, Georgia Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring Civil and Environmental Engineering for First-Year StudentsAbstractFirst-year undergraduate students who are required to select a major during the application processoften times have a poor understanding of the topics and the breadth of possible career paths withintheir selected major. In addition, our civil and environmental engineering (CEE) curriculum didnot provide meaningful engagement for the students until the end of their second year at theinstitute
that the issue for engineering education is more ofrecruitment than retention. Further, Godwin et al.32 advised that efforts to recruit women shouldnot solely focus on building physics, math, or engineering identities but should also emphasizetheir empowerment in changing their world through engineering.Insight 2: Women students rely on their family members for choosing their careers Many authors have highlighted the influence of high school teachers on students’ careerchoices and preparation for the choices29,30,26,33, it appears that women students also rely on theirparents and other family members for making the choices34.Insight 3: The K12 system must help women students to develop social capital and navigationalcapital The K
create a partnership with the College of Natural Sciences to develop and deliver bias and inclusion workshops and training across the colleges for students, staff, and faculty. She continues to be active in service to the UT community working with peer and professional mentoring programs. She presents to numerous groups on a variety of leadership, inclusion, and career-focused topics. A member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) since 2006, Ana completed a three-year appointment to the WEPAN Board of Directors as Communications Director. Ana received the Eyes of Texas Award in 2011, the University’s Outstanding Staff Award in 2012, and the Cockrell School of Engineering Staff Excellence Award. After
virtual scavenger image hunt in orientation and game nights every Wednesday. During the ten weeks, we also organized a half-hour daily check-in and check-out in the morning and afternoon respectively, through which students got ample opportunities to speak in a group setting about their own accomplishments and challenges for the day as well as their plans for the next day. Moreover, a PhD pathways panel and several professional development seminars on Graduate School and the research process were successfully organized to motivate students to pursue a research career. To facilitate communication, our site adopted multiple software tools (slack, google calendar, zoom, and moodle). An independent evaluator evaluated our
Paper ID #37992Collateral Damage: Investigating the Impacts of COVID onSTEM Professionals with Caregiving ResponsibilitiesKelli Paul Dr. Kelli Paul is a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Research on Learning and Technology at Indiana University where her research focuses on the development of STEM interests, identity, and career aspirations in children and adolescents.Jungsun Kim (Research Scientist)Amanda Diekman (Professor)Allison Godwin (Associate Professor) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and of Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. She is also the
Academy in 2020. The goals of the Cyber Academy are to engage AF JROTC cadets in learning cybersecurity skills and becoming more aware of careers in cybersecurity by connecting high school JROTC cadets with dedicated faculty, mentors, and the wider cybersecurity field and Air Force through an intense summer course. This pilot was hosted at one institution (Mississippi State University) and was designed to teach a college-level cybersecurity course to 25 AF JROTC cadets in high school. In 2021, the Cyber Academy moved to a distributed model taught at five institutions. In total, the Academy was designed to reach 100 AF JROTC cadets, 20 cadets at each host institu- tion receiving very similar core