studentsprefer a different learning style compared to senior students? Are senior students equipped toutilize the industry techniques that are heavily digital or tactile oriented? Understanding theevolution of student preferences towards these learning styles would provide valuable insights toinstructors and researchers aiming to enhance engineering education by determining when/whereto emphasize a certain pedagogy during the undergraduate engineering experience.This research is a multi-institutional collaboration between Penn State University and theUniversity of Maryland. Freshmen and senior engineering students are included in this study inorder to quantify the differences between digital and hands-on learning: 1) across engineeringgrade levels, and
, message passing, and a host of other complex features best covered in a course dedicatedto embedded systems, rather than an introductory course in microprocessors.4. Designing Microcontroller Libraries for EducationTraditional approaches fill needs defined by industry (vendor libraries, RTOS products) or aimfor a broad audience by abstracting away essential microcontroller features (Arduino and mbed).The need for an educationally-focused library is clear. In contrast to the traditional approach ofdesigning a library by optimizing for performance, flexibility, or features, the design of this edu-cationally-focused library is based on criteria of: 1) a high-level language, 2) clarity, 3) simplici-ty, 4) diagnostic error reporting, 5) detailed
2Stanford Sierra Camp initial focus group discussionThe focus group discussion at the Stanford Sierra Camp (FGSSC) in October 2012 wasscheduled for 90 minutes after a 60 minute brainstorming session designed to discover topics ofinterest. Our FGSSC discussion group defined this goal: Focus on [defining] a framework around which the education of engineers in the knowledge, skills and attributes (KSAs) of innovative engineering can be designed, delivered and assessed.Participants in FGSSC are listed in Table 1. FGSSC participants also decided that our currentand future deliverables included: • A description of each innovative stage in the development of a new innovation and • Identification and definition of the unique KSAs
transformations. Teachers and students putup posters with such promises. On April 1, Liu Xianzhou led a group of 14 professorsand teachers in makinga pledge to “a transformation into both red and expert.”10Overall, starting in the 1950s, Tsinghua University had been pursuing a Soviet-style“technology supremacy.” In that training program of higher education, humanities andnatural sciences were demarcated strictly. In engineering education, except for theideological and political education, students were cut off from any education in thehumanities. In fact, scientific disciplines could not exist independently whenseparated from the whole science system. The long-time separation betweenhumanities, science, and engineering education created defective ways of
sources to meet baseload demand for power, willresult in the ongoing need for new graduates. Universities have been slow to educate students incoal power generation. A solution to this is presented in this paper in the form of a lesson planwith introductory information of the coal power generation process, equipment utilized, andsome of the policies and concerns surrounding coal use. This paper can serve to start a dialog inenergy courses and provide future directions for students interested in pursuing energy careers.Introduction Coal for utility-scale electrical power generation has been in widespread use forapproximately a century. It is currently the largest energy source for electrical power andremains cheap and abundant.1 While many
ascertain – 1. Which instructional scaffolds and technological affordances do students perceive as helpful when collaborating through online tools? 2. Which instructional scaffolds and technological affordances do engineering instructors perceive as effective for online collaboration? Presented in this research is a qualitative case study that searches for an optimal balanceof instructional scaffolds for online collaborative tools employed in mechanical engineering froma learning perspective. The concept of the Goldilocks continuum represents the naturalinclination of humans to move toward the most agreeable or the least disagreeable position; anoptimal balance along the continuum. For sake of this
increasedcollaboration between faculty in both disciplines. In survey research conducted in the earlyyears of ABET Engineering Criteria implementation, House et al (2007) gathered responsesfrom engineering faculty in a variety of institutional settings and academic disciplines regardingtheir willingness to incorporate communication into their technical courses. They were generallyinterested in such a curricular change (or in some cases, were already engaged in these changes),but many lacked good models for such incorporation.1 Subsequent research along similar linesreflected increasing practices among engineers that blended technical communication andengineering.2-4 Dyke and Riley, for example, provide insight into the strategies engineeringfaculty use to blend
, and some prerequisite information is retained or learned differently based on individual learning styles (as measured by our assessments)1. Based on our findings, we recommend that every instructor evaluate the prerequisite knowledge of their students and complete targeted interventions aimed at known robust MSE misconceptions and local knowledge gaps. Since our state has a large community college system, local knowledge gaps differed somewhat from section-‐to-‐section of the course, but several core key themes emerged. For example, introductory chemistry courses emphasize ionic and covalent bonding, leaving the students with knowledge gaps and robust
campus: A college campus residing within an urban setting in which the institutiondoesn’t overwhelm or compete with the city’s resources. The city is a major regional populationcenter. The institution which includes this student organization, Indiana University PurdueUniversity Indianapolis (IUPUI), has an undergraduate population of 22,271 1 students and itresides within Indianapolis, population 844,000. For comparison, a nearby traditional non-urbanuniversity has a student population of 46, 817 and resides within a “college town” of 80, 405inhabitants. Page 24.1224.2Nonresidential campus: A campus where the vast majority of students live off
employees.Research Goals and ObjectivesThe end goal for the collection and evaluation of the original research data was to help determineif participation in at least one internship program should be a considered as a mandatorycomponent of program completion for construction education students. This original researchsought to address several issues: 1. provide students with a competitive edge and offer insight into what characteristics industry felt were necessary for student success; 2. identify the role internships played in current accredited construction focused programs and whether student participation in internships had an influence on their recognition of the characteristics, as noted by industry hiring professionals, necessary for
quality and type of the student-faculty interaction are important factors in studentlearning.27,29MethodologyDuring Summer 2012, eleven students (7 men, 4 women) from nine universities participated in aten-week REU program. Five students (45%) were from an under-represented group. Data werecollected from three student-centered artifacts and one faculty-centered artifact. The student-centered artifacts were: a reflection paper on the experience (week 5); an exit satisfaction andfuture plans survey (week 10); and a follow-up survey (two semesters later, end of Spring 2013).Students were given an explanation of the research study for the reflection paper (artifact 1) asapproved by the university’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). The faculty
how to assessthose programs for efficacy.IntroductionPrevious research indicates that knowledge about the admissions process as well aspsychological factors impact transfer to four-year institutions among community college studentsand shows that satisfaction with the advising process plays an important role [1]. In consideringpotential psychological factors that might impact rate of transfer, self-efficacy has beenidentified as an important concept when considering success and retention amongunderrepresented groups in STEM fields. Self-efficacy has been conceptualized as four domains:mastery experience, vicarious experience, social persuasion, and physiological reaction [2, 3, 4].Individuals receive information from each domain either through
, evaluated,and revisited during product development – the structure and interaction with the IC makes itdifficult for students to ignore the “iterative” nature of the design process.The IC supports a large number of design tools, methods, and approaches for implementation,such as Voice of the Customer, TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), Taguchi Methods,etc. Details regarding suggested tools and methods that may be incorporated into the IC, as wellas other fundamental IC development components were presented by Kline et al.1 The intent ofthis paper is to provide formative feedback for future IC implementation and to investigate itspotential as a teaching/assessment tool for capstone design instructors
innovationcompetencies and illustrate the proposed interactions in the educational system.This paper is based on three main themes:1. Effective innovation is facilitated by the Innovation Competencies, and these are in turn supported by the model-centric Systems Competencies, along with the Discovery Page 24.1230.3 Competencies and the Discipline Competencies;2. Effective learning of the Innovation Competencies is facilitated by experiences during the learner’s interactions either (a) with the explicit system models used by the System Competencies, or (b) with other actors, catalyzed by those system models;3. In addition to their effectiveness in
aspects will be presented and discussed.The argument of the paper will be based on the International Building Code (IBC 2012) which is issuedby the International Code Council (ICC) and considered as the most comprehensive and coordinatednational model code in the US and is currently commonly used and enforced in 44 states. The paper willalso examine and report on the purpose, types, interpretation, understanding and use of building codesapplied in the United States.We discuss the courses from students’ point of view, and the experience earned in design, codedevelopment, and also in written and oral communication skills. Future plans to evaluate the effectivenessof these courses in term of learning outcomes. 1. Introduction:Architecture design
these systems occurs as predicted. Page 24.1232.7 Figure 1 – The underlying technologies of the Internet of Everything (IoE)As shown by Figure 1 above, the underlying technologies of the Internet of Everything consist ofseveral enabling technologies. The cyber-physical system technician will still need to haveknowledge of the basic fundamental DC and AC concepts, be aware of signal characteristics, andhave the ability to use instrumentation and make measurements. Additionally, they will need tobe knowledgeable about: embedded controllers and have the ability to interface signals to thesedevices (i.e. a familiarity with sensors
. Page 24.1233.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The inverted classroom in introductory calculus: Best practices and potential benefits for the preparation of engineersWhat is the inverted classroom?Higher education has for many years organized its curricula and instruction around aninstructional design model that should be instantly recognizable to most readers. This modelinvolves three phases for each unit that is taught: 1. The instructor decides what concepts and topics should be covered in the unit and articulates a collection of learning objectives that will eventually be assessed. 2. The instructor uses class time to present information on the main
Page 24.1234.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Mentoring Experience: Finding Value in Guiding Undergraduate Researchers Katy Luchini-Colbry, Korine Steinke-Wawrzynski, Megan Shannahan Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USAAbstractWe discuss results from surveys of faculty involved in mentoring undergraduate researchassistants in a summer program at Michigan State University. The goals of this study were: (1)to examine how mentors set expectations and communicated with students early in the researchexperience; (2) to explore the ways that mentors and students
scoring rubrics for the competition, the affordability aspect of thecompetition was often given only superficial consideration. In the 2011 competition, the mostaffordable house cost $230 per square foot while the 2011 overall winner’s cost exceeded $380per square foot. In 2009, while the construction costs were tabulated for each of the entries,affordability was not a direct component of the competition. Prior to 2009, affordability was notofficially calculated, and houses such as the 2007 winner had self-reported cost-estimatesexceeding $400,000 for an 800 square foot house ($500 per square foot). Page 24.1235.3 Figure 1: Norwich
preview videos – use of recordings of experiment preview lectures in place of in-person preview sessions20 “Classroom Capture” – term referring to providing video and audio of lectures online for student review, a service offered at many universitiesEach of these methods was evaluated during the Fall 2013 and Spring 2014 semesters. Datarecorded for each method included: Amount of time the method saved for instructor Monetary cost for use of method Frequency students actually benefitted from method Open-ended student comments from end-of-semester course evaluations3. Results3.1. CATME3.1.1. Assigning student engineering teamsTwo of the many challenges of teaching UO courses are (1) initial assignment of
the Journal of Engineering Education's publicationmission,1 ASEE’s Year of Dialogue2, the articulation of a set of research areas to structure futureengineering education research agendas,3 and a plethora of editorials calling for the birth of anew discipline or the value of different forms of engineering education research.4,5 These eventslaid the intellectual groundwork for the growth of a new formal discipline of engineeringeducation. Their momentum increased the hiring of engineering education faculty where tenureis granted based primarily on research performance.6 These positions emerged in a variety ofdifferent departments including engineering, education, and even newly established engineeringeducation departments. Furthermore, new
ofsupport that students find most helpful. Zhao, Golde, and McCormick found a strong correlationbetween PhD student satisfaction and their advisors’ academic advising behaviors, as well asadvisors’ personal touch and career development behaviors14. Similarly, Demb reported thatstudents’ feedback on the advising relationship centered on five critical areas: 1) Demonstrating respect for the student and valuing ideas; 2) Trust; 3) Providing challenge, feedback, direction, and conceptual support; 4) Appreciating the difference between an advisor and a mentor; and 5) Investing in the relationship by sharing personal experience while maintaining appropriate boundaries.She identified the first three of these
earlier work; hence, grading of an already completed solution often involves judging off-path steps that may be irrelevant to the intended learning or steps that build upon prior incorrectwork. Given the very limited effectiveness of human grading to provide feedback to students oncomplex homework problems, it is natural to inquire whether the computer can do better.The research questions this paper seeks to answer are: (1) Is it possible to provide automated,formative assessment of efforts to solve complex engineering problems, (2) What metrics allowone to judge whether the feedback indeed promotes learning, and (3) On what basis can one seekimprovements to the formative assessment offered?We address these questions in the context of a test case
faculty coach surveys are conducted severaltimes—at the beginning, middle, and end of each semester. Information from the Likert scaleand qualitative questions inform the IPPD Program on students’ mastery of some of the qualities Page 24.1240.5presented in the Guide’s Professionalism Competency Model. During the course of the projectsand looking back at the peer assessment surveys, projects that had lower outcomes also had lowpeer assessment scores. After reviewing feedback from past surveys, it became clear that moreaccountability for professionalism needed to be added to the course.Table 1 shows a sample peer feedback summary for a student who was
1 depicts two pages of the ME 27400 Lecturebook which are representative ofLecturebook sections designed for factual content delivery and to introduce an example problem,respectively. As evident, the style of factual information delivery largely mirrors a traditionaltext, while the example problems are cast in terms of a Given-Find format. The latter is designedto bring clarity to the thought processes of novice students who are still establishing theirbaseline problem-solving skills. To exercise higher levels of cognition, the aforementionedcontent is augmented on both an intra- and inter-topic basis with Challenge Questions andConceptual Problems. The Challenge Questions are specifically designed to have studentsexpand their depth of
source, and commercial Page 24.1242.3systems with proprietary software. Some examples of the desktop 3D printers and theirrespective prices are included in Table 1.Desktop 3D Printer DIY Fully Commercial Approximate Open Source Assembled Cost Open SourcePrusa Mendel RepRap X $550Delta RepRap X $400Trinity Labs X $2,199Aleph
paper will describe the numbers of international students andfaculty, level of internationalization within courses, numbers of students participating insemester and summer-long study abroad programs, as well as participation rates in internationalservice learning projects. The paper concludes with recommendations for opportunities tostrengthen and expand these internationalization efforts. Internationalization is not a one-size-fits-all process; however, the concrete examples provided may help other universities achievetheir internationalization goals.IntroductionThe American Council on Education (ACE) defines internationalization as the “process by whichinstitutions foster global learning.”1 They then define global learning as “three related
that can assist them in obtaining higher paying STEM jobs.The initial implementation of the pathway has led to high school and college faculty workingtogether, workforce members returning to school for additional training, and industry fillingneeds with locally educated students. This paper shows how this pathway was started and whatprogress has been made in fulfilling the needs of all of the partners.IntroductionManufacturing is the dominant economic activity within southeastern Indiana. Nearly 1 in 3employed citizens within a ten county region of this part of the state are directly employed bymanufacturing companies. The local workforce, however, has not improved to satisfy the need ofthose employers and a local initiative, Economic
variety of settings in spacecraft design and survivability and reliability. He has led programs in experi- mentation, modeling, and simulation of radiation effects in electronic systems. He has been involved with six separate space-based radiation effects experiments over the last 20 years: 1) RadFx-1,-2,-3: A series of CubeSat Based Radiation Effects Testbeds (PI), 2) Microelectronic and Photonics Test Bed (Instrument Card PI), and 3) Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (Investigator), 4) Living With a Star – Space Environment Testbed (mission definition and requirements). As a NASA civil servant, Robert was the lead radiation effects systems engineer for several NASA spaceflight projects, including the