Learning & Teaching in 30 years’, as part of The London Accord Statement from the conference on ‘Key Technologies Shaping the Future’, convened by the Royal Academy of Engineering, London, UK and CESAER, Leuven, Belgium during July 1-2, 2021. He serves on the board of the ArborCreek Montessori Academy, Dallas, TX, USA and on the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion working committee, Staff Advice & Implementation Committee, School of Engineering, MIT. Dr. Mitra earned a dual degree in chemical engineering (ranked third) and chemistry (ranked second) and a PhD in chemical engineering from theBirla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani, India. He conducted his doctoral research at the department ofchemical
justice concerns on data scienceprojects that have direct and indirect implications to barriers to an inclusive, just, and sustainableworld. Figure 1: ESJ Reflection, Evaluation, Action CycleIn Figure 1, we diagram an iterative cycle of questioning, reflection, and discussion that allowsteam members to build a shared knowledge base on the ethical and social justice implications inthe conceptualization, design, and application of the knowledge, resources, and tools that emergefrom data science projects. We envision different components of our toolkit to be used indifferent steps, and are currently evaluating the suitability of the components for different pointswithin the life cycle of a research project.As a basis for this
colleges [1]. Women and members of ethnic/racial minoritygroups continue to be underrepresented in computing and engineering fields at both two- andfour-year institutions [1], [2]. Community colleges are a vital part of the solution to broadeningparticipation in STEM fields; however, more evidence is needed about the impact of innovative,sustainable models for serving greater numbers of transfer students in high demand disciplines,such as technology, across pathways from community college to university. Knowledge about theimpact of best practices for transfer advising and other supportive interventions is especiallycritical [3]. The Post-Transfer Pathways (PTP) program at a mid-sized public research university(UNIV) was designed to increase the
, andentrepreneurial skills, and to prepare for entire industries that do not yet exist. This observation isin line with a 2020 National Academy of Engineering report [1] that sought to provide an answerto the question: “What will or should engineering education be like today, or in the near future,to prepare the next generation of students for effective engagement in the engineering professionin 2020?” The report indicates that first and foremost, engineering education must producetechnically excellent and innovative graduates. The challenge, however, is to equip thosetechnically competent graduates such that they are better prepared to work in a constantlychanging global economy. In the same vein, the Institute for the Future (University of PhoenixResearch
reasonable progress toward accreditation.”[1]. They were established before 1964 expressly to educate African – Americans [2]. Sincetheir establishment, their positive economic impact cannot be overemphasized as a studycommissioned by United Negro College Fund (UNCF) makes it clear that their benefits also flowto the local and regional economies that are connected to HBCUs. Key findings from the study(based on 2014 data) include a total economic impact of $14.8 billion for their local and regionaleconomies, a total employment impact of 134,090 jobs, and total lifetime earnings for graduatesof $130 billion [3].Though expressly established as teaching institutions to educate people of African Americandescent, HBCUs over the years have been providing
due to a gap in skills such as communication and problem-solving [1]. Newlygraduated and employed engineers must be ready to engage in workplace learning as self-directed learners. This preparation must come from engineering learning experiences designed tohelp students transition from instructor-led learning (as is typical of pedagogy) to more self-directed learning (as is typical of adult learning or andragogy) across the curriculum [2].However, there is much fixation on pedagogical approaches and engineering science learning,wherein students work to solve predominately close-ended problems [3]. Andragogicalapproaches focus on students becoming self-directed individuals who rely on their bank ofknowledge and apply their skills to perform
naturallandscape of humanity. After a voluntary moratorium imposed a year prior, this group ofscientists, government officials, and legal experts recommended stricter guidelines onrecombinant DNA research, but to allow its overall practice given potential benefits to society[1]. Fifty years later, bioengineers can chemically synthesize entire bacterial genomes on theorder of millions of base pairs with speed, accuracy, and costs improving annually [2], [3]. DNAsynthesis and sequencing has enabled much of the biobased economy with an estimated marketsize of >$1 trillion in the US [4]. The biotechnology industry has no intention of slowing down.CRISPR-Cas9 has been lauded as the molecular scissors necessary to edit human diseases out ofthe genome with
addressing the nationwide issue of faculty diversity in community colleges,the NSF INCLUDES Aspire Alliance dedicated to developing inclusive and diverse STEMfaculty was established in 2018,with the vision to create “Inclusive and diverse national STEMfaculty who thrive within inclusive organizational cultures, leading to high retention from URG’sin STEM career pathways”[21]. The Alliance utilizes collaborative leadership models toorganize its work in change teams at three levels, referred to as Institutional, National andRegional Collaboratives . For the scope of this paper we will be specifically addressing the RCs(Regional Collaboratives) which are collaborative networks of geographically related two andfour year institutions.Figure 1. Regional
projects.IntroductionProblem based as well as active learning methods both contribute to maintaining student interestin engineering topics; this can be accomplished through design-based projects or simulations [1]-[7]. Prince defines active learning as “any instructional method that engages the students in thelearning process.” [1] Many educational institutions were forced to conduct their classes onlinedue to COVID-19, at least at the start of the pandemic. This presented a problem for manyinstructors to maintain student interest in lab based courses for which students were unable toattend in person. As a result many labs were taught virtually or were simulated. For this reason,development of hands-on hardware-based projects or labs that do not require the students
factors early in the process of designlearning experience development. This work in progress paper presents an example of use of theContext Canvas for redesigning a project spine course in the engineering program at ourinstitution.Keywords: Design experiences, visual tool, context, community-based participatory design,human-centered design, engineering education, problem explorationIntroductionThe necessity to improve education for the benefit of the student continues to increase over time.Some institutions and faculty are now working towards the creation of new or better engineeringdesign experiences for students by considering diversity, equity and inclusion as major issues toaddress [1]. It is therefore important to understand the system in
equalgroups A and B. Two different fourbar lectures are given, and two different problems are used in thisexperiment. The first lecture is about the half-angle method and the second lecture is about theprojection method. After the first lecture, participants in group A receive Problem 1, and participants ingroup B receive Problem 2. After the second lecture, the distribution is reversed. For problem 1, groupA is the control condition and group B is the experimental condition. For problem 2, group B is thecontrol condition and group A is the experimental condition.From this study, we have found that the time required to complete problems using the projection methodis significantly lower than the half-angle method even if the participants perceive both
program elements within that institutional framework. Finally, wediscuss some of the limitations of mindset surveys and propose an alternative method for makingmeaning of the impacts of entrepreneurial education on student mindsets.One of the challenges to forming a useful metric for assessing mindsets is that the stage ofanalysis is the internal cognitive processes one undergoes when analyzing situations,opportunities, or ideas for solutions. The graphic below (Figure 1) demonstrates this process.First one perceives the world around them, analyzes their options and contextualizes what theyare perceiving, and finally choose to take, or not take, entrepreneurial actions. We argue that theimportant part of this, as it relates to education, is the
job market. Furthermore, BME graduates receive lower startingsalaries and have fewer discipline-specific job opportunities than other engineering disciplinedegree holders [1]. Thus, there have been many efforts to identify and understand skills andexperiences that are of value to BME recruiters. This work in progress study seeks to explorewhat recruiters in industry, healthcare, and academia are looking for in BME graduates. Thework is guided by the following research questions:What qualities, skills, and experiences are recruiters looking for in potential BME hires? Howcan they be represented on resumes of BME undergraduates?We will explore these questions by analyzing resumes designed to reflect the specific qualitiesdesired by BME
deformation can be an obstacle to structural mechanicseducation and learning. Teaching structural mechanics is traditionally delivered by a primarylecture component usually complemented by structural laboratory demonstrations. While thelecture component covers the theoretical concepts and derivations, the laboratory demonstrationsare known to improve the students’ understanding of the concepts through observation andexperimentation. Students often work with line drawings of members with idealized loadings andboundary conditions, but struggle to understand the dimensional reduction of load path (i.e. 3Dcombined loading reduced to member force effects) within a multi-story building systems [1, 2].Other shortcomings in traditional modes of teaching
vision. Thecommittee that produced The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century(2004) explicitly state their goal in terms of increasing public appreciation of engineers andengineering. Table 1 on the next page summarizes the aspirations articulated in The Engineer of2020. For our purposes, the second item in the category “Our Image and the Profession” isparticularly relevant in its emphasis on “the union of professionalism, technical knowledge,social and historical awareness, and traditions that serve to make engineers competent to addressthe world’s complex and changing challenges” (p. 49). The word “union” reflects the integrationof heterogenous knowledge that is required for engineering competency.There is, however, a
' resistanceto flipped learning. Also, flipping introduced flexibility on how the students first encounter thecourse contents.1. IntroductionFlipped instruction is a student-centered, more-involved form of active learning that aims toincrease students learning and the quality of activities during the class period. The flippedclassroom is a relatively new pedagogical approach for student-centric learning. It is ushering in anew cohort of active learners. The pedagogical approach in a flipped classroom is based on outside-of-class video lectures and practice problems for homework, and active group-based activities inthe classroom [1]. Bishop and Verleger [1] defined flipped instruction as interactive, group-basedlearning activities occurring inside the
decision makers and instructors in mind, this paper proposes and applies (1) apreliminary set of criteria for assessing the value of the papers for the engineeringcommunication community and (2) categories for characterizing the functions of the papers.These criteria and categories should help authors publishing in the field design their work formaximum impact and help newcomers to engineering communication avoid “reinventing thewheel,” that is, devoting time and energy to developing pedagogical approaches and answeringresearch questions that have been established and validated by previous scholarship.Factors That Shape the Distinctive Needs of the Engineering Communication CommunityEngineering communication, while it both motivates and draws upon
= moment about the y axis from a force𝑃 = 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 ∙ 𝑥 = the applied pressure (see Figure 1)𝑃𝑂𝐿𝐸𝑥 = x axis coordinate of the pole𝑃𝑂𝐿𝐸𝑦 = y axis coordinate of the pole𝑟= perpendicular distance from an arbitrary axis to the center of the differential area, differential mass, or the center of mass of a particular shape𝑟𝑚 = mass radius of gyration about an axis𝑟𝑥 = area radius of gyration about the x axis𝑟𝑦 = area radius of gyration about the y axis𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 = the slope of the applied pressure𝑡= thickness of a prismatic shape𝑥= perpendicular distance from an arbitrary y axis to the centroid of a differential area or the centroid of a particular shape𝑥𝑐
taught in the Java programming language atLoyola Marymount University, a primarily undergraduate university. To ensure grading consis-tency across sections, every student was randomly assigned two labs per late policy, for a total ofeight labs completed over the course of the semester. The four late policies consisted of: 1) Nopenalty for late submissions, 2) Early incentive (one extra credit point awarded per day early thelab was submitted, up to three points max), 3) Late penalty (25% off within 24 hours of the dead-line, 50% off for 24-48 hours late, 75% off for 48-72 hours late, and zero credit after 72 hours), and4) Combined (early incentive combined with a late penalty). For our quantitative and qualitativestudy, we measured, per policy
collective effort to address environmental problems[1]. An individualistic approach to life is considered a major factor contributing to the currentenvironmental challenges [2]. Scholars have recognized the need for inviting multiplestakeholders to jointly tackle these complex and interconnected environmental issues [2]–[5]. Asthe challenge of creating sustainable living is intrinsically a team sport, individual efforts are notenough.However, collaboration among multiple stakeholders does not always deliver expected positiveresults [3] since the quality of micro-level (person to person) collaboration plays a critical role inany joint endeavor [6]. The term system within the complex systems perspective is often limitedto macro-level systematic
junior engineers’ responsibility to reshape companies’ goals to address environmental and social impacts of their technology/product? - What is your opinion?Several qualitative questions focused on students’ actions. Students in their 1st year were askedquestion 1 but not question 2 because the team assumed they would not have had time toaccumulate enough experiences within the institution at that point. 1. Is there a time when you acted to improve some situation? Please explain. 2. Which projects with a social or environmental aspect have you participated in while at “our school” (in class, in projects)? Please list.Question 1 will not be discussed in this paper because coding of the answers proved verychallenging. In
transition was more rapid. These rapid shifts required tools to share course materials suchas lecture notes, assignments, and activities, which were primarily convened using an LMS[1-3]. Also, the tools were needed to conduct exams online with the surety of minimalplagiarism and conduct classes online, which were often integrated into the LMS [4].Although technology integration was the need of the hour, it had several drawbacks. Theseinclude: 1) the rapid integration was done without validating its effectiveness on variousfactors of students' learning or any alignment with the course content, assessment, andpedagogy [5]. 2) the rapid transition overlooked the preparation of faculty and students toadopt such tools and stay engaged. 3) the rapid
vibration suppression, and stabilization of the pendulum inthe inverted position. Pictures of the left and right sides of the robot are shown in Figure 1.The robot performs real-time feedback control experiments and uses the combination ofa Raspberry Pi and two Arduinos to form a wireless, open-source system. The studentsprogrammed the robot in Python while lower-level Arduino code was provided to them. 1Figure 1: Pictures of the robotic cart/pendulum system (left and right hand side views).Literature ReviewDynamic systems and feedback control can be abstract and mathematically intensive. Courseson these subjects are sometimes taught from a purely theoretical point of view. Feedbackcontrol experiments
similar characteristicswould be found amongst peers. The assignment serves as an evidence-based practice to exposefirst-year engineering students to the challenges of designing for a universal user, creating aninteractive unit to understand the variations of user interpretations in an active way.IntroductionIn 2018, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that engineering professionals are workingwithin all major industry workforces [1]. The perception of engineers only contributing to themanufacturing and technical service fields is historical knowledge, not contemporary reality.Today, engineers are applying technical knowledge in government, retail, entertainment, andtransportation industries. Mann & Tan [2] highlight that the
todissuade students from completing engineering degrees. Positivism in science, which emerged during thewestern European Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century, has been the prevalent tradition inwhich science and engineering have been portrayed in the classroom. In this positivistic perspective ofscience, empirical data and the scientific method are emphasized and science is presented as objective fact[1, 2]. As such, there is a long history of classroom science and engineering being taught with anemphasis on memorizing and churning out facts in addition to lab work where the solution is knownahead of time [2].The result of these pedagogical practices is the belief by students that science and engineering are staticbodies of knowledge
engineering students who participate in sponsored programs. According to Ortega-Alvarez et al. [1], three common challenges that most early-career engineering faculty face arebalancing the demands of research, teaching, and other professional obligations; lack of time tocope with personal and professional responsibilities; and setting realistic goals and expectationsfor individual accomplishments. The difficulties can be more pronounced for internationalstudents, especially those who return to their home countries. Khanal and Gaulee [2] describethis readjustment as reverse culture shock. Arthur [3] recognizes that international students oftenneed coping strategies to manage the re-entry transition after their academic studies arecompleted. She
researchers, across fields, to more critically examinetheir methodologies and to center the well-being of the participant over the benefit of theresearcher.Introduction:Historically, engineering education has neglected the experiences of its students. Students areexpected to work in intensive, difficult curriculums in the name of rigor and aptitude [1].“Numerous publications have documented an engineering culture pointing not only to issues of‘climate’ but also to the lack of role models, rigid pedagogical approaches that lack creativedesign elements and teamwork, and even subtle habits used to establish who belongs inengineering and who does not'' [2]. However, “[e]ngineering has reflected some unjust biasesembedded in our social structures to the
Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Engagement in Practice: Reflections on Remote Community- Engaged Learning in the Context of a Multilateral International PartnershipIntroductionA significant aim of many engineering programs is to give students the knowledge, skills, andattitudes to become global problem solvers [1]. There has been re-examination withinengineering curricula to prepare students to achieve said outcomes that will help them navigatethe culturally diverse global workforce [2]–[4]. Universities across the higher educationlandscape have developed community-oriented programs that aim to give students team-basedopportunities to apply technical
knowledge, skills, and attitudes neededfor convergent problem solving then engineering educators have a set of tools and practices thatcan contribute towards creating engineers who are better prepared to work on the hard problemsof tomorrow.1. IntroductionThis paper explores the connection between convergence and entrepreneurial minded learning.The term “convergence” emerged from work at the National Academies and the NationalScience Foundation. The goal of convergence work is to address problems that cannot beaddressed by traditional disciplines or approaches by bringing together a variety of disparatedisciplines, sectors, methods, and ideas to create new knowledge, tools, and modes of thinking[1]. While the idea of convergence emerged
Indiana Summer Clinical Residency in Innovation for Biomedical Engineers or (IN)SCRIBEProgram, which combines clinical rotations, multi-format instruction, and team-based design tobuild student design skills and awareness of socioeconomic factors in healthcare.Biomedical engineers who understand the varied contexts of healthcare training and delivery arepositioned to make informed design decisions in the classroom (e.g., capstone) and beyond (e.g.,industry, academia). BME programs across the U.S. have leveraged an opportunity from theNational Institutes of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) to establish clinicalimmersion programs for their students [1]. Published examples of such programs have combinedstructured instruction with