of the robot is secondary to that of the PLC. That said, to train engineeringstudents to program both and tie the two together such that each is performing its task mostefficiently is the purpose of the course described here. 1 Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright©2025, American Society for Engineering EducationCourses in Place Prior to NowThe development of the present course rests on the back of several other courses including theoriginal PLC course taught first to Engineering Technology students and then to ElectricalEngineering and finally Mechanical Engineering
of these areas is use of ChatGPT for technical writing. It isgenerally believed that reviewing and editing articles to make sure that they are accurate and freefrom errors are among the laborious and time-consuming tasks in academia. However, this task,among many others, can be performed by using AI thanks to some promising features it offerssuch as error detection, improving text coherence, and trend identification [1]. It can also be usedfor summarization and data analysis as well, which are amazing tools for conducting academicresearch. Although using ChatGPT can facilitate the essay writing process, there is an increasingconcern about the ethical considerations and the significance of balancing AI assistance withstudents’ involvement
, andeventually establishing the generative models as flawless and reliable resources for both studentsand educators in STEM fields.IntroductionThe integration of advanced technologies into educational practices has been a transformativeforce in shaping contemporary learning environments. One such technology that has gainedprominence in various educational domains is ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art language modeldeveloped by OpenAI. This publicly accessible AI model, Conditional Generative Pre-TrainedTransformer, commonly referred to as ChatGPT has seen remarkable popularity since its initialrelease in November 2022 [1]. The innovative progress of intelligent technology, embodied byChatGPT, signifies a new era in artificial intelligence. This technology
secured several federal (e.g.,NSF, DOL) and industrial awards to advance the developments in these fields. As part of thesesponsored projects, advanced curricula in industrial robotics and programmable logic controllers(PLCs) and complementary simulation tools have been developed. These have been disseminatedand become popular for teaching robotics and controls; educating faculty; and conducting K-12teacher/student outreach [1-13]. Recently, the College of Computing at Michigan Tech,pioneering in mechatronics education, launched BS and MS degrees and associated stackablegraduate certificates in Mechatronics.Considering the multidisciplinary nature of Mechatronics, experiential skills in robotics,mechanical, controls, and cybersecurity require
Social Cognitive Career ConstructsRachel E. Durham, 1 Michael L. Falk 2, Alexis Daniels2, Allison Riegel2, Alisha Sparks2, MargoWilliams2, Emily J. Yanisko 3This research is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL-2005790.Abstract (paper type: ERM) -- Performance in math, particularly algebra, is a major barrier tostudent success and participation in STEM among under-represented minoritized students,particularly Black U.S. high school students. This research applies Social Cognitive CareerTheory (SCCT) to measure impacts of an afterschool algebra-for-engineering program on mathself-efficacy and interest in STEM among high school students in a large urban district. To studythe program’s effects, a mixed methods research
Warfare Center (NSWC) facility at Crane, Indiana.The DoD and many employers seek skilled engineers who are highly innovative and are strongleaders in the workplace [1], and has developed leadership competency models specifically forits civilian workforce. In 2019, the 38th Marine Commandant’s Planning Guidance emphasizedthe combination of leadership with innovation, saying “For the Marine Corps, meaningfulinnovation is not just having great thoughts and concepts rather, it is about translating greatthoughts and concepts into action.” [2]. However, many engineering and computing degreecurricula, including at this institution, require neither any leadership training nor researchexperience that enables innovation (other than the practice of design
engagement in undergraduate research opportunities promotes improved criticalthinking and scientific reasoning, increased academic performance, enhanced retention bothwithin STEM majors and in college overall, and improved satisfaction with college. [1] However, there are several structural barriers to participation in research, including lackof information, time, and income. [2] Undergraduates may not participate due to lack ofawareness about opportunities, uncertainty about the recruitment process, uneven access tofaculty mentors, and personal responsibilities and living situations (e.g., living off campus). [3]First-year undergraduate students in particular may express interest in participating inundergraduate research experiences but may
look at the impacts onstudent self-efficacy. Those outcomes will be used to scale and tailor the program to addressadditional research topics across disciplines at the University of New Mexico.1. Introduction1.1. Undergraduate Involvement in Interdisciplinary ResearchUndergraduate participation in interdisciplinary research opportunities enriches educationalexperiences through the development of critical thinking skills, personal development, exposureto practical application of academic knowledge, and overall increased academic performance[1][2]. Tangible benefits of early-stage research involvement of college students can be observedthrough increased test scores, enhanced retention of class material, and the development ofprofessional
)navigate the same sociotechnical design challenge based on the Gold King Mine spill and theproblem of acid mine drainage. We found that students in these two departments not onlythought about the problem differently between teams but between departments. We also foundthat students took agency over the experiences of stakeholders as they considered stakeholderneeds, and identified community outreach and community resources as key constraints on theirfinal designs.Introduction and research purposeDesign challenges are difficult for students because of the nature of these problems. They are ill-structured [1], meaning there are many possible satisfactory solutions, as well as many possiblepaths toward a solution, requiring designers to frame the
thread between the threethemes provides one answer for the research question. I propose spiritual knowledge as thebinding thread that connects the themes and (re)connects Indigenous knowledge and STEMeducation. Spirituality can become a theorizing space to help with the decolonizing ofengineering education by challenging the dominant knowledge types and bringing in other waysof knowing.Keywords: Culturally Relevant Education, Indigenous Knowledge, SpiritualityIntroductionThe United Nation’s (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) attempt to address theinequalities of our global society and tackle climate change, biodiversity, and nature restoration[1]. These complex issues affect our global community and require an approach that includes
, engineering programs can producegraduates who are not only technically proficient but also socially responsible, ready to lead theway in achieving a sustainable future. [1-3]. Important steps in weaving the sustainabledevelopment into engineering technology education are curriculum integration, project-basedlearning, and capstone design projects, supported by research, and institutional commitment.Curricular Integration forms a foundational element in aligning engineering and engineeringtechnology education with the global trends in sustainable development. This involves a strategicinfusion of Sustainable Development Goals into the curriculum and promoting interdisciplinarylearning to ensure that graduates are not only proficient in their technical
. The module enables students to explore fundamentalconcepts such as water electrolysis fundamentals, fuel cell characterization, solar power generationparameters and effects, and wind turbine parameters and operation. The developed learning frameworkand virtual reality experiential module targets students of different learning styles. Virtual Realitytechnology enables faculty to use multisensory teaching tools to enhance student comprehension andmotivation to learn. The end-goal of these transformative immersive teaching instruments is to offerstudents improved means of exploration of fundamental notions of the topics studied, leading to apersonalized and optimized learning in a subject matter [1], [2], [3], [4].The paper is presenting the
students would benefit from moredeliberate, distributed practice with measurement and data acquisition [1]. Second, themeasurement and data acquisition activities were much more hands-on than the statisticscurriculum, creating very different energy and engagement in the class throughout thesemester. We wanted to modify the course to address these two concerns but decided to takea more holistic approach to the redesign.This paper outlines our comprehensive approach to redesigning Data Analysis. We not onlyconsider changes to the assessments and activities of the class, but we also re-evaluate thelearning objectives in the context of program and college level goals and students’professional careers. We utilize a curricular priority framework to
programs (#0849881 and #1458714) [1, 17,20,]. New York City College of Technology (City Tech), the designated college of technology inthe City University of New York (CUNY) system and a Hispanic Serving Institution, ranks 16thamong public schools and 18th in social mobility according to US News and World Report [3].Around one-third of our students self-identify as Black (non-Hispanic, 28%) and as Hispanic(34%); along with 21% as Asian/Pacific Islander, 11% as White (non-Hispanic), 2% as Other,and 4% as non-residents [19]. Eighty percent (80%) of incoming first-year students and 67% ofcontinuing students receive need-based financial aid. Fifty-five percent (55%) of students reportworking 20 or more hours per week while more than 61% report
focus of this paper, has experiencedsimilar outcomes. A notable uptick in graduation rates at CU occurred between 2009 and 2015,with six-year degree completions reaching 62.2%, yet recent years have witnessed plateaus inretention rates. Persistent disparities befall minoritized students [1], [2]. These stagnantcompletion rates occur in the face of substantial need for increased engineering talent, bothnationally and globally, to support fields including technology, security, transportation, andinfrastructure.The causes of student attrition from engineering are multifaceted and vary across demographics.A range of known issues includes an unwelcoming climate, conceptual difficulties in corecourses that hamper progress toward degree, lack of self
, andthe environment is also vitally important. There is increasing recognition among engineers,educators, and industry leaders of the importance of preparing engineers to account for thesesociocultural dimensions [1]-[4]. We use the term “sociotechnical dimensions” or “practices” torefer to social or contextual factors such as ethics, engagement with stakeholders, and therecognition of power and identity and their role in engineering broadly. Environmental factorssuch as sustainability and the potential future impacts of engineering work are also categorizedas sociotechnical dimensions as they draw attention to possible consequences to the naturalenvironment. A call for broader engineering skills is reflected in the Accreditation Board
work todevelop a framework to support the design and delivery of equity-centered engineeringcurriculum and instruction within undergraduate courses. This paper presents high-level learningfrom (1) our synthesis of relevant literature on how instructors teach equity-centered content –how they integrate equity considerations into engineering content – and (2) a summary ofinterviews with equity-oriented instructors. Our literature review and interviews aim to identifycourse design components that instructors and staff consider essential for equity-centeredengineering education, including pedagogy, content, and the interplay between them. For thisresearch, we defined equity-centered engineering curriculum and instruction as courses orsequences of
denial of STEM identities to their perceived social pressures[1], [2]. When researchers interview participants in STEM education experiences, we receivecertain responses that help us to learn about STEM identities. When we look to social mediacontent, which is sometimes shared publicly and voluntarily, we see a possible window into theperspectives and identities of African American youth and young adults that may help us learnabout STEM identities in a new way. Through this window, we may observe social mediacontent that reveals STEM identities and community involvement. Along with text, the socialmedia content may include non-text paralinguistic elements such as emoji, hashtags, images,videoclips, and GIFs (graphics interchange format
an airplane- flying, motorcycle-riding, singing storyteller, delighting audiences with his charm for over 50 years. 4CONFERENCE SCHEDULE THURSDAY, OCTOBER 21 WORKSHOPS PANEL DISCUSSIONS Room IS 203 IS 205 IS 105 1:30 pm W1.What Engineering Looks Like W3. Quantum Computing PD1. Hybrid & Remote Delivery: in PreK-12 STEM
Teacher Training in DEI + STEM: A Collaborative Work in Latin America and the Caribbean Juan Sebastián Sánchez-Gómez1,6, Laura Eugenia Romero Robles2,6, María Catalina Ramirez Cajiao3, Libis Valdez Cervantes4,6 y Luis Alberto Cruz Salazar5 1 Universidad de los Andes, Engineering School, Colombia, js.sanchez14@uniandes.edu.co 2 Tec de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Mexico, romero@tec.mx 3 Universidad de los Andes, Engineering School, Colombia, mariaram@uniandes.edu.co 4 UNITECNAR, Engineering School, Colombia, decano.fadi@unitecnar.edu.co 5
was done to a population of students at the university X. Thesestudents were identified as at-risk college freshmen by the office of student affairs. Once thestudents are identified then the college sends out different ways of communication (email, phonecalls, and text messages). In the year of 2021and 2022 a total of 484 at-risk students were askedif they wished to participate in the Boostcamp. A total of 122 students replied they wouldparticipate. However, not all students who accepted came, and not all students who came to thecamp finished it. Hence, three different categories of students were identified. 1. Students who agreed to participate and COMPLETED boostcamp (COMP), 2. Students who agreed to PARTICIPATE and did NOT COMPLETE the
toward their careers, along with high-impact practices to support them.IntroductionTransitions “in, through, and out” of the university system are challenging for students [1].Students may face challenges that include, for example, passing a class, keeping up with familyor social commitments, or holding a concurrent part-time job. These challenges can negativelyaffect student attrition [2]. Even with so many barriers, there is an increasing number of studentswho have been able to persevere and obtain a meaningful career [3,4]. However, there aredisadvantaged communities of students who are especially challenged to overcome the expectedand necessary student transitions.Schlossberg in “A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition” has
engineering.IntroductionCuriosity, a force that motivates people to seek out new information and discover new things, isvital to the process of invention and innovation and is inextricably linked as a valuable trait forengineers to possess [1]. Beyond its connection to innovation and societal advancement, theability for one to be curious has also been correlated with a variety of desirable outcomes ineducation, including increased motivation [2,3], greater ability to retain information andpersevere [4], improved learning [2] and increased academic achievement [5]. Additionally, it isstrongly associated with a willingness to embrace uncertainty and unpredictability [6,7], traitsthat are often desirable characteristics for engineering students and practicing engineers. Thus
setting appropriateexpectations for graduate students, addressing differences in perspective and goals, managingself-doubt as an advisor, and tackling problems outside the traditional roles of a graduate advisor.IntroductionCultivating a strong graduate advising relationship is essential for the success and growth of boththe graduate student and faculty advisor. Various research studies have demonstrated theimportance of strong advising relationships for graduate students, both generally [1, 2] and as astrong predictor for degree completion [3, 4], degree satisfaction [5-6], and career attainment [3,4]. Similarly, faculty advisors report several benefits from engaging in graduate student advising,including increased research productivity [7], a
in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the research to practice cycle within first-year engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024The First-Year Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset: A Longitudinal Investigation Utilizing Indirect Assessment Scores1. IntroductionSince the turn of the century, global and national calls have been made to develop a moreinnovative and entrepreneurial society to support economic growth [1]. Such calls haveemphasized the development of entrepreneurial concepts
dynamics. By comparing ChatGPT’s entirereasoning process and individual steps with human reasoning, this investigation unveils both itsconstraints and capacities. The results show that ChatGPT’s limited capability to understand theprofound implications of text. It addresses the need for caution when employing it in reasoningtasks within the context of mechanical engineering education.Key words: mechanical engineering education, ChatGPT-4, engineering reasoning.1. IntroductionReasoning skill, often denoted as logical reasoning, constitutes the cognitive ability to engage inclear, structured thinking, analyze information, and logically derive valid conclusions on thefoundation of evidence and facts [1]. Within the domain of mechanical engineering
Christian system answers, “So whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God.” (1 Corinthian 10:31) • A Normative Ethic demands, “What rules should we obey?” The Christian system answers: “These are the commands, decrees and laws the LORD your God directed me to teach you to observe in the land that you are crossing the Jordan to possess, so that you, your children and their children after them may fear the LORD your God as long as you live by keeping all his decrees and commands that I give you, and so that you may enjoy long life.” (Deuteronomy 6: 1-2)Hence, Christianity does not dispute each question’s primacy. The imitation of
use of common PCs as a low costreplacement to the expensive proprietary equipment used previously in such tactical simulations.Various computer game platforms20, 21 were used to develop virtual simulations of accidentscenarios in chemistry laboratories, stipulating that this approach is more effective thandistributing safety regulations to the students in the traditional paper form. For example, a videogame was developed by students at DHS’ CREATE Center to train fire fighters to efficiently usetrucks, equipment and personnel in fighting a fire (see Figure 1). It simulates an emergency indowntown Los Angeles and is being tested out by the city fire department.22
EM.IntroductionEntrepreneurship education has been regarded as an important component of undergraduatetraining programs in the last decade [1], including in engineering education [2]. For example,94% or above of faculty and academic administrators believe that students should have access toinnovation and entrepreneurship opportunities via electives and/or extracurricular activities,despite their personal engagement level in those opportunities [2]. Most respondents in the study,however, identify challenges to making entrepreneurship a core component of curriculum, with a“lack of room in curriculum” reported as the most common challenge [2].The author(s) acknowledge The Kern Family Foundation’s support and collaboration through theKern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network