mechanical engineering from Duke University in 2010 and a Ph.D. in 2014 with a focus on nonlinear dynamical systems. She now works in the Center for Instructional Technology and teaches dynamics at Duke University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Massive Open Online Laboratories? Ongoing Work with Microelectronics Experiments Performed Outside of the Traditional LaboratoryKip Coonley, Kim Manturuk, Justin Miles, Genevieve Lipp, Chris Lorch, Christopher Woodard, Martin Brooke Duke University, Durham, NC 27708AbstractWith the advent of open source hardware and software, students are able to perform advancedmicroelectronic
Paper ID #37969Toy Adaptation in a Laboratory Course: An Examination of LaboratoryInterests and Career MotivationsDr. Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of California, San Diego Dr. Alyssa Taylor is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Shu Chien-Gene Lay Department of Bioengi- neering at the University of California San Diego. Dr. Taylor has twelve years of experience teaching across bioengineering laboratory, introductory, and capstone design classes. Through work such as toy adaptation described in this paper, Dr. Taylor seeks to prepare students to engage in Universal Design and consider accessibility in their
forced to explore the LabVIEWcomputer program allowing me to learn more than a structured lab would teach me. Out of thebox thinking is well taught in this class. I know from my experience that this is how it is whenyou are at work and have to solve a problem on the fly.Student #3: This unconventional laboratory instructional method is when the instructor givesthe students a small demonstration on how to do certain labs, and allow students to attempt tofind a solution on how to solve a problem given to them in the lab. The advantage ofimplementing this method are that it allows the student to use their creativity to come up witha solution of their own, rather than having the instructor give them a predetermined sequenceon how to solve certain
Paper ID #36907From Online to In-person Electrical Circuits Laboratoriessessions: Benefits, limitations, and challengesMartha Torres Martha Torres is a Ph.D. Candidate in Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Texas in El Paso, Tx. Currently, she is working on Multicriteria Decision Methods for Wireless Sensor Networks Technologies. Also, she is a Teaching assistant for Electric Circuits Laboratory for Electrical Engineering students since Summer 2020. She is a member of the Circuits Lab team where Circuits Lab Online was developed for the pandemic period. After the shutdown, she developed the new
AC 2007-879: PLANNING A LIVING-BUILDING LABORATORY (BUILDING ASA LABORATORY) THAT WILL INTEGRATE WITH ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY CURRICULUMJason Durfee, Eastern Washington University JASON DURFEE received his BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington University he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, professional ethics and piano technology. Page 12.1156.1© American Society for Engineering Education
A Case-Study of Assessment in Materials Laboratory Claudia Milz, Rufus L. Carter University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 / Marymount University, Arlington, VA 2220 Materials engineering students are often ill prepared to enter the workforce upongraduation. While students master the content knowledge they often lack critical skills forsuccess. Our industry feedback of internship students indicates weakness in the areas of:technical writing, critical thinking, professional attitude & teamwork, analysis, reasoning anddecision making. We have examined the effectiveness of new teaching and assessment methods in theMaterials
strengthening the capstonedesign courses improved the ratings in recent years, students have not been fully confident intheir design ability, especially designing and conducting their own experiments. These surveyresults are also consistent with the findings and observation of the author who has beencontinuously teaching Senior-level laboratory courses for the last twenty years. The authorcontends that there are two major reasons that prevent students from adequately developing theability and skills. The first one is limited training due to insufficient exposure in handling open-end experiments, and the other is lack of opportunity in reviewing and improving imperfectexperiments due to their own mistakes and/or inferior equipment by devising new
AC 2008-2436: ENHANCING THE LABORATORY EXPERIENCE USING PEEREVALUATION OF GROUP LABORATORY REPORTS IN A FLUID MECHANICSCOURSEDavid Shaw, Geneva College David W. Shaw is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Geneva College. He received his B.S.M.E. in 1983 from Geneva College and his M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (1988) from the Ohio State University. His research interests include measurement and modeling of thermal properties of materials and teaching the design process in undergraduate engineering classes. He has developed courses and laboratories in heat transfer, fluid mechanics, instrumentation, and freshman design. He has been active in sponsoring student teams in competitions such as Solar
Session 2526 Development of an Environmental Laboratory and Laboratory Experiments for a Civil Engineering Technology Program Carlos A. Ortiz , Ph.D. Southern Polytechnic State UniversityPopulation growth and infrastructure requirements demand good understanding of environmentalengineering related issues from civil engineering technology graduates. Consequently, back in1998 the Civil Engineering Technology (CET) Department at Southern Polytechnic StateUniversity (SPSU) started activities to improve the existing environmental laboratory, so theschool could provide the
conducting tests in a conventional laboratory session.Cross-cultural discussions at a professional level provided appreciation for standardized testingmethods, the importance of research in civil engineering practice, and differences in approachingdesign problems in different countries. Reports submitted to an external client providedincentive for strong student performance. The new teaching methodologies described in thispaper (global video-conferencing with an overseas practitioner and development of laboratoryassignments as short films) are well suited for teaching softer aspects of the BOK related todevelopment of broad communication skills and providing global context for engineeringproblems. Experiences, challenges, and opportunities
disciplines, and often even to subsequent course work within the same discipline. Thiscompartmentalized approach compromises the progressive advancement of laboratory skills andacquisition of problem-solving capabilities. In order to address this issue, instructors forlaboratory courses in Bioengineering, Chemical Engineering, Physics, Biochemistry and CellBiology, Chemistry, and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Rice University have metregularly to discuss how to develop scientifically literate graduates who build upon priorlaboratory experience as students advance through their programs. Discussions have led toseveral cross-disciplinary initiatives.Twenty common teaching/learning objectives that transcend the discipline-specific goals
Engineering Education, 2006 The LASER CULT: Hands-on Laboratory in PhotonicsIntroduction: Challenges in Teaching OpticsThe unique nature of the field of optics creates challenges for effectively teaching optics inengineering disciplines. Harnessing Light, a study by the National Academy of Sciences1, pointsout that “Although optics is pervasive in modern life, its role is that of a technological enabler: Itis essential, but typically it plays a supporting role in a larger system.” To enable the teaching ofoptics in science and engineering program the study identifies two issues that need to beaddressed when designing programs that teach optics: “How to support and strengthen a fieldsuch as optics whose value is primarily enabling” and
, however, is reduced due to limited interaction, delayingfeedback until after an exam, and tediousness of many repeating laboratory sessions.We are implementing steps to teach manufacturing laboratory to a large class of 250 studentseach semester. Complementary online instructional videos and class lectures, Clickerassessment, regular grade feedback, and cellular manufacturing laboratory exercises are utilized.Laboratory exercises are grouped into cellulars to save resources, space, and are synchronizedwith relevant lectures to facilitate students’ understanding. For each laboratory exercise, theoverall lab objectives are covered in class, but details of tooling and machine operation areshown using online professional videos so that students can
Page 7.1158.1change was made to the exterior of Maury hall. The Maury hall renovation followed similarrenovation programs for the adjacent Sampson and Mahan Halls. Upon the completion of theMaury Hall renovation, the entire three building complex was brought up to appropriatestandards as an integrated and connected unit.Maury hall provides office and most of the classroom and laboratory space for the Systemsdepartment. Although the electrical Engineering offices are also located Maury hall, electricalengineering classrooms and laboratories are located in buildings which have not yet beenrenovated. Therefore, this paper focuses on experiences from a Systems department point ofview. The Systems department teaches two service courses to all Naval
Testing Jigsaw Learning In a Freshman Laboratory CourseAbstract:In Jigsaw Learning,1 a peer-to-peer teaching method developed by Elliot Aronson and hiscolleagues, every student in the class is placed in 2 sequential groups – an “expert” group tolearn a section of a course topic (a jigsaw puzzle piece) and a jigsaw puzzle group where theyjoin with different course topic “experts” to share and learn from each other,– thus completingthe course topic as a whole in a group (the completed jigsaw puzzle). The class is then tested onthe complete course topic. In prior research2, which was part of a Students First grant to improvestudent retention, the author tested Jigsaw Learning against traditional individual studenttraditional
engineering education. Maxwell is an IEEE member, a member of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AaeE), and was recently awarded a USQ Dean’s Commendation for Achievement in Learning and Teaching in 2011.Dr. Peter D. Gibbings Peter Gibbings is an Associate Professor and the Associate Dean (learning and teaching) in the Faculty of Engineering and Surveying at the University of Southern Queensland. His professional background is in land surveying and his key research interests include problem-based learning, remote access laboratories, and engineering education. His academic achievements have been recognized by receiving a University Medal in 2003 for excellence in design and delivery of problem-based
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20824Advanced Manufacturing Laboratory to Enhance STEM LearningDr. Kee M Park, Queensborough Community College Dr. Park is an Assistant Professor at Queensborough Community College, teaching various mechanical engineering courses including statics, strength of materials, thermodynamics and fluids, and materials laboratory. Dr. Park has extensive industrial experiences, working in design of consumer products, design of power plants and research for U.S Department of Defense. Dr. Park’s research interest include STEM
follow the procedures to acquire data, present any collected data in theforms of tables or graphs, and correlate the results to the particular theories, hypotheses, ormodels that they learned in prior classes. Students usually do not put much effort into theselaboratory classes, which are usually assigned with only one credit hour and taught by graduatestudents. Efforts have been made recently to improve learning effectiveness. Some studies havelooked into improving laboratory instruction from the perspectives of teaching assistants andstudents 3. Other studies have proposed alternative teaching methodologies, such as theframework of Legacy Cycle 4,5,6, a web-based four step tutorial, LabWrite 7, multimedia coursecontent 8,9 and pre-laboratory e
AC 2008-1373: INTRODUCING MICROFLUIDICS THROUGH APROBLEM-BASED LABORATORY COURSEIan Papautsky, University of Cincinnati Dr. Ian Papautsky earned his Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of Utah in 1999. He is currently a tenured Associate Professor of in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. His research and teaching interests include application of microfluidics and nanotechnology to biology and medicine.Cathy Maltbie, University of Cincinnati Dr. Catherine Maltbie earned her B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ed.D. in Educational Studies (cognitive and social aspects of instruction). She is a Research Associate at the Evaluation
Paper ID #14717An Asynchronous Course/Laboratory Development for Automation ControlsDr. Cheng Y. Lin P.E., Old Dominion University Dr. Lin is a Professor and Program Director of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Old Dominion University. He received his PhD of Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University in 1989, and is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. Dr. Lin has expertise in automation control, machine design, CAD/CAM, CNC, geometric dimensioning and tolerancing, and robotics. He has been active in the technology application research and teaching training courses for the local industries and
. When I started teaching the electronics course, the lab experiments that were being used were in the old format designed for weekly on campus lab experiments. These labs were well suited for the older format in distance learning where students would come to RIT or find a local community college to attend weekly or 3 -4 times per quarter to complete their lab requirements. In spite of the movement toward the newer flexible format students in this class were merely instructed to do what they could at home and finish the labs during the single all day session on campus. The use of Power Point as shown in this paper allowed me to create new laboratory experiments students could perform at home. These labs contained tutorials that allowed students
April 27-28, 2012and failures. Faculty also provided students with additional information related tonanobiotechnology and the procedures and equipment used. Teaching assistants helpedstudents implement the lab experiences. At the end of the term, each group gave a PowerPointpresentation on their experience, summarized the steps that they went through to answer thequestion, reported results, and discussed implications and recommendations. Each group alsocreated a brief video on one of the lab experiences. Four different lab videos were created.In this presentation, the challenges and experience on offering such an interdisciplinaryundergraduate laboratory course will be summarized. The evaluation results and students’feedbacks will be
who was also a veteran with significant electrical T&ME experience was sought out. Theveteran expert was only helping with the electrical T&ME. Other responsibilities, such as labsetup or grading, were handled by a traditional teaching assistant and laboratory instructor. Theveteran lab instructor assisted in all lab sessions and provided limited outside assistance as welland was paid $1,500 for the semester. This was all made possible by a newly mandated upper-division classroom fee structure, which enabled a number of previously unfunded educationalideas to be implemented.This paper describes the results of a one-semester trial starting with our Circuit Analysis lab.This is the first lab in which traditional electrical T&ME (e.g
Hands-On Industrial Robotics Laboratory DevelopmentIntroductionThis paper presents efforts of the author in developing practical hands-on laboratory exercises inRobotics and Automation, based-on his work in two different universities. The laboratoryexercises evolved into their current state after more than a decade of teaching with ABB, Eshed,and Fanuc robots. The author’s previous laboratory development included programming olderASEA IRB 6 and modern ABB IRB 140 robots using ARLA and RAPID languages respectivelyas well as integrating conveyors, sensors, Prolight NC machines, and Eshed’s Scorbots into asmall work-cell structure. After working with ASEA and ABB robots, the author had to go backto the FANUC technology due to change in teaching
regard, colleges employ various equipment to teach students how to conduct a safestarting sequence of the robotic arm, execute basic manual controls through various tasks such aspicking up an object and dropping in a bin or placing on an assembly line, program automaticoperations, and turn off the equipment safely. Although every student must learn these basicoperations, the limited space in the laboratory or financial challenges allow colleges to educate with asmaller number of equipment than the class size. Moreover, spring 2020 semester required alleducational institutions to conduct their classes remotely due to the global pandemic. Therefore,development of a virtual reality simulated robotic arm was important for effective learning
Session 2366 DEVELOPING A 21st CENTURY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY CURRICULUM Charles Knight, University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaAbstractElectronic instrumentation and computer data acquisition has revolutionized the experimentallaboratory. Universities with limited funding face major challenges in upgrading theirlaboratories. Industry advisors tell us they expect our engineering graduates to have modernlaboratory skills. Many engineering faculty members do not possess the modern skills requiredto develop and/or teach laboratory curriculums required in the 21st century. This situation hasdeveloped
AC 2011-1079: ASSESSMENT OF A LABORATORY ORIENTED STUDYCURRICULUMMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a senior member of IEEE
Optimizing Engineering Materials Laboratory Time with TechnologyBySteven M. Cramer, Nancy Ciezki, Hussain Bahia, Carole Kraakand Carole SchrammUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonAbstractThe background of engineering students has changed over the years, resulting in newchallenges in teaching hands-on laboratories. Engineering design involves visualization.This visualization spans the spectrum from understanding how pieces of a structure fittogether to having a first hand knowledge of how material deforms, flows or fracturesunder different loads. Engineering laboratories provide critical hands-on experiencesthat build visualization skills at the same time that material or structure behaviors aredemonstrated. But engineering laboratory time is
Session 3663 The TRP-Funded Integrated Manufacturing Laboratories at CCNY Benjamin Liaw and Gary Benenson The City College of The City University of New YorkAbstract With the opportunity of funding from ARPA-NSF TRP (Technology ReinvestmentProject), faculty and students at the City College of the City University of New York (CCNY)completely overhauled several teaching laboratories related to manufacturing education in theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering. This two-year effort started in early 1994 and more than$200,000 (along with countless personnel hours) has been invested into these
of Technol- ogy in 2006 and went on to receive a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of Wisconsin- Madison in 2011.Dr. Chris Barr, University of Michigan Dr. Christopher Barr is the Instructional Laboratory Supervisor in the Chemical Engineering Department at University of Michigan. He obtained his Ph.D. at University of Toledo in 2013 and is a former Fellow in the N.S.F. GK-12 grant ”Graduate Teaching Fellows in STEM High School Education: An Environ- mental Science Learning Community at the Land-Lake Ecosystem Interface”. His main responsibilities are supervising and implementing improvements to the undergraduate labs. He also serves as secondary instructor for the CHE labs, the Departmental