through a big transition of the programwith one professor retirement (founder of the program) and two new faculty members arriving.Our recent activities comprise following three major parts: 1) Expanded teaching laboratory, 2)Strong faculty/students research projects, and 3) Active SPIE student club. We are presenting theabove three efforts in this paper.1. IntroductionCalifornia Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) has one of the nation's largest primarilyundergraduate engineering colleges. The photonics program within the EE department began in1985. Currently, there are two senior elective lecture courses and one graduate-level lecture inthe photonics area. A 700 ft2 fiber-optics laboratory was introduced in 1986. This laboratoryserves dual
Riffe is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering and teaches the lecture andmanufacturing laboratory portions of this course and also a senior Sheet Metal Forming course. He is a formermember of the Board of Directors of SAE and a past-chairman of AFFT/SME. Prior to academia, he had 20 yearsexperience in the steel industry as a design consultant.LAURA RUST – Professor Rust is an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department.Where she teaches courses in circuits, signals and digital signal processing. Her research area of interest is in Page 7.303.7predictive maintenance. She teaches the electrical
Laboratory) in the following.3.1 Lecture EvolutionThe content of the lecture section of the course changed in reaction to the following influences:1) The content of the freshman engineering program, 2) The need for additional curriculumcontent in professional engineering skills, and 3) The expertise of the instructor. Each of theseinfluences is discussed below.Freshman Engineering Content: The freshman engineering course changed from a design,graphics and programming course to one that surveyed the various fields of engineering. This puta greater demand on the Design & Analysis class to teach the concepts of the design process,design for manufacture and cost estimation.Professional Skills: Course material was added to the lecture part of the
, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Prof. Samira Azarin Samira Azarin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy in 2006 and went
minutes. The students in the classroomsaw the same SEM images as the operator, with a real time view of the sample preparation tableand the laboratory environment. At all times they could converse with the laboratory instructorand ask questions.Figure 2: This is the actual implementation of the system. Photo was taken during an actualclassroom teaching. Page 23.295.5Since it is a mobile system, it can be easily moved into any other laboratory, such as fordemonstrating an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) or Transmission Electron Microscope(TEM). We have also used it for conducting virtual tours of a cleanroom nanofabricationlaboratory, where the
Session 1532 Application of a Learning Model in an Introduction to Digital Logic Course Cordelia M. Brown, Arthur J. Brodersen Vanderbilt University School of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Nashville, Tennessee 37235AbstractDuring the 2003-2004 academic year, a general learning model is being employed at the Schoolof Engineering at Vanderbilt University (VUSE) in the “Introduction to Digital Logic” course.This course is accompanied by a laboratory component. There are
Laboratory 11. My knowledge of wave-particle duality helps me to solve problems in the Nanotechnology Laboratory 12. Nanotechnology Laboratory teaches me to measure parameters and determine parameter error in nanostructures 13. The Nanotechnology Laboratory will help me appreciate the multidisciplinary nature of nanotechnology 14. Would you recommend this Nanotechnology Laboratory to other students Page 13.385.7APPENDIX 2Descriptive Statistics of Formative Evaluation of Lab ExperimentsAbbreviations of Lab Experiments:3 – Study of the Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite (HOPG) Surface Using STM6 – Diffraction of Electrons from
their minor, but now with theimplementation of the integrated curriculum are ineligible to enroll in the coursesdue to a lack of perquisites. It is thought the integrated courses pose too much ofchallenge, from a scheduling perspective, to allow students to pursue a minor in CM. Page 25.893.8Faculty Workload and Teaching AssignmentsAccording to EP&R 76, the governing documents related to faculty workload at CalPoly, Faculty Workload is defined as the normal workload of a full-time facultymember and consists of two components: • 12 weighted teaching units (WTU) of direct instructional assignments, including classroom and laboratory instruction
on projects on their own schedule or with a teaching assistant during scheduledtimes. An initial pilot offering in the spring semester 2020 started out following this model butunfortunately had to change direction when the campus was shut down due to the Coronaviruspandemic.The mid-semester transition to remote learning was particularly difficult when students lostaccess to the laboratory equipment. Remote lectures were fine but student projects were greatlyhindered. For the remainder of the spring semester we sent custom hardware kits to studentscontaining a Raspberry Pi with an accelerometer add-on. With these kits students were able tocover much of the original course content but some of the key components (such as Linux buildsystems and
that semester.The only class to draw more students between 1999 and 2001 was a class on web page design,another very popular subject.There are several positive effects of teaching a popular subject. Students enjoy learning, andare excited by the enabling effects of their study. They tend to study more and are willing toinvest more time in their efforts. Students tend to remember more if they are convinced thatwhat they are learning is useful. There is less likelihood of cheating or copying other student’swork. And if there is copying, it is of the positive kind where both students improve in acompetitive manner. Hands on experience, like that obtained in a laboratory can increase thepopularity of a popular subject.Forazan’s popular text, Data
. Felder R M, and Brent R Designing a Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria J. of Eng. Education, 7-25, 2003.16. Hercog D., B Gergi·c, S Uran, and K Jezernik. A DSP- Based Remote Control Laboratory. IEEE Trans on Industrial Electronics, 54(6):3057-3068, 2007.17. Hassan H., C. Dominguez, J.M. Martinez, and J. Albaladejo. Remote Laboratory Architecture for the Validation of Industrial Applications Control. IEEE Trans on Industrial Electronics, 54(6):3094-3102, 2007.18. Hough M, Word E, Yip S, and Marlin T. A Web Site to Support Active Student Learning in Process Control American Society for Eng. Education. Proceedings of the ASEE 2002 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2002.19. Irawan R., M. Ooi, G. Yeung, E. Weyer
2006-856: UPDATING MECHANICAL ENGINEERING MEASUREMENTS ANDINSTRUMENTATION – A CASE STUDYTheodore Heindel, Iowa State University Ted Heindel is the William and Virginia Binger Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University. He taught ME 370 at ISU from spring 2003 through spring 2005 and was responsible for major course modifications, including development of several new laboratory exercises. He is currently teaching thermal science courses, including fluid mechanics and heat transfer. He also has an active research program in multiphase flow characterization and visualization and gas-liquid mass transfer enhancement, and is the director of a one-of-a-kind X-ray
laboratory and design projects required in theElectric Circuits and Introduction to Electrical Laboratory courses. Tables 1 to 4 show thecontents of a sample laboratory experiment that was designed using the Mobile StudioIOBoardTM. Note that the concepts covered in this lab experiment are similar to those conductedusing the regular lab equipment although different test instruments are used. All students have toinitially complete a laboratory experiment that teaches them how to use the software andhardware of the Mobile Studio IOBoardTM , and how it can be connected to circuits they designon their bread-boards. The survey and feedback questions shown in Table#4 are given to thestudents at the end of each lab to get their feedback, comments and
Session 1417 A Multidisciplinary Dynamic Systems Curriculum Timothy M. Cameron, Rosalyn S. Hobson, Gary S. Huvard Virginia Commonwealth UniversityAbstractFaculty in Chemical, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering collaborated in developing a newcourse, “Process and System Dynamics,” and new dynamic systems laboratory exercises that canbe used in a variety of courses and disciplines. The objective was to educate students in thefundamentals of dynamic systems and expose them to a broad diversity of applications indifferent disciplines. The labs are largely complete and are being used by
distance education programs in engineering education is not a very new effort.Zalewski mentions that the first attempts to access lab experiments remotely date back to19913. In 1999 Alexander and Smelser presented an online material laboratory course makinguse of a tensile test simulation from the Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory at theUniversity of Colorado at Boulder4. Nevertheless the development of online laboratories,which are based on real physically existing and remotely controlled equipment instead ofsimulations, remains a particularly challenging task. Following Schaefer et al. the main ad-vantages of remote experimentation include performing hands-on learning experiences and atthe same time reaching those students, who are not
has developed surface preferential approaches for nucleation and crystallisation of biological and complex organic molecules. More recently, he has worked as a Research Associate investigating the role of surface properties on particle-particle interaction and developed approaches for decoupling contribution of different surface attributes on powder cohesion. In 2012, as recognition to his contributions to Undergraduate laboratory teaching, he was been nominated for the Graduate Teaching Assistant Awards for the Faculty of Engineering. Umang currently has a role in leading the operation and innovation of the teaching laboratories and he manages Graduate Teaching Assistants for the Department of Chemical Engineering
allow students to practice their creativityor develop critical thinking skills5,6,7. Inquiry-based learning in a laboratory environmentdevelops creativity and critical thinking skills8,9. Peer-teaching has also been shown to increasestudent learning in a laboratory environment3. This study looks at how inquiry-based learningfollowed by peer-teaching affects student attitudes toward the subject matter and their overalllearning experience.MethodsTable 1. The five different measurement techniques utilized to complete instructor providedobjectives. Technique Instructor Provided Objectives Collect signal using National Instruments myDAQ and homemade Electromyography amplifiers (EMG
technologyeducation are currently being redefined and implemented. The changes being made invarious aspects of engineering education including course content and curriculum,multimedia learning environments, teaching methods, classroom and laboratory setup.II. Course Content and CurriculumTraditionally, curriculums for various engineering disciplines focused on thatindependent discipline with little to no reference to other engineering disciplines. Coursecontent helped to define and maintain this disciplinary focus and isolation.Cross utilization of multiple engineering disciplines should be incorporated into eachdiscipline-specific engineering education curriculum as it lends itself to more holisticknowledge base to best fuel creative thinking and cross
Modern Computer Tools,” to be submitted to the Journal of Engineering Education, April 1998.David McDonald is a Professor in the School of Engineering and Technology at Lake Superior State University. Heis Chair of the Department of General Engineering and Engineering Technology, and teaches courses in ElectricalEngineering and Engineering Technology. His primary interests are in control systems, data acquisition and control,and modern instrumentation.Ajay Mahajan is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering and Technology at Lake Superior StateUniversity. He is the Director of the Autonomous Systems Laboratory, which is a research facility in the School. Hisresearch interests are in robotics, controls, autonomous systems
Session 1526 The Development of Hands-on Fiber Optics Undergraduate Course ALFRED S. ANDRAWIS Electrical Engineering Department South Dakota State UniversityAbstract This paper outlines the development of a one credit undergraduate laboratory courseto be taught concurrent with a lecture course. Students in this laboratory course learn about avariety of subjects pertinent to fiber optics and contemporary design techniques forcommunication systems and sensing within electrical engineering curriculum.This laboratory
and scientific programming languages. However, the CAD tools andprogramming languages themselves do not warrant dedicated courses for the purpose of learningtheir use.RIT has implemented studio style classrooms within the Electrical Engineering Department,similar in function to those at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). This arrangementcombines lecture, recitation, computer, and laboratory activities in one “studio” facility andprovides the opportunity to adopt a hands-on approach to teaching electronics and circuits.22,23,24The rooms are also equipped with multimedia systems, 100 base-T Ethernet connections, andIEEE 488 control of instruments to enable virtual laboratory approaches such as web-basedinteractive learning modules.25 The
], strength of materials [23], andengineering economy [24], to advanced topics such as finite element analysis [25]. One area that hasreceived considerable attention is manufacturing with some work done on laboratory applications[26, 27] and other work on using multimedia simulations to teach design [28]. Some work has alsobeen done in the area of environmental engineering [29 - 31].The topic of trying to supplement or replace basic engineering laboratories has also been studied.The concept of virtual engineering laboratories was introduced for electric circuits at Vanderbilt in apaper by Mosterman et al [32]. Simulations in manufacturing process laboratories andmanufacturing design have been presented by Hailey and Hailey [27] and by Riggs et al
Session 3157 Motion-Tracking Technology & Three-Dimensional Displays Provide Leading-Edge Research & Educational Tools to Industrial Engineering Students at Texas A&M University-Commerce Andrew E. Jackson, Ph.D. Texas A&M University-CommerceAbstract In the fall of 2002, a new Industrial Engineering program was established at Texas A&MUniversity-Commerce (TAMUC). A central component of this new undergraduate program is areconfigurable, modularized Human Factors & Ergonomics Laboratory (HFEL) that will providestudents
receive training in an Rensselar Politechnic Institute (RPI) clean room, the total cost will be $40/hour/class, which will fund a teaching, assistant ($15/hour) and the teaching assistant's clean room usage fee ($25/hour). The access to RPI and SUNY-Albany eliminates the need for new multimillion-dollar semiconductor specific laboratories at HVCC. Faculty – Twenty-nine contact hours of faculty load would be generated by the new courses required by the program. Existing faculty and/or adjunct faculty will teach the seven technical course electives in the area of Nanotechnology and semiconductor manufacturing technology (SMT). Other NYS research institutions (Rensselaer, University at Albany-Center for Thin Film Technology, RIT) have provided HVCC
. McGraw Award; Purdue’s life-time Murphy Teaching Award for outstanding undergraduate teaching; induction into Purdue’s Book of Great Teachers (an honor reserved for only 267 faculty in the history of Purdue University at the time of his induction); Purdue Teaching Academy Fellow and Execu- tive Board (charter member); the Ronald Schmitz Award for Outstanding Service to FIE; the ASEE IL-IN Outstanding Campus Representative; the ASEE Hewlett Packard Award for Excellence in Laboratory In- struction; the ASEE IL-IN Outstanding Teaching Award; Marquis’ Who’s Who in the World, in America, in Engineering and Science, and in Education.Dr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Lucietto has focused her
States Military Academy with a B.S. in Environmental Engineering and graduated from Columbia University with an M.S. in Environmental Engineering in 2016. He teaches Environmental Biological Systems, Environmental Science, Environmental Engineering Technologies, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, Advanced Individual Study I-II, Biochemical Treatment, and Officership.Kimberly Quell, United States Military Academy Kimberly Quell is a Laboratory Technician in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineer- ing at the United States Military Academy. She is a 2010 graduate of SUNY-College of Environmental Science and Forestry with a B.S. in Environmental Science and is a currently attending graduate school
Technology (ABET) undergraduate programs offered nationwide thatrequire students to conduct laboratory sessions onsite. For some students this arrangement maybe inconvenient, or in some cases, impractical. Furthermore, there are many challengesassociated with teaching electrical engineering online courses because of the interposition ofheavy equation use and interactivity required.Over the past three years, we have been investigating the use of inexpensive, highly portableinstrumentation to facilitate our lab requirements. As a result of this enabling technology, anonline program targeted toward completing the second two years of an undergraduate electricalengineering degree is being piloted at our institution. Nearly 109 students have participated
both education and research comes through aconsortium of universities aimed at promoting the enhancement of nuclear engineering educationand infrastructure. This funding is currently providing the establishment of a radiation detectionlaboratory to be used in teaching the radiation detection and instrumentation laboratory coursewhich will be offered remotely through advanced distance education technology (see more onthis below). This same lab will serve the needs of research efforts involving radiationmeasurements and characterization.USC has also pursued direct support of the program from DOE through “Plus-Up” requests tosupport growth and expansion of research and teaching in areas of interest to DOE such as theclean energy initiative
Internet.IntroductionToday, educational institutions are increasing their use of the computer basedtechnology in the teaching environments1. There are various ways how to use thistechnology, but basically the computer-mediated learning can be used as single teachingmedium or it can be used in combination with traditional classroom experience2. Onlineclasses have advantages and disadvantages3 .This is actually means that there is not auniversal approach how to use the internet for education, especially for courses withlaboratories. There are still discussions how to utilize the distance education toundergraduates when the laboratories are involved4. Meanwhile some universities areusing the lab-based courses on the internate5,6,7,8. There is an indication of
Paper ID #7152Authenticity Promotes Student Engagement and Learning in a Stand-AloneTechnical Communications CourseDr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Dr. Shannon Ciston is a lecturer in the Chemical Engineering Department at the University of Califor- nia, Berkeley, where she teaches courses in technical communications, first-year design, and pedagogy. Dr. Ciston holds degrees in Chemical Engineering from Northwestern University and Illinois Institute of Technology. Her research interests include aspects of engineering student experience, identity, and motivation, especially among first-year students and