AC 2012-3231: CHARACTERIZATION OF STUDENT MODELING IN ANINDUSTRIALLY SITUATED VIRTUAL LABORATORYErick Jacob Nefcy, Oregon State University Erick Nefcy is a doctoral student in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. Through his undergraduate studies, he has held multiple internships at Intel Corporation. He is currently studying the growth of self-forming barrier layers in copper thin films, as well as investigating the student teams’ use of models during completion of the Chemical Vapor Deposition Virtual Laboratory project.Dr. Edith Stanley Gummer, Education NorthwestDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a professor of chemical engineering
AC 2012-3360: A HALF BRAIN IS GOOD: A WHOLE BRAIN IS MUCHBETTERDr. Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, D.WRE, and F.NSPE, is an independent consultant provid- ing management, engineering, education/training, and marketing services. Prior to beginning his consul- tancy, he worked in the public, private, and academic sectors serving as a Project Engineer and Manager, Department Head, Discipline Manager, marketer, legal expert, professor, and Dean of an engineering college. Walesh authored or co-authored six books and many engineering and education publications and presentations. His most recent book is Engineering Your Future: The Professional Practice of En
AC 2012-4601: ASSOCIATE OF SCIENCE DEGREE PROGRAM TO FA-CILITATE TRANSFER OF STUDENTS FROM TWO-YEAR TO FOUR-YEAR ENGINEERING PROGRAMSDr. James K. Nelson Jr. P.E., University of Texas, Tyler James K. Nelson received a bachelor’s of civil engineering degree from the University of Dayton in 1974. He received the master’s of science and doctorate of philosophy degrees in civil engineering from the University of Houston. During his graduate study, Nelson specialized in structural engineering. He is a registered Professional Engineer in four states, a Chartered Engineer in the United Kingdom, and a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers. He is also a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and
AC 2012-3820: THE NATURE OF PEER FEEDBACK FROM FIRST-YEARENGINEERING STUDENTS ON OPEN-ENDED MATHEMATICAL MOD-ELING PROBLEMSMiss Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University Kelsey Rodgers is a graduate student at Purdue University in the School of Engineering Education. She is currently conducting research on peer feedback within model-eliciting activities (MEAs) in the First- year Engineering program with her advisor, Professor Heidi Diefes-Dux. Prior to attending Purdue, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E in engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation. She began her research in engineering education on disassemble, analyze, assemble (DAA) activities with her previous advisor at
AC 2012-3987: SPATIAL ABILITY IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTSMs. Kristin L. Brudigam, Lake Travis High School Kristin Brudigam is a mathematics and engineering teacher at Lake Travis High School in Austin, Texas. She earned her undergraduate degree in mathematics education from Wayne State College and her mas- ter’s degree in science education with an emphasis in engineering education from the University of Texas, Austin. Additionally, Brudigam is certified to teach civil engineering/architecture and Introduction to En- gineering Design as part of the Project Lead the Way curriculum at Lake Travis High School. Brudigam developed a curriculum entitled ”Careers Involving Mathematics” as an undergraduate in the John G
AC 2012-3421: STUDENT-CREATED WATER QUALITY SENSORSMs. Liesl Hotaling, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg Liesl Hotaling is a Senior Research Engineering with the College of Marine Sciences, University of South Florida. She holds a B.A. in marine science, a M.A.T. in science teaching, and a M.S. in maritime systems (ocean engineering). She is a partner in Centers for Ocean Science Education Excellence - Networked Ocean World (COSEE-NOW) and specializes in real time data education projects and hands-on STEM educational projects supporting environmental observing networks.Dr. Susan Lowes, Columbia University Susan Lowes, Ph.D., is Director of Research and Evaluation at the Institute for Learning Technologies
AC 2011-2315: TRANSFER FROM CAPSTONE DESIGN: A MODEL TOFACILITATE STUDENT REFLECTIONSusannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe is the Design Clinic Director in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College, where she coordinates and teaches the capstone engineering design course. Her current research focuses on innovations in engineering design education, particularly at the capstone level. She is also involved with efforts to foster design learning in middle school students and to support entrepreneurship at primarily undergraduate institutions. Her background is in civil engineering with a focus on structural materials; she holds a B.S.E. degree from Princeton, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees from Cornell.Mary A
AC 2011-1776: WEIGHTED SOCIAL TAGGING AS A RESEARCH METHOD-OLOGY FOR DETERMINING SYSTEMIC TRENDS IN ENGINEERINGEDUCATION RESEARCHXin (Cindy) Chen, Purdue University Xin (Cindy) Chen is currently a Ph.D student in School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses on the influences of modern technologies on science and engineering education, including science and engineering virtual organizations, mobile devices and social media.Nikitha Sambamurthy, Purdue University Nikitha Sambamurthy is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University.Corey M Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Schimpf is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is
AC 2011-1796: NAVY METROLOGY ENGINEERING CENTER STEM OUT-REACH THROUGH THE STEP PROGRAM: CHALLENGES, LESSONSLEARNED AND APPLICATION TO DOD STRATEGYDouglas Sugg, Navy -NSWC Corona CA Doug Sugg is the Department Head of Product Engineering Assessement at the Corona Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center.John V Fishell,JD, John Victor Fishell, President, Science and Technology Education Partnership (STEP) John V. Fishell retired from his position as Technical Director of NSWC, Corona Division, Corona, CA in 2008 after 36 years of service. He holds a Juris Doctorate in Law from California Southern Law School and a BSEE from the University of Texas, El Paso along with two Certficates in Management from the
AC 2011-441: CONNECTING SCIENCE WITH ENGINEERING: USINGINQUIRY AND DESIGN IN A TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOP-MENT COURSELouis S. Nadelson, Boise State University Louis S. Nadelson is an Assistant Professor in the College of Education at Boise State University. His research agenda is conducted within the context of STEM education and includes aspects of conceptual change, inquiry, and pre-service and in-service teacher education. He has published research ranging from teacher professional development to the impact of inquiry on STEM learning. Dr. Nadelson earned a B.S. degree in Biological and Physics Science from Colorado State University, a B.A. with concentrations in computing, mathematics and physics from
AC 2011-321: DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING TEACHER PROFES-SIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN NANOSCALE SCIENCE AND ENGINEER-ING: WHAT MAKES FOR A SUCCESSFUL PROGRAM.Nancy Healy, Georgia Institute of Technology Nancy Healy is the Education and Outreach Coordinator for the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN). NNIN is an NSF-funded user support network of 14 universities which also provides nano-education outreach activities and programs. NNIN provides informal and formal activities to a K-gray age span. Her office is located at Georgia Institute of Technology, Nanotechnology Research Center. Prior to joining the NNIN in 2004, she was a program manager at the S.C. Commission on Higher Education. At SCCHE she was
AC 2010-860: PRIORITIZING TEAMWORK: PROMOTING PROCESS ANDPRODUCT EFFECTIVENESS IN THE FRESHMAN ENGINEERING DESIGNCOURSEKyle Simmons, University of Utah Kyle Simmons is a graduate student currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Communication at the University of Utah. He received his M.A. from Colorado State University in Communication Studies and is currently working with the CLEAR Program as a consultant for communication and teamwork with the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Drawing from his eight years of experience with communication and teamwork, his responsibilities in this position include team building—including cohesion and conflict management, providing student/team consultations, and
Journal cover (2008). She is an ac- tive mentor of undergraduate researchers and served as co-PI on an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams since 2003 and during this time has contributed to numerous ASEE conference proceedings articles and educational journal publications.Babs Carryer, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) Babs Carryer is director of faculty development and
2 1 1 0 0 F D C B A F D C B A Figure 3. Final grade distributions from the spring 2012 pilot 1 pre-calculus course and the subsequent fall 2012 calculus grade distributions.As this GoldShirt cohort moved on, of the 11 students who took calculus 1 in the fall 2012, onlytwo students (18%) earned a B- or better—one student earned a B in one-semester calculus andthe other earned an A in the first semester of yearlong calculus I. Nine students (82%) earned aC, C-, D or F. Compared to the previous results, a lower percentage of students
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper AC 2007-2234. 23 pp.[8] Pickering, M., E. Ryan, K. Conroy, B. Gravel, M. Portsmore. 2004. The Benefit of Outreach to Engineering Students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition. Session 1692. 12 pp.[9] Bielefeldt, A.R., J. Lewis, M. Polmear, D. Knight, N. Canney, C. Swan. 2020. Educating civil engineering students about ethics and societal impacts via co-curricular activities. Journal of Civil Engineering Education. In press.[10] Cress, C.M., C. Burack, D.E. Giles, J. Elkins, M.C. Stevens. 2010. A Promising Connection: Increasing College Access and Success through Civic Engagement
AC 2009-853: BUILDING RESEARCH COMMUNITIES AND COLLABORATIVENETWORKS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: LACCEI VISIONAND INITIATIVESIvan Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University Ivan E. Esparragoza is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Penn State. His interests are in engineering design education, innovative design, global design, and global engineering education. He has introduced multinational design projects in a freshman introductory engineering design course in collaboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the International Division of
knowledge “through the transformation of experience” 1. To understand the cycle, anunderstanding of the four basic kinds of experience modes is needed: concrete experience (CE),reflective observation (RO), abstract conceptualization (AC), and active experimentation (AE).A different learning process is conducted depending on which aspect of experiences affectindividuals 12. The ideal experiential learning cycle will have a learner "touch all the bases" 12 ofthe cycle seen in Figure 1. In diverse fields, several positive effects Concreteof experiential learning have been proven. ExperienceExperiential learning benefits learners withproper exercises. For example, researchexperiences increased
institution’s goal of reaching R1 status (Ford, 2023; Weissman, 2023).The Carnegie Classification® is the leading framework for recognizing and describinginstitutional diversity in U.S. higher education. The Carnegie Commission on Higher Educationdeveloped the system in 1973 to support its research and policy analysis program. Derived fromempirical data on colleges and universities, the Carnegie Classification® was updated in 1976,1987, 1994, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2018, and 2021 to reflect changes among colleges anduniversities. The system includes any institution of higher education that conferred at least onedegree during 2019-20, as reported through the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
University of Colorado Boulder. Her teaching focuses on fate and transport of contaminants, capstone design and aqueous chemistry. Dr. Bolhari is passionate about broad- ening participation in engineering through community-based participatory action research. Her research interests explore the boundaries of engineering and social science to understand evolution of resilience capacity at family and community level to sustainable practices utilizing quantitative and qualitative re- search methods.Dr. Daniel Ivan Castaneda, James Madison University Daniel I. Castaneda is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Univer- sity. Daniel earned his PhD in 2016 and his Master’s in 2010, both in civil
Paper ID #10155Ethnography in Engineering Ethics Education: A Pedagogy for Transforma-tional ListeningDr. Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech Yanna Lambrinidou is a medical ethnographer and adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Sci- ence and Technology Studies (STS) at Virginia Tech. For the past 7 years, she has conducted research on the historic 2001-2004 Washington, DC lead-in-drinking-water contamination. This work exposed wrongdoing and unethical behavior on the part of local and federal government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-conceived the graduate level engineering ethics course ”Engineering
AC 2012-3271: A COLLEGE-INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP: THE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY MASTER’S OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERINGDr. James G. Ladesic P.E., Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach James Ladesic is the Associate Dean of Industry Relations and Outreach and Professor of Aerospace En- gineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He has been with Embry-Riddle for 38 years, serving in many different capacities as faculty member and engineer. He is the recipient of the 1993 University Research Achievement Award, the 2001 Outstanding Teacher Award, and the 2009 Outstanding Service Award at ERAU. A registered Professional Engineer in Florida and FAA structures designated engineering representative. He is a recognized
AC 2010-2111: QUALITY INDICATORS FOR ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGYEDUCATIONMichael Dyrenfurth, Purdue UniversityMike Murphy, Dublin Institute of TechnologyGary Bertoline, Purdue University Page 15.1008.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Quality Indicators for Engineering & Technology EducationAbstractIn recent years the development and use of university rankings, comparisons, and/or leaguetables has become popular and several methodologies are now frequently used to provide acomparative ranking of universities. These rankings are often based on research and publicationactivity and also not uncommonly focus on indicators that can be measured rather
AC 2011-315: MODAL ENGAGEMENTS IN PRECOLLEGE ENGINEER-ING: TRACKING MATH AND SCIENCE CONCEPTS ACROSS SYMBOLS,SKETCHES, SOFTWARE, SILICONE AND WOODMitchell J. Nathan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Mitchell J. Nathan, BSEE, PhD, is professor of Educational Psychology, with affiliate appointments in Curriculum & Instruction and Psychology at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and a faculty fel- low at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research (WCER) and the Center on Education and Work. Dr. Nathan studies the cognitive, embodied, and social processes involved in STEM reasoning, learn- ing and teaching, especially in mathematics and engineering classrooms and in laboratory settings, using both quantitative
twotypes of explanations. The first explanation represented a situation where the instructoroverexplained a concept and provided too much information to be meaningful, while the secondexample was simple and easy to understand. I have also been like Zara… The first stuff was easy like ‘okay sig. figs (significant figures) cool’ and then it got to adding in work, heat, dew point, and other such things and I just got really confused… So, I drew a picture of a lecture hall format, with a couple people in it and, like some of the people are saying ‘I don't understand’ and then some of the people are saying ‘I understand, I'm totally going to ace this exam.’ I feel in this class there's people who understand and
in the program from around the university and elsewhere; ongoing continuousimprovement efforts in the home program.References1. B. Jaeger, & E. LaRochelle, E.. EWB – “Engineers Without Borders: Educationally, a world of benefits” . 2009 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference Proceedings, Paper AC 2009-740, Austin, TX, 2009.2. E. J. Coyle, L.H., Jamieson, W. C., Oakes, “EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service”, International Journal of Engineering Education Vol 21, No. 1, Feb. 2005, pp. 139-150.3. J. L. Huff, C. B. Zoltowski, and W. C. Oakes, “Preparing Engineers for the Workplace through Service Learning: Perceptions of EPICS Alumni”, ”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 105, No. 1
to Appendix) are the most critical questions. In a sense and based on roughestimation and initial findings, the concepts that generally garnered the lowest scores are: ● The role of time constant in first-order circuit operations. (Concept Group D) ● The behavior of reactive elements in terms of power delivery and dissipation in an AC-source circuit. (Concept Groups B and G)Interestingly, these significant concepts are also considered difficult based on the findings from aprevious study [12] wherein students responded to survey questions about electric circuit conceptsand then ranked them based on their perceived importance and level of understanding. The resultsshowed that transient analysis and reactive power are students’ least
Paper ID #38653Building a Rotary Wing Aviation Program to Facilitate Integration ofMilitary Veterans and Service MembersMr. Charles William Weigandt, Austin Peay State University EDUCATION Austin Peay State University M.A. in Military History 2016 Emphasis on WWII and the Cold War Grad- uated with Honors Awarded a Certificate in Security Studies University of Pittsburgh B.A. in Physics 1976 TEACHING EXPERIENCE Austin Peay State University Assistant Professor, Aviation Science 2018-Present Adjunct Instructor 2016- 2017 Taught American History, HIST 2010 and HIST 2020 U.S. Army Academic and Flight Instructor 1983
coveringsfor shade and weather protection (Figure 4). This awningdesign does not require support from the ground and wasbuilt in four 10 ft sections.To generate power to the Duke DesignCube, two 300 Wsolar panels are fixed on top of the container (Figure 5).They feed deep-cycle batteries for a total storage of 2.5kWh. An AC inverter supplies 120V power to five outlets Figure 4: Retractable AwningFigure 5: Solar Panels Figure 6: Batteries and Solar Control Systemalong the interior of the container. The solar controllers, batteries, and AC inverter are mountedinside the container (Figure 6).The prototyping tools and materials for the Duke DesignCube were selected based on commonlyused tools in other Duke makerspaces. The