experience working in interdisciplinary teams. Similarly, NASA is a leader in the useof remote operations in the form of telescience or telecontrol of robots because of the numerousspaceflight missions conducted each year. The Nevada Space Grant Consortium’s (NvSGC)student satellite program, NevadaSat, is one of the many national and international programswith student satellite programs [1]. Students participating in these types of programs typicallystudy and develop complex systems that span a range of tasks, with Earth-orbiting satellitestypically at the pinnacle. The approach taken typically uses a process of graduated steps inprogram complexity—the formula followed by other successful Space Grant Consortia such asthe University of Colorado, is
workshop activities. Although a few individual seminars havebeen changed or refined over the eight years of ETW, the intent of the seminars remains thesame – to provide content and embedded activities that orient, motivate, inform, stimulate,demonstrate, apply, and assess. Table 1 is a listing of the seminars to be offered as part of the2007 ETW which is being hosted at Northern Arizona University in July. The ETW staffconsists of engineering and construction management faculty volunteers from across the U.S.who are scholars of teaching and learning and schooled in the philosophy and methods of ETW. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2007
average students.IntroductionThere are a lot of recent articles in the literature describing the use of Tablet PCs for instruction.Anderson et al.1 discuss the use of Classroom Presenter (a presentation system that allows for inkannotation on electronic slides) in the engineering classroom. The benefits of digital inkannotation are described by Hulls2 and contrasted with other teaching methods. Wise et al.3present responses to student surveys that indicate that Tablet PC use by instructors can helpimprove student learning. The above-mentioned papers use subjective instruments (such asstudent surveys) to identify benefits of using the Tablet PC for instruction. The authors havebeen able to find very little in the literature that objectively
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering EducationIntroductionThe School Robotics Initiative seeks to improve student and teacher learning in regional schoolsand prospective teacher learning at the university. It is based on the establishment and gradualexpansion of a network of regional schools that will develop robotics-learning programs linkedto Cal Poly Pomona technological resources and faculty in education, psychology, andengineering. The School Robotics Initiative is implemented as a problem-based curriculumapproach designed to enhance cross-curricular learning (with an emphasis on mathematics,science and writing) at the levels of elementary through high school.1 As it evolves, this effortwill involve industry and academic experts
contentknowledge to effectively teach mathematics (Ball, 1997).1 Content knowledge is the conceptualunderstanding of the mathematics that teachers need to have in order to teach. Pedagogicalcontent knowledge involves understanding how children think and learn. Teachers who are ableto teach math effectively are able to bridge content and pedagogical knowledge. For example, astudent states that the fraction “ ¼” is smaller than “1/8” because “4 is smaller than 8.” In orderto teach effectively, the teacher must understand mathematically why ¼ is larger than the 1/8th .The content knowledge required to teach this concept involves understanding the concepts ofunit, unitizing, equivalency, partitioning and part-whole conceptions of fractions. Furthermore,the
for teaching nanotechnology have revolved around the basic sciences,i.e., physics, chemistry and biology. This is probably because basic research in nanotech is stillevolving. However, there are over 380 products currently on the market that usenanotechnology, and $30 billion worth of nano-products were sold in 2005 1.Scientists are now passing on the development of micro- and nano-systems to engineers forcreating new products. Engineers are beginning to design and manufacture micro-/nano-systems. Hence, nanotechnology is taking on an engineering approach. Now nanotechnology isbeing taught in some engineering departments of U.S. universities, and it requires a differentapproach when teaching it to engineering students. Since nanotechnology
1. W. Ted Mahavier et al.. A quick-start guide to the Moore method. http://www.discovery.utexas.edu/rlm/reference/quick_start-3.pdf 2. William S. Mahavier. What is the Moore method? http://www.discovery.utexas.edu/rlm/reference/mahavier1.html 3. G. Edgar Parker. Getting more from Moore. http://www.discovery.utexas.edu/rlm/reference/parker.html 4. Wolf-Dieter Otte. Example of a class web site. http://flagstaff.cse.nau.edu/Courses/CS499%20-%20Enterprise%20Web%20Computing/index.html 5. Apple Inc. iTunes-U. http://www.apple.com/education/products/ipod/itunes_u.html 6. UC Berkeley. iTunes-U Portal. http://itunes.berkeley.edu/ 7. Stanford University. iTunes-U Portal. http://itunes.stanford.edu/ 8
integrate a broad range oftechnologies and skills. Students are given the opportunity to crystallize the ideas learned earlierand to implement comprehensive systems across an organization. The Master’s Research Projectfocuses on the research and selection of an appropriate topic on one of the research orapplications in the field of wireless communication systems. Each project is to be evaluated by apanel consists of five judges (normally two from university and three from industry) and gradedby “H” for Honors, “S” for Satisfactory and “U” for Unsatisfactory. Each group is responsibleto submit a final project report and make a 50 minute formal presentation. Following is the listof MSWC courses: 1. WCM601 Analog and Digital Communications
fromsurrounding regions.Advanced topics in engineering management: introducing students to entrepreneurshipWhile introducing engineering students to entrepreneurship was the primary focus of the class,developing the course as an engineering course was key. Therefore, the tenor of the coursefollowed many other industrial engineering or engineering courses in that it focused on systemsanalysis or resource allocation. Peter Drucker was fond of quoting the nineteenth-centuryeconomist J. B. Say, stating “The entrepreneur shifts economic resources out of an area of lowerand into an area of higher productivity and greater yield.”1 As such, the course was notpresented so much as a course on how to start a business, as entrepreneurship is often perceived,but
low cost.The CPE and EE are currently collaborating with the Mechanical Engineering (ME) Departmentand CCATC to create an Electronic Travel Aid (ETA). People with impaired vision can use acane successfully to navigate in a forward direction, but often have difficulties with obstacles ateye level and with detecting openings (such as open doorways) to their sides. A team of one EEand one ME student is developing an ETA using ultrasonic sensors to detect obstacles in frontand to the sides of the wearer. Upon sensing an obstacle or a doorway opening, this informationis provided to the user by means of a tactile belt (Figure 1). Vibromechanical tactors, which aresimilar to vibrating batteries in cell phones, can be placed circumferentially around
Conceiving — Designing — Implementing— Operating process. The crux of the CDIO Initiative is its Syllabus (see Appendix), astatement of undergraduate engineering education goals; and a set of 12 Standards designed tohelp achieve the goals (see Figure 1 below). The Standards address program philosophy(Standard 1), curriculum development (Standards 2, 3 and 4), design-build experiences andworkspaces (Standards 5 and 6), new methods of teaching and learning (Standards 7 and 8),faculty development (Standards 9 and 10), and assessment and evaluation (Standards 11 and 12).The Syllabus approximately corresponds to EC2000 Criterion 3 of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET), but is more comprehensive. The Syllabus and Standardswere
total number of credits forgraduation. Most engineering curricula have become more intensive and thus students arerequired to spend more time for each subject. California State Polytechnic University in Pomona,California has one of the largest engineering programs in the US with over 4,500 undergraduatestudents. On the other hand, more than 84 percent of students at CPP are working during theweek [1]. In recent years, student attrition has been a problem for many engineering programsacross the nation such that a significant number of students drop out in their first- and second-year. As indicated in the EERP report on student attrition [2], the primary non-university relatedreasons students claimed for leaving their studies were the
results show that US students are falling behind their internationalcounterparts somewhere in the middle grades: “It (TIMSS and TIMSS-R) suggests that ourchildren do not start out behind those of other nations in mathematics and science achievement,but somewhere in the middle grades they fall behind.”2 When researchers compared theperformance of fourth graders in 1995 with eighth graders in 1999, they found that the relativeperformance of eighth graders in science and math was lower then the fourth graders. 1 TIMSS- Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2007, American Society for EngineeringR also showed that US twelfth graders scored below
uniqueroute in the formation of highly directional and nanostructured materials. These structurespossess unique morphologies and are expected to allow the formation of submicron channels, ordomains, which will increase the conductivity of protons. The synthesized polymer issupramolecular because of hydrophobic / hydrophilic interactions between the sulfonatedpolyamide (hydrophilic) and the PBI (hydrophobic) segments. In Figure 1, the hydrophobic andhydrophilic regions of the polymer are shown. These polymers are expected to form “lameller” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineeringor layered structures. Also
remained fairly constant,1 though differentdepartments have increased steadily (such as Mechanical Engineering) while others have varied.The “Design4Practice,” or “D4P,” curriculum is a series of innovative undergraduate classes whichinvolve active learning laboratories for the students in each of their freshman, sophomore, junior andsenior years. The program objectives were developed in response to the call by industry forbaccalaureate engineers to possess a broader set of skills beyond their analytical and computer skills.This call was strengthened by the Engineering faculty’s observation of the students’ experiences insenior capstone design during the late 1980’s and 1990’s. These students, who had had no priorexperience with a design process
, American Society for Engineering Educationlevel accreditation criteria in the late 1980’s when it was last thought that ABET would allowdual-level accreditation in discipline. The baccalaureate degree programs remain accreditable atthe basic level today because EAC Criterion 9 says, in part, "Criteria for advanced levelprograms are completion of a program of study satisfying the general criteria for basic levelengineering programs. . ."[1]The template for all Speed School accredited programs is shown below. ACADEMIC PROGRAM TEMPLATE DIVISION OF PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL OF GENERAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING DIVISION OF
follow a curved black line on a white background • battle-bot – robots used touch sensors to stop on contact at front. See Figure 1. • basket-shooting robot – robots tossed ping-pong balls into 12” basket from 1.5’ distanceTechnical assistance is available from faculty and undergraduate students.The design competition is part of a scholarship competition, where the members of the winningteam receive a scholarship to attend Northern Arizona University. Other aspects of thescholarship competition include a presentation to parents and family about the design project andpositive contributions throughout camp.Camp LifeIn addition to classroom activities, the design challenge, and evening activities, STEP UP teachesparticipants about campus
1960s, have taken various approaches to using technology to enhance learning. One recentsystem, WeBWorK [1], was developed at the University of Rochester as a web-based interactivehomework system. The original fields were mathematics and the sciences and numerous problemsets have been developed in these areas.In the effort described in this paper, problems are being developed for the beginning class, EE188 Electric Circuits I, at Northern Arizona University. This class covers basic dc and ac circuits,and fundamentals like Ohm’s Law, Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law and Kirchhoff’s Current Law. Theemphasis is on circuit analysis, where the circuit and parameter values are given and the studentdetermines a given voltage, current, power, or other value
interdisciplinary and “newer” branches and technologies, such as bioengineering, nanotechnology, alternative energy, etc.; this coverage varies from site-to-site and is primarily at the discretion of the individual instructors. As a means of describing the course coverage, the assignments that contribute to the course grades for the students will be discussed. The assignments can be divided into four general categories; those involving (1) a laboratory activity, (2) communication skills (written and/or oral), (3) a spaghetti bridge project, and (4) the final exam. The four laboratory activities and descriptions are as follows: (a) Materials Testing Lab – using spaghetti of different thicknesses, exercises involving
same. The simplest expression of the design process is encapsulated in ETC,Express-Test-Cycle. 7 This methodology may be explained as follows: 1. Express : This phase encompasses concept generation – brainstorming, ideation, sketching, defining the problem. 2. Test : In this phase ideas generated are tested and vetted against specific criteria. 3. Cycle : New issues inevitably arise that must be addressed, requiring a return to the Express phase.Other approaches are equally valid, but ETC is useful to make the relationship between designand convergent/divergent thinking more transparent. In the Express phase, divergent thinkingdominates. When a small group of solutions arise that are deemed preferable
the students with more hands-on experienceand to challenge them by requesting the procedure for each laboratory experiment to be designedand carried out by each group of students.This senior level laboratory course consists of experiments in deformable solid mechanicsincluding stress and deflection analysis, fatigue life evaluation, stability and mechanicalvibration. Prerequisite courses for this laboratory are Mechanical Design I and MechanicalVibrations. In line with the program objectives of the department, the following list of objectiveshas been defined for this course: “Upon successful completion of this course, the students shouldhave: (1) become knowledgeable in the use of standard instrumentation for static and dynamicstructural
- ing engineer. This program at- tempts to fill the Systems Engi- neering void by educating work- ing engineers in a manner com- patible with their needs and avail- ability. It allows them to study where and when they can, what Figure 1. Systems Engineering Industrial Survey. subject matter they need, and at a cost they can accept.System Engineering
learning of machine design using MDT in a computer labsetting. The MDT is expected to have a major impact on student’s retention of classroommaterials. It has been observed by Kolb [1] that active experimentation leads to better than 90%retention of material compared to a 30% retention for reflective observations.Programming Rationale for the MDT The MDT has been developed using de facto numerical analysis software, MATLAB, bytaking advantage of its user-friendly interactive graphic user interface (GUI) and multipledocument interface capabilities. Development of the MDT using MATLAB was a meritoriouschoice for many reasons, since its versatile computational power, easy graphical user interface,and availability of numerous toolboxes have lead
theirorganizations, including: process innovation, product/service/market innovation, andbusiness model innovation. This paper highlights GOEE’s development and delivery ofthe ESIM program. IntroductionMany voices have joined in the chorus identifying “innovation” as an essentialcomponent of enterprise competitiveness and global economic growth. 1 The NationalInnovation Initiative (NII) report delivered to President Bush in December 2004, defined“innovation” as follows: “Innovation transforms insight and technology into novelproducts, processes, and services that create new value for stakeholders, drive economicgrowth and improve standards of living.” 2 The NII panel was chaired by Nick Donofrio,IBM’s Senior Vice
moment diagram for a given shear force diagram.As an example, the practice exam question pertaining to the last prerequisite skill givenimmediately above is shown in Figure 1. Which of the following moment diagrams best corresponds to the shear force diagram shown immediately below? V a) M b) M c) M d) M e) M f) M Figure 1. Practice prerequisites skills exam question on shear and moment. Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering EducationExam implementationThe first opportunity students have to take and pass the exam is during the second