laboratory components. The null hypothesis is that there existsno difference between the course grade outcomes of pre- and post- pandemic. The hypothesis hasbeen tested using Chi-square goodness of fit test at p=0.1. Engineering Economics on-campuspost-unplanned pandemic section in Spring 2020 is found to be significantly different from thepre-pandemic in Spring 2019. However, in the online section, there is no difference between thepost- and pre- because the online section is planned for virtual mode. Similar finding is reachedfor DC Circuits and Design that the post-unplanned pandemic section in Spring 2020 is found tobe significantly different from the pre-pandemic in Fall 2019; but the post-planned in Fall 2020is found to be statistically same
Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Prof. Samira M. Azarin Azarin, University of Minnesota Samira Azarin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the
to the industry with the latest technologies in their fields.Most of the instructors, however, face the challenge of teaching both non-majors and majors,sometimes even in the same classroom. The aim of this article is to discuss the main challengesand to share teaching methods that the author has used to encourage active learning andengagement among major and non-major students in an Electrical Engineering Technologyprogram. The author addresses the use of technology for teaching, the use of lecture timeeffectively, the importance of well-designed laboratory experiments, and use of simulation tools.Assessment tools have indicated that the teaching methods used have been successful in meetingthe teaching goals.Keywords: engineering education
-engineer. Here we focus on engineering design faculty as those engineers most qualifiedto carryout this effort.Themes of Design and Their Relation to Technological Literacy Instruction The multiple dimensions of technological literacy instruction (historical,economic, technical, and social) relate clearly to the central themes of engineeringdesign. Theme: Design is multidimensional Technology literacy instruction may contain Page 11.1228.3lectures on history and technical content, laboratory work involving device dissection,assembly, or even de novo construction, and complete case studies (technical, economic,social and cultural aspects). As
-engineer. Here we focus on engineering design faculty as those engineers most qualifiedto carryout this effort.Themes of Design and Their Relation to Technological Literacy Instruction The multiple dimensions of technological literacy instruction (historical,economic, technical, and social) relate clearly to the central themes of engineeringdesign. Theme: Design is multidimensional Technology literacy instruction may contain Page 11.1229.3lectures on history and technical content, laboratory work involving device dissection,assembly, or even de novo construction, and complete case studies (technical, economic,social and cultural aspects). As
2006-734: AN INTERWOVEN MULTISEMESTER DYNAMIC SYSTEMSPROJECT TO INTEGRATE STEM MATERIALPeter Avitabile, University of Massachusetts-Lowell Peter Avitabile is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department and the Director of the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. He is a Registered Professional Engineer with a BS, MS and Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering and a member of ASEE, ASME and SEM.Stephen Pennell, University of Massachusetts-Lowell Stephen Pennell is a Professor in the Mathematics Department at the University of Massachusetts Lowell.John White, University of Massachusetts-Lowell John R. White is a Professor in
of the key areas for scientific education and research atthe national level. Nationally, few universities offer courses in signal integrity (SI), and there arenone in the immediate area. Therefore, there is a critical need for signal integrity training andsupport. This is especially important in the Harrisburg metropolitan area given the highconcentration of electrical connector companies.In this paper, the authors describe the implementation of a signal integrity course that include up-to-date topics, modern laboratory experiences and speakers from industrial settings. The topicsinclude: basics of simulation tools to visualize time and frequency domain signals as well astransmission line modeling using PSPICE; introducing a Time Domain
addition to her current positions she has held various positions at the Naval Research Lab- oratory and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Filling the Pipeline By Exciting Middle School Girls with Creative ProjectsIntroduction:Despite some progress, the gender imbalance in electrical engineering and computer science inhigher education and in industry has persisted. ASEE reported that in 2016, women made up justover 20 percent of students pursuing Bachelor’s degrees in engineering, with an even smallerpercentage of women students pursuing degrees in electrical engineering (12.7%) and computerscience (12.3%) [1]. To address
designed to prepare a workforce to fill the IIoT skills gap.Central to this education network infrastructure is a remotely accessible Converged Plant-wideEthernet/IP (CPwE) hands-on lab environment that provides synchronous access to IIoTlaboratory experiences.This paper details an interdisciplinary project involving the design, development, andimplementation of a remotely accessible lab environment that integrates enterprise IT withindustrial automation and control systems (IACS) into a fully functional CPwE manufacturinginfrastructure. The CPwE laboratory environment provides a platform for students and facultyfrom ECU and regional community colleges and high schools to develop critical IIoT skillsthrough collaborative hands-on lab
created, as part ofthe software termed Virtual Mechanics Laboratory (VML). We have created VML as a unifiedvideo motion and deformation analysis tool that can be used in both dynamics and mechanics ofmaterial course projects. In the project with VML mechanics of material module, first, studentswill capture a digital video image of a plate-shaped elastic object subjected to a plane-stressloading with a high-resolution digital camera that is widely available nowadays. Subsequentlyin the computer laboratory, students will select target region of interest (ROI) to “measure” thepixel displacement and material deformation within the ROI, using the digital motion trackingalgorithm termed “Digital Image Correlation (DIC)” algorithm built in the VML
culminating in the collaborative design and fabrication ofan autonomous vehicle. Students were provided a realistic design scenario early in the course,with subsequent lecture and laboratory activities tying directly to the proposed problem.Following the submission of student design work, and demonstration of their mechatronicdevices, student learning outcomes were assessed both indirectly and directly. Indirectassessment implied both the course content and collaborative design project contributed tostudent learning. Direct assessment of student designs showed improvement from previoussemesters.IntroductionLawrence Technological University (Lawrence Tech) is engaged in a seven-year process toincorporate active and collaborative learning (ACL) and
Paper ID #16477Implementing a Challenge-Inspired Undergraduate ExperienceDr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Lecturer in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In her career, Marcia has been active in improving undergraduate education through developing problem-based laboratories to enhance experimental design skills; developing a preliminary design course focused on problem identification and market space (based on an industry partner’s protocol); and mentoring and guiding student teams through the senior design capstone course and a translational
is also active in ophthalmology research - having co-formed and currently serving as a Technical Director for the ophthalmology-based medical device design lab (ORBITLab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Anthony holds a B.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengi- neering.Dr. Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois, Chicago Miiri Kotche is a Clinical Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and currently serves as Director of the Medical Accelerator for Devices Laboratory (MAD Lab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Prior to joining the faculty at UIC, she worked in new product development for medical devices, telecommunications and consumer products. She co-teaches both bioengineering
AC 2007-1121: A FOUR-YEAR PROGRESSION OF OPEN-ENDED PROJECTS INAN UNDERGRADUATE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMDaniel Cavanagh, Bucknell UniversityJoseph Tranquillo, Bucknell UniversityDonna Ebenstein, Bucknell University Page 12.40.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Four Year Progression of Open-Ended Projects in an Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering CurriculumAbstractOne of the important instructional goals of our Biomedical Engineering Program is to providestudents with the opportunity to develop strong, independent project skills in both the classroomand the laboratory. To accomplish this goal, the Program has developed a
,physicists recognize problems of river currents and problems of headwinds and tailwinds inairplanes as involving similar mathematical principles, such as relative velocities.4 Gone are thedays when students were ham radio operators, played with Erector/LEGO sets, tinkered withelectronic kits or simply taken things apart for fun. As a result, students have less “gut intuition”and expert skills than prior generations possessed when entering the job market.5STUDIO PEDAGOGY The defining characteristics of studio classes are an integrated lecture-laboratory format, areduced amount of time allotted to lecture; a technology-enhanced learning environment,collaborative group work and a high level of faculty-student interaction. The studio
,physicists recognize problems of river currents and problems of headwinds and tailwinds inairplanes as involving similar mathematical principles, such as relative velocities.4 Gone are thedays when students were ham radio operators, played with Erector/LEGO sets, tinkered withelectronic kits or simply taken things apart for fun. As a result, students have less “gut intuition”and expert skills than prior generations possessed when entering the job market.5STUDIO PEDAGOGY The defining characteristics of studio classes are an integrated lecture-laboratory format, areduced amount of time allotted to lecture; a technology-enhanced learning environment,collaborative group work and a high level of faculty-student interaction. The studio
addressed in developing andimplementing a curriculum in nanotechnology. The list of issues is as follows: • Preparing faculty to teach in a broad based technology that is still evolving. • Industry involvement and practical experience for faculty. 1) The interdisciplinary nature of nanotechnology curriculum. 2) Arranging access to laboratory facilities. 3) Need to focus on a specific aspect of nanotechnology. 4) Outreach programs. 5) Co-op and internship arrangements aimed at real world experience for students. 6) Developing partnerships with education, industry, and government. 7) Securing resources to develop curriculum, faculty, laboratories, and appropriate technical supportFroyd, Creasy, Karaman, Teizer, and Caso [2
-onapplication of concepts learned in an academic setting is key to deep understanding, this courseserves as a capstone where concepts previously taught in several classes are integrated to givestudents an overarching view of aircraft operation, putting the theory students are taught inprevious courses into practice. In order to facilitate a learning environment and mitigate safetyissues associated with using real aircraft, two modern high performance aircraft models in theVirginia Tech Flight Simulation Laboratory are used instead of test aircraft. This allows foraccomplishment of targeted learning objectives, while alleviating operational costs, weatherconcerns, and liability and safety concerns. It also gives students the ability and opportunity
analysis of student perception data collected via an onlinesurvey embedded in the homework assignment are discussed.IntroductionInstructors have reported various ways to introduce physical or numerical hands-on experienceinto traditional lecture-based courses, either in place of or as supplements to a traditionallaboratory experience. Among the papers that are published in archival journals or presented atengineering education conferences, the following alternatives to traditional engineeringlaboratory instruction are discussed: ‚ take-home experiments1, 2, 3 ‚ laboratories integrated with lecture4, 5 ‚ distance laboratories6, 7 ‚ simulated laboratories8, 9, 10Another portion of the literature that is important to this topic
NanomaterialsWe have recently developed a one-credit course designed for first-year students considering thenew major in Microsystems and Nanomaterials Engineering. It is based on a successful“Engineering Projects” course offered through our General Engineering department, which hassubsequently been made into a popular summer program for prospective students. The goal ofthis new course, which meets two laboratory hours per week, is to expose students to several ofthe important ideas and concepts in microsystems and nanotechnology, and to give them hands-on projects that will help them learn these multidisciplinary ideas. Further, the “ulterior motive”of this course is to inspire students to stay in engineering, and to give them a flavor of
buildings,hydrogen fuel-cell systems, wind power (generator and gear train systems), waste heat, biomassfuels, wave power, tidal power, active/passive human power, nuclear and hydroelectric energy,storage technologies (battery, supercapacitors), and hands-on laboratory projects. This courseacquaints students with existing and potential ambient alternative energy sources, productioncapacities and energy harvesting, conversion, and storage techniques. Key concepts,terminology, definitions, and nomenclature common to all energy systems are introduced byusing historical traditional energy generation methods and by reviewing typical energyconsumption patterns. The course concludes with a general review of how to integrate energyharvesting technologies
first two semesters of study. Finally,conclusions, limitations, and future work are detailed.MethodsTo assess the role of contextual exercises on the manifestation of adaptive expertise and CADmodeling procedures, a series of exercises was introduced into a junior level product designcourse that uses the laboratory portion of the course for CAD instruction. PTC’s Creo Parametricprogram is used for this purpose. The first step was to establish a baseline level of adaptiveexpertise through the use of an adaptive expertise survey (AES) instrument. The instrument usedin this work was developed by Fisher and Peterson 10 and uses a 42 question, 6-point Likert-scaleto assess adaptive expertise based on four main dimensions: multiple perspective
include introduction to design, manufacturing, anddesign for manufacturing; phases of a product life cycle; product design process; introduction toengineering drawing standards and graphics; computer-aided design (CAD) modeling; andvarious manufacturing processes. The course includes "hands-on" CAD/CAM and computernumeric control (CNC) machining projects.This paper discusses experiences in designing and delivering the DFM course. Among the issuesthat had to be resolved were what topics should be included; what book or books should be used;what software should be used; what kind of laboratory experience should be included; and whatresource materials should be chosen for the course?I. IntroductionThe College of Engineering at The University of Iowa
critical final link for a thorough understanding and appreciationof scientific and engineering theories. Every possible effort should be made not to deprive thefuture engineers or educators from this vital component of their education [1]. It is thereforenecessary to continue development of effective and efficient pedagogical methods andtechniques for the engineering laboratory experience [2].Laboratory apparatus is generally expensive due to low production levels, specialized featuresand significantly higher Design Costs built into the final cost. For example, the range of cost fora typical educational fatigue testing apparatus is from $28,500 to $32,500. These units arebasically adaptations of the R. R. Moore Industrial Fatigue testing devices
Session # 3559 Virtual Labs in the Engineering Curriculum D. M. McStravick and M. K. O’Malley Both of Rice UniversityAbstractComputer simulations have been developed for use as student exercises to illustrate conceptsrequired for various engineering courses. These simulations or Virtual Labs are highly graphicaland interactive to help undergraduate students understand basic concepts by graphically solvingproblems and by visualization of real-time parametric changes. These Virtual Labs (or VL’s) canbe used productively in conjunction with existing laboratory experiments as pre-lab exercises,but the more
). Taught by engineeringfaculty, the course will include lecture, laboratory and recitation components. Using anapplication-oriented, hands-on approach, the course will address only the salient math topicsactually used in a variety of core engineering courses. These include the traditional physics,engineering mechanics, electric circuits and computer programming sequences. While the abovecore courses are traditionally reserved for the sophomore and junior years, it is proposed to movethem earlier in the curriculum, with EGR 101 as the only math prerequisite. It is finally proposedto develop a new Engineering Calculus sequence to be taught by the Math department later in thecurriculum, in concert with college and ABET requirements. By removing
, Curriculum, andLaboratory Improvement Phase II grant, awarded in 2008, have been accomplished. Theseinclude the publication of the 3rd edition of the laboratory manual in 2009,1 the development ofon-line multimedia learning materials to support student experimentation outside of theclassroom,2,3 vodcasts on measurement techniques used in individual experiments linked directlyto the lab report template,3 and the development of on-line classes for two circuits laboratorycourses.4 The first is a d.c. circuits course is designed for off-campus students and the second isa supplement to increase independent learning by students in the a.c. circuits course. Theassessment of the learning materials and evaluation of the project has been initiated.In addition
Applications Department of IEEE/IAS. He authored more than 25 refereed journal and conference publications. In 2009 he as PI received NSF-CCLI grant entitled A Mechatronics Curriculum and Packaging Automation Laboratory Facility. From 2003 through 2006, he was involved with Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL in developing direct computer control for hydrogen pow- ered automotives. He is also involved in several direct computer control and wireless process control related research projects. His interests are in the area of industrial transducer, industrial process con- trol, modeling and simulation of Mechatronics devices and systems, wireless controls, statistical process control, computer aided design and fabrication
: A Multidisciplinary Course in Mechanical Engineering Electrical EngineeringAbstractThis paper presents pedagogy and experiences in teaching system modeling and analysis as wellas feedback control systems in the engineering curriculum. The course is a requiredmultidisciplinary course to be offered at the junior level for both electrical and mechanicalengineering students. In addition, electrical engineering (EE) students and mechanicalengineering (ME) students who pursue an electrical engineering (EE) minor are required toconcurrently complete a laboratory course. But regular ME students who do not pursue an EEminor are not required to take the laboratory course. The motivation for offering thismultidisciplinary
6.815.1based interface, and existing SEM was modified to allow control of the instrument from a series Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationof remote workstations1,2. This laboratory allowed a number of students to simultaneously viewand control the image using a series of TV monitors and a large screen projector. This effort waslimited by the need to retrofit an SEM that was never designed to be operated remotely.Nevertheless, clever engineering and network development allowed the SEM to be operable byindividuals off campus using modems. The success of this classroom was widely disseminatedand the