specific altitude are compared. The error barsrepresent the average of maximum and minimum readings from the location it appears with. Total average power readings for all experiments per altitude can be seen in Table 1below. Table 1 above shows the average data collected from each altitude and the corresponding control data. The left of each group is the data from the different altitudes and right is the control. Error bars are presented as the average Max/Min of each location on the corresponding days.The location data seen on the x-axis refers to both the location itself and the correspondingcontrol data (taken at the same time), with intermittent cloud interference on the 533ft and 700ftlocation. The data ranges
community engagement programs. Participants will leavethe session with a practical action plan to implement the types of partnerships they wish to buildwith their community.1. IntroductionIn the last decade, there has been a significant increase of the number of community engagementprograms and a growth in research on these programs. As a result of this upsurge, newpublication venues have also been established, including the International Journal of ServiceLearning in Engineering (IJSLE) founded in 20041, and the new ASEE Community Engagementdivision founded in 2013.2 Related research has primarily focused on students, with particularemphasis on knowledge and skills; attitudes and identities; recruitment, retention, and diversity;and professional
University in Education Technology. Masters from Texas A&M Commerce in Engineering Technology. Currently the Facility Manager of the Texas A&M Engi- neering Innovation Center. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessment of Student Outcomes in a 48-Hour Intensive Innovation ExperienceIntroductionRecent reports (1, 2) have highlighted the need to promote development of innovativeskills and entrepreneurial mindsets among undergraduate engineering students. Thispaper will focus on a new extracurricular 48-hour weekend Intensive InnovationExperience (IIE) designed to provide teams of engineering undergraduates opportunitiesto pursue rapid development of hardware
, Page 26.328.4Helping other people, Having others working under my supervision, Having job security,Working with people rather than objects, Inventing new things, Developing new knowledge andskills, Having lots of family time, Having lots of time for myself/friends, Making my owndecisions, Having an easy job, Having an exciting job, Making use of my talents/abilities,Working in an area with lots of job opportunities. Characteristics were rated on a scale of 1 to 6,where 1 = Not at all important and 6 = Very important. (For more information on the PRiSEproject and survey methodology, see 26, 27)Occupational DataThe most recent available occupational statistics were obtained from the U. S. Bureau of LaborStatistics (BLS). These include 2013
initialparticipants, a size optimal for large group training as well as small group work with the fourmentors. Professors, academic advisors, and academic support staff were solicited for studentnominations. Due to the timing of the program funding, the request for nominations was not sentuntil the last week of the semester, resulting in 15 nominations received. Nominees were askedto complete an application and were subsequently interviewed by at least two of the mentors. Ofthe 15 nominees, 13 were invited to join the program (one student didn’t respond for aninterview and one student was graduating). Table 1 shows the demographics of the male studentcohort. Once selected, these students were asked to come to campus prior to the start of theautumn semester
least 42”, the wall which would serve as both temporary and permanent fallprotection, thereby reducing the fall from height hazard for workers installing the finish roofingsystem and rooftop HVAC equipment, as well for workers performing roofing and HVACequipment maintenance over the lifetime of the building.The empirical data that ties design with construction worker safety supports the Hierarchy ofControl model, which is one of the theoretical frameworks of occupational safety. As depictedin Figure 1, the Hierarchy of Control suggests that safety management techniques that are higheron the hierarchy are inherently more effective.20 36 When envisioning construction safetyequipment, some civil engineering faculty think of hard hats, safety
to Figure 1 and Figure 2, shown below:“A group of workers for an engineering and research collaborative in a desolate Arcticarea are updating an oil infrastructure project to meet increased demands. A Base ofOperations (BOO) [1] has been established in the area of interest and work hascommenced. Extreme weather is common and frequently disables the main powersystem, making working conditions unacceptable. Due to the importance of the projectand existing infrastructure, the project team desires an autonomous robot that canaccomplish a variety of repair, maintenance, and risk-mitigating tasks at the project sitethat are unsafe for humans to attempt.A research team at The Ohio State University has constructed a scale model of the BOOand the
offering first-year introduction to engineering subjects or through required design“cornerstone” subjects. Early project-based experiences (such as first-year, cornerstone courses)are shown to have a large impact on engineering students.1-4 In particular, they serve to enhancestudent interest in engineering, improve retention, and improve results in later courses.5,6Richardson and Dantzler noted that the retention rates of students at the University of Alabamawho take engineering courses in their first-year improve as much as 16%. There is a similarimprovement in second-year retention rates among engineering students who take a project-based course, as reported by the Gateway coalition of eight schools (Columbia, Cooper, Drexel,NJIT, Ohio State
the wheel. Gearing is two or more wheels with meshing teeth. Whenthe teeth are cut straight across the edge of the wheel parallel to the axis of rotation, it’s knownas a spur gear. These are the simplest types of gears and are used to translate rotating motion.5MethodsA simple interactive spur gear mechanism in a heart-shaped housing was chosen because itdemonstrated the iterations in the evolution of a 3D model. The model is a popular selection forstudents at the University of Florida and it can be built quickly and easily. The original 3D gearheart was posted on Thingiverse™ on February 1, 2015.6In the original model, the gears were close together and would barely turn. A subsequent modelhad the gears printed separately from the heart
encouraging and showed that EPICS could attract a more diverse studentpopulation that is traditionally drawn to engineering. The early cohorts were nearly gender-balanced with significant representation from Latino and African American students [referenceASEE 2008 and 2012 papers]. Student data showed that EPICS was having a positive impact ontheir view of STEM and engineering careers as shown in Figure 1. ProgramAbilitytoMotivate StudentstoPursueaSTEMMajor 8% ExtremelyFavorable 15% ReallyFavorable 21
category for Multidisciplinary Engineering Technology. However, considering that aproposed program includes fundamental courses in mechanical engineering technology andelectronic systems engineering technology which includes embedded electronic hardware andcontrol software, it is reasonable to say that graduates from a multidisciplinary engineeringtechnology program can be hired to work in many of the areas covered by these fields, especiallywhere the specialties intersect and require capabilities in multiple disciplines. Although detailed statistics specific to careers in engineering technology are notavailable, in general these careers will closely follow those of similar-focused engineeringcareers. Table 1 shows the growth outlook in USA
past as an indication ofthe impact of their scholarly work, increasingly print presents limited information about themuch more dynamic environments of internet based communication platforms such as Twitter,networking sites such as LinkedIn and ResearchGate, or even aggregators such as GoogleScholar.1 In the past ten years researchers have had alternative means to publicize their researchusing social media and other web based tools. A category of tools that measure impacts andstatistics of usage and viewing based on the Social Web are referred to as altmetrics.2 Altmetricspresent an alternative to journal based metrics such as impact factor, Eigenvalues, and other printbased algorithms or measures.3The basic functions of online scientific
studentsreported that the activity helped them understand the principles behind water treatment whilealso challenging their preconceived notions about water treatment technologies in the developingworld.IntroductionInductive learning has repeatedly been shown to improve learning outcomes in engineeringstudents. Inquiry-based learning is a type of inductive learning method where students are firstpresented with unanswered questions, unsolved problem, and observations withoutexplanations.1 Therefore, the student is responsible for generating questions, determining results,and formulating conclusions. These student-centered methods increase student engagement andtap into their intrinsic motivation. With these established methods in mind, the hands-on
engineering” or “disciplinary engineering” courses.2Chen (2014) also analyzed course descriptions of 2,222 non-repeated first-year engineeringcourses to identify topical key words using a revised First-Year Engineering CourseClassification Scheme2,3. On average, first-year engineering courses listed 5-6 different topics,with 8% listing only one topic and less than 1% listing twenty or more topics. The mostfrequently listed topics (not in rank order) included engineering profession, disciplines ofengineering, engineering careers, and roles and responsibilities of engineers, problem solvingskills, laboratory experiments, software tools, programming skills, Computer Aided Design(CAD), graphics, circuits, problem solving skills, basic design concepts
engineeringexperience. This paper discusses how the Robotic Mining Competition is used to providestudents with a multidisciplinary, systems engineering learning experience. Specifically, itpresents the general design process used by the University of North Dakota Robotic MiningCompetition Team. The paper also contains a discussion of how the team evolved from year toyear based on their successes and failures.IntroductionAs engineers develop more complex systems there is a need for every engineer to have at least abasic understanding of systems engineering. NASA defines systems engineering as “a robustapproach to the design, creation, and operation of systems.”1 This process involves theestablishment of a set of project objectives, creation of a set of design
mentor program will impact retention by creating a sense of belonging inthe department and at the university.Peer mentor programs have been shown to increase both (1) levels of student success during thetransition to higher education and (2) the likelihood of students identifying with the universitycommunity. In an effort to help new students feel included, the Department of MechanicalEngineering at the University of Utah has implemented a peer mentor program to serve allstudents new to the major, including incoming first-year and transfer students. The programdistinguishes itself from similar peer mentor programs in several ways. First, the program isadministered by the mechanical engineering department and services only mechanicalengineering
, policies, teaching methods, and learningobjectives across the courses to facilitate students’ computational competencies and technicalcontent knowledge across the targeted course sequence.The revisions to the MatSE undergraduate curriculum were guided by two curriculum and coursereform aims: (1) integrating computational materials modeling in sophomore and junior-levelcore courses and (2) developing a capstone senior materials modeling elective. The integrationof computational materials with technical content took place in MSE 201, MSE 206, MSE 304,and MSE 406, each of which has 100+ students enrolled each semester. Together, these coursesspan three broad areas of materials science: mechanics, thermodynamics, and electronicproperties. The
activity that addresses these challenges.Graphical Statics refers to methods that are based on the graphical method of adding vectors e.g.,force and position, to solve two-dimensional Statics problems. The aims of the paper are asfollows (1) to discuss how Graphical Statics fits into the context and criteria of active learningbased on definitions and existing research in the literature; (2) to review the fundamentaltechniques of graphical statics, including force triangles and funicular polygons; (3) to outline aseries/progression of concepts, in the order they appear in Statics curriculum, that can be solvedusing graphical techniques; and (4) to explore how the specific effects of these activities can beassessed.Active LearningActive learning is
SCI is a ten-week domestic research program in which sophomore and juniorstudents complete quantum-related research internships with faculty at an urban university.This study is timely given that science and engineering (S&E) research is an increasinglyinternational effort. In its 2015 Science Indicators, the most recent year available, the NationalScience Board noted that 33% of science and engineering papers published in the U.S. in 2013were internationally coauthored; at the same time international citations among papers by U.S.authors increased from 43% to 53% between 1996 – 2012 [1]. This shows the increasingimportance of international research and collaborations for science & engineering researchers inthe U.S. Furthermore, in
-unitcourse, spans over sixty-eight class periods of forty-five minutes each, including lectures, labs,and final exam, all delivered within three weeks. This course was taught by the three authors ofthis paper in Fall 2016, Fall 2017, and Summer 2019 respectively. In order to overcome theabove-mentioned challenges, namely inadequate academic readiness, language barrier, lack ofmotivation, and condensed course schedule, the authors developed a learn-by-doing approach toengage students learning and motivate them for the continuing courses in the IoT curriculum.Overview of Course The major teaching objectives of this course are listed below:1. Introduce students to the basic concepts behind the Internet of Things (IoT) including history
Economic Forum published a report on how workforce dynamics will changeover the next five years, including what skillsets will be most important for employees to have. 1Table 1 below illustrates this change by comparing the current top three skills, identified in a2015 survey, with research-supported predictions for 2020. While complex problem solving willremain a necessary skill, critical or systems thinking and creativity will both become more andmore important in solving complex system problems. As new technologies transform industries,these skills will enable the mental flexibility needed to interact with increasingly complexsystems. Table 1: Top Three Skills for Employees1 In 2015
based on the real-time data from the devices(DEVS models simulation representation).This cloud-manufacturing environment is fully functional and will allow to use this examplefor research and education of postgraduate students and industry clients and forunderstanding the important trends in future manufacturing. IntroductionOne of the most ambitious and distinctive international future manufacturing projects is theGerman Government program Industry 4.0 [4]. As a part of its long term strategy, the mostimportant expected project achievement is the development of next generation cyber-physical systems, M2M communications based on real data analysis, cloud basedengineering [1] and manufacturing environments. Despite the positive outcomes of
-effective.1 That which seems lacking in all thepresently described design paradigms is reference to the value system of the designer. Thereseems no place for questioning the designer’s bias or prejudice. Is the designer open-minded?Nor does it seem possible to ask the following question—am I all right with going forward orcan I state that I cannot do this kind of work anymore. Lastly the question of impact on the Earthand all that entails seems vague at best, at least from my perspective.A recent conference on climate change cautioned against overuse of generalizations about tribesbut acknowledged common issues and priorities.2 Two characteristics fundamental to indigenouspeople grow out of their place-based values: their close relationship with
by Wicklein, the primary reasons are “inadequateunderstanding by school administrators and counselors concerning technology education,inadequate understanding by the general populace concerning technology education, and lackof consensus of curriculum content for technology education”1. These concerns were ranked #2, # 3, and # 4 in a research finding among technology educators2. Likewise, in a recent surveyamong prospective employers, 30% of 250 respondents did not have any awareness about theengineering technology program and one-third of those who claimed to have awareness aboutthe program could not distinguish the difference between the work performed by the engineersto the work performed by the engineering technologist accurately3. This
interesting, to face prioritization of certainfabrication techniques that appear to them more exotic in the context of their prior education.Nanotechnology ModulesA new nanotechnology module was implemented by Dr. Koshka in ECE 4293-01/ 6293-01,Nano-electronics in the spring 2015 semester. This split-level technical elective was populatedby 1 graduate and 8 undergraduate students. The Medici 2D Device Simulator from Synopsiswas used in 2014 to develop templates of simulation scripts for modeling performance of micro-/nano-electronic devices to be covered in this class. In this course, limited-scope simulationassignments were given to the students as an experiment. Such assignments were not present inthe previous offerings of this course. Graduate
groupactivity. Students learned about the various steps of the engineering design process through aguided activity. Students were introduced to the concept of constraints and limitations whenasked to build a tower of a specific height that could hold a certain weight. They utilizedinformation from Physical Science in deciding what type of structure would allow them to havesuccess in their design.Cardboard Roadways Activity: During the unit on Force and Motion, students worked in groupsof 3-5 to design a roadway that would allow a small die cast car to remain in motion for 10seconds and not run over their track by more than 1 foot. Students were first introduced to theactivity following the first few classes on force and motion, then as their knowledge
of a business model to support a sustainable fundingmechanism, and some accomplishments.IntroductionAmerica must ensure that our citizens have access to high quality and affordable educational,learning, and training opportunities throughout their lives.1 Today’s students and tomorrow’sgraduates are likely to value access to lifelong learning opportunities more highly than jobsecurity, which will be elusive in any event. They understand that in the turbulent world of aknowledge economy, characterized by outsourcing and offshoring to a global workforce,employees are only one paycheck away from the unemployment line unless they commit tocontinuous learning and re–skilling to adapt to changing work requirements.2One vision of the evolving need
group of students. These students further developed themechanical, electrical, and computer designs this past summer (2015), combining the bestaspects of the two prototype designs. These students will construct two bike racks (spring 2016)for implementation. We intend to place one bike rack on campus and the other in downtownYork when they are complete.1. IntroductionFrom their inceptions, the York College of Pennsylvania Mechanical, Electrical, and ComputerEngineering Programs have always prided themselves on being “hands-on” engineeringprograms. Lab experiences are used heavily throughout the academic curricula to reinforcelecture material, and all students are required to complete three separate terms of co-opexperience as a graduation
understand certain important concepts in the fluid and thermal sciences. Theinitial stage of this development consists of eight exercises that were identified by the authors asdifficult concepts for the mechanical engineering technology students at Penn State Erie - TheBehrend College in thermodynamics, heat transfer and fluid power. Some of these exerciseshave a basis in a previous project by Gerald Recktenwald and Robert Edwards (Engineering ofEveryday Things (EET))1 which had a focus on laboratory exercises. Since these are for use in aclassroom, the existing exercises needed to be scaled back in both size and duration. Others arenew to this project. The overall project is in the early stages. Some of the exercises are welldeveloped with only a
Foundataion as a Program Director in the Division of Undergraduate Education from January 2007 through August 2009. Prior to her appointment as Associate Dean, Dr. Sorby served as chair of the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Michigan Tech. She received a B.S. in Civil Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, all from Michigan Tech. Dr. Sorby has a well-established research program in spatial visualization and is actively involved in the development of various educational programs.Dr. Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mary A. Sadowski has been at Purdue since 2003 and until September 1, 2011 served as the Associate Dean for