of ASME, SIAM, ASEE, and AGU. He is actively involved in CELT activities and regularly participates and presents at the Lilly Conference. He has been the recipient of several Faculty Learning Community awards. He is also very active in assessment activities and has presented more than thirty five papers at various assessment institutes. His posters in the areas of assessment, Bloom’s Taxonomy, and Socratic Inquisition have received widespread acclaim from several scholars in the area of cogni- tive science and educational methodologies. He has received the Assessment of Critical Thinking Award twice and is currently working towards incorporating writing assignments that enhance students’ critical thinking
, evaluateprogress, advocate for their well-being, and connect them with relevant resources. They helpgraduate students navigate their programs and achieve their academic and career goals byoffering support, encouragement, and constructive feedback. This is why it is essential tocomprehend their opinion of the GRE as a graduate school application component for MS/Ph.D.programs.BackgroundNearly all studies on the GRE as an admissions component have focused on its predictivevalidity for graduate students’ success in terms of grades, time to degree completion, advisorrating, and peer-review publication ratings, among other graduate student success metrics.Kileger et al. [3] adopted a multivariate approach to measuring the predictive validity of the GREand
array of take-home lab experiments, including a ball and beam. Seehttps://thl.okstate.edu/index.htm The labs are intended to be thoroughly documented, enabling astudent to complete the experiment without the support of a teaching assistant. Control is doneusing MATLAB and Simulink tools so that student do not have to write code using C or Python.An image of the ball on beam experiment is shown in figure 1, showing its 3D printed base andbeam.Figure 1Ball and beam experiment from Take Home labs site at Oklahoma state https://thl.okstate.edu/SoftwareFiles.htmlMorimoto [4] developed a low-cost haptic handle kit that provides force feedback, engaging thelearner’s sense of touch. The kit, however, required 3D printing of parts. Many students may
addition to being the Faculty Advisor for the Women in Computer Science (WiCS), Director of the Computer Science Fellows program, and the Co- Director for the Technology Entrepreneurship Initiative at Baylor. She is the co-PI on a series of grants from the Kern Family Foundation, and a KEEN Fellow. She has authored and co-authored over sixty peer- reviewed papers.Bradley R Norris BRADLEY NORRIS MSM, Director of the Center for Technology Entrepreneurship As Director of the Center for Technology Entrepreneurship, Nr. Norris serves as a cross campus liaison for the Lab-To-Market Collaborative, Baylor University’s unique approach to technology commercialization. Additionally, Mr. Norris serves as faculty in the
. Tori’s undergraduate focus on Sociology and Applied Physics allows her to easily translate between technical and non-technical team members. Tori obtained an MBA from the University of Texas and is a continued advocate of increasing the number of women in STEM careers.Teresa L. Larkin (Associate Professor of Physics Education) Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Combined Plan Dual-degree Engineering Program at American University. Dr. Larkin conducts educational research and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a
between 2019 to 2021 for both African American • Provide methods of scaffolding for students who are and Hispanic students. With this data, we identified an area struggling by providing resources like tutoring, success where our instruction can improve to better support students studio, and peer mentoring. of color.C. Data TABLE III The data collected show students by major in Computer CS I AND CS II PASS RATES BY TRANSFER STATUSScience, Computer Networking, Applied Mathematics, Cyber-security, and Engineering. The sample size N
very helpful, especially when you're going to another country that you're not reallyaware of what it will look like, they covered, race, different, cultural aspects that you wouldn'tthink about.”Data collected on an embedded program traveling to New Zealand were collected throughstudent reflections published on self-created websites. A selection of student responses to theprompts is shared below.What impact did this experience have on you personally (e.g., growth and cultural humility) andprofessionally (skills and strengths improved)? “I grew more confident in writing and speaking in a more professional manner as a result of the various presentations and writing assignments. I am not embarrassed to ask questions or to
toinvestigate if the students in the experimental group benefited from completing the project.In Soil Mechanics, the term group project was used to assess the students' ability to apply theknowledge gained from the first seven of the eight course modules to solve a real-life problem.The CATME tool - developed and licensed by Purdue University, was used to form teams basedon different criteria such as GPA, preferred schedule, software skills, writing skills, leadershippreferences, commitment level, and big-picture/detail-oriented thought process. The project hadthree phases. In the last phase, the groups had the option to submit the final deliverable in theform of a written report or an oral video presentation.In Principles of Construction I, students
E G E G E G Exploratory, define need Force and Equilibrium Concept design Analysis Tensile testing Testing/final report* Note: Other topics (MATLAB, company visits, communication skills {report writing}, etc) must be included ineach lecture.Project factor 9 requires that professors, instructors, teaching assistants, and peer teachers arecomfortable with material required for the project. Although it might be expected that theinstructors would recognize connections
E G E G E G Exploratory, define need Force and Equilibrium Concept design Analysis Tensile testing Testing/final report* Note: Other topics (MATLAB, company visits, communication skills {report writing}, etc) must be included ineach lecture.Project factor 9 requires that professors, instructors, teaching assistants, and peer teachers arecomfortable with material required for the project. Although it might be expected that theinstructors would recognize connections
sit through a lecture on basic circuits as a mechanicalengineer if you know that next week the topic will be forces and mechanical work. Similarly,visiting a potential employer site which employs many or all of the disciplines in the coursemakes it easier for students to envision how the skills they are developing will interface withthose of their peers in another discipline and how all the disciplines work together to developengineered solutions.One way that was simple to communicate which content “belongs” to a discipline was to usecolor codes on the schedule to show what activities/lessons apply to all disciplines(communications, ethics, engineering design process, etc.) and which are more specificallyfocused on a given discipline
at a level acrossthe college or above level, but they will also include students from your units/majors.What do these groups do? What are their goals? Often the students don’t know. They just jointhe group to be with their peers and see what will happen. While a well established group mightbe self-sustaining, most of these groups do need an advisor to help guide them.[4] Generically,the advisors job is to guide them to meet the goals of the group (e.g., to learn about theprofession of chemical engineering, to honor strong academic performance and perform serviceback to the community, or to provide a place for different cultural or affinity students to be withtheir peers). However, it is often the advisor that directly or indirectly has a
partially during a face-to-face class meeting. The guided practice assignment at thebeginning of this module used the following resources: Section 2.1 “The heat conductionequation”, Section 2.2 “Steady heat conduction in a slab: method”, Section 4.1 “The well-posedproblem”, and Section 4.2 “General solution of the heat conduction equation” from A HeatTransfer Textbook, and the CU screencast video “Heat Equation Derivation.” The group activityportion of Module 3 took place during a face-to-face class meeting. Two conceptual questionsfrom the CU ConcepTests were posed and discussed following a Peer Instruction model [38].Additionally, students worked together to complete two problems.The work for Module 4 (Temperature Profiles) was completed entirely
misunderstanding of the difficulties for them to engage material due to no real ● Set schedule challenging to interaction follow by students that have ● Students may feel isolated demands at work and home and less happy without the interaction with their peers and professorThis table shows some general differences between these two approaches. However, there areseveral additional variables to consider before determining which of the two systems is better fora specific course. Some of these complex
wastried and guide them to discover the solution.Here are several examples of the typical problem-solving scenario given to the students whereeach lab created a simulation of a real-world cybersecurity event: ● Extracted and analyzed malware from a binary image using opensource forensic tools. It was the infamous WannaCry ransomware that affected over 200,000 computers in 2017. ● Found a famous fugitive, John McAfee, by extracting coordinates from pictures taken of him while on the lam in Central America. [5] ● Created an encryption and decryption C program for one assignment and have it be continuously bombarded with garbage data to see if any security vulnerabilities exist. If so, students learn how to write more secure
identification through an adapted entrepreneurship framework [7]. The lecture taught problem-centric design with an emphasis on choosing a market, identifying relevant problems, and developing a solution aligned with the competencies of the group. 2. All groups (MTE, ME, ECE) also participated in a field experience to the fourth-year capstone symposia. These are public events in which engineering students present their final designs at the conclusion of their capstone design projects. Visiting the symposia was intended to provide the third-year students with an opportunity to practice applying the need finding strategies by looking critically at the work of their older peers in the program. 3. Two
classroom [21]. At Canisus College in New York, Bordonaro andRichardson collaborated to embed a librarian in an undergraduate education course. They foundthat through the embedded information literacy assignments, several types of scaffoldingoccurred including: peer to peer, librarian and professor to student, library and professor to eachother and external education professionals to student [22]. As students worked through theassignments, they gained experience using information literacy skills in the discipline.MethodologyFollowing full implementation of the flipped information literacy lesson in fall 2017, theresearch team began to discuss methods to improve the quality of student bibliographies on thefinal report assignment. In the initial
speaks to our effortto help improve the quality and rigor of the research in the fieldis the conducting research section. In this section, we haveguides for writing research questions, choosing an evaluationinstrument, and reporting on activities. We have heard lots ofpositive response from the various guides on this part of thesite and there are conferences that are pointing to them intheir guides for authors submitting to the conference as a wayto help them ensure the quality of the papers they aresubmitting. However, the part of the site that is most importantto the work we are discussing today is the article summaries. 9 Articles Inclusion Criteria (https
module’s activities were shared. Each senior was required to present a brief (3-5 minute),informal update on their consulting project with a minimum of three (3) PowerPoint slides addressingtheir progress/status against milestones with the subset of seniors participating in the is modulefortnightly. The assignments included an initial presentation of the project scope, deliverables, andtimeline (Gantt chart) for all key project milestones. These regular activities assured that the clientneeds would be well understood by not only the consultant involved, but all of the seniors participatingin the module. They were then able to gauge how well they were progressing compared with theircolleagues. The peer to peer interaction was encouraged and
transferring to a four-year university. In addition to allowing students to participate in the program as part-time interns,the group setting wherein students work with their peers and faculty they know will give studentsthe supportive learning environment needed to succeed in their first internship experience. Acollaborative learning environment has been shown to positively impact minority students—improving cognitive development [9] and reducing students’ feeling of isolation [10]. The 2017ASPIRES Group Research Internship program consists of six research groups.This paper focuses on the work done by the ASPIRES Mechanical Engineering group consistingof 5 community college mechanical engineering students, led by two mechanical engineeringsenior
tenured full professor. CSULB is a teaching-intensive institution and thus, he has taught classes at different levels from introduction to programming and data structures; to junior level classes in database design; senior level classes on database, web development, and senior projects; and finally to graduate classes in database systems. In 2014, Dr. Monge joined a team at Google that created NCWIT’s EngageCSEdu, an online living col- lection of peer-reviewed teaching instruments that use research-based techniques that retain and engage students, particularly effective in broadening participation in computing. Dr. Monge’s research inter- ests have evolved over time. Through his participation in an NSF sponsored
they finish at the end ofthe 3rd year, but the opportunity does exist. The new found independence from classes incombination with the daunting task of writing a dissertation often leaves the third yearstudents lost again. Students typically have a hard time defining the research in theirdissertation and getting started.The Third Year (and Beyond) StudentYou made is through two years, now is the tough part. By the third year you have shouldbe a fairly independent researcher. At this point you need to start working on yourdissertation. (Your own research problem and solution.) If your advisor is nice he/shewill help you get started by working with you to lay out your dissertation, but this is notalways the case. If your advisor doesn’t sit down
in an active laboratory experience.5 Both senior projectswere designed to give undergraduate students an opportunity to introduce and experience amultidisciplinary research project, which is common to the fields of MEMS and BioMEMS. Page 13.1042.3Furthermore, team projects provided an opportunity for peer learning, teaching, and tutoring aswell as expository instruction from faculty members.II. Typical project structureA typical senior project in BioMEMS consists of three quarters, and an additional fourth quarteras an advanced optional research during the following summer. Throughout the course of theirprojects, senior students are required to
indicated they didn’t learnanything from writing the paper. The responses to the remaining statements are onaverage 0.22 lower than seven-semester average indicated in Table 4. Further, for thelast seven responses related to the solar still project there is an 11% negative response(disagree or strongly disagree) compare to a 3.5% negative response indicated in theseven-semester average in Table 4. ConclusionsA six-week long team project (design, build and test a solar still) conducted in asophomore design course has been described. While the individual performances for thestills were quite varied, the average performance of the eight stills was very close to the Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE
-visual aids, Power Point Presentations, Tutorials, Problem-solving sessions, written research reports, peer group discussions, etc.) to communicate with students who may prefer to have different learning styles. The author also recommends that students utilize the resources that are readily available at the university, such as Library. Writing Center, etc. Figure 1 shows the four important components of assessment. Appendix A shows the rubrics that were used to carry out assessment. The author used a rubric that is very much similar to Washington State University’s Critical Thinking Rubric while administering grading. The data obtained was tabulated using a Likert Scale. The author has collected data
of citation and referencing, and be willing to compromise overdifferences in writing practices.” 12 However, we tend to disagree with the statement thatacademic institutions need to compromise on academic integrity due to cultural Page 14.1296.7difference. When in Rome, do as the Roman’s do.The topmost priority of every University should be to maintain the academic integrity ofthe institution. Plagiarism has been around for many centuries. What is new is the methodused in “accomplishing” plagiarism – it keeps changing with the ages and keeps evolvingwith technology. Advances of technology in general and the internet specifically havecreated a
knowledge usedthroughout history, why must modern students earn college degrees to become practicingengineers?” “Describe the engineering job that is of most interest to you. Explain why this job is of interest.”Short essay assignments were graded on a scale of 0 to 10; students were given the grading rubric inadvance, and they knew the grading scheme. Zero to one point was awarded for submittingassignments on time with proper headers, identifications, and word counts. Zero to three pointswere awarded for use of college-level writing; zero to three points were awarded on the basis ofhow well essays summarized what the speaker said; and zero to three points were awarded on thebasis of how well students responded to the prompt. On writing skill
end of this more in depth discussion, afew students were asked to rephrase what was discussed. If they could not make the links ormissed a concept, they were teamed up with another student and received peer help. The varioussteps of knowledge and links between concepts in this topic were as follows: Step 1: Lime (Ca(OH)2) is a base. Linkage 1: Addition of lime raises the pH. Step 2: Carbonates in water occur in various species (e.g., H2CO3, HCO3- and CO32-) Linkage 2: Raising the pH causes CO32- to be the dominant species. Step 3: Precipitation of CaCO3 is based on solubility where the product of concentrations of Ca and CO32- is always a constant. Linkage 3: When CO32- becomes
school and college programs.Ms. Amee Hennig, University of Arizona Amee Hennig has her B.S. in physics and creative writing from the University of Arkansas as well as her M.A. in professional writing from Northern Arizona University. She oversees the education and outreach activities for the Center for Integrated Access Networks based out of the College of Optical Sciences at the University of Arizona. At the University of Arizona she manages a number of summer programs for Native American students and educators.Daniel Lamoreaux, University of Arizona Daniel Lamoreaux is a current doctoral candidate in the University of Arizona’s School Psychology pro- gram. While working as a graduate assistant for the education
California, Santa Barbara. Dr. Zhao joined CSU faculty in 2004. He is currently serving as the director of the Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, and the Chair of the Graduate Program Committee in the Department of EECS, the ABET coordinator for the BS in Computer Science Program, and a member of the faculty senate at CSU. Dr. Zhao has authored a research monograph titled: ”Building Dependable Distributed Systems” published by Scrivener Publishing, an imprint of John Wiley and Sons. Furthermore, Dr. Zhao published over 150 peer-reviewed papers on fault tolerant and dependable systems (three of them won the best paper award), computer vision and motion analysis, physics, and education. Dr. Zhao’s research is