approach has increased student performance and satisfaction.Introduction Universities face an increasing interest in providing students with recorded class material because today’s students expect to have 24/7 access to online learning materialsfrom anywhere at any time [1]. “Millennial” students see technology integration in highereducation as a key component of their learning environment because they have grown up usingtechnology in every facet of their lives [ 2] . The use of lecture capture technology has the potential to fundamentally change the way instructors and students interact in the classroom [3],[4],[5] . It also has the potential to change the classroom environment and therelationship between instructors and students by
promotingcritical thinking and real-world application compared to traditional methods. Students also recognizedGenAI as both a valuable learning tool and a potential risk to academic integrity. These findingscontribute to the ongoing discourse on adapting higher education to the challenges and opportunitiespresented by GenAI, ensuring assessments remain relevant and effective in fostering meaningfullearning outcomes.1. IntroductionThe role of assessments in higher education is fundamental to evaluating student learning, fosteringcritical thinking, and preparing learners for real-world challenges. Traditional assessment methods—such as homework essays, and problem sets—have long been regarded as the cornerstone of educationalevaluation. However, as
seeking to contribute to or construct engineering work. In thispaper, we describe our new project through which we hope to contribute to the scholarshipthat explores the ways that race and culture, broadly, play in or influence the socialconstruction of science or engineering knowledge by exploring the experiences ofundergraduate Black men participating in science or engineering project teams. Ourinvestigation is guided by the following research questions: 1) How do undergraduate Black men experience academic socialization vis-à-vis the development of professional identity and discursive literacy through their participation on engineering student teams? and, 2) How does the intersection of race and gender experienced by
system willrecalculate the reactions instantly. In the figure there are representative shapes of different loadtypes (i.e. uniformly distributed, distributed with increasing or decreasing rates, etc.). The beam isgraduated and allows to incorporate the point of application of the force based on the type of load.The five concepts covered in the course include: 1. Basic Forces and reactions as shown in figure 1, loads could be placed at any point on the red beam at different locations, the reactions at both ends of the beam will be displayed in the x & y directions. Figure 1, loading a beam with different distributed loads shown in black. Figure 2, Arduino controller is used to process the load sensors at the support points.2
have an improvement on the problems assigned. Hopefully,the XX program can find companies to sponsor these and give us [projects].” Anotherechoed this sentiment with a “Desperate need for a better/more industry relatedcapstone.” Finally, one chimed in with an instructive comment, “Make Capstone moretechnical.”Figure 1. First generation capstone project model.It was clear that not having real-world cases of applied engineering problems was ademotivating factor for the seniors. There was a need to improve the capstone projectexperience, especially, the need for industry engagement and a better advising structure.ABET Looking at the learning outcomes that ABET requires, we had room forimprovement in demonstrating student mastery in the
“to advance the human condition and thus serve society” [1]. Engineers are in ourevery day lives from the homes we live in, the technology we use daily and the healthcare weengage in. The National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) has developed a code ofethics for engineers to follow. As part of the code of ethics, NSPE Code of Ethics, afundamental canon is to “hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public [2].” Inorder to satisfy or abide by this canon, I propose that engineering students must be civicallyengaged and as such it should be embedded into the engineering curriculum.Civic Engagement in Engineering“Civic Engagement involves working to make a difference in the civic life of one’s communityand developing the
success of thecommunity-developed water supply system project, through the ingenuity of engineers,community support, and grant resources, presents a model that the analysis will show as anoutcome, a solution that will benefit the community and align with a course of study for tertiaryeducation.BackgroundWater is essential for life, and the United Nations recognizes its access as a human right [1].Marginalized groups are disadvantaged by not having access to the precious commodity. Anestablished water authority with the requisite technology and expertise can assist conventionalpractices for developing water supply, which will include the operation and maintenance of thesystem. Worldwide, the aim is to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs
project takes a structured approach toinstitutional transformation. By following Kotter’s eight steps, this effort drives momentum, andfosters change in engineering education. Using KCM ensures that each phase of the initiative,from planning to execution, is supported by strong leadership and clear communication, whichare critical for overcoming resistance and maintaining progress.The project is structured around three primary goals: (1) establish a sustainable network forcollaboration among faculty and institutions, (2) create a replicable model for interventions andlearning strategies to address multi-disciplinary academic preparation barriers to pursuingengineering degrees, and (3) improve the equitable attainment of engineering degrees
greater integration, it is also important to understand 1) How well versed instructorsare with AI in terms of literacy and 2) what methods they employ in utilizing AI in their lessons.Despite the promising potential that AI continues to deliver, there is a knowledge gap regardinguniversity educators' perception of AI within the TPACK framework. Specifically, regardingtheir AI literacy and how it shapes their pedagogical approaches to higher education. Existingstudies on AI integration within the TPACK framework have largely employed quantitativemethodologies, focusing on self-reported competencies. (Celik, 2022).However, being more of a confidence indicator, these studies do not highlight the nuancedexperiences, challenges and pedagogical shifts
Structure, Student Experience, Academic/Faculty Roles, Cultural norms, Engineeringglobalization.Introduction and ContextEngineering provides solutions crucial to human well-being and societal growth. Despiteremarkable advancements, engineers continuously learn from past failures, emphasizing the needfor education that extends beyond technical expertise. The Hatfield rail crash in 2000 exemplifiesthe devastating consequences of engineering management and execution errors [1]. Similarly, the2019 Keystone Dam incident highlights the importance of a broader understanding ofenvironmental factors in engineering decisions [2].As Vyas [3] stated, engineering disasters often result from a complex interplay of design flaws,underestimations, and insufficient
universities. Such alternative approachesmay include a nudge-focused approach.theory and research questionThe nudge theory postulates that we can guide people’s decision making and behavior in aparticular direction by shaping the decision environment, a.k.a., the choice architecture [1].Using this theory, we attempted to achieve high replicability and cost effectiveness as well astheoretical and methodological relevance. Thus, the present study investigated if the introductionof an online, immutable records data management platform would induce positive changesamong graduate-level engineering students and/or science labs in terms of ethical understanding,ethical behavior in a research lab setting, and the choice architecture in which they were
throughgraduate students. Team members may have participated in VIP for one semester or up to threeor more semesters. The VIP model enables tiered mentoring, from faculty to graduate students,graduate students to undergraduates, and more senior to newer students [1]. The goals of UofM’sVIP program are to: (1) help build a more inclusive research culture; and (2) help students buildSTEM identity, as well as self-efficacy, mindset, and intentions to stay in engineering. The firstgoal is based on research about the positive impact of active learning and mentoring forrecruiting and retaining women and other historically excluded groups in STEM [2]. The secondgoal builds on previous work on mentoring and community building on STEM Identity, whileextending
groupproblem solving. Preliminary results show students are engaged: students are explaining their homeworkproblem solutions to peers, working on teams on homework problem sets, manipulating thephysical models (with guidance) in class. All students completed team contracts and engagedwith their teams effectively to submit assignments. Initial results from graded homeworkproblems indicate that students are confident in their knowledge to complete the problems andin their ability to solve similar problems in the future. Challenges to implementing theseinstructional approaches include timing of class activities, specifically the amount of time thatstudents took to work with the physical models.1. IntroductionStatics is one of several sophomore level
included to highlightthe accreditation and structural organization variances.INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUNDAll construction degree programs include the core curriculum courses as a part of the degreerequirements defined by the state, regional accreditation, and professional accreditationprocedures. Among these core curriculum courses, the mathematics and physics requirementsmay vary based on the type of professional accreditation and be influenced by the historicaldevelopment of the program.Construction is a multi-disciplinary and application-oriented discipline that is recognized bymultiple accreditation agencies, including the American Council for Construction Education(ACCE) [1] and ABET (under engineering, technology, and applied science
usemodern engineering tools is best accomplished by reinforcing skills throughout the four-yearcurriculum. But this is challenging in practice, as engineering courses are already packed withessential technical material and any encumbrance to delivering this material is unwelcome. Theclassical mechanics course (Dynamics) described in this paper is an effort to satisfy theconflicting goals of building technical skills using engineering tools while maintainingtheoretical content.The use of numerical simulation is not unique to the course described here. Quoting from [1]“Computational tools are necessary to prevent unnecessary mistakes when solving problems inclassical mechanics”. In a dynamics course offered by Kurt M DeGoede of Elizabethtown College
case studies to give the technical content appropriate context.This paper is intended to stimulate discussion in an innovative approach to the development ofskeleton notes that incorporate the following key characteristics: 1. The handouts consolidate the technical material into a single unified and concise message. Multiple streams of information (lecture, supplementary handouts, slides, reading assignments) are avoided; the handouts are complementary with and integrated into the oral lecture. Discussion of the underlying concepts accompanies the detailed technical content. 2. The handouts are hand-written (on a tablet computer), highly graphic, colorful, and even “cartoonish” in
their thinking, and respond to support their disciplinary work.Describing this approach in science classrooms, Hammer, Goldberg, and Fargason write:1 “A responsive approach [to teaching]… is to adapt and discover instructional objectives responsively to student thinking. The first part of a lesson elicits students’ generative engagement around some provocative task or situation (or, perhaps, by discovering its spontaneous emergence). From there, the teacher’s role is to support that engagement and attend to it — watch and listen to the students’ thinking, form a sense of what they are doing, and in this way identify productive beginnings of scientific thinking.” (p. 55)There are several proposed
Transformation Guided by a Multi-Frame Organizational Analysis ApproachAbstractThe goal of an ongoing institutional transformation project (NSF ADVANCE #1209115) at alarge private university (hereafter referred to as LPU) is to increase the representation andadvancement of women STEM faculty widely by removing barriers to resources that supportcareer success and by creating new interventions and resources. An additional goal is to adaptinterventions to address the needs of key subpopulations classified by ethnicity or hearing status.The work of the project, which began in 2012, is to: 1) refine and strengthen targetedinstitutional structures; 2) improve the quality of women faculty’s work lives; 3) aligninstitutional
requires practical andrelevant training. Historically, there has been concern that graduate students, especially in thescience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, were not receiving adequate trainingto prepare them to teach as graduate students and as future faculty.1, 2, 3, 4 However, more recentresearch has shown that when engineering graduate students receive instructional training, theyare more likely to use teaching methods to engage undergraduate students.5, 6 For instance,Lattuca, Bergom & Knight (2014) found a modest correlation between engineering faculty whoreceived training on student-centered teaching methods as graduate students and the likelihoodthat they will use these pedagogies as faculty as opposed to more
Page 26.1110.2(described more fully below) include: (1) Arduino-based air quality monitoring; (2)Arduino-based water quality monitoring; (3) Arduino-based GPS wildlife (dog) tracking;(4) hydroelectric power generation; (5) helium balloon-based aerial photography, and an(6) open source research submarine. This paper has two key sections. First, we describe the idea of Commons-based PeerProduction. It is likely that many readers in Engineering or those with an interest inMaking, Makerspaces or Maker-networks will not be familiar with this concept, except ifwe say that collaborative editing of Wikipedia is a well known example of thisphenomenon. It is also the foundation that the “Maker” phenomenon is grounded upon.In this section we also
Research Council reviews of technology education content stan- dards developed by the International Technology Education Association. He has degrees in biology and journalism. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Engineering Technician and Technologist WorkforceIntroductionCalls to expand and improve the quality of the U.S. technical workforce have been made in oneform or another for decades. Over the last 10 years, and particularly since the economicdownturn that began in 2008, the urgency of these concerns has grown.e.g., 1 A key worry,expressed by both policy makers and corporate leaders, is that the nation’s status as a worldleader of innovation is slipping. In fact, by some
, the scholarship of teaching and learn- ing, mentorship models for undergraduate and graduate students, and professional support of all students, with special emphasis for those from underrepresented backgrounds in STEM and beyond. She has en- joyed collaborations with colleagues from multidisciplinary backgrounds toward solving special chal- lenges in teaching and learning. Her ongoing collaborations analyze 1) the experiences of participants in STEM professional development programs for retention and success in academia and 2) similarities, differences, and gaps in the expectations of STEM faculty and students toward successful undergraduate course completion.Ms. Shawnisha Shont´e Hester, University of Maryland
for Engineering Education, 2015 Comparing Organizational Structures: Two Case Studies of Engineering CompaniesIntroduction“Design is what engineers do, and the intelligent and thoughtful decision of the engineeringcurriculum should be the community’s first allegiance [1].” Yet, we find that engineering designonly underpins a small selection of undergraduate courses in a typical engineering curriculum;diminishing the importance of the activity in engineering education. Comparatively, design is aubiquitous activity in engineering company settings—the foundational work driving much of theactivity being conducted by professional engineers. We posit that understanding professionalengineering design
,tacticsIntroductionThe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK) is defined 1 as "the necessary depthand breadth of knowledge, skills, and attitudes required of an individual entering thepractice of civil engineering at the professional level in the 21st century." The premise ofthis paper is that, going forward, the CEBOK should include creativity/innovation Page 26.421.2knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs).The reasons for this premise are presented elsewhere2,3,4 and summarized here. Verybriefly, creativity/innovation will be increasingly important for U.S. engineers because offorces such as the Grand Challenges for Engineering; the coming of the Conceptual Age
is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Dis-tinguished Teaching Award at NYU. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior FacultyFellow of NYU Tandon’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have in-cluded 3 edited books, 8 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 55 journal articles, and 126 conferencepapers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 17 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research studentsand 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 300 K-12 teachers and 100 high school studentresearchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 60 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di-rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of
-week course was held in 2015. The evaluation results presentedin this paper are primarily based on the second round results. In the following, the courseconcept will be described more in detail. Afterwards, we will explain the evaluation conceptwe intentionally designed for this course, discuss the evaluation results and will end with afinal summary.Course conceptThe course concept is based on two core course objectives and three instructional tools forcourse delivery and interaction (see figure 1). We will start by explaining the course objec-tives first, followed by a review of the instructional resources.On the one hand the course aims for preparing students for their time in Germany. Based onour and the students’ reported experiences from
over a decade-long process4 that engagedstakeholders from across industry and academia. In 1992, ABET President John Prados5 calledfor a paradigm shift in engineering education, noting that while the post-war paradigm shift toengineering science was sorely needed to meet the technological challenges of the day, it leftengineers unprepared for the present-day needs of industry: Few would argue that the engineering science emphasis has not produced graduates with strong technical skills. However, these graduates are not nearly so well prepared in other skills needed for success in today's engineering practice and in the development and management of innovative technology; these include: (1) oral and written
teaching other subjects or from careers in other fields. Among the manyvariations influencing engineering teaching practices is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK),defined as the “the knowledge of, reasoning behind, and enactment of the teaching of particulartopics in a particular way with particular students for particular reasons for enhanced studentoutcomes [1]”. This multiple case study explores the PCK of five middle school engineeringteachers implementing the same middle school engineering curriculum, STEM-ID. The 18-week STEM-ID curriculum engages students in contextualized challenges that incorporatefoundational mathematics and science practices and advanced manufacturing tools such ascomputer aided design (CAD) and 3D printing, while
focused on on-line programing development in mathematics and computer science education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Engaging Rural America in Computer Science: Understanding the Rural Context Abstract In the United States, 1 in 5 people, approximately 66.3 million individuals, live in a rural area. To address the growing need for computing professionals and the need for a computationally literate populace, we need to engage rural learners effectively. A first step in this direction is understanding the learning context for students engaging in computer science, and how that differs for a rural population
worldwide. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Embodied Sensors and Digital Twins as an Introduction to Microprocessor Programming for Middle and High School Non-CS MajorsAbstractLow-cost, accessible microelectronics and sensors embedded in a bioengineering curriculumare ideal for generating engineering interest and computational thinking proficiency innon-engineering high school courses and middle school electives. This kind of curriculumprovides relatable, empathetic, real-world engineering challenges that engage non-engineering-focused and marginalized student communities. This paper describes recent curriculum andinstrumentation updates to two curriculum units: (1) a novel bioengineering high