to all STEM Coreparticipants across the network. The series incorporates multiple workshops focusing on STEMresume writing (plus follow-up 1-on-1 resume writing sessions), LinkedIn workshops forstudents to create and update resumes and profiles specifically for STEM employers.Additionally, students participate in sessions with a STEM Diversity Specialist around DEIcareer readiness strategies. Using research and insight from top employers, the STEM Coreprogram works to dismantle career readiness challenges that impact diverse students frompursuing and/or persisting in STEM-based careers and to excel while job searching.Overall, the STEM Core Internship Development Series works to equip staff and students withspecific techniques and tips to be
urban environment. Thecomposition of the university is diverse, serving a higher percentage of underrepresented groupson average among its peer institutions. The total student population of the department is ~200students with about a 10:1 ratio of students-to-faculty and staff. Most classes are taught bytenure-track faculty. The engineering program has a four-year, project-based learningcurriculum, where all engineering majors take team-based project courses with external clientsfor three years. The students’ first-year experience revolves around team-based labs and lectureswith a second semester of the first year devoted to learning fundamentals of Design for SixSigma and Agile with a client internal to the department. In the second year they
Paper ID #37092Student Responses to a Gender-Neutral Engineering EthicsCase StudyCharles Riley (Professor) Professor and Graduate Program Director Civil Engineering Department Oregon Institute of Technology I conduct research in diverse areas of engineering education from professional skills, to writing, to gender and ethics. I also maintain a structures laboratory to conduct full-scale structural component testing and field investigations of highway bridges.Franny Technology Howes (Assistant Professor) Franny Howes (e/em/eirs) is an associate professor in the Communication Department at the Oregon Institute of
space to explore their passions. To support career readiness, theschool personalizes student learning and focuses on enhancing student problem-solving skillsthrough hands-on projects. Learning is integrated into projects to support students in acquiringskills and knowledge in math, science, technology, social sciences, etc.Students' relationships with teachers are fundamental to their success in school [5], [6], [7]. Asupportive and strong relationship with teachers allows students to feel more competent, makemore positive connections with peers, and achieve greater academic gains [2]. Teachers’personal values drive their goals and behaviors at school [3]. Furthermore, motivation isimportant for teachers to persists and succeed in the
educators,administrators and decision makers by providing insight into what steps can be taken in order toaddress these issues and create academic environments that are inclusive and supportive forHispanic students at rural colleges. Literature Review Most rural HSIs face significant challenges as they strive to improve the educationaloutcomes of their Hispanic STEM students. Some of these challenges are uncommon among 2their peer institutions in metropolitan settings and others, while shared by urban colleges, areexacerbated by rural isolation and poverty. In a study of the challenges facing rural
from China. Fan received her MS in Elementary Education Science and a graduate certificate in Curriculum Instruction.Dr. Lisa Y. Flores, University of Missouri, Columbia Lisa Y. Flores, Ph.D. is a Professor of Counseling Psychology at the University of Missouri. She has expertise in the career development of Latino/as and Latino/a immigrant issues and has 80 peer reviewed journal publications, 19 book chapters, and 1 co-e ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student perceptions of confidence in learning and teaching before and after teaching improvementsAs part of an overall research program investigating the impact of changes in teachingstrategies on
the product owner. • Weekly sub-goals are based on the software requirements document, but minor changes can be made as issues are encountered during implementation. • Written assignments (beyond the design specification) are technical and non-technical, such as broad reflection essays.Assessment is based on performance on presentations and writing activities, and the deliverableis a final project presentation. Providing a complete product is expected but not a majority oftheir grade. The following changes are suggested for a more inquiry-based experience forstudents: • The premise of the project is a vague question or obstacle to the state of the art. • Students are required to have an authentic project by
following the tours to give the students additionalnetworking opportunities with the alumni professionals.The program finished with the students writing their reports and giving their final presentations.Reports varied in length between approximately 5 to 20 pages depending on the types of data © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceFigure 1. Example of Quad slidescollected. All reports followed a specific template designed to aid the program managers incollecting important information necessary for post reporting requirements. Rough drafts were dueone week in advance to both the program managers and the student’s advisor. This allowed
in the junior/senior design clinic as well as teaches graduate-level engineering communication courses. Her research involves engineering commu- nication, technical communication pedagogy, and knowledge transfer. She has published and presented widely including work in the Journal of Engineering Education, the Journal of STEM Education: Innova- tions and Research, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, the Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Technical Communication and Technical Communication Quarterly. Julie has a PhD in Rhetoric and Professional Communication from New Mexico State University, an MA in English with Technical Writing Emphasis from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte
may be associated with tenure promotion aspectssuch as grant writing, publication demands, travel, or establishing collaborative efforts acrossacademia. Additional factors are based on personal experiences, attitudes, and perceptions thatlimit awareness of the value and need to engage in responsive forms of mentorship.II. PROPOSED WORKTherefore, having a greater impact on undergraduate student success demands for engineeringfaculty members to engage in [quality] mentorship roles rather than advising roles. In this study,the authors have developed a mentorship model which allows faculty members to establish aconsistent rapport to become an instrumental and psychosocial support to shape student outcomes.The proposed model identifies four key
. Kapon, M. Schvartzer, and T. Peer, “Forms of participation in an engineering maker-based inquiry in physics,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 249–281, 2021.[13] L. Atkins Elliott, K. Jaxon, and I. Salter, Composing science: A facilitator’s guide to writing in the science classroom. Teachers College Press, 2016.[14] I. Salter and L. Atkins, “Student-generated scientific inquiry for elementary education undergraduates: Course development, outcomes and implications,” Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 157–177, 2013.[15] N. R. Council et al., National science education standards. National Academies Press, 1996.[16] L. Atkins and I. Salter, “Engaging future teachers in having
much more apparent. We require the student teams to meet once per week outside of class but we find that they often voluntarily meet more frequently. Certainly the leadership team (CTO and team leads) meets even though it is not required. • Students get taste of being a mid-level manager (the “CTO” role). They are elected to this position by their peers and not allowed to write any code while they are in the role. Even so, they quickly realize that it’s a lot of work. This is much more of a true leadership position than just a team lead. The CTO selects sprint goals and team composition. “I was class CTO” looks good on a resume too. • Progress is faster. Having one team of 20 isn’t four-times faster
computational problem into manageable sub-problems. • Write an algorithm to solve a specific problem, and then translate that algorithm into a program in a specific programming language (Python). • Reason about solution’s performance and measure its efficiency. • Write clear, concise documentation for their code and develop tests to verify proper program operation.The second aim is to explore the breadth of Computer Science as a discipline and how it exists inthe world: • Reason how computational tools, and computational thinking, are used to solve problems in a diverse set of application areas. • Explain the basic theory and organization of a computer system, basic operation of modern software tools (e.g
more or less formulated by Kolb the experientiallearning [8], Schön the reflective practitioner [9], and Cowan the reflective learner [10].The Aalborg (AAU) PBL model i ba ed on he idea ha den mo i a ion and engagemen isupported when students get an active role in the acquisition and creation of knowledge. Furthermore he eache ole in he lea ning oce ha o be ini ia o and facili a o in a collabo a i e oce ofknowledge development and knowledge transfer. The organization of the students learning process isbased on group work which means that peer-learning is becoming vital in the shared educationalprocess of the project group [8].The characteristics in PBL at Aalborg University, faculty of Engineering and Science are described
results in active participationduring the lecture with students seeing results in real time. In addition to working in parallelduring the lecture phase, immediately following the lecture the students try in-class exercisesdesigned to reinforce the concepts from the lecture. The hands-on in-class exercises havereceived very positive feedback from the students. Often the material seems to make sense whileI’m lecturing and giving examples, but when the students have to write the code themselves, theyoften realize they do not know the material as well as they thought they did. Students can askquestions and get one on one help during the in-class exercise portion of the class. The greatestimpact of the in-class exercises is a higher level of retention
testing skills), Learning Specialist (including anymeetings over phone, email, or in person with learning specialists), Tutoring (for any particular topic orsubject), Math and Science Lab (for drop-in tutoring of math and science subjects), Writing Lab (fordrop-in tutoring on writing and editing), and Tech Coaching (for help in utilizing tech resources) . Inaddition, we collected specific information on the majors of engineering students and courses for whichstudents were seeking academic support.ResultsResource Availability We found 34 webpages offering resources for students with disabilities on the arizona.eduwebsite through a simple internet search. Of these webpages, 15 pages were DRC materials ranging from‘FAQ’ and disability
PrinciplesFigure 1. Components 11 of implementing meaningful, consequential learning in studios in CBEE at OSU.To this end, we have focused on: Instructional Design Principles. We have convened a set of six core instructors to write an initial draft of Instructional Design Principles for studios. These include: Practice First; Group Worthy Problems, Looping, Cooperative Learning; Assessment; and Manageable Change. These will next be taken to the larger set of studio instructors for further development and consideration. New Studio Activities. We have developed and implemented seven new studios to date over the sophomore-level sequence. Two of these are based on virtual process simulations
multiple choice style questions. Most clicker systems alsorequire additional technology to be purchased. Of the systems mentioned in this paper, clickerquestions are perhaps the most useful for students to see how they are performing in relation totheir peers as frequency of collected responses is often revealed to the class.While there are many options available to aid professors in simplifying grading assessments, mostsystems are limited to one style of question (multiple choice) and are not in the naturalpaper-based format of traditional assessments and problem solving exercises. Most attempts tocreate paper-based automated grading systems work effectively, but tend to be tightly customizedto a single professor’s preference or for single
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, user interface design, and the pedagogical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon. Page 12.1122.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 One-Minute Engineer, Nth Generation: Expansion to a Small Private UniversityAbstractThe concept of having first-year students conduct ‘One Minute Engineer’ (OME) presentationswas presented at the 2006
that theirparticipation in EWB helped them to develop new skills not taught in the classroom, such asproposal writing, project management, multi-disciplinary collaboration, assessment of social andeconomic impact, and social responsibility. They also assert that EWB has provided a uniqueopportunity for them to refine their grasp of concepts learned in class by applying theirengineering and professionalism skills to important problems in real environments.Introduction Page 12.1184.2Engineers Without Borders (EWB-USA) is a non-profit humanitarian organization that partnerswith developing communities worldwide in order to improve their health and
asked six quantitativequestions with possible answers between 0-10 (0 for “not at all successful” and 10 for“extremely successful”). These questions rated their knowledge at the beginning of semester.Additionally, some qualitative questions were asked. These questions were graded by using theevaluator’s template and an established scale. These responses established the quantitativebaseline of students’ knowledge at the beginning of the course. Step 2 took place at theconclusion of the semester. Students were asked the same questions as in Step 1. The questionsdealt with topics such as their understanding product and process development, design formanufacturing and assembly, writing, presentation, and project management skills. In both stepsa
not aware that their research program isfunding this undergraduate research program and are only interested in solutions to their researchproblem. Assessment methods for the undergraduate research include the standard methods usedfor graduate level research. This includes evaluation of the projects outcome by the sponsors,presentation and discussion at national conventions & peer reviewed journal articles. Theprogram is analyzed and the students experience and its possible impact on their personal andprofessional life is discussed and evaluated in this paper. These aspects of the program areassessed through the use of a survey.OverviewTo summarize Ramseyer1, Camp Concrete developed in response to the unique constraints andopportunities
of Texas at Arlington and his Ph.D. in Industrial Education from Texas A&M University. Page 13.1109.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Student Perceptions of Academic Honesty in an Electronic AgeToday students arrive at a university accompanied by information and communicationtechnologies (ICT) that enable them to acquire information in support of academic endeavorsfrom a wide array of public and private sources, including co-located and virtual peers andprofessionals. The ubiquitous nature of these technologies creates a tension between facultyexpectations and student expectations regarding their proper
consuming activity of viewingaudio visual materials such as DVDs. Require the students to view the materials on theirown time at the library (room use only) and write a three paragraph “executive summary”that is collected and serves as discussion points during class.Learning Technique Number 5 - Preparing to TeachDoyle in Integrating Learning Strategies into Teaching 9 suggests that we give thought toenhancing student learning, by asking and answering the following seven questions.Question #1 - Prior Knowledge: What background information do my students need to beprepared for my course?Application of the Theory:By letting students know what prior knowledge you are assuming they already have and bysuggesting ways to review or fill in missing
are described and students' competencies are discussed. Finally,the conclusions of our work are summarized, and a short discussion is presented.Online hands-on embedded system project lab designA. ChallengeEngineering Technology students benefit from hands-on laboratory education and take-homeproject. As part of the requirements of the AAS in the EMT capstone hands-on project lab, studentsmust connect the electronics components and devices correctly on the breadboard. Students mustknow how to use basic instrumentation to test and monitor the embedded system, such as to usean oscilloscope, function generator, power supply, and multimeter. The students also need to knowhow to write and debug programs to control electromechanical devices, such
prepared by the engineering staff at Cypress Semiconductor Inc. This book is also available at www.cypress.com For an evaluation copy please contact cuap@cypress.com. • Several student design projects were defined and completed, including embedded controllers, encryption systems1, temperature log systems, monitoring systems, and telephone log systems. • As a byproduct, this effort identified interesting research in the area of design methodologies for reconfigurable Σ∆ ADC design. Papers have been published in peer- reviewed conference proceedings.The main goal of the course material is to teach students the fundamental, theoretical conceptsand practical skills required in designing and building
, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice, schedule, sketch, solve, use, or write.(4) Analysis: Instruction using the following are applicable to this level-analyze, appraise, calcu-late, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate, discriminate, distinguish, examine, ex-periment, question, or test. (5) Synthesis: Instruction using the following are applicable to thislevel-arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate, manage,organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, and write. (6) Evaluation: Instruction using the follow-ing are applicable to this level-appraise, argue, assess, attach, choose compare, defend estimate,judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value, or evaluate. However
, personalized advising service, mentoring at USF and HCC, paid research experiences for undergraduates, a peer tutoring program, and professional development opportunities. All of these programs are used to recruit, retain, and prepare community college students to continue on their educational path toward a four-year university experience.≠ Bridge students from community colleges to four-year universities and graduate school. CSTEP offers two summer programs with strong math, programming, and research components. These components are taught in formal courses that allow the students to be admitted directly to the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, bridging the students from HCC to USF.≠ Increase graduation rates
, select, and justify tooling that will produce high quality manufactured products economically, reliably, and quickly. • Demonstrate the theoretical and practical knowledge required to measure precision part parameters and propose appropriate corrective action. • Demonstrate communication skills with respect to the ability to define a project, support choices made in the decision stage, and clearly communicate the parameters of a design to the professor and, in the future, to workplace peers. • Identify appropriate information sources, assess validity, and integrate information sources in the design of tooling. Page 11.790.3
: planning, project management, problem solving, presentation, patience andpersistence were skills either transferred from industry or newly acquired. All were essential forsuccess as an engineering educator. Each and every one played an important role in the transitionprocess and are equally valuable today and surely will be in future years.Quest for TenureThe third year intensified the pursuit of tenure leading to new obligations and responsibilities. Inaddition, many of the tasks from the previous two years continued over into the third adding tothe workload. Among the challenges were obtaining excellent ratings from the courseevaluations submitted by the students at the end of each term, writing peer reviewed articles forconferences and