Processes ASEE GSW Annual Conference Paper Ozoemena C. Anyaegbu and Emmanuel A. Dada Chemical Engineering Department Prairie View A&M University AbstractArtificial Intelligence (AI) is an area of computer science that accentuates the development ofprograms that enable computer systems and machines to perform tasks that usually need humanintelligence and reactions. This implies that AI could eventually replace human input. Mostchemical industries use computational methods such as simulation design and optimization for theirprocesses; an area where AI could excel. AI could provide a significant
additional challenges whendigital content is inaccessible or difficult to use. Accessibility for SWD using Universal Design ofLearning (UDL)-based methodologies is recognized as a best practice [2–5].Engineering education researchers have previously reported that SWDs preferred searchablelecture video with transcriptions for the content delivery compared with students withoutdisability (SWOD) [2]. Furthermore, the statistical analyses reported in SIGCSE and ASEE andone-on-one student interviews in the past showed all students in a course benefited from multiplemodalities of content delivery in online learning [2, 3]. In addition, previous results foundstudents would have wanted lecture video with transcripts and/or a course textbook
. Prairie View, TX. Paper ID: 35739.[21] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. Teaching Engineering Virtually: A Rapid Response to Address theAcademic Challenges Generated by COVID-19. 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference.March 24-26, Baylor University. Waco, Texas. Paper ID: 35065.[22] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S., Molina, S. Implementation of Visual Supplements to StrengthenPedagogical Practices and Enhance the Physical Understanding of Fundamental Concepts inEngineering Mechanics. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl.Paper ID: 24780[23] Murnane, R. J. (1975). The impact of school resources on the learning of inner-city children.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.[24] Summers, A. A., & Wolfe, B. L. (1977). Do
4, 2019, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00049.[31] K. DeGoede, M., "A Chegg® Era Model for HW," presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual, June 22, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/33979.[32] M. Makel and J. Plucker, "Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the educational sciences," Educational Researcher, vol. 20, pp. 1-13, January 2014.
://www.analog.com/en/education/education- library/software-defined-radio-for-engineers.html [4] J. -K. Hwang, "Innovative communication design lab based on PC sound card and Matlab: a software-defined-radio OFDM modem example," In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. III-761.[5] K. VonEhr, W. Neuson, and B. E. Dunne, “Software defined radio: choosing the right system for your communications course,” In Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.[6] C. J. Prust, "An introductory communication systems course with MATLAB/Simulink- based software-defined radio laboratory," In Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual
. 143–147, 2015.[12] S. Meyers, K. Rowell, M. Wells, and B. C. Smith, “Teacher Empathy: A Model of Empathy for Teaching for Student Success,” College Teaching, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 160–168, 2019, doi: 10.1080/87567555.2019.1579699.[13] K. Mikkonen, H. Kyngäs, and M. Kääriäinen, “Nursing students’ experiences of the empathy of their teachers: a qualitative study,” Adv in Health Sci Educ, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 669–682, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10459-014-9554-0.[14] B. V. Sundaram, N. N. Kellam, and S. S. Jordan, “Understanding the Perspectives of Empathy Among Engineering Faculty Members,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Aug. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available
of the first-year engineering design curriculum throughoutthe post-secondary system. Vancouver Island University (VIU) is a mid-sized teaching institutionwhere students typically take one year of engineering studies prior to transferring to a largerengineering school to complete their degrees. Due to COVID-19, VIU shifted instruction of the first-year engineering design curriculum entirely to remote learning environment during the 2019/20academic year. Students were not expected to be in physical contact at any point during the term. Inmaking this transition, factors considered included: • Ensuring the learning outcomes of the curriculum continued to meet the requirements of VIU’s transfer partners. • Demonstrating empathy
profession- and ASCE,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016-June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.25567.[2] NCEES, “Engineering Licensure,” 2022. https://ncees.org/licensure-engineering/.[3] A. R. Bielefeldt, “Professional Licensure among Civil Engineering Faculty and Related Educational Requirements,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000411.[4] J. Crepeau et al., “Generation-Z learning approaches to improve performance on the fundamentals of engineering exam,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2020-June, 2020, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34705.[5] G. S. Liaw, P. Saha, and J. Foreman, “Preparing minority engineering students to pass the fundamentals of
, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering”, National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, 2019.[18] G. M. Bettencourt, C. A. Manly, E. Kimball and R. S. Wells, “STEM Degree Completion and First- Generation College Students: A Cumulative Disadvantage Approach to the Outcomes Gap”, The Review of Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 753-779, 2020.[19] C. Rozek, G. Ramirez, R. Gerardo, R. D. Fine and S. L. Beilock, “Reducing Socioeconomic Disparities in the STEM Pipeline Through Student Emotion Regulation”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 1553-1558, 2019.[20] D. J. Espiritu and R. Todorovic, “Increasing Diversity and Student Success in Engineering and Computer
integrating new theoretical or analytical frameworks (e.g., from data science or complexity science) and (3) conducting design-based research to develop scaffolding tools for supporting the learning of complex skills like design. He is the Program Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division for the 2022 ASEE conference.Andrew Olewnik (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor | Engineering Education | University at Buffalo © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comSurfacing Students Design Problem Understanding through System Mapping: A Novice-Expert ComparisonAbstractAn engineer or engineering
at the K-12level. In addition, suggestions collected from the tool will be implemented and could also lead tofuture studies.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-2120746. We also would like to acknowledge the support of MathWorks® in our effort todevelop this tool.References[1] N. Nevaranta, P. Jaatinen, K. Gräsbeck, and O. Pyrhönen, “Interactive Learning Material for Control Engineering Education Using Matlab Live Scripts,” in 2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Jul. 2019, pp. 1150–1154. doi: 10.1109/INDIN41052.2019.8972282.[2] N. Leger and B. Berhane, “Work in Progress: A Literature Review On Computational &
American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) provides a platform for engineers topresent findings that describe the importance of DEIJ in engineering education. In particularArmanios [19] and his colleagues outline the efforts of the Civil and Environmental Engineeringdepartment at Carnegie Mellon to incorporate diversity, equity and inclusion within theengineering curriculum. Carnegie Mellon’s work in DEI builds upon Baillie [20] and Riley’swork [5] as they present the connection between engineering and social justice in their respectivebooks. Specific examples of how this incorporation was carried out will be presented in asubsequent section. As Bucciarelli [1] mentions, to solve many of the world’s problems, thereneeds to be a more
4 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Each student who evaluates(b) Spring 2019 Surveying Lab Data Student Peer Assessment Average out 4 3.5 3
. Finally, a list ofsuggested supporting classes and training is provided for other institutions interested inestablishing such a laboratory.1) Introduction: Lawrence Technological University (LTU) established a Li-ion cell assembly and testingresearch laboratory in collaboration with Intecells, Inc., a start-up Li-ion battery equipmentprocessing company. This collaboration started in November of 2019, and continued into 2023.This laboratory is an active on-campus research laboratory, and is currently not used foracademic activities. No classes are taught at this time in this lab. Formal education classes maybe possible with this laboratory in the future as additional funding is secured. However, limitedfunding does not currently permit this
; (c) Strategizing: By prioritizing questions, identifying an action plan for next stepsand sharing; (d) Reflecting on the process as a team. This process led to initial exchangesbetween project teams and faculty mentors who responded to the questions posed by thestudents. During weekly team meetings with faculty mentors, the teams continued to pursueinquiry on their individual projects and they were encouraged to practice the questioningtechniques presented. The final step in the seven stage PjBL gold standard process is the public product. In thisresearch, the teams developed papers on the CPS and PLM topics and submitted drafts of therespective publications to the ASEE 2022 regional conference that took place place atWentworth Institute
, Salt Lake City, UT., 2018.[3] M. P. Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, 6th Edition | Wiley. WILEY, 2015.[4] B. Ansaf and N. Jaksic, “Teaching Undergraduate Manufacturing Course using a Design-Based Teaching Approach,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] J. Craig, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, 4th Edition, Pearson, 2018.[6] D. Spencer and N. Jaksic, “A Multidisciplinary Robotics Learning Environment: What Mindstorms and DARPA Urban Challenge have in Common,” Computers in Education Journal, Special issue on Novel Approaches to Robotics Education, Vol. 1/3, pp. 32-40, July – September, 2010.[7] N. Jaksic and D. Spencer
insight into how to support all students to equitablyengage in interdisciplinary STEM+CS instruction. Specifically, this paper addresses thefollowing research questions: (1) In what ways do elementary teachers verbally support theintegration of science and computer science into engineering lessons and to what extent are thesesupports planned in curricular materials or added in-the-moment? (2) To what extent do teachers’verbal supports for integration differ between two different classroom contexts?BackgroundEngineering in elementary classrooms National frameworks call for K-12 students to engage in engineering projects thatintegrate science, mathematics, and computer science (American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE), 2020; NRC
. and Recktenwald, G. “A Multi-Instructor Study of Assessment Techniques in Engineering Mechanics Courses.” Conference Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 16-19, 2019. Tampa (FL). 2. Recktenwald, G., Grimm, M., Averill, R. and Roccabianca, S. “Effects of SMART Assessment Model on Female and Underrepresented Minority Students.” Conference Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Submitted for review. June 21- 24, 2020. Montreal (Canada). 3. Recktenwald, G. and Averill, R. “Implementation of SMART Assessment Model in Dynamics Courses.” Conference Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Submitted for review. June 21-24, 2020. Montreal (Canada). 4
: REvolutionizing engineering and computer science Departments (IUSE PFE\RED) - Formation of Accomplished Chemical Engineers for Transform- ing Society. She is a member of the CBE department’s ABET and Undergraduate Curriculum Committee, as well as faculty advisor for several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone Design courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning
pedagogical uses of digital systems. She also investigates fundamental questions critical to improving undergraduate engineering degree pathways. . She earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. In 2013, Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh was honored as a promising new engineering education researcher when she was selected as an ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Choice of Major and Career Aspirations of First-Year ECE StudentsINTRODUCTIONTypically, university engineering study is categorized into specialty areas, e.g. civil, chemical,computer, electrical, mechanical, etc. Engineering students are asked to select a
variability.Mr. Camilo Giraldo, University of KansasLogan Sidener, University of Kansas c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Developing Problem Solving Skills in Dynamics: Implementation of Structured Homework AssignmentsAbstract Improved student learning should be a common goal for all instructors. Two objectives wereexplored in this study. First, we examined the impact of utilizing structured homework assignments,compared to online homework, on students’ learning based on concept inventory data and performance ontest questions mapped to learning objectives. Second, we examined the effect of the homework systemtype on the students’ satisfaction and the attributes of
, “Evaluation of Inexpensive Hardware for Control TheoryApplication”, 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 23-27,2018.[3] Curtis Cohenour, “A Low Cost Control System Experiment for Engineering TechnologyStudents”, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 25-28, 2017.[4] Criterion 3. Student Outcomes, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering programs,https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3[5] David A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning andDevelopment, 1st Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1984.[6] https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/doctoralcollege/training/eresources/teaching
Paper ID #26195Humanitarian Entrepreneurial Multi-Year Interdisciplinary BmE CapstoneDesign Course to Enable the Continued Supported Employment of PersonsWith DisabilityDr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University Director, Center for Rehabilitation Engineering, Science, and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Pro- fessor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Humanitarian Entrepreneurial Multi-Year
Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and graduate level education of civil engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: An Update and OverviewIntroductionIn October, 2016, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) launched the Body ofKnowledge 3 Task Committee (BOK3TC), and in 2017 an update on the task committee’s workwas provided at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition in Columbus, OH [1]. Thatpresentation and paper provided a summary of the findings of the committee followingcritical reviews of published literature and an initial survey of
. Advances in Engineering Education, 2012. 3(1): p. 1-16.28. Liberatore, M., et al. Student-Generated Problems that Reverse Engineer YouTube Videos. in ASEE Annual Conference proceedings. 2018.29. Duckett, T.R., et al., Assessing the Reliability of a Chemical Engineering Problem-solving Rubric when Using Multiple Raters, in ASEE annual conference & exposition;. 2019.30. Asogwa, U., M.W. Liberatore, and A.P. Malefyt. Problem Solving When Using Student- Written YouTube Problems. in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2019. 1231. Donohue, S.K. and L.G. Richards. Factors affecting student attitudes toward active learning activities in a graduate engineering statistics course. in 2009
. 2022.[18] D. M. Sparks and K. Pole. "“Do we teach subjects or students?” Analyzing science and mathematics teacher conversations about issues of equity in the classroom." School Science and Mathematics 119, no. 7 (2019): 405-416.[19] C. Rottmann and D. Reeve. "Equity as rebar: Bridging the micro/macro divide in engineering ethics education." Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 20 (2020): 146-165.[20] A. H. Mehdiabadi and R. Atadero. "How are Issues of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice Reflected in Engineering Societies’ Written Communications? A Review." In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2022.[21] American Society of Civil Engineers. Code of Ethics. 26 October 2020
Paradigms," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 8-12, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20241 B. Wynne, "May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide," in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, vol. 40, p. 44, 1996. G.L. Downey, "What is engineering studies for? Dominant practices and scalable scholarship," Engineering Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 55-76, 2009. DOI: 10.1080/19378620902786499 K.C. D’Alessandro, M.K. Swenty, and W.N. Collins, "Integrating History into Engineering Curriculum," in Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://se.asee.org/proceedings
Grainger College of Engineering faculty and researchers from the Siebel Center forDesign (SCD) [10] . Since 2019, SCD researchers have been using HCD to develop programsand design activities that can help students learn about HCD processes and practices and developits mindsets [4]. This work started through collaborations with engineering faculty and staff tobetter understand where students were exposed to design topics as well as how design wastaught.In previous work, we developed an evidence-based human-centered engineering design (HCED)framework [11] that identifies connections between human-centered design processes [4] andmindsets [12], [13] and literature-based engineering design activities [14]. With this framework,we argue that there are