. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 978–1003, 2010, doi: 10.1002/tea.20363.[13] M. R. Kendall, M. Denton, N. H. Choe, L. M. Procter, and M. Borrego, “Factors Influencing Engineering Identity Development of Latinx Students,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 173–180, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TE.2019.2909857.[14] R. A. Revelo, “Engineering Identity Development of Latina and Latino Members of the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.629.1-26.629.13. Accessed: Aug. 29
education,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 34, pp. 299–306, 2009.[11] A. Baisley, K. Hjelmstad, and E. Chatziefstratiou, “The accuracy of self-assessment in engineering mechanics,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[12] K. Shagitha and A. K. Hadiyanto, “Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions toward Self- Assessments,” SAGA J. Engl. Lang. Teach. Appl. Linguist., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–124, 2022.[13] J. H. Nieminen, “Beyond empowerment: student self-assessment as a form of resistance,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1246–1264, 2021.[14] J. Biggs and C. Tang, EBOOK: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw- hill education (UK), 2011.[15] B. J. Zimmerman, “From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A
: 10.1109/TSE.2016.2519887.[20] H. Zhang, X. Huang, X. Zhou, H. Huang, and M. A. Babar, “Ethnographic research in software engineering: A critical review and checklist,” in Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Tallinn, Estonia, Aug. 2019, pp. 659–670. doi: 10.1145/3338906.3338976.[21] D. E. Forsythe, “‘It’s just a matter of common sense’: Ethnography as invisible work,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 8, no. 1–2, pp. 127–145, Mar. 1999, doi: 10.1023/A:1008692231284.[22] R. Stevens and A. Vinson, “Institutional obstacles to ethnographic observation in engineering industry,” in 2016 ASEE Annual
Farmer, Emily Haluschak, Samantha Miller, Gillian Morse, & Emma F.Mann.Finally, this study was part of a larger project with a larger team of faculty, staff, and studentresearchers from Purdue’s INSPIRE Research Institute for Pre-College Engineering.References[1]. X. Fan, and M. Chen, “Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis,” Educational Psychology Review, pp. 1-22, 2001.[2]. H. Ehsan, A. P. Rehmat, H. Osman, C. Ohland, M. E. Cardella, & I. H. Yeter, “Examining the role of parents in promoting computational thinking in children: A case study on one homeschool family (fundamental),” In Proceeding of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), Tampa, Florida, 2019.[3]. M
Education, 144 (2020) 103702. [Online] Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103702 [Accessed June 4, 2022][6] D. A. Trytten, R. Pan, C. E. Foor, R. L. Shehab, and S. E. Walden. “Inclusion or Exclusion? The Impact of the Intersection of Team Culture and Student Identity and Pathway on Team Diversity”. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Seattle, Washington, June 14-17, 2015. [Online] Available: https://peer.asee.org/24273 [Accessed February 9, 2023][7] E. Jensen, N. Jones, K. Orozco, L. Medina, M. Perry, B. Bolender, and K. Battle. “Measuring racial and ethnic diversity for the 2020 Census”. US Census Bureau, 2021 [Online] Available: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings
Paper ID #36562Engineering Students Conceptions of The HiddenCurriculum in Hispanic-Serving Institutions: Learning toInform PracticeIdalis Villanueva (Associate Professor) For the past 10 years, Dr. Idalis Villanueva has worked on several engineering education projects where she derives from her experiences in engineering to improve outcomes for minoritized groups in engineering using mixed-and multi-modal methods approaches. She currently is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. In 2019, she received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and
engaging Learning experience using a series of self-sirected mini-projects and ePortfolios: Face-to-face versus online-only instruction.” 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. 2021.[2] W. Ali, “Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic,” High. Educ. Stud., 2020, doi: 10.5539/hes.v10n3p16.[3] S. Dhawan, “Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., 2020, doi: 10.1177/0047239520934018.[4] A. W. Astin, “Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education,” in College Student Development and Academic Life: Psychological, Intellectual, Social and Moral Issues, 2014.[5] R.S. Caffarella
related grants funded by the National Science Foundation, and a prior paper by the P4E research team was awarded Best Diversity Paper at the ASEE Annual Conference in 2015. She also conducts technical research with civil engineering and construction management graduate students. She and her students study ways to extend the safe and useful life of existing structures, particularly concrete bridges, through enhanced inspection, management and repair techniques. This research has been funded by the Mountain Plains Consortium, a USDOT University Transportation Center, and the Colorado Department of Transportation. She teaches courses in structural engineering such as reinforced and prestressed concrete design and civil
of Mechanical Engineers, SME, and a senior member of IEEE. He served as the president of the Tau Alpha Pi Engineering Technology Honor Society national board from 2014-2018. He is past chair of the Mechanical Engineering Technology Leadership Committee. He is also a member of the Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission of ABET. Dr. Johnson has won several departmental and college-level awards for teaching, research, and service. He is also an ASEE National Engineering Technology Teaching Award and Fredrick J. Berger Award winner.Amarnath Banerjee (Associate Professor)Glen Miller © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by
teaching, research, and service. Dr. Ofori-Boadu is a dedicated instructor, advisor, mentor, and role model who has served over 1,500 undergraduate and graduate students. Andrea has received almost $2M from funding agencies to include the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Engineering Information Foundation (EIF), the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the National Housing Endowment (NHE), and East Coast Construction Services (ECCS). In 2019, she received her prestigious NSF CAREER grant to construct substantive theories that explain professional identity development processes in undergraduate architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) women in the United States. In 2020, Dr. Ofori-Boadu received a
362, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10798-018-9446-3.[6] Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 957 983, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10798-017-9428-x.[7] J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 817 835, Nov. 2009, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016127.[8] 2016 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, Jun. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/25942[9] Design of Spatial Ins J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 151 158, 1997, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00278.x.[10] enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first
success in the major is evident. In 2017, women comprisedapproximately 20% of engineering graduates, up from 18% in 1997, and 15% never entered theengineering workforce. In 2019, women comprised 48% of the workforce, 34% of the STEMworkforce, and only 16% of practicing engineers, a 3% increase from 2009. In an effort to betterunderstand these disparities, this mixed methods research investigated the creative self-efficacy(CSE) of women engineering majors and their beliefs about creativity in relation to livedexperiences and explores the research question: In what ways do undergraduate womenengineering students describe their creativity and how their lived experiences influenced theirdecision to major in engineering? The researchers investigated
Teacher award at Rose-Hulman in 2000 and the Rose-Hulman Board of Trustee’s Outstanding Scholar Award in 2001. He was one of the developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inventory, and he is a co- author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self. In 2019 Dr. Cornwell received the Archie Higdon Distinguished Educator Award from the Mechanics Division of ASEE.Ioan Feier © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Hydrostatic Vacuum Tube: a Low-Cost Thermal Fluid Science LaboratoryAbstractStudents often
such, the project teamhopes to take the experience and lessons from developing these three OER textbooks and applythem to these related subjects. We hope our project will serve as an example for othercollaborative projects to develop OER in engineering.Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the US Department ofEducation Open Textbooks Pilot Program.Works Cited[1] C. Leachman, and T. Anderson, "Open educational engineering resources: Adoption and developmentby faculty and instructors." 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2017. Available:https://peer.asee.org/28725[2] J. E. Seaman, and J. Seaman, "Opening the Textbook: Educational Resources in US Higher Education,2017." Babson Survey Research Group, 2017
reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] B. Donovan, D. M. Mateos, J. F. Osborne, and D. J. Bisacco, “Revising the Economic Imperative for US STEM Education,” PLOS Biology. Jan. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001760[2] M. Smith and L.N. Willison, “Stem Obstacles In The Collegiate Setting,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, vol. 22, no. 4. Oct. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/2532[3] A. Zilouchian, N. Romance, A. L. Myers, and D. Hamadeh, “A Collaborative Framework to Advance Student Degree Completion in STEM,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. July 2020.[4
to the breakthroughcontributions physicists made to engineering [14]. Seely (1999) notes the gulf that developedbetween engineering schools and industrial practice [15]. Shepperd et al. (2009) learned from anextensive study of engineering education the “imperative of teaching for professional practice”because of the generally weak link between industry and academia [16]. Akili (2019) notes thattoo often brand-new engineering faculty ironically go straight from graduate school, with noindustrial experience (practice), to teach practice-related courses [17].Engineering students clearly must learn the fundamentals of engineering to become successfulpracticing engineers. However, they must also see the connection between theory and
17(2):93-97 (2019)[17] P. Dawkins, P. Hurley, and P. Noonan, Rethinking and revitalising tertiary education in Australia, Mitchell Institute, Melbourne (2019)[18] G. Bischof, C. J. Steinmann, T. Kainz, E. C. Menard, R. Poetsch, M. Sterkl, and C. Tröster, Bringing differential equations to life by two- and three-dimensional visualizations of numerically simulated dynamic systems. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN (2022)[19] Formula SAE, Accessed March 23, 2023. https://www.fsaeonline.com/[20] Formula Student, Accessed March 23, 2023. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, http://www.formulastudent.com/[21] Joanneum Racing Team, Accessed March 23, 2023. https
this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] G. Herman, K. Varghese, and C. Zilles, “Second-chance testing course policies and student behavior,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–7. [2] G. L. Herman, Z. Cai, T. Bretl, C. Zilles, and M. West, “Comparison of grade replacement and weighted averages for second-chance exams,” in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 2020, pp. 56–66. [3] C. Yang, W. Zhao, L. Luo, B. Sun, R. Potts, and D. R. Shanks, “Testing potential mechanisms underlying test-potentiated new learning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning
, professional development of science teachers, and issues of college student retention. He teaches coursework in science and research methods. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Promoting Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering Students Using IoT- Focused Project-Based Learning1. Introduction1.1 Problem IdentificationIn a recent report by the Society of Human Resource Management, over 50% of industryexecutives reported that recent college graduates lack problem-solving, critical thinking,innovation, and creativity. The report also identified communication and teamwork skills asother missing attributes in recent engineering graduates [1]. In its 2019 Job Outlook survey, theNational
in college statistics courses,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 161–186, Apr. 2003. [2] J. B. Garfield, “Assessing statistical reasoning,” J. Educ. Behav. Stat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 22–38, May 2003. [3] T. A. Wood, D. D. Nale, and R. K. Giles, “Closing the homework feedback loop using Dual-Submission-with-Reflection homework methodology,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020. [4] C. R. Lund, “Can students Self-Generate appropriately targeted feedback on their own solutions in a Problem-Solving context?” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020. [5] K. A. Douglas and S¸. Purzer, “Validity: Meaning and relevancy in assessment for engineering education research,” J. Eng
of an Asian University," International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, vol. 3, 2014.[5] B. Prevella and H. Uzunboylu, "Flipped Learning in Engineering Education," TEM Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 656-661, 2019.[6] A. Karabulut-Ilgu, N. J. Cherrez and C. T. Jahren, "A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education," British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 398-411, 2017.[7] J. L. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, "The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2013.[8] R. Al-Hammoud, "Molding the Interactive Flipped CLassroom Based on Students' Feedback," in ASEE 124th Annual
to Failure," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 547-573, 2019.[3] B. A. Camburn, "Design Prototyping Methods," Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering Dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 2015.[4] B. A. Camburn, D. Jensen, R. Crawford, K. Otto, and K. Wood, "Evaluation of a Strategic Method to Improve Prototype Performance with Reduced Cost and Fabrication Time," in DS 80-4 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Milan, Italy, July 27 - July 30 2015, vol. 4: The Design Society, pp. 333-342.[5] S. P. Dow, K. Heddleston, and S. R. Klemmer, "The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time
education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2010.tb01038.x.[2] E. A. Cech and H. M. Sherick, “Depoliticization as a mechanism of gender inequality among engineering faculty,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Tampa, FL, 2019, pp. 1–12, doi: https://peer.asee.org/32586.[3] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado, “Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 311–334.[4] E. A. Cech and W. R. Rothwell, “LGBTQ inequality in engineering
Paper ID #32358Learning from the Voices of Faculty: An Analysis of the Impact ofShelter-in-Place on Faculty at San Jose State University in Spring 2020Dr. Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University Maria Chierichetti joined the department of Aerospace Engineering as a full-time assistant professor in Fall 2019. Her interests lie in the field of aerospace structural design and vibrations, with particular emphasis on developing methodologies for combining finite element analysis and machine/deep learning for structural health monitoring and unmanned Structural inspections in the context of urban air mobility. Maria is
, “Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence”, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no 2, pp. 331-361, apr. 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20042.[2] G. Zavala, M. Truyol, and A. Dominguez, “Professional Development Program on Active Learning for Engineering Faculty in Chile: First Stage”, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, jun. 2017, p. 28761, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28761.[3] D. Rodríguez-Oroz, R. Gómez-Espina, M. J. Bravo Pérez, and M. E. Truyol, “Aprendizaje basado en un proyecto de gamificación: vinculando la educación universitaria con la divulgación de la
the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #32715UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of theWomen in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli-mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering
hoursConclusions:This paper presents an effort attempting to prepare College of Engineering and Technology faculty for allthe uncertainties and changes they had to face as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The series ofdiscussions organized by faculty across different departments certainly have helped many facultymembers facing the enormous challenges in multiple facets. The ideas collected from these sessionsparticularly assisted in transitioning essential experiential learning to appropriate contexts in order tocomply with capacity limitations, PPE requirements, and social distancing. Experiential learning wasunderstandably one of the most impacted areas of teaching and learning given all of the constraints.The authors wish such a discussion at an ASEE
her an in-depth understanding of the developmental nature of students participatingDr. Krishna Bista, Krishna Bista is an Associate Professor at Morgan State University, Maryland (USA).Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko, Morgan State University Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko is currently a Doctoral student and Research Associate in the Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University (MSU) in Baltimore Maryland. Prior to joining the department in January of 2019, Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko was a Graduate Research Assistant (GRA) at Tennessee State American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
. A. Cheville and J. Heywood, “Tensions Between Industry and Academia: Policy Making and Curriculum Development,” in The Engineering-Business Nexus: Symbiosis, Tension, and Co- Evolution, S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, C. Didier, M. Meganck, and M. Murphey, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019, pp. 475–498.[25] M. Gauci, A. Perz, S. Purzer, J. Kirkpatrick, and S. McComb, “A Comparison of Nursing and Engineering Undergraduate Education,” in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, 2012.[26] T. Adams and P. H. Sawchuk, “Professional-Organizational Contradictions and Hybridization of Knowledge: Insights from the Study of Engineering and Nursing in Canada,” Vocat. Learn., 2020