) a single college or university within a country or an academic discipline.As our understanding of impactful learning evolves, many instructors are drawn to explorealternative pedagogies such as flipped classrooms, hands-on exploration, problem-based andproject-based approaches, case studies, peer instruction, and more. These and other activepedagogies can improve engineering student learning [2]. Effectively deploying any of theseapproaches entails a shift in curricular culture. Roles, activities, expectations, and artifactschange from one pedagogical approach to another, and so the underlying assumptions facultymembers make about teaching and learning must change as well.Faculty members undertaking such pedagogical modifications sometimes
associations were used as thebasis for sending survey solicitations, including: members of the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) ethics, community engagement, liberal education/engineering &society, and educational research & methods divisions; authors of papers from peer-reviewedjournals and the ASEE conference with ‘ethics’ as a keyword, principle investigators of NSFfunded grants related to ethics; faculty advisors for student professional, honors and servicesocieties (e.g., Society for Women Engineers, the American Society of Civil Engineers, TauBeta Pi, Engineers Without Borders); and faculty mentors of NSF funded Research Experiencefor Undergraduate sites.In total there were 1448 responses combined from both the curricular
. Our community college partnersmay accept students into their schools even if the student is not skills proficient inreading and/or writing and/or math; these students then take remedial or developmentalcourses so that they can become skills proficient in reading and/or writing and/or math.At the senior college, all of the students who enter into the school of engineering asfreshmen are skills proficient. Once a student is accepted into the school of engineering,s/he is classified as an engineering major and once s/he begins as a first-time, full-timestudent, the student is part of the cohort that is tracked and reported for retention andgraduation data analysis.In order for information to be consistent, the cohort of students in a program has
online solutions and peers when completinghomework problems [7].The problem of students copying from online sources is pervasive [7] and not just an issue forstandard problems from popular textbooks. In 2016 one of the authors created an all-new staticsproblem on aircraft center of gravity using an adapted image from an FAA website, and within aweek the solution was available online for copying. The instructor was alerted to this factbecause the online solution included a calculation error that appeared on 5 of 50 student papers,even though the syllabus prohibited the use of online resources to complete homework.Experiences like this make one question if customized paper homework is worth the significanteffort involved.Online homework reduces
missing flavor packets, but there werestill a few hundred complaints for this defect per year. An agreement was made in to assign anIUPUI undergraduate student team to develop a system that would significantly reduce thenumber of missing flavor packets in NK Hurst soup mix packages.Consumer ComplaintsDirect consumer complaints of product defects are an incomplete indicator of overall quality.According to research [2] performed by the Technical Assistance Research Program (TARP) atHarvard University, only 3% of customers complained directly to manufacturers regardingdefective low-cost products. TARP’s studies found that for packaged goods similar to the beansoup mixes made by Hurst, only one person in fifty writes a letter to the manufacturer when
is based on student's formal project report and the employer’s evaluationsurvey. The minor co-op employer evaluates the students’ performance based on the followingcriteria:1- Evaluation of Student Performance Expectations ● Specialized Knowledge ○ Basic knowledge and understanding of the theoretical aspects ○ Basic knowledge & understanding of the technical aspects ● Broad and Integrative Learning ○ Ability to explore concepts and questions that bridge different areas of learning ○ Ability to write effectively ○ Ability to communicate effectively ○ Ability to critically and creatively
, textbooks, and peers [2, 4, 6]. Situatedcognition theory offers a theoretical framework for studying this education-practice gap inengineering. Situated cognition theory proposes that the social and material contexts whereinknowledge is learned and applied influences our ability to apply similar knowledge in newcontexts [7]. Engineering education often focuses on transmitting conceptual knowledge tostudents in abstract formats with the intent of providing students a fundamental understanding ofconcepts so that they can apply these concepts to unique situations in their future coursework orengineering careers [5, 8]. Situated cognition challenges this ubiquitous notion of concepts andour ability to apply conceptual knowledge within novel
leaders of relevant organizations, providing students withengineering faculty as mentors, and finally, introducing them to the design process, working inteams, technical writing, and oral presentation.More specifically, cognitive stimulation was supplied by introducing the concept of engineeringdesign to the students early in their academic career. In some sections of the experimental US1100classes, a design project was completed after design theory was taught. Introducing students todesign early on in their academic careers has been shown to help students develop crucial skillsthat they would need throughout the remainder of their education and well into their career, suchas critical thinking, working effectively in teams, and technical
make adaptations to suit students with less flexibleschedules, especially engineering students, reflected a commitment by faculty and administratorsto be entrepreneurial in seizing opportunities to develop the program.Engineering ChangesAs entrepreneurship activities proceeded in the Business Department, in the Engineeringdivision, a first-year introductory course intended to familiarize students with computerapplications for engineers was modified in 2013 to follow a new paradigm wherein coursecontent was presented paralleling a real-world engineering consulting project. Topic-specificlectures focused on requisite computer application, analysis and writing skills were paced withperiodic “business meetings.” Those meetings were related to a
balancing of four core anduniversal ethical principles: beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and respect for autonomy,9through an ethical reasoning process that Beever and Brightman described as reflexiveprinciplism.10 Our focus is on the range of stakeholders impacted, the allocation of risk whennovel technologies emerge, and the specification and balancing of core ethical principles in lightof numerous, diverse, and sometimes conflicting stakeholder perspectives. As a final goal for thiscase study, students collaborate on a group case report to reason through the ethicality of deeperand riskier oil drilling within the Gulf of Mexico. In writing their group case report, students mayjustify their responses by referring to issues not directly
institutions have some distance learning offerings as of 20143.Our large, public, research university (Arizona State University) has started to offer its ABETaccredited undergraduate program in a fully online format beginning fall 2013, with the goal ofproviding online students the same high quality educational experience as the on-site students4.At the time of this writing, our degree program is one of the only two ABET accredited BSelectrical engineering programs in the nation offered in a 100% online format5.Digital Design Fundamentals is the first electrical engineering course on this online bachelordegree program major map. An online version of the course was designed to deliver equivalentcontent and assessment comparable to the face-to-face
testhypotheses, and rebuild or reprogram accordingly--students learn to see errors as opportunities,not failures); communication (as mentioned above students are asked to present at school-wideor parent events. In addition, they write about their progress and challenges in a blog or on-lineworksheet.) A key aspect of this program is to engage parents substantively. Working with the schools,LSA prepares events which guide parents to understand education and career paths for theirchildren in STEM and STEM-related professions. LSA does this with the hope that in additionto being better able to advocate for their children, parents (many of whom are young themselvesand un- or under-employed) will see STEM in their own education or career path. While
staff advisors. Each advisor meets with two teams over a one hour“cohort” meeting once per week to discuss progress of the project. The teams come preparedwith a short slide deck (1-5 slides) detailing the progress made in the past week. Lectures areonce per week and serve the purpose of reinforcing the design process by introducing techniquesfor project management, research, design process management, sketching, ideation, prototypeplanning, photography and videography skills, effective presentations and writing skills.The Electrical Engineering capstone course consisted of 6 projects. Five of these projects weresponsored and defined by industrial partners, and 1 was industry sponsored but competitiondefined (SpaceX Hyperloop Pod). The course
education.12 In literature, themost popular way of integrating real-world problem solving, especially in multidisciplinaryteams, seems to be through capstone design courses. As of 2005, roughly 35% of undergraduatecapstone design projects were conducted in multidisciplinary teams of students (an increase from21% in 1994).6 Evidence has shown, both qualitatively and quantitatively, that students benefitgreatly from working in multidisciplinary settings. Survey results show that engineeringprofessionals associate interdisciplinary thinking with creativity in their peers and ratemultidisciplinary work as very important in preparation for industry.7 Similarly, students whoparticipated in a multidisciplinary capstone course identified functioning in a
, SketchUp). To train students in using modern prototyping equipment (low cost 3d printing, vinyl cutting, vacuum forming) and tools. To require that students work in teams, give presentations, and write reports, thus developing both their oral and written communication skills.In order to design content that provided these educational objectives, the Project ExecutionTeam, along with the content experts in each of the three primary threads met multiple times toprovide an initial layout of the project content. The team followed the DESIGN model, proposedby one of the Project Execution Team members. This is a model that builds upon previoussuccessful projects, but is a new iteration that was piloted for STEM-Discovery. DESIGN
grants in both the public and private sectors, and served as an external reviewer for doctoral dissertations outside the U.S. She publishes regularly in peer-reviewed journals and books. Dr. Husman was a founding member and first President of the Southwest Consortium for Innovative Psychology in Education and has held both elected and appointed offices in the American Psychological Association (APA) and the Motivation Special Interest Group of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Page 26.50.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A group
Coll Univ. 2013.5. Brownell JE, Swaner LE. High-Impact Practices: Applying the Learning Outcomes Literature to the Development of Successful Campus Programs. PEER Rev. 2009.6. Kuh GD. High-Impact Educational Practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Assoc Am Coll Univ. 2008.7. Wenzel T. Definition of Undergraduate Research. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 1997;17.8. Laursen S, Hunter A, Seymour E, Thiry H, Melton G. What is Known About the Student Outcomes of Undergraduate Research? In: Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010.9. Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A
Ph.D. in Me- chanical Engineering (Design Thinking) from Stanford University. Dr. Lande is the PI on the NSF-funded project ”Should Makers Be the Engineers of the Future” and a co-PI on the NSF-funded project ”Might Young Makers Be the Engineers of the Future?”Ms. Amy Elizabeth Bumbaco, University of Florida Amy Bumbaco is a PhD candidate in the Materials Science and Engineering Department at University of Florida, USA. She is working on engineering education research as her focus. Her current research interests include first year engineering education, critical thinking, qualitative methodologies, and peer review. She received her BS in Materials Science and Engineering at Virginia Tech. She founded an
modeling and simula- tion, dynamic modeling of physical systems, and STEM education. She has published 20 peer-reviewed publications in these areas, and her research has been funded by the NSF, AFRL, and LA-BOR. She also serves as an Associate Editor for the American Control Conference and the Conference on Decision and Control, two premier conferences in the controls community. She is a member of the IEEE, SIAM, and ASEE.Dr. Paul Hummel, Louisiana Tech University Paul Hummel is a lecturer in the Electrical Engineering department at Louisiana Tech University. He has a BS in Engineering with a Computer concentration from LeTourneau University and a PhD in Engineering with an emphasis on Microelectronics from
. Amelink et al. (5), innovative thinking skills include: a)critical thinking and effective generation of new ideas, b) application and integrationof science/engineering content knowledge, c) ability to organize newinformation/ideas/products articulately, d) ability to communicate ideas to peers andothers, effective use of technology/tool selection in design process, e) complex Page 26.261.2thinking process that transforms a creative idea into useful services/products,potential for prototyping/commercialization. The program discussed here has beendeveloped to promote innovation with focus on the following learning outcomes:Understanding of Design (a thru e
andmagnets to illustrate applications of different interest factors, One Minute paper, Muddiest Pointpaper, think-pair-share, individual and group problem solving, assigned reading, daily individualand team quizzes, daily assignment, daily presentations of homework by the peers, exams linkedto the learning objectives and a number of other techniques. Many of these ideas are derivedfrom best practices presented as part of a Mini-ExCEEd Teaching Workshop at our institutionconducted by our Dean for new faculty3,4. Page 26.377.3After the course learning objectives were articulated and assessment questions regarding thelearning objectives were devised5
front of peers, instructors,industrial advisers, and faculty guests. This was a practice learned from architecture studios atLawrence Tech. These milestone reviews occur at the Project Pitch, Concept Selection, Pre-build, and Working Prototype stages within the design process. The final review will be done inan expo format with faculty and industrial advisors. At the expo, students will present a posterand demonstrate their working prototypes. Less formal reviews occur throughout the semesterand other summative assessments include reading quizzes, frequent update meetings withinstructors, a project binder that documents the entire development process, and an e-portfolio onInnovation Portal (www.innovationportal.org). Of course, given the studio
) changes over time.7 In fact, in another publication, Chua claims that the morea student participates in project-based learning, the better the student grows in critical thinkingand generates better project-related products.5 For similar reasons, Rasul et al. advocate early,deliberate preparation of a student before their senior year capstone project.8 The importance of capstone design courses in an engineering education is well-documented.9Ward writes that capstone projects “bring all aspects of an undergraduate student’s experiencetogether”.10 Ward further notes that the completion of capstone projects do not only benefit thestudent but also serve as validation by potential employers of the student’s ability to applyknowledge and generate
robotic character (animatronic) that moves and talks Smart Home Challenge Set (for example purposes listing only 1 challenge level not all): Level 5 - Pick an enchanted object from a movie, storybook, or fable. Write down what the enchanted object does in the story. Write down how those features would be useful in real life. How can you create a real world object that has those same functions using technology, computer science, and engineering? Using the tools that you have available to you such as the litteBits, Legos, paper, markers, etc try to create a prototype or your own working version of this enchanted object so that you can demonstrate how such works to people. Once you have done such create a video telling people what your object does
systems (MEMS) and microfluidics. He has published two book chapters and over 100 peer-reviewed journal and conference papers, and is co-inventor on three U.S. patents. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Multidisciplinary Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) Teams at the University of Hawai‘i: Challenges and SynergyAbstract: The Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program is characterized by large,multidisciplinary teams of undergraduate and graduate students focused on long-term researchproblems aligned with the faculty mentor’s field of interest. In terms of methodology, it follows aproject-based cohort approach to education where students can potentially work on the
resources, age/seniority,negotiation style, trust, personal connection10,11,12.UNESCO UNITWIN FormationThe UNESCO UNITWIN in Humanitarian Engineering was signed in May 2013. Two yearsof the initiative have transpired and the first report has not yet been submitted to UNESCO,therefore the data summarised in this paper should be treated very much as preliminary dataand interpreted as such.When initially setting up the UNESCO UNITWIN strong parallels could be drawn betweenits operation and the Tuckman Model for ‘Developmental Sequence in Small Groups’15. Withthe actual development and writing of the proposal simulating the Forming Stage cultivatinga positive and polite atmosphere between partners. This has rapidly been followed by theStorming Stage of
tutorial guide [3], and abook by Pardum [4]. Students used the tutorials and book to explore the basics of microcontrollers.Small projects were used to allow exploration and application. By the end of the semesterstudents were able to write structured programs with simple strings. Electrically they could dealwith analog inputs/outputs, servo motors, distance sensors, and others self-selected.Projects in engineering courses are effective to motivate students’ interest in Engineering andenhance their understanding of the knowledge [5-7]. Thus, a semester project in EGR 106 wasused to ensure that students were able to integrate and apply the knowledge. In previoussemesters the project was a ‘sumo bot’. These robots were designed and built by teams of
peers andgained the knowledge and skills to be applied in future Challenge-It sessions. Learning Blockswere broken down into sections with specific expectations as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1: Learning blocks used to guide camp activitiesThe learning blocks were divided into different categories, subjects and sections. Learn-Itsections were 10-minutes in duration and consisted of brief explanations of the theory,introduction and purpose of the activity, and expectations with facilitators providing fun andengaging presentations using videos and live examples. The emphasis here was to provide asummary of the key terms, topics and strategies without elaborating in regards to specificsolutions or challenges. This gave campers a basis for
infrastructure • introduces each of the subdiscipline areas of civil and environmental engineering (transportation, environmental, construction, structural, and geotechnical), and • develops professional skills (e.g. report writing, oral communication, teamwork).This course is required of all CEE majors and is one of the first courses taken once studentsmatriculate into CEE programs from General Engineering, typically in their second year. Thecourse is one of three fundamentals courses (along with Surveying and Computer Applications)that students take before advancing to first courses in each of the CEE subdisciplines. Fivesections, with approximate enrollments of 30 students each, are offered each academic year in athree lecture hour
writing down the chapter title and thetitles of all the headings, subheadings, etc. For concept mapping, a student writes two conceptshaving similarities and differences, then lists those similarities and differences. For instance, theequations for the first law of thermodynamics for closed systems and for open systems may becontrasted.Flashcards are self-explanatory. Although some students do not believe they are helpful in thecourses included in this study, other students found them helpful. They have the advantage ofbeing flexible and handy. They can be made to nearly any size, so they can be carried in apocket or bookbag. A student can run through a set of flashcards while waiting in line for lunchor between classes.ExercisesOne of the most