of 2020” 6:• strong analytical skills (science, mathematics, discovery and design),• practical ingenuity, creativity,• communication, business and management,• leadership, high ethical standards, professionalism,• dynamism, agility, resilience, flexibility,• lifelong learners.Engineers Australia lists its required graduate attributes as follows 7 – the emphasis is ours: a) ability to apply knowledge of basic science and engineering fundamentals; b) ability to communicate effectively, not only with engineers but also with the community at large; c) in-depth technical competence in at least one engineering discipline; d) ability to undertake problem identification, formulation and solution
mechanicalengineering majors, and junior entrepreneurship majors. The students were all chosen by thefaculty based on their high competence in their respective major, creative spark, work ethic, andthe ability to work in teams. Thus, the students were uniformly good to excellent.We used these criteria for selecting students for several reasons. Firstly, we did not want tospend time on material that was domain specific (there was an exception to this, as noted later),and we wanted students who could complete reasonable tasks in their discipline. Secondly, wewanted to concentrate on design in the context of product development to encourage creative,entrepreneurial thinking. This is possible only when students have acquired reasonablecompetence in their field of
contemporary issues. • An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. • An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. • An ability to communicate effectively. • The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. • This course provides students with the necessary tools (mathematics, chemistry, physics, Page 12.623.11 Earth sciences, and engineering science) to understand and implement the underlying principles used in the engineering of processes and systems. • This course prepares students for
material, test-taking skills, and college survival skills. • Professional Success – career planning and effective presentations. • Engineering Information – career and advisement information and research presentations/laboratory tours. • Engineering Design and Problem Solving – creativity, effective teams, brainstorming, process design, and product design. • Societal Issues of Engineers – ethics, diversity/international issues, environmental issues/sustainability, medicine and bioengineering. • Personal Development – stress management and other wellness issues.This course is a particularly good class to do problem-based, cooperative activitiesbecause it addresses the goal of giving students engineering
the knowledge of the subject matter and begins to delve into the importantarea of cognitive and affective measures of student development. Whereas factstransmitted in the classroom are unlikely to be retained in long-term memory,decision making styles, critical thinking and ethical reasoning abilities,interpersonal skills and identity formation created by the college experience willguide our performance in the workplace. 3 This form of assessment is oftenpresent in cooperative education programs as well.When faculty hold themselves accountable for the students’ development incognitive and affective areas, not simply for discrete bits of knowledge for aparticular course, a culture emerges where the assessment process improvesstudent learning
short papers, in-class exercises, and exam questions, students will acquire more practice in writing engineering communications. • Possess an educational background necessary to understand the global context in which engineering is practiced, including a knowledge of contemporary issues related to science and engineering, the impact of engineering on society, and the role of ethics in practicing engineering. The contemporary political, economic, and ethical issues related to manufacturing often come up on industry tours, and while not formally addressed in the lecture, the students’ attention is directed to them during the course.Specific Expected Educational Outcomes of the CourseUpon completion of
. van Haneghan, B. Johnson, E.J. Newman, and S. van Eck, 2001, “A report on service-learning andengineering design: Service-learning’s effect on students learning engineering design in ‘Introduction to MechanicalEngineering’”, Int. J. Engng. Ed., 17(1), 30-39.3 - Pritchard, M.S., 2000, “Service-learning and engineering ethics”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 6(3), 413-4224 - Zydney, AL, JS Bennett, A Shahid, and KW Bauer, 2002, “Impact of undergraduate research experience inengineering”, Jour of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151-157.5 - Lewis, C., S. Magleby, and R. Todd, 2006, “Learning to design products in environments with limited designtraditions”, Int. J. Engng Ed, 22(3), 591-597.6 - Fernando, S., N. Murali, and S. Bhushan, 2006, “The
management. Other CSQE subjects are covered in the other MScourses shown in Figure 1 above. Table 1. CSQE BOK Subjects covered in our SQM course SUBJECT COVERED IN OUR COURSE? I. GENERAL, KNOWLEDGE, CONDUCT, and ETHICS (10%) A. Quality philosophy and principles Yes 1. Benefits of software quality (Comprehension) Yes 2. Prevention vs. detection
. • Topics: design process, creative design, project management, team work, business basics, product / project lifecycles. (possibly could have ethics and oral/written communication) • Multi-disciplinary project assigned. D. Freshman course • “How Things Work” – show the interdisciplinary nature of engineered products, engineering projects, and their manufacture/construction. • Hands-on laboratory (product teardowns, field trips) E. Suite of Design • Create a suite of design electives organized
professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern scientific and technical toolsThe electrical engineering department at Oklahoma State University uses a two coursecapstone design sequence. The first course teaches skills required for design, while thesecond course has teams tackle open-ended design projects. The paper addressescurricular changes made to the first capstone course which prepare students for team-based design
Contemporary Engineering Ethics Issues in anIntroductory Freshman Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006b.iii Mullin, J.S., Lohani, V.K., and Lo, J.L., “WIP: Introduction to Engineering Ethics through Student Skits in theFreshman Engineering Program at Virginia Tech,” to be published in the Proceedings of the 2006 Frontiers inEducation Conference, San Diego, CA, October 27- November 1, 2006b. Page 13.533.14iv Lohani, V., and Mullin, J. S., 2006. “International activities in a freshman engineering course,” Posterpresented at the International Education Fair
3.524 4.0288 Critical thinking 3.578 3.9789 Ability to identify and formulate problems 3.564 3.97210 Importance of a broad and general education 3.803 3.95811 Expectation of the need for lifelong learning 3.433 3.95012 Understanding of ethical and professional responsibilities 3.208 3.92413 Ability to be a leader 3.155 3.83414 Ability to apply knowledge of basic science & chem eng fundamentals 4.063 3.75415 Management
. Page 13.705.3 CADET BASIC TRAINING Afghan, Regional, & Information Pre-Calculus & Ethics, Moral Intro to the Military1 Foreign Language Composition Islamic Culture Technology Modeling Theory & Islam Profession Introduction to2 Foreign Language World History Composition Chemistry Calculus I
distance education,” Journal of Distance Education, vol. 13, 1998, pp. 1–32. 13. McAlpine, H., L. Lockerbie, D. Ramsay, and S. Beaman, “Evaluating a web-based graduate level nursing ethics course: thumbs up or thumbs down?,” Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, vol. 33, 2002, pp. 12–18. 14. Able, K., “Modernizing the teaching method in the classroom-Does it impact student performance?” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2007, AC 2007-2525. 15. Salamonson, Y., and J. Lantz, “Factors influencing nursing students’ preference for a hybrid format delivery in a pathophysiology course,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 25, 2005, pg. 9-16. 16. Young, J.R., “Hybrid teaching seeks to end the divide between
thestudent who achieves a bachelor degree in civil engineering will essentially only be acquiring a Page 13.1398.8‘pre-engineering’ level of knowledge. There will be greater emphasis on history, globalawareness, business and economics, environment and ethics. It just may be that the BS in civilengineering will not suffice for an entry-level position in civil design or construction firms, andthat the new-normal for entry to civil engineering practice will be the Masters Degree. How willthis new-normal level affect the civil engineering industry in the U.S.?As civil engineering education is broadened to be more of a pre-engineering course of study,then
professional manner. (b) 5. Ability to use modern computer tools in mechanical engineering. (k) 6. Ability to communicate in written, oral and graphical forms. (g) 7. Ability to work in teams and apply interpersonal skills in engineering contexts. (d) 8. Ability and desire to lay a foundation for continued learning beyond the baccalaureate degree. (i) 9. Awareness of professional issues in engineering practice, including ethical responsibility, safety, the creative enterprise, and loyalty and commitment to the profession. (f) 10. Awareness of contemporary issues in engineering practice, including economic, social, political, and environmental issues and global impact. (h,j) * Mapping of ME program outcomes to the ABET
Research Experiences for Undergraduates(REU) program [1]. The goal of this program is to support active research participation by undergraduate studentswith the long-term goal of encouraging more students to pursue advanced degrees and to increase participation ofgroups traditionally underrepresented in science and engineering. One key attribute of such a program is that theREU projects must involve students in meaningful ways – i.e. the undergraduates may not be simply lab technicians.It is viewed favorably if the REU Sites include professional development training including ethics. Also, involvingparticipants from diverse schools across the country (especially those from primarily undergraduate institutions) aswell as inclusion of an
,and solve engineering 22.5 1.5 0 0 0 14problems 4.94f. understanding ofprofessional and ethical 17 3 4 0 0 14responsibility 4.54g. ability to communicateeffectively 19 5 0 0 0 14 4.79h. ability to understand theimpact of engineering in a 11 5 4 0 0 18global context 4.35i. recognition of the need for,and ability to engage in life- 14 7 2 0
analog/digital, dynamic reconfiguration for implementing new functionality and obtaining better performance.In terms of ABET’s (a)-(k) criteria4, the following are the primary outcomes set for the course:(a) Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering.(b) Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as, analyze and interpret data.(c) Ability to design a system, component, or process, to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health, and safetymanufacturability, and sustainability.(d) Ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.(e) Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems.(g) Ability to communicate effectively.(k
better prepare studentsfor successful careers in the workplace. As shown in Figure 2, some of these topics include teambuilding, collaborative learning, leadership, communication skills, project management,procurement, and ethics. The first lecture cluster focuses on team dynamics such as teambuilding activities, project management, proper communication techniques, and leadership. Next,students learn how to properly procure materials and equipment, and review general ethics.Finally, the classroom introduction of professional skills can be practiced and utilized in theteam-based laboratory experiments and projects.To reinforce the learning concepts, periodic multi-week homework assignments have beenassigned for completion by student teams
teaching assistants. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference.[6] Verleger, Matthew and Velasquez, Juan. Training of teaching assistants on technology driven lessondevelopment. 2007 ASEE Annual Conference.[7] Prieto, Loreto R. and Altmaier, Elizabeth M. The relationship of prior training and previous teachingexperience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 35:4 (July 1994), pp.481–497.[8] Jenkins, Susan. Cultural and linguistic miscues: a case study of international teaching assistant and academicfaculty miscommunication. International J. of Intercultural Relations 24:4 (July 2000), pp. 477–501.[9] Branstetter, Steven A. and Handelsman, Mitchell M. Graduate Teaching Assistants: Ethical Training, Beliefs,and Practices
tosupport a more concentrated prototype production timeline (See Figure 3). To alleviatecongestion in the fabrication facility, the four sections of the course were staggered with twosections completing prototype production while the other two sections attended three formallessons on engineering economics, ethics, and project management, respectively. The sectionswould then reverse roles such that each student had approximately one week to complete thefabrication process. Student feedback indicated that while this was sufficient time to build theprototype, it did not allow enough opportunity to complete finishing details. Subsequentiterations of this syllabus will provide an additional design studio lesson to address this concern
” (WCED, 1987).Therein the emphasis lies on not compromising the future through sustainable developmentmethods that reflect positively on current situational needs with a lasting appeal towards thefuture.David W. Orr (1992) widened the scope of sustainability in his seminal book “EcologicalLiteracy” from technological to ecological sustainability. Technological sustainability mainlydeals with technological and ethical issues; ecological sustainability is considered an effort thataffects all aspects of a culture. In order to adequately prepare us for the future, Orr envisions adramatic shift in the existing pedagogies of all educational programs—a shift toward an earth-centered education. Earth-centered education entails a rethinking of both the
, systemof units and conversions, ethics, economics, and data presentation and graphing.To achieve the goals of Activity 4, faculty professional development is required to implementCBI. Therefore, faculty members participating in Activity 4 are also encouraged to participate inother activities of this project. Implementing new hands-on activities and challenge-basedinstruction (CBI) methods requires STC STEM faculty members to acquire training throughworkshops designed to promote STEM instruction with modern pedagogical approaches.Moreover, Activity 4 also addresses the need for Qualified Tutors for Advanced DEEA Courses.There is a significant need for qualified tutors and mentors to help students enrolled in the mostadvanced courses (e.g. Calculus
and context of work ≠ An ability to work with complexity ≠ Use of a systems thinking approach ≠ Appreciation and understanding of culture and language ≠ An ability to use collaboration techniques and software ≠ Effective oral and written communication ≠ Knowledge of sustainability practices ≠ An ability to assess environmental and energy impact across diverse engineering projects ≠ A well-developed sense of social responsibility and ethics ≠ Entrepreneurial skills ≠ A preparation to work with varying levels of resources and in various types of ≠ organizations ≠ Strong critical thinking skillsThis paper focuses on the final competency, critical thinking, as a competency that isconsistently
andtechnological ventures may be determined by the ability/inability to overcome culturaldifferences. In “Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations,” Hendon et al writes: The way onesucceeds in cross-cultural negotiations is by fully understanding others, using that understandingto one’s own advantages to realize what each party wants from the negotiations, and to turn thenegotiations into a win-win situation from both sides.” Kale in “Universal Code of Ethics inIntercultural Communication” describes the ethical communicator as one “who address people ofother cultures with the same respect that they would like to receive” and as one “who encouragespeople of other cultures to express themselves in their uniqueness.” The ideal communicator is inessence one who
and English more relevant for engineering students, 4. Provide training in management, communications and leadership, 5. Emphasize engineering fundamentals and interdisciplinary study, 6. Adhere to professionalism and ethics, 7. Integrate design into the curriculum, incorporating social, environmental and legal considerations. This curriculum was approved by the faculty and steps have been taken for its implementation. Newcourses have been developed and existing courses are being revised in line with the objectives of the curriculum.The Pilot Program To test and refine the concept, this new curriculum was started as a pilot program with a sample group ofstudents in the fall semester of 1995. Having a small number of
outcomesThe second motivation for the effort described in this paper is the new Engineering Criteria 2000(EC2000) of ABET which states that graduates must attain the following criteria (those thatapply directly to this effort are shown with **):a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineeringb) **an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret datac) **an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityd) **an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamse) **an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering
; Develop Pilot Modules– Team Development + Ethics ≠ Yr 4 – FY11: Release Team Development + Ethics Module V.1; Develop Pilot Modules – Conflict Mgmt
engineering programs by developing a laboratory- and project-based course, which simulates commercial nanotechnology processes in biomedical and energy applications using an in-depth case study approach. 2. Prepare students for employment in the emerging nanotechnology field in areas such as process development; scale up and control; product specification development; and raw material and capital costing including ethical, environmental, and sustainability concerns. Special attention will be placed on a breadth of manufacturing activities with emphasis toward developing an engineering and engineering technology employee with a valuable range of skills and expertise to the employer. 3. Train the students