traditional teaching laboratory courses with design, build,and test (DBT) activities. In particular, the following principles and methods are adapted: ahands-on experience integrated to abstract concepts discussed in lectures, a clear linkage toindustrial applications, and Design Build and Test (DBT) projects. Specifically, two DBT coursemodules are developed: the heat exchanger and scaled building air-conditioning system. Theproject attempts to improve the relevance of the stand-alone ME lab course to the lecture coursesthrough the execution of DBT activities. This adaptation enhances students’ learning of thermalscience subjects by providing students an enhanced, open-ended design problem experience inthe mid-stage of the curriculum rather than
AC 2008-2386: LESSONS LEARNED FROM A MULTI-FACETED FRESHMANDESIGN PROJECT: SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, ELECTRONICS,MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION, SOFTWARE-HARDWARE INTERFACE ANDECONOMICSDavid Shaw, Geneva College David W. Shaw is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Geneva College. He received his B.S.M.E. in 1983 from Geneva College and his M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (1988) from the Ohio State University. His research interests include measurement and modeling of thermal properties of materials and teaching the design process in undergraduate engineering classes. He has developed courses and laboratories in heat transfer, fluid mechanics, instrumentation, and freshman design. He has been active in sponsoring
as designing and testing of propulsion systems including design and development of pilot testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate
(Entrepreneur, etc.) 5 (50%) 44 (33%) Government (Politician, Science Policy Advocate, etc.) 3 (30%) 16 (12%) Industry (Engineer/Research Scientist) 10 (100%) 114 (84%) Research Laboratory (Engineer/Research Scientist) 7 (70%) 67 (50%) Other (please specify) 0 (0%) 3 (2%) *Responses obtained from a survey sent to the 272 GSIs in the College of Engineering in Fall 2009 (~50% response rate)Since EGSMs are advanced doctoral students (many of whom have reached candidacy), whoalso have in-depth training and experience related to effective college teaching, consulting
of 5. Comments from the students included:This paper discusses the use of the inductive style in teaching an electrochemical engineeringcourse and gives examples of how traditional laboratories can be integrated with lecture material.In summary to convert a laboratory write-up to an inductive style the following should be done:1. Handout a prelab given to peak the students interest. Have them hypothesize the trendsin the data that will be collected.2. The laboratory work should primarily consist of data collection and analysis using onlygraphical methods.3. Discussion of the lab should take place in the classroom setting. Variable-parameterrelationships should be identified.4. Lectures on the variable-parameter
awareness.) Touch, in particular, may be underappreciated as a component in studentlearning, since it can increase students’ long-term memory and recall of the phenomena.One of the drivers of the debate is the increasing complexity and expense of laboratory equipment.In order to give students a taste of the current state-of-the-art in industry and in graduate researchlabs, university faculty have sought to acquire highly accurate and sophisticated tools, which mustbe housed in dedicated laboratory spaces and maintained by teaching assistants who candemonstrate their use to undergraduate students. In contrast, the laboratory experiences proposedin this research are purposely designed to be portable, affordable, and when possible, studentowned, and
Paper ID #33260Service Learning Through RoboticsDr. Uma Balaji, Fairfield University Dr. Uma Balaji received her Ph. D from University of Victoria, B.C., Canada in Electrical Engineering. She was a Canadian Common Wealth Scholar. Her research focused in novel modelling techniques to de- sign components for wireless and satellite applications. Some of the components designed and fabricated by her include RF power amplifiers, antennas and filters. Another area of her research and teaching inter- est is Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC). Prior to joining Fairfield, she is a recipient of the University Grants Award
outcomes that they enhance. Prof Lindsay is the Foundation Professor of Engineering at Charles Sturt University. His research interests centre largely around online learning – the use of remote and virtual laboratories, MOOCs and other methods for making learning asynchronous, and data analytics for promoting student learning. Prof Lindsay was the 2010 President of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education. He is a Fellow of Engineers Australia, and a Fellow of the UK Higher Education Academy. Prof Lindsay was the recipient of a 2007 Carrick Award for Australian University Teaching. In 2005 he was named as one of the 30 Most Inspirational Young Engineers in Australia.Dr. Pamela Roberts, Charles Sturt
and exploit taxonomies, intrusion detection systems, virtual test beds, and a relay setting automation program used by a top 20 investor owned utility. He has authored more than 40 peer reviewed research conference and journal articles in these areas. Dr. Morris’s research projects are funded by the National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, NASA, the US Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Research Development Center (ERDC), Pacific Gas and Electric Corporation, and Entergy Corporation. Prior to joining MSU, Dr. Morris worked at Texas Instruments (TI) for 17 years in multiple roles including circuit design and verification engineer, applications engineer
13.182.3 Figure 2. Components of the retention program at COEThe Introduction to Engineering course exhibits radical departure from the COE’s tradition inwhich each engineering department in the College offered its own introductory course. Logisticalproblems related to scheduling, laboratory space, and equipment resources were resolvedthrough a very concerted effort across the college. The course has been implemented withexisting resources. This organization and development of Introduction to Engineering course ispresented below.Development of the Course:Until Fall 2007 Semester, each department in the COE offered their own introductory course.The content of these courses varied widely from teaching computer applications to
Multidisciplinary Design Experiences into the Capstone ExperienceAbstractAs educators we must ask ourselves whether we are truly meeting the needs of today’syoung people to become engineers. Are we showing students what it means to be anengineer and how engineers help people and contribute to society? Are our youngengineers prepared to successfully integrate knowledge from diverse areas of thesciences, mathematics, arts and humanities, and social sciences, to solve the complexmultidisciplinary problems that the world is facing? The mission of Rensselaer’s O.T.Swanson Multidisciplinary Design Laboratory (MDL) is to provide clinical real-worldexperiences for students that build confidence and teaches them to integrate disciplinespecific
Paper ID #9584Inductive Learning Tool Improves Instrumentation CourseProf. James Andrew Smith P.Eng., Ryerson University Dr. Smith specializes in Biomedical Engineering at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada. He was Biomedical Engineering Program Director in 2010/11 and is currently Biomedical Engineering Stream Coordinator. His research combines aspects of biomechanics and robotics, with active research projects in legged systems, obstetrics and surgical systems. In addition to teaching awards received at the University of Alberta and Ryerson University, he is a recipient or co-recipient of four IEEE Real World
to others.VII. Lessons Learned in Developing Engineering and Engineering Technology LaboratoriesThe experience gained from teaching this software package to technicians and technologists inindustry, and then to practicing engineers, has provided valuable insight into developing thistype of laboratory for undergraduate students. The intent is to share our findings in the hope thatyour labs will gain from our experience. Two of the producers of test and measurement softwaredescribed in the paper issue regular newsletters and bulletins for the academic community1,5.These publications describe special offers to academics to use the software for development anduse in educational and industrial laboratories. They also publish experiences of and
with dynamics and vibrations. of several buildings. They created one of the earliest multi-Dynamics and vibrations are yet extremely complex subjects and dimensional building models and studied its performance on ademand costly laboratory resources. Since the faculties ofengineering in these universities are new, there are no shaking table. During the 1940s an impact table for simulatinglaboratories for dynamics and vibrations yet. It was obvious that, earthquake ground motions was used to study the mechanicalwithout laboratory work, the students were not able to performance of large shear
or for real world studies of human power generation during exercise.Makerspaces and living laboratories are examples of how universities are actively investing inmore hands-on educational missions outside of the classroom, but these spaces may be used forcore research activities as well.Living laboratories seek to build on the extensive research support for team-based, active,project-based, and design-based learning to create spaces that support hands-on, open-endedlearning throughout the curriculum. The Integrated Teaching Learning Laboratory (ITLL) at theUniversity of Colorado Boulder is a pioneering example of such a space. Opened in 1997, theITLL supports a computer simulation lab, integrated networks of experimental equipment, twolarge
one decade ago. However, itwas the rise of mobile devices what pushed new dynamics at the classroom which werepreviously inconceivable, modifying the way of both teaching and learning, especially at K12level. Actual mobile devices give the flexibility and the easy-to-use requirements one-to-oneand group interactions always dreamed by teaching innovators. Authors like Murray andOlcese18 link the collaborative possibilities offered by the iPad with the competences neededby students this century, emphasizing the need to use modern learning models. By contrast,technological tools have usually been used in simulation environments, laboratory practicesor as basic tools for creating either work or reports in higher education, regardless the
waste of time because it does not lead to program improvements.The assessment process outlined here has been designed to stimulate faculty discussion of coursecontent, teaching methods, and how student learning may be improved. Obviously, this requiresan atmosphere of trust and respect among department faculty. The process also attempts toincrease faculty accountability for student learning while maintaining an atmosphere of facultyautonomy. Obviously, this is a difficult balance to successfully achieve. Improperlyimplemented, the assessment process presented here can fail due to faculty fear of losing theiracademic freedom.III. Outcomes Assessment Process Model at A&TThe engineering programs at A&T have worked over the past
circuit of S3 board, as an example to illustrate inductive instructionimplemented in our class.Longitudinal data on students’ performance in this class have been collected from 2014 to 2016.Assessed by laboratory reports, midterm and final exams, the students had better understandingon the topics than those in the previous semesters. The teaching evaluations from studentscontinually improved over the past three years. We have received more positive comments fromstudents with regard to this course as well.The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II presents inductive instruction using 7-segment LED time-multiplexing circuit as an example. Section III discusses student attitudes inthe engineering course through active learning and
) minigrant toacquire the software at CSIT Department, Clayton State University.additional approaches used for teaching such approaches. Tablet PC are reported in [11] to be usedto enhance student engagement for programming courses. Use of computer games is anotherapproach reported in [12] for teaching algorithm and programming concepts and [13] reports useof Web-Based laboratories for courses covering digital circuits, data representations, computerarchitecture, operating systems and networking to name a few.Computer programming fundamentals has always been challenging to teach for faculty, andlearning these concepts for students who are beginning in the computer science program.Traditional teaching is not effective in achieving course goal in such
. Page 24.738.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Increasing students’ conceptual understanding of alternating current (AC) circuits: An application of Licht’s modelAbstractThe complexity of AC circuit concepts warrants the application of an instructional method thatpresents the concept in an iterative manner. This is aimed at helping students appreciate thechanging nature of alternating current while learning about the discrete function of electricalquantities and circuit components. The dynamic nature of alternating current and student’s lackof pre-conceived notions about electricity makes this task of teaching and learning immenselydifficult. This difficulty can be attributed to
styles used by the majority of your students.For instance, are your students primarily Active or Reflective, Sensing or Intuitive,Visual or Verbal, Sequential or Global learners? If you are not familiar with thisterminology, you can test your own learning style at the North Carolina State web site2.The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI ®) purports to determine a person’s personalitytype among sixteen possibilities. This instrument has also been heavily used and reportedin the literature in relation to teaching methods for engineering students. Literature andexperience are used to formulate differences in personality types between engineeringand engineering technology students. Suggestions are made with respect to teachingmethods that should be
technology and science.IntroductionEngineering and engineering technology have always been part of a larger set commonlyreferred to as technology but science is not entirely in the sphere of the technology set.There is perhaps not one single word to describe the union of technology and science.The fields of engineering, engineering technology, and science, however, have long beenconsidered to be part of a continuum or a spectrum ¹.The educators who teach engineering, engineering technology and science, therefore,attempt to cover the overlapping concepts, principles and applications in this continuum.A somewhat clear distinction has emerged over the years between the roles,responsibilities and performance qualifications of science and engineering
merits and rigor ofactive learning over passive learning as well as providing faculty with ongoing pedagogicaltraining will be necessary to realize the advantages of active learning in higher education.Experiment-centric pedagogy is an innovative active learning pedagogy that has transformedlearning and teaching experience in the classroom and laboratory. As described by Authors [10],experiment-centric pedagogy places students at the center of the learning process. Experiment-centric pedagogy (ECP) focuses on inexpensive and safe hands-on tools and activities to promotelearning in STEM subjects. As presented by Connor et al. [5], and Authors [6], ECP engageslearners and improves their comprehension, familiarity, and retention of knowledge
work full-time over asix-week period. Each PI will open their laboratory to the undergraduates during the summer.The students will be divided into teams and split into the different laboratories. In thelaboratories, the students will be paired with a graduate student following the Pair-2-Learn(PAL) model.Pair-2-learn (PAL) model - Four undergraduate students will be “paired” with one graduatestudent to work in a research project; the graduate students will be trained by the Center forEffective Teaching and Learning (CETaL) at UTEP before they start working withundergraduate students. The graduate student will be the project leader while the undergraduatestudents will help in achieving the research tasks. The students involved in the research
University, India, and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Bharathiar University, India. He is currently a profes- sor and director of engineering technology at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV). Prior to joining the UTB (A legacy university) faculty he was a visiting professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology and an associate professor of production engineering at the PSG College of Technology, Bharathiar University, India, where he served as the director of the Computer Vision Laboratory and National Cadet Corps – Engineering Division Director. With over 33 years of teaching and research ex- perience in manufacturing/mechanical engineering and engineering technology, he currently teaches
includes an undergraduate degree in Chemistry, M.Ed.Secondary Science Education, and an Ed.S. Teaching & Learning, all from Georgia SouthernUniversity. She has professional skills in working with laboratory equipment/instruments in theindustrial setting, data analysis, and regulatory affairs. Also, she is a co-author (Tricia Hughes)of an article entitled "Teacher Perceptions of Interactive Whiteboards: A Comparison of Usersand Future-Users in High School and Middle School Mathematics" published in the Associationfor the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Lindsay SnowdenLindsay Snowden graduated from Georgia Southern University with a Bachleors ofScience degree in Biology in 2016. She continued her education at Georgia Southern in the
. Interconnectivity, Frictional Behavior, Macro, Micro, Nano………. Regulatory ISO – ASTM – FDA Substantial equivalence Accepted Protocols for testing and verification and validation So where is the journey taking us?Disruptive Technologies Present An Exceptional Opportunity for Collaboration Translational and Applied Research opportunities Interdepartmental and Multi-disciplinary collaborative teaching and research opportunities Educational Support to prepare graduates for a career with emphasis in Additive Manufacturing Additive Manufacturing processes Mechanical Engineering (Machine Design )– Computer Aided Design, Finite Element Analysis and other modeling Biomechanics
, anecessary step in any design process. A Program Manager (PM) is assigned to each project.This is either a graduate teaching assistant or one of the courses instructors. The PM gives thestudents four or five higher level requirements. The students must write the remainingrequirements that follow from these higher level requirements. To do this they must furtherresearch the subject area, submit their requirements to the PM, and get them approved. Thisprocess takes several weeks. The engineering school librarian provides instructions on doing aliterature search. The students write a second research paper on what they have found. There isa laboratory exercise and several lectures in which the students learn how to write requirementswith the correct
Education, Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–the above three methods, they could calculate or measure the 681 (1988)stress and deflection of components in the given truss bridge. [2] Clive L. Dym, Alice M. Agogino, Ozgur Eris, Daniel D.They calculated the stress and deformation based on the Frey, and Larry J. Leifer, Engineering Design Thinking,information from statics and strength of materials classes. Teaching, and Learning, Journal of Engineering EducationThe actual experiment was performed with PASCO kit and (2005)load cells. In addition, two computational simulation models [3] Lyle D. Feisel, The Role of the Laboratory inwere built by Autodesk Inventor and Dassault Systèmes Undergraduate Engineering
AC 2007-1292: PANEL SESSION - EDUCATING GRADUATES FOR A FLATWORLD - 2Stephen Williams, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Stephen Williams is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He received the Ph.D. degree from the University of Missouri in 1990 and has 20 years of experience across the corporate, government, and university sectors. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Wisconsin. He teaches courses in control systems, electronic design, and electromechanics.Owe Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Petersen is the Department Chair and Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at