respect to the product design for atticaccess scenario, students were supplied broad background on the scenario and why a new productwas being designed. The homework consisted of five parts (Problem Identification, Research,Design Specs, Specification Source Model, and Site Plan Bubble Drawing) with 11 stepscomprising the five parts: listing stakeholders, creating a needs statement, identifying broaderimpacts of design solution, consulting experts, reviewing publications, asking stakeholdersquestions, assumptions to make, classifying constraints and evaluation metrics in the designspecifications, applying the Specification Source Model (second scenario), establishing newconstraints and evaluation metrics, and creating a preliminary site plan of
construction, or plan to work in the industry. This wide range ofstudents and varying levels of experience necessitates an understanding of terminology early inthe course. The technique presented in this paper is done during the third and fourth lectureperiods to help facilitate that understanding.As this may be the only construction course that many Civil Engineering students at MichiganTech take, it was decided that the course should cover a broad range of topics that CivilEngineers would need to know. As a result there are many topics covered that may have acourse dedicated to them in other programs. These topics include a construction overview, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference
engineering works, (2) to provideengineering students experience working on diverse teams, (3) to enhance the real-worldproblem-solving and research capabilities of students, and (4) to work with developingcommunities on appropriate sustainable solutions to environmental problems.Three student teams, each composed of two American engineering students (oneundergraduate, and one mentoring graduate student) and two Bolivian engineeringstudents, partner with a Bolivian NGO and Bolivian community members to assess, plan,design, execute, re-assess, and communicate a sustainable development project of need tothe community. The American undergraduate engineering students are selected from arecently started Certificate in International Sustainable Development
semester. This study reports thesurvey data collected from the class and discusses how the data help design and develop thecourse. It makes recommendations to improve future courses when applying a similar hybridinstructional model.IntroductionEngineering education plays an essential role in preparing students to innovate advancedtechnologies in the future. New course design and development are part of the strategic plan tohelp students advance their learning goal while in school. In order to effectively deliver coursecontent covering a broad range of topics and facilitate interactive learning activities, engineeringcourses have been traditionally delivered in classroom settings until recent years when Internettechnologies have become an integral
design office, andthe other student assumes the role of a superintendent at a construction site. The teams competeagainst each other in an attempt to verbally communicate information. Specifically, the“designer” must communicate the floor plan drawing shown in the bottom of Figure 1 to the“superintendent,” relying only on telephone (i. e., verbal) communication. (Figure 2.) 390Figure 1. Digital model of building (top); floor plan of building (bottom). Not to scale.Figure 2. Architecture student teams in the process of playing the communication game: senders(left) and receivers (right).Game resultsTable 1 shows a sample of the results or the outcomes of the communicated information.Although all teams
Dublin, Ireland, in 2003 and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2006 and 2010. He has been the recipient of over a dozen invention, entrepreneurship, and student mentoring awards including the MIT $100K business plan competition, Whitaker Health Sciences Fund Fellowship, and the MIT Graduate Student Mentor of the Year.Dr. Donal Padraic Holland, University College Dublin D´onal Holland is an Assistant Professor in the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Uni- versity College Dublin, and an Associate at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. His research interests include engineering design education, methodologies for
of the art is planned for future offerings3. The followingtable provides a summary of their responses:DTSCParticipantEvaluations* Item 5 4 3 2 1Becauseofthissummercamp,IcannowemployDesign Thinkingtosolveproblems. 4.25InowbelievethatDesignThinkingisanimportantand beneficialskillforahighschoolstudent. 4.20Thecamphasmetmyexpectations. 3.60 Iwouldhighlyrecommendthiscamptoothers. 3.80
, ease of use, and easy integration to other core subjects. Allmore compatible with the Next Generation Science Standards. The course there is scarcely any attention in elementary school settings. For these misconceptions in science, concept mapping, teaching science through reflective essays were positive and encouraging about the inclusion ofin its modified form includes engineering design component. Specifically, reasons, we need more trained and well-equipped elementary educators inquiry, 5-E lesson planning, integrating science, engineering and language educational robotics in elementary classrooms, but they found thethe engineering design component was addressed with the use of
instructors to trackthe diversity of course experiences they are exposing students to by recording the “experiencetype” (e.g., lecture, homework problem, exam question) and the representation used (e.g., active,intuitive, visual). The “app” will record this information, and present longitudinal summaries ofrepresentations favored by the instructor, highlighting which representations students may not beexposed to frequently.When used across a course or a degree program, this technology can serve as both a formativeand summative assessment of instructional strategies. In this work-in-progress paper, we willdescribe the “app”, its features, and plans for beta-version testing. We will also highlight howthis “app” will be used to study prevalent
available for PSUs or USUs. Stratum caneasily be developed and employed with minimum input allowing a researcher to consider ormitigate secondary variables. Consequently, if a researcher decides that additional or fewer strataare needed, the methodology proposed can be easily generalized to increase or limit theprobability of a person or institution being included as an USU.Multistage Sampling has both economic and statistical benefits. Simple random sampling is bothcostly when implemented on a national scale and does not guarantee an accurate representationof the population. Comparatively, multistage sampling designs are considered more costeffective without sacrificing size because multistage sampling plans are designed to capturesubpopulations
development for young women in HS • 100% Female • Teams pitch their App and business plan to • 40% Minority Participation panel of venture capitalists • $850,000 Annually • Winning App is professionally developed • After participating in program, 80%of and released students interested in pursuing STEM • Each team paired with a female graduate Education/Career or undergraduate student near-peer mentor • Locations in San Francisco Bay Area,• Partnership with Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Boston, New York City MIT, Twitter Ongoing Metrics
Program Planning Deputy Manager Manager & Control Manager Daryl Woods Earl Pendley Keith Hefner Boosters Deputy Engines Deputy Stages Deputy Manager Manager
Rapid Manufacturing.Dr. Bonita Barger, Tennessee Technological University Currently, Dr. Barger is a Professor Emeritus of Management at Tennessee Technological University. She has diverse domestic and international operations experience in both for-profit and non-profit organiza- tions. Demonstrated ability to conceptualize and implement effective strategic human resource manage- ment plans that further broaden corporate objectives. Strong personal initiative, effective leadership skills, ability to influence others, proven collaborative style, and adaptability to various situations. Her research interests include creating global leaders and developing organizational talent. c American
rubric marking was conducted by raters whose training addressed the specificcontext and content of course assignments. Raters were undergraduate students and graduatestudents, with faculty called on for subject area expertise when necessary. The raters wereengaged longitudinally through the study and where possible markers used across disciplines toprovide consistency of ratings. This stresses the importance of having a well-planned, well-supported process to rate artefacts using the VALUE rubrics and an environment whichfacilitates rater discussion and interaction.Participants and ResultsParticipants consented to participate in standardized tests and to have samples of their coursework scored by trained graders using VALUE rubrics. The
as a resource for inquiry anddesign, rather than as a challenge 20, 21. The three authors of this paper were the co-facilitators ofthe CBE Institute.The institute included the following phases: • Learn - Week 1 (Three 2.5-hour sessions): During the learn “Learn” phase participating volunteers were engaged in learning through exploration of the engineering design process. They designed and tested prototype solutions to two engineering design problems posed by the institute instructors. • Plan - Week 2 (Three 1- hour sessions): During the “Plan” phase the participants worked in pairs to plan an engineering module for elementary students. The problems had been previously
, including the mentors’ offices. Our initialattempt failed to consider the nuances of lab collaborative work resulting in the observer missingmany of the interactions.This epic failure helped the research team to take the nature of lab experiments into account fordesigning our future research plan. For example, a timeline is needed in advance of the REUprogram. The frequency of observation needs to be more frequent (e.g., once per day) rather thanonce per week to detect changes. All types of interactions, including face-to-face/verbalinteractions and distance/non-verbal interactions should be observed.Additional InfluencersThe settings for these observations are important to note when situating the research. This isimportant even when the program is
schedule. (In the twenty years of this program transportation has not been an issue, as either at least one undergraduate in each group had access to a car, or the faculty member was able to provide rides from campus to the K-12 school, or the school was accessible via public transportation.)• Each group must practice their outreach presentation in front of the faculty member. It should be exactly as the group plans to present it in the classroom. The presentation must be timed to ensure that it will fit in the allocated period. All of the materials needed for activities, must also be included. The group must bring the pre/post class surveys they plan to use. The practice presentation must take place a minimum of one week
students each semester, and mentor incomingfreshmen during the bridge camp and introductory courses. Mentors are also encouraged topursue their own ideas and passions, and they are given support to plan and carry out novelprograms. Mentors have written proposals and been given seed funds for innovative activitiessuch as a the first 24-hour computer hackathon in Louisiana, a weekend bootcamp forsophomores in chemical engineering, and a 3-day robot build, each demonstrating leadership andcommitment to the community. Analyses have shown that mentors are retained and graduate in engineering at a 30-40%higher rate than their CoE peers. Over 80 mentors have graduated since the beginning of thisprogram and are now employed across a spectrum of
clinical trials, economics, ethics, and regulatorystrategies. Throughout the second year, students will continue working on their research project,with the culmination of the second year being a summer clinical or industrial immersion relevantto the project. In addition to immersion experiences, we are planning tracks: research,entrepreneurship, professional school, and industry; while these are at early stages indevelopment, they are being developed to integrate with other campus activities.Beginning junior year, students will continue undergraduate research while being extensivelytrained in engineering design, in contrast to traditional education which focuses primarily ondesign in the senior capstone course. The coursework for this year is not
theycannot simply copy answers. Most calculation exercises have an associated practice problemstudent can explore before attempting the scored exercise. Exercises are graded automatically,freeing graders to spend more effort on higher-level assignments, e.g., more sophisticated oropen-ended exercises or reports.Figure 2 is a screenshot of the PathFinder Plan Tab for a Spring 2018 Freshman EngineeringClinic II (FEC II) web-book at a public university in the northeast. FEC II is a second semesterengineering course that introduces students to fundamental engineering concepts such ascustomer-focused design principles, statistics, engineering economics, and engineering ethics. Itis the second in a sequence of four interdisciplinary, hands-on, project
responsible for the design of building systems from initial planning stages through final project inspection and completion. Julia was involved in new and retrofit projects including hospitals, health clinics, assisted-living and nursing facilities, education facilities, office buildings, retail facilities, dormitories, and churches. In July 2003, Julia accepted a faculty position with K-State in the Architectural Engineering and Construction Science Department. She completed her Master’s degree in Architectural Engineering (2005) and her Doctorate (2010) in Education both from K-State. She is a Licensed Mechani- cal Professional Engineer in Kansas and Iowa and holds two ASHRAE Certifications - High-Performance Building
of engineering and familiar with innovative research about the benefits of the technology.areas. They demonstrated basic information literacy, andpracticed writing a report in a precise and concise style. Use the information from the Research Guide on "How toThis activity will become a permanent part of the FED101 Evaluate Information Sources” to evaluate the quality of thecourse syllabus for ESC students and we plan to propose the article you found. Use the criteria in the “CRAAP test” andidea to other engineering departments for their FED101 make sure it is of equal quality to the article you chose fromsections. Formal assessment using a validated rubric for the list in
willingness to aid in developing opportunities that would build theskills through hands-on, industry driven projects. From these conversations, some key takeawaysincluded the student’s lack of being able to develop a Production Part Approval Process plan,design fixtures to hold parts or measuring instruments during the inspection process,misunderstanding of data in control charts, and inability to complete a design of experiments.With this in mind, manufacturing and quality engineers from local injection molding companiesand small machine shops were asked about donating parts (good and bad), as well as theassociated mechanical drawings, for students to use as part of class projects. In turn for donatingparts, these representatives would be invited to
based instruction to prepare graduatesfor careers in industry. Each of the programs also utilize an Industry Advisory Board (IAB)comprised of industry experts to assist in curriculum steering and program development. Severalfaculty members within the programs, along with assistance from IAB members recognized aneducational gap between the students entering undergraduate degrees interested in robotics(based off of their robotics experiences in high school), and the demand from industry lookingfor graduates with knowledge in automation and industrial distribution. Conversations betweenthe EET program faculty and the IAB, lead to planning of a Robotics and Automation minor Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education
economy, and construction planning, scheduling, estimating, and management. Page 12.1136.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Outreach Initiative for Recruiting Women to Engineering: Doing a Good Deed for Girl ScoutingIntroduction The youth of today are the leaders of tomorrow. This truth is frequently brought to lightby many who would raise an alarm about a perceived trend or character trait contrary to theirvision of a secure and robust future; others would sow confidence in a generation from whichgreat things were expected. Current studies indicate that the United States is facing an
demonstrate, calculate, show, using required skills or knowledge solve, examine, modify Analysis Seeing patterns, organisation of parts, Question cues: analyse, identification of components explain, compare, order Synthesis Use old ideas to create new ones, relate Question cues: modify, knowledge from several areas, predict, draw design, formulate, rearrange, conclusions, generalise from given facts plan, create / combine Evaluation Assess value of theories, make choices based Question cues: assess, decide, on reasoned argument, verify value of
Page 12.1086.4members are resized until the entire building frame meets both AISC and IBC code requirementsusing economical sizes, resulting in the final design sizes for the structural steel framing. Thefinal process in the course is to produce construction documents for the building structure. Theseinclude general structural notes, plans, schedules and details. The details include typical detailsalong with specific connection details for both simple and moment frame connections. Thoughcondensed to classroom content, this course enables the students to experience the completedesign process for a multi-story steel structure.Since each student is expected to design and document an entire multi-story steel structure, someconcessions had to be
of January through June 2006, to allow for flexibility with individualized teaching plans. • Receive CIESE staff into classrooms to support and observe implementation. • Administer pre-tests and post-tests to students. • Participate in a focus group about the effectiveness of the modules. • Complete surveys regarding the implementation of the materials.Upon completion of all the tasks outlined above, participating teachers received a $300.00stipend for their efforts.2.0 Elementary-Level Activities – Engineering is Elementary (EiE)The elementary curriculum selected for the pilot study was the Engineering is Elementary (EiE)series, developed by the Museum of Science, Boston’s (MoS), National Center for TechnologicalLiteracy
team work skills.The Toothpick Factory © is a series of activities set in an actual working environment, aproduction facility that makes custom toothpicks. It comes with a full suite of game parts, aswell as lesson plans, classroom teaching materials, and debriefing guidelines. A professionaldevelopment workshop is available to help potential facilitators learn how to most effectively usethe simulation. This presentation will outline The Toothpick Factory© simulation game,highlight the workplace soft skills it reinforces and summarize the initial implementation dataand responses both in classrooms and facilitator training sessions. Page
conducted. Finally, plans for publishingmanuscripts (regarding the above mentioned collaborative international engineeringdesign project will be finalized. Page 13.91.6Technical DetailsEach partner institution is required to work on a component of this internationalengineering design project. At the completion of this project, all the components will beput together to produce a functional engineering application.The complete engineering design project consists of designing the electrical supplysystem of an agricultural form using different renewable energy sources, photovoltaicpanels, a wind turbine, and a small hydro-electric station. This farm is