Seminar)* Graduate mentors/tutors* Peer mentor* Designated orientation sessions Welcome and kick-off programs COMPASS Tutoring Center* Living-learning community (block housing)* Undergraduate research experience**evidence based practices identified in the literature reviewTo meet the fourth objective (Research) of determining how Career Readiness and CareerDevelopment assessment results correlate to students selecting STEM and being successful inSTEM, instruments designed to register increases or decreases in career readiness factors areimplemented in a pre/post format for all participants and a control group.The remainder of this paper will detail the support, development and implementation of theCOMPASS LC. Specifically, (a) a comprehensive
experience. However, it is evident that most students were greatly impacted bytheir international experience.Recruiter SurveyMuch of the motivation for developing competencies in engineering studentsto practice engineering in a "global engineering world" is based on what we see companies doingin their global expansion. In addition, as noted in the introduction section of this paper, manyhave written about the need for preparing our students to be "competent globally". But what ofthe companies that actually hire our graduates? What do they feel about "globalization" and what Page 15.77.11value do their recruiters place on students who have been
andapplying them to a larger problem for the first time. A similar reflective assignment will be givento the seniors prior to facilitating their first recitation section based on that described in Neubertet al. (2013). As the recitation sessions occur throughout the semester, a class period on thistraining will be less beneficial. Instead, the instructors will also provide senior students with a‘tip sheet’ about best practices in running the recitation, focusing on how to engage and supportthe students in the recitation.Survey Design: The survey instrument employed to measure student outcomes (engineeringidentity) was developed by Dr. Allison Godwin (2016). Her tool focuses on engineering identityvia quantitative measurement. The three key constructs
, perhaps the only, pathway for enforcing and validating the attainment of the Bodyof Knowledge as a prerequisite for entry into the professional practice of engineering.Consequently, the exploratory committee addressed its charges from the licensure perspective orcontext and focused on the outcomes in the BOK2 with experience expectations.Still, irrespective of licensure considerations, the exploratory committee felt that in striving toattain the educational and experiential outcomes of the Body of Knowledge, the graduate civilengineer is investing in a successful and rewarding career in which progression is recognizedthrough licensure and promotion to positions of increasing responsibility.The exploratory committee’s conclusions acknowledged that
anticipation of the actualdevelopment of new programs for either undergraduate or graduate students, a pilot course inrenewable energies was conducted during the summer of 2021. The course was offered forjunior/senior undergraduate students and had a broad presentation of renewable energies,theories, and practices associated with each. For this pilot course, a series of invited speakerlectures were offered. Experts in the field covered technical aspects of solar, wind, andbioenergy, as well as business, legislative and geopolitical aspects. Students taking the courseparticipated in an end-of-semester survey about their perception of renewable energies, theassociated industries, and their interest in pursuing jobs related to them. This paper will
the Practice of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical & Biochemical Engineering Department at UMBC, where she teaches, the Introduction to Engineering Design course, among other Chemical Engineering courses. Her research interests include engineering education and outreach. She is actively involved in developing curriculum to introduce engineering concepts to K-12 students.Greg Russ, University of Maryland-Baltimore County Gregory Russ graduated Magna Cum Laude in 2006 with a BS degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He is currently pursuing a MS degree in Chemical Engineering with a focus on Engineering Education, also from UMBC. He is a member
, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of
; (2) Transnational mobility for engineering students, researchers, and professionals needs to become a priority; (3) Global engineering excellence depends critically on a mutual commitment to partnerships, especially those that link engineering education to professional practice; and (4) Research on engineering in a global context is urgently needed.These recommendations suggest that a very strong collaboration should exist among theacademia, the industry and the government to facilitate the best practices to educate world-classengineers2.The European Union has defined and facilitated multi-national educational experiencesimportant to capacity development in their area, but this has not been done for the WesternHemisphere
, The Pennsylvania State University Justin Lavallee graduated from the Harvard Graduate School of Design in 2010 with a Master in Architec- ture. After working as a researcher studying novel applications for industrial robots in custom manufac- turing processes, he joined the MIT Department of Architecture in 2011 as an instructor and eventually director of the MIT Architecture Shops. He joined the MIT New Engineering Education Transforma- tion as a lead technical instructor in 2019. Throughout his time at MIT he has focused on developing and teaching courses at the intersection of design, technology, and making, while also participating in a number of research projects focusing on new fabrication techniques.Dr
Education Excellence Award.Dr. Tonia A. Dousay, University of Idaho Tonia A. Dousay is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Idaho and a Google Certified Innovator. She has more than 15 years of instructional design and eLearning project management experience. Tonia’s teaching and research focus on design-based learning activities and the knowledge and skills acquired and reinforced through these opportunities. Makerspaces currently serve as the hub of her research, creating an engaging environment to play with robotics, 3D printing, 3D modeling, and mo- bileography for K20 learners. Where some areas of education focus on STEM-learning, Tonia emphasizes STEAM-learning, giving attention to art
Graduate School of Imaging Science andTechnology (http://www.eng.chiba-u.ac.jp/joho.htm). Japanese universities, individualprofessors hire younger faculty members to form a distinctive research effort in severalimportant areas. Thus, there is no formal “center” but rather a group of three or four talentedfaculty members and a continuum of graduate and undergraduate students who work on a widerange of electronic imaging problems. While Dr. Miyake’s laboratory will support one or twovisiting professors (normally from out side of Japan) there are no formal postdoctoral positions.The funding for the research comes mostly from the school and the Ministry of Education.While there are strong ties to industry, there is little financial support for the
ugly.Engineers are faced with moral dilemmas that need to be analyzed and which are not just amatter of feelings and preferences, but include rational and moral reasoning. Engineering ethicsinvolves more than simply teaching maxims: do not bribe, spy, or commit sabotage. It involvesissues related to safety, environmental impact, privacy, and military use, each of which containsmany potential moral dilemmas.Technology from the design phase to its implementation and use is not a neutral activity, whichhas not been properly recognized by engineers and engineering education, and which often ismissing in courses in which future engineers are taught to deal with ethical issues. Theaccreditation organization ABET identifies "an understanding of professional
Georgia Tech has developedinto one of the world’s largest university resources for multidisciplinary system design studies.Learners working here range from freshmen to graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, researchengineers and faculty. They work on a large number of problems from various government andindustry sponsors, and have organized themselves into an environment where team members atall levels can be integrated into teams. A range of analytical tools and standard operatingprocedures have been developed, that are available for use in courses. Thus we now have thefollowing formal resources as a starting point for the project: Page
students to design and develop an energy harvesting prototype that will be used to power health monitoring systems.Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dr. Dan Jensen is a Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), M.S. (Applied Mechanics) and Ph.D. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MSC Software Corp. His research includes development of innovative design methodologies and en- hancement of engineering education
Paper ID #16120Ergonomics Topics for the Undergraduate ClassroomDr. Terri M. Lynch-Caris, Kettering University Terri Lynch-Caris, Ph.D., P.E., is a Professor of Industrial Engineering (IE) and Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Kettering University in Flint, Michigan. She earned her Ph.D. at the University of Michigan, holds an MS Degree from Purdue University and a BS from Kettering University, formerly GMI-Engineering & Management Institute. She teaches courses in Work Design, Ergonomics, Statistics and various other Industrial Engineering classes. Her research is in the
biotechnology research are revealed, it isimportant that the information be disseminated throughout the academe, the medical world, andto the public. The understanding of the complexity of the technique can be simplified through theuse of multimedia as a form of medical education. A pilot study is underway at Arizona StateUniversity, researching rich media technology for Web-based document distribution forbiotechnology education. This study is a collaboration between the Northwestern UniversityFeinberg School of Medicine and Arizona State University’s IDeaLaboratory, a creative thinkingand usability engineering laboratory.The scope of this research is exploratory in nature. It will compare two e-learning technologies,address the impact of using e
Paper ID #26177Board 98: Validity Evidence for the SUCCESS Survey: Measuring Non-Cognitive and Affective Traits of Engineering and Computing Students (PartII)Mr. Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matthew Scheidt is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He graduated from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and The Ohio State University with a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing. Matt is currently part of Dr. Allison Godwin’s STRIDE (Shaping Transformative Research on Identity and
, be a catalyst for interaction with outside “suppliers” such as math and physics, and be ameans for communicating program objectives to students.IntroductionIn November 1996 the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) approvedEngineering Criteria 2000, Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering in the United States(ABET, 1996). The new criteria represent a paradigm shift in accreditation from a highlyprescriptive set of criteria to a relatively simplified, flexible set of outcomes-based criteria whichfocus on the attributes engineering graduates are to have. These attributes are, •an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; •an ability to design and conduct experiments as well
global environmental quality. Its program encompasses all of the engineeringand science disciplines, focusing on the design and synthesis of materials, processes, systems, anddevices with the objective of minimizing overall environmental impact (including energyutilization and waste production) throughout the entire life cycle of a product or process. AnABET impetus for green engineering is contained in Criterion 3 Program Outcomes andAssessment, Item [h] of the EC200 requirements, requiring that ‘Engineering Programs mustdemonstrate that their graduates have: ……………….the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.' 5 Some effortsare underway to have the ABET language of item [f
-widetheoretical assumptions (in relation to the settings), and analyze the symptoms that emerge. Welook at questions that bring meaning to volunteerism from a corporate standpoint, and whichinvestigate the social, political, economic, and civic implications for industry partnerships withthe educational system.Research InstrumentsThis mixed method study uses three research instruments to collect data: (1) pre- and post-survey, (2) a structured observation protocol, and (3) an exit interview protocol.1. Pre- and Post-SurveysThe pre- and post-surveys were designed to better understand the impact of skills-based Page 26.1508.6volunteerism on incumbent
with supervisors. Situated in asenior engineering design capstone course, results show that students’ VMC fluency improved.When subjected to rubric-based intervention strategies and repeated exposure, engineeringstudents gained enhanced audience awareness and practical knowledge. This study contributes tounderstanding how communication development emerges and is best fostered in engineeringstudents. Key research impacts include a feature-based model of successful VMC interactionsand recommended rubric-based best practices for curricular inclusion of VMC.As engineering students’ academic and professional lives unfold increasingly online due to theglobalization of labor, engineers will need to become fluent in using VMC to manageprofessional
of research andeducational collaborations not just within IEC but also between its MSI members and PWIresearch-intensive institutions. This is especially true since its member institutions serve a uniquepopulation of minority students. The IEC is developing the infrastructure and programs tofacilitate collaborations between faculty, students and staff in its member departments, based onlessons learned from the previous educational program and, more generally, on the Science ofTeam Science. It is also addressing how best to build a different type of team structure withPWIs, industry, and other external constituencies. For each type of partner, a process is beingdefined and tools are being addressed. The Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC
same part, for the same price, anywhere in theworld.”4 In the previous vertical integration model, the design and manufacturing ofproducts was an internal affair and regulated by long-held standards, procedures, andhierarchies. This world is disappearing and being replaced by the much more chaotic“flat” de-verticalized and global design and manufacturing For technical professionalsincluding engineers, globalization and de-verticalization means that instead of thepredictable long-established world of a Ford or an IBM, new graduates must master theirprofession in the largely undefined universe of 12,000 mile supply chains, multiplelanguages, and dozens of suppliers all with differing roles as to design andmanufacturing. This problem has been
desirable when compared to other engineeringschools because they have a shorter on-the-job learning curve as a result of the practicalexperience they gained. Faculty members engaged in industry-supported research usuallyinvolve undergraduates. Thus, the graduate profile reflects the College vision of “A scholarlycommunity dedicated to excellence through student-centered education and researchemphasizing professional practice in engineering and applied science" and the College missionof preparing “job-ready graduates.”Background on S-STEM Scholars ProgramBegun in 2010, the S-STEM Scholar Program increases opportunities for financially needy butacademically talented students. These students: • Come into the S-STEM Scholar Program as first-time
recruiting program, using current undergraduate students, and onegraduate student, to help in the University’s computer science recruiting efforts. InSeptember 2003, the planning began with the NSF grant to determine the best approachfor recruiting and targeting females and minority students and raising their interest inattending college and majoring in technology related fields. In early 2004, the TETCgrant was added to enhance the ongoing efforts. A&M-CC designed their recruitingprogram using the “Best Practices” for recruiting underrepresented minorities. This is atechnique used by some of the nation’s most successful engineering schools forproducing minority graduates. This paper describes the details of the implementation ofthe recruiting
participated six times in the National Science Founda- tion funded Research Experience for Teachers in Biomedical Engineering held at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. From that I have twice co-presented research projects at the annual Northeast Biomedical Engi- neering Conference.Dr. Marsha W Rolle, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteDr. Terri A. Camesano, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Professor Camesano is Dean of Graduate Studies and Professor of Chemical Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Participating in authentic engineering projects improves teachers’ ability to teach the design process to middle school
Education”3. Job Excelling and Creating Graduates - Attract and retain the very best students by our leadership in producing graduates widely known for not only being in great demand for existing jobs, but for their understanding of, and unique preparation for, creating jobs.These goals led to the definition of specific educational objectives for the College, suchas:1. Cutting Edge Education a. Improve the student/faculty ratio to at most 15/1 in every school, which will require increasing the faculty by 40-50%. b. Increase project-based, multidisciplinary educational opportunities. c. Increase our focus on technology-based learning to enable educational innovation. d. Improve the educational infrastructure.2. Cutting Edge
Paper ID #45160Engaging Two-Year Students in STEM: A Professional STEM Society’s Effortsto Support Community College StudentsDr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Roberta Rincon, Ph.D., is the Director of Research and Impact for the Society of Women Engineers. She is responsible for overseeing the research activities for the organization, including collaborative research projects with external researchers and dissemination of SWE research through academic conferences, the SWE Research website, and the annual SWE State of Women in Engineering magazine issue. She is the Principal Investigator for the NSF INCLUDES
multiple courses provides many opportunities to study the impact of ECP on transfer oflearning from one course to another and several other research questions including whether ornot personal instrumentation makes it easier for students to learn the fundamentals ofmeasurement. Possibly the most powerful outcome of ECP is that learning experiences can besignificantly more authentic. In the intro Circuits course, for example, students are offered theoption of either doing traditional, step-by-step procedural labs or a new type of design-based lab,with both sequences addressing all course content. Finally, the general engineering electronicscourse provides a compressed version of the ECSE sequence which permits transfer to beaddressed quickly for
-10-01. Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (NJ1).20. Verdin, D., Godwin, A. and Morazes, J. L. (2015), Qualitative Study of First-Generation Latinas: Understanding Motivation for Choosing and Persisting in Engineering Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.2462821. Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of graduate medical education, 5(4), 541-542.22. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and