solving. The escape room exercise was split into a total of two laboratory periods (ca. 4 hours). Teams who did not escape during laboratory period one were given the option to complete the unfinished module, at the end of the first laboratory period, during the time between laboratory period one and laboratory period two. The instructor team used Microsoft Teams to communicate with groups during the exercise, which expedited communications. In addition, we used one instructor and one staff member during the exercise to minimize time that groups waited for assistance. The need for an instructor team is discussed in more detail below.5. Develop a grade scheme. The instructions stated that every group who escaped by the end of the
Technology (FDST) program provide an overview of instrumentation aspectsof ongoing multidisciplinary research efforts in smart farming and precision agriculture[9] led bythe primary author, and the UMES laboratory manager to cover basics of voltmeters, ammeters (including the clamp ammeters), oscilloscopes, Vernier calipers, etc. Experiential and activelearning components are integrated with the course using popular microprocessor-based sensorsand actuator kits and simulation tools. The course objectives have some overlaps with all of the 7outcomes listed by ABET in the Criteria 3 of the new accreditation guidelines [8] but put moreemphasis on the last three.2.0 Course AssessmentThe fall 2021 offering of the Instrumentation (ENGE 380) course was
methods, (2) ability to use engineering analysis in creative design, and (3)ability to apply engineering judgment despite uncertainty and incomplete knowledge. After theproject was completed, informal assessment of the outcomes indicated that some improvementwas needed. The literature strongly suggests that hands-on project work and laboratories are acritical component of engineering education, providing substantial motivation for this work.Several specific features of the project seemed to hinder these educational outcomes, so asignificant overhaul of the project was undertaken to mitigate the technical issues underlyingthese weaknesses. While addressing these concerns, general improvements of the project as aneducational tool were also
fromoutside, or in a public place not very quiet having a lot of elements around that may destroy thefocus of the lecture coming through a little computer/mobile device.Besides misusing the advantage of mobility, there are issues with capability of performing someactivities through online meeting sessions. For example, courses that require hands-on practicesand practical exercises, such as computer programming, mobile application development,biology-physics-chemistry laboratory works, electrical engineering laboratory works, are stillfacing this challenge of teaching in a remote setup. Although, some innovative ideas are inventedby recent studies to mitigate this lacking by proposing virtual laboratories 3 4 , this shortcoming isstill present since
physical laboratory for our electric machines course uses workstations populated by modularElectromechanical System (EMS) equipment in the Festo LabVolt Series [6]. Although thissystem employs PC-based instrumentation, it is not suitable for unattended remote access. Festoalso offers its Electromechanical Systems Simulation Software (LVSIM-EMS) [7], whichemulates the equipment in our workstations and serves as an ideal candidate for unattendedremote access. Our objective—once this simulator had been located—was to use it to build asynchronous, team-oriented lab.BackgroundOur first step on this quest was to specify what the system we were seeking would need to do: A. Provide simultaneous access to a separate instance of a licensed simulator to
-strain curves from materialsamples upon which the remainder of the course content is built. The global pandemic forcedengineering students online, challenging materials laboratory instructors to adapt instructionaldelivery to remote learners.There currently exist no ABET-accredited undergraduate mechanical engineering programs taughtfully online.i Moreover, while many other college disciplines have extensive histories of successfulremote and online instruction, the engineering education community has limited experienceteaching lab classes online. Affordable, small, and easily mailed experimental educational lab kitshave emerged as a key advancement in hands-on undergraduate engineering instruction. ii,iii Asmall, inexpensive, and safe benchtop
responsibility [23]. Thus, anexperimental learning framework is a great teaching method if educators could implement it usingVRT as a proxy. 2.2 Virtual reality in educationVirtual Reality technologies have already lent themselves to many implementations in K-12schools, tertiary education, research laboratories, and collaborative programs across academia. ForK12 education, VR tools are commonly used for visualizing geometry-shape in math class, solarsystem and planets in earth science, historical sites around the world in history and geographyclass, organs and animal habitats in biology, and molecular bonds in chemistry. It can help putclass materials into perspective, magnify small elements, and shrink large systems. Beyond the K12program, the
Cross (IC), one challenge; 2. The Virtual Biomechanics Laboratory (VBL), three challenges; and 3. Jumping Jack (JJ), three challenges. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas Tech University Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationThe same testing methodology was used for each module. First, a general background lecture onthe module’s topic was given using a Powerpoint slide show prepared by the first author. Thestudents were then randomly assigned to their group and were given a pre-test that included apre-affect survey. Depending on their group assignment, the students showed
diversity, and so on.The half-life of knowledge gained in many engineering fields is estimated between two-and-a-half and three years6. Since engineering students have only four years to study therequisite engineering and non-engineering courses, they necessarily need to learn manyimportant newer fields on their own by way of “learning by doing” projects.Several leading universities have emphasized innovative approaches to engineeringeducation, such as “hands-on learning”, “learning by/while doing”, and “project-basedlearning”. The tangible and intangible benefits of such active learning approaches aremost widely gained through practical laboratory and project-based instruction7, 8.To quote Professor Seymour Papert, the creator of the Logo language
different methods of delivering engineering and science laboratorycontents in a remote learning environment. Remote or virtual laboratory content could beprovided through computer screens, where students interact with physical apparatus using remotecontrol and make observations with cameras installed in the labs [3]. Some other educationalstudies have explored having students use components and materials available at home [4], andin some cases where resources permit, delivering physical lab kits for the students to useremotely [5][6]. These studies on various practices have demonstrated the effectiveness ofdifferent types of remote laboratory delivery methods, however, in some disciplines and courses,physical hands-on experience is still essential
Laboratory (AFRL). His academic research interest which correlated with his work at AFRL involve the areas of human and machine teaming, cyber-human systems, human and system Integration, control and intelligent control systems, machine learning and artificial intelligence applications, and system engineering design American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-in-Progress: Enhance Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Education with CPS/IoT InfusionAbstract: Electrical engineers serve a vital function in our modern world. Currently,undergraduate electrical engineering (EE) students are in high demands to be hired with thehighest median
Indianapolis. I like researching additive manufacturing as well as new forms of education for engineers.Mr. Bill Faton, University of Indianapolis I am a junior studying Mechanical Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. I have interests in coding, additive manufacturing, and engineering education.Mr. James T. Emery II, University of Indianapolis James Emery is the Laboratory Manager for Mechanical Systems at the R.B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. Prior to coming to the University of Indianapolis James worked as a lead model maker at a scale model wind tunnel.Dr. Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis American c Society for
(Electrical Circuit Analysis I Laboratory) and ECE 2200 (Microelectronics Circuits).They learned the fundamental laws of electric circuits, applications to circuit analysis, matrixmethods; the behavior of semiconductor devices including diodes and MOSFETS, and theapplication of large signal models to single stage amplifiers to determine voltage transfer curves.This lab course was scheduled to meet once a week, on Thursdays from 4:00 PM to 6:50 PM inECE 9-431 operating systems laboratory. There were 13 experiments in the lab for the total of 13weeks related to design, construction and characterization of microelectronic diode and transistorcircuits with an emphasis on large signal performance. The most current course information waskept on Blackboard
newperspective, and a chance to interact with freshmen, peers and faculty in a relaxed setting.IntroductionAll freshmen college students face a range of decisions, including which academic discipline topursue, which social group to associate with, and which extracurricular activities to pursue, eachof which may have a profound impact on their future. Freshmen BME majors at Johns Hopkinsface additional decisions including which laboratory to work in and which focus area withinBME to pursue. Each student at Johns Hopkins must choose a focus area by the end of theirsophomore year, such as cell and tissue engineering, systems biology, imaging, instrumentation,or computational biology. At Johns Hopkins University, freshmen start their BME experiencewith a
Federation with a highly diversified industry base. However, this growth is threatenedby a lack of engineers to guarantee this innovative economy. A project of successivevocational training of engineers has been developed at Kazan National ResearchTechnological University (KNRTU) to meet this challenge. KNRTU is uniquely positioned toaddress this need. Firstly, it has a well-developed multilevel vocational training system thatincludes bachelor, master and postgraduate programs, as well as vocational retraining andfurther education for both lecturers and industry specialists. Secondly, it organizes an efficienteducational process integrated with the research conducted in its laboratories and researchcenters. Thirdly, it provides many networking and
learning of mathematics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Hands-on Learning of Wireless Communication Principles Using Software Defined Radio Experiments and LabVIEW With the rapid proliferation of millions of smartphones, the adoption of the latest 4G LTEtechnology worldwide, and the emergence 5G broadband wireless technologies, wirelesscommunications have become an integral part of every person’s daily life and will continue to beas such in the foreseeable future. Due to this remarkable surge in wireless technologies, a strongneed for developing a flexible, hands-on laboratory platform to teach a wide variety of wirelesstechniques has emerged. Indeed, current educational
Paper ID #15580HYPOTHEkids Maker Lab: A Summer Program in Engineering Design forHigh School StudentsDr. Aaron Kyle, Columbia University Aaron Kyle, Ph.D., is Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Engineering at Columbia University. Dr. Kyle teaches undergraduate laboratory courses, bioinstrumentation and Senior Design. Senior Design is Dr. Kyle’s major teaching focus and he has worked diligently to continually enhance undergraduate design. He has taught or co-taught the BME Design class since January 2010. Dr. Kyle has spearheaded the incorporation of global health technologies into Senior Design, leading the development of
Paper ID #25660Work in Progress: Building the Mechatronics and Robotics Education Com-munityProf. Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Michael A. Gennert is Professor of Robotics Engineering, CS, and ECE at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where he leads the WPI Humanoid Robotics Laboratory and was Founding Director of the Robotics Engineering Program. He has worked at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, the University of California Riverside, PAR Technology Corporation, and General Electric. He received the S.B. in CS, S.B. in EE, and S.M. in EECS in 1980 and the Sc.D. in EECS in 1987 from MIT
LearningAbstract – Integrating sensing and machine learning is important in elevating precision in severalInternet of Things (IoT) and mobile applications. In our Electrical Engineering classes, we havebegun developing self-contained modules to train students in this area. We focus specifically indeveloping modules in machine learning including pre-processing, feature extraction andclassification. We have also embedded in these modules software to provide hands-on training.In this paper, we describe our efforts to develop an online simulation environment that willsupport web-based laboratories for training undergraduate students from Electrical Engineeringand other disciplines in sensors and machine learning. We also present our efforts to enablestudents
separated for convenience ratherthan some requirement of mechanics. Constitutive stress-strain relationships can be skillfullyapplied in a numerical model developed using the finite element method or finite differencemethod to reasonably predict the behavior of soil and soil-structure interaction1; however, astudent needs to believe what they are seeing is “true” in order for the teaching tool to beeffective. Soil behavior previously observed in the field or in the laboratory can be expressed in avariety of ways including charts, as shown in Figure 1, and photographs, as shown in Figure 2.These ways of illustrating soil behavior can help student appraise the reasonableness of theories
directly; in a way theyare involved in at least one task of each of the three projects, though each task is different in eachproject. There are three final deliverables, one from each group, delivered at the same time. Thestudents get a more holistic idea of what is involved to get to the final delivery from the initialtasks. The disadvantage remains one of a coordination issue. An additional drawback in multi-disciplines would be finding a project where all steps of a project are relevant to all groups ofstudents.3. Application ExampleIn this paper the pilot project implemented made use of the Sequential Learning Matrix. Theproject was implemented as part of the laboratory exercises. The targeted skills includedproblem solving, technical
core.When designing such a course, the selection of a particular microcontroller is a very importantdecision. The selection should consider not only what microcontrollers are currently popular, butalso the ease of project development using the system, the availability of support to students, thecosts of starting up a lab, and the flexibility of the platform to fit into a course with multipleobjectives. This paper reports on using Cypress Semiconductor’s Programmable System on aChip (PSoC) as the basis for a microcontroller systems design course. The experience ofselecting the PSoC, designing a curriculum around it, designing laboratory exercises andmanaging the course are described. Furthermore, considerations such as the technical andfinancial
Learning in Electrical Engineering Class1. IntroductionAll core courses in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Howard University and, at certain extent,in most engineering and science disciplines everywhere, are each taught by a combination of lectureand laboratory. The idea behind the lecture-lab combination is to help bridge the gap between theclassroom knowledge of theory and the practical aspect in real world. The good idea, however, hasfailed to produce the necessary practice and intended result. Lecture and lab are seldom taught in thesame class and, therefore, different topics are covered in two separate classes. Often, lecture and labare taught by different instructors. Consequently, the intended learning
Transition Command's Implementation and Support team at the National Military Academy of Afghanistan.Christopher Conley, United States Military Academy Chris Conley is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy. He earned a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Massachusetts (1978), and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from Cornell University (1980, 1983). He has served as a Member of Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories, a Senior Research Associate at Cornell University, and an Assistant Professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. In his 13 years on the USMA faculty he has taught a
150-minute laboratory session each week. Students from all four disciplines are mixed insections of approximately 20 students each. The course serves as both an introduction to collegeand an introduction to engineering. Lectures focus on survival skills and other topics importantto freshman engineers, such as note taking, problem solving, engineering estimation, significantfigures, professionalism and ethics. Approximately eight of the laboratory sessions are devotedto open-ended project-based learning used to reinforce lecture topics. The rest are used forexams, to view and discuss videos, etc.Freshman Clinic I is additionally designated as a “Rowan Seminar” course. Rowan Seminarclasses are university-wide courses designed to help freshmen
, and has developed and taught many of the freshmen engineering courses, including ENGR 107 (Intro to Engineering) and ENGR 108 (Intro to Design). Other courses she is teaching are Dynamics, Dynamics of Machinery, and Engineering Materials. She is a member of ASEE and is developing a biomechanics laboratory as a center for research in bone and joint care.Eric Sprouls, University of Southern Indiana Eric Sprouls has been the Chair of the Department of Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana (USI) since 2002, where he has been teaching engineering technology and engineering courses since 1977. He holds a MS in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois. Prior to coming
course (EMT 2461) is offered as an Associate-level capstone course to uppersophomores (AAS students) and lower juniors (BTech students). Each lesson has a one-hourlecture and a two-hour laboratory. The class meets every week. The course integrates the base ofseveral engineering technologies (electrical, electronics, mechanical, and computer). The capstoneproject aims to integrate knowledge, methods, and problem-solving skills that students learn inprevious courses. Before this course, students acquire some experience working with electricalcircuits, analog and digital circuits, embedded systems hardware development environments,oscilloscopes, function generators, digital multimeters, power supplies, C/C++ programming, andmore. The course is
to support this project during their spring 2007semester. The Senior Design Class installed a solar photo-voltaic panel and a Sevonious-typewind turbine on the roof of the museum. The controls for these alternative energy producers, aswell as a static display solar panel and a second wind turbine, will be part of the public exhibit.For another part of the exhibit, seniors in the Mechanical Engineering Laboratory (ME Lab)course built a wind turbine display complete with LED lights to show the magnitude of thepower produced when a fan was operated at various speeds. Another team of seniors in ME Labinstrumented wall simulations to measure the temperature drop across different insulationmaterials. A similar display on the effects of window
undergraduate programs that use programmable logic technologiesprovide only limited access to these technologies in 2 or 3 hour weekly lab sessions. Duringthese lab sessions, students have to master new concepts previously taught in theoretical lectures,use laboratory equipment to build experiments, develop software and hardware debuggingskills and learn how use complex CAD tools. The limitation of this traditional approach is thefact that 2 or 3 hours of lab sessions prove insufficient to meet all the lab objectives.Consequently, students do not develop the right skills required by industry.A new approach, where every student owns his or her own programmable hardware system andCAD tool suite, is now feasible due to decreased costs. Programmable logic
and the University corerequirements. The outcomes have been adopted considering the University and school mission,program objectives, (a) through (k) defined by Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) 4, and specific outcomes for manufacturing engineering as defined by theSociety of Manufacturing Engineering (SME). The program provides students with extensiveexperience in basic science and mathematics, engineering science, laboratories, computers,design, communication and teamwork, along with humanities and social science.To achieve the goals and objectives of the program educational objectives, we have developed aninnovative model for assessing our program. The model uses both indirect measure and directmeasure and is based