. Results are compared with previous surveys in 2010 and earlier.Almost all departments still require only one three-credit-hour course in kinetics and reactordesign. Fogler’s textbooks are still the most popular. Over 80% of courses cover topics throughsteady-state reactors in depth. Over 60% of courses also cover unsteady non-isothermal reactorsand reaction hazards but with less depth. Over half of the courses responded that more than 50%of the homework assignments use a computer, which is a substantial increase from the survey in2010. Exams and individual homework assignments are still the most popular assessments, butteam homework and team projects are increasing. The course is used to assess the achievementof ABET Student Outcomes 1 and 2 in
Research Assistants. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How well can Makerspaces build an Entrepreneurial Mindset?1. IntroductionIn this paper, we explore if makerspaces can contribute to student development of anentrepreneurial mindset. Makerspaces take prior implementations of hands-on engineering, suchas machine and wood shops, and push a step further to have complete digital tools available toassist with the common goal of creating a final product or solving problems. Often integratedthrough coursework, students usually have access to tools and a maker community both in andout of the classroom. They also allows students to unleash creative potential and
completed three co-ops at early stage biopharmaceutical companies. She will be entering a Ph.D. program in Fall of 2021.Ms. Amanda Dee, Northeastern University Amanda Dee is a second-year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in bioengi- neering and minoring in mathematics and music. This is her first year with the Connections Chemistry Review program. In the past, she has been a first-year tutor for the College of Engineering and is currently a CRLA Level 1 tutor for the Northeastern Peer Tutoring Program. She is also passionate about research and is currently developing tools for engineering and evaluating transgenic root cultures. Outside of aca- demics, she is an avid musician and performs with
the real work of engineers[1]. Other scholars have also found that allowing students to grapple with high cognitive demandtasks (i.e., tasks for which there is not one correct solution) supports the development ofstudents’ conceptual understanding [2], [3]. Moreover, in the digital age, when so manyengineering tools and data sources are widely available online, faculty can take advantage ofthese resources to design authentic, high cognitive demand tasks for their students [4] - [6]. Thisstudy builds on prior work to assess engineering students’ conceptual understanding andtechnical skills before and after completing modules designed around authentic, high cognitivedemand tasks.Given the challenges posed by traditional methods of instruction
work lays out the case for connecting virtue to competency, presents a collectionof operational definitions for various virtues and explores a collection of engineering andcomputing codes of ethics as a means of identifying virtues more necessary to engineering andcomputing competence. Thereupon, this work proposes four virtues as more essential to the E/Cprofessional: Prudence, disinterestedness, truthfulness, and justice.IntroductionVirtue focuses on the morally good, or as Julia Annas describes it, “A virtue is a lasting featureof a person, a tendency for the person to be a certain way.” [1] This matters significantly inengineering and computing. For example, the virtue of prudence is shown by theengineering/computing (E/C) professional who
seeking help related to mental health.Interview questions were grounded in the Integrated Behavioral Model, which recognizes theimportance of the perceived barriers and facilitators associated with mental health related help-seeking. Researchers used Braun & Clarke’s thematic analysis to identify emergent themesrelated to engineering students’ mental health help-seeking beliefs. Six major themes wereidentified: 1) An unsupportive engineering training environment creates stress, 2) Difficult workand time constraints create stress, 3) Supportive input from others promotes help-seeking, 4) Iftime is limited, mental health is a lower priority, 5) Students operate on a suck it up mentalityunless they’ve reached a breaking point and 6) Help-seeking
coherence. We took adecidedly academic approach to this process; taking advantage of relevant literature in highereducation and curriculum studies, and applying qualitative methodology to our process.The idea of striving for coherence is a key goal in this work. Coherence has been defined byTatto [1, p. 176] as “shared understandings among faculty and in the manner in whichopportunities to learn have been arranged to achieve a common goal.” Hammerness [2] drewupon this definition and defined conceptual and structural coherence, while acknowledging thatthe borders between these constructs often become indistinct. Conceptual coherence refers to theconnections between content within a program, and the relationship between foundational ideasand
other manufacturing. This project identifies thecurrent and future change in the number of machinists in Northeast Tennessee region, especiallythe five-county service area of Northeast State Community College (NSCC). There is anoticeable upward trend in the number of companies that contact the NSCC looking formachining students to fill open positions at their companies. However, according to the Bureauof Labor Statistic information for Machinist and Tool and Die Makers (these two job titles arelisted together), the job outlook is only 1% expected growth from 2016 to 2026. This leaves uswondering if there is more potential growth in our immediate area than predicted by the Bureauof Labor Statistics, or if another phenomenon is occurring. Using
, in the contextof engineering organizations, are not well explored. This study examines the actions newlyhired engineers take during organizational socialization and identifies the actions from newlyhired engineers working in the U.S. aerospace and defense (A&D) industry. By followingMorrison's framework of new employees' primary tasks in socialization, we present theproactive actions taken by 10 participants. Specifically, we identified 13 actions andclassified them into four categories: Relationship Developing, Knowledge Acquiring, RealTask Training, and Positive Attitude Cultivating. This study expands the research literature asit 1) explores new employees' proactive actions in the context of engineering organizations,2) discusses and
clear what impact this common first-year experience would have on engineeringtechnology and, more specifically, on enrollment. Now, with six years of historic data as well asdata available prior to 2014, the effects this restructuring has had on the enrollment inengineering technology can be analyzed. This paper presents this analysis and discussesimpacts on recruiting and enrollment.IntroductionThe selection of a college major has been called a “high stakes decision” and could havesignificant long-term implications [1]. For some students, this decision is made during theapplication process to a four-year degree program when they might be seventeen years old. Forother students, it is made later, once a student has matriculated to campus and has
, networking opportunities, entrepreneurshiptraining, and modest funding that enable their technology to transition into the marketplacedirectly or guide them into becoming NSF I-Corps Team applicants [1, 2]. Furthermore, severalof the close to 100 existing Sites also serve student participants working on student-ownedintellectual property. We are currently operating on the fourth year of our I-Corps Site grant,which has supported 11 cohorts and more than one hundred teams at a larger Southwesternuniversity. In previous work, using pre- and post-program surveys, we evaluated student changesin perceptions of interest in entrepreneurship, confidence in defining their value proposition, andself-efficacy in entrepreneurship, and lessons learned from
compared directly against one another to determine which course modalitiesthe students rate highest. The results show that while face-to-face courses in Fall 2020 hadimproved student evaluations compared to the same courses in Fall 2019, the online-synchronousand online-asynchronous courses had lower student evaluations in some categories for the Fall2020 semester than in Fall 2019.Introduction As the COVID-19 pandemic spread throughout the world in the spring of 2020, thehigher education sector responded by rapidly moving students out of residence halls, cancellingsports seasons and shifting nearly all classes online. Many universities made attempts to mitigatethe disruption to students by adopting grading schemes such as pass/fail [1
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of COVID-19 on Self-efficacy and Retention of Women Engineering StudentsIntroductionIn today’s society, companies continue to need college graduates with expertise in STEM fields.In fact, the number of bachelor’s degrees in engineering has steadily increased since 2000 [1]due to a high need of skilled engineers in today’s workforce. In the United States, womenrepresent half of the population, nearly 47% of the workforce and approximately 57% of thebachelor’s degrees awarded each year [2]. However, women comprise only 20% of bachelor’sdegrees in engineering fields [1] and represent less than 20% of the domestic engineeringworkforce [3]. This discrepancy can
course is DC Circuits and Design. The course DC Circuits and Designhas both theory and laboratory components.First course: Engineering Economics was offered on-campus in two sections in Spring 2019 withcombined enrollment as 53 students. One section was offered online with 37 students. All thethree sections were taught by the same instructor (Author-3). These sections were not hamperedby any unplanned situations during the semester. In Spring 2020, four sections were offered: twoon-campus sections with 16 and 40 students, and two online with 40 and 45 students. Twoinstructors: Author-1 and Author-3 taught the course. The worldwide pandemic due to COVID-19 hit in the middle of the spring semester and all sections were changed to virtual mode
and adoption of technology in education even before COVID-19, andthere has been a significant surge in the usage of advanced educational tools and online learningsoftware such as language apps, virtual tutoring, video conferencing tools, etc. [1] since the startof the pandemic. However, despite this advancement and growth, much of the world was notprepared for such a sudden change to this level of heavy internet dependence for once in-personactivities, and many instructors and students had no prior experience in online teaching andlearning before the start of the pandemic. Instructors and students who do not have access toreliable high-speed internet connections or the appropriate equipment and tools have found thisonline mode of teaching and
Missouri.Dr. Lisa Y. Flores, University of Missouri - Columbia Lisa Y. Flores, Ph.D. is a Professor of Counseling Psychology at the University of Missouri. She has expertise in the career development of Latino/as and Latino/a immigrant issues and has 80 peer reviewed journal publications, 19 book chapters, and 1 co-edited book and presented over 200 conference presen- tations in these areas. She has been PI and co-PI on grants funded by NSF and USDA to support her research. She is Editor of the Journal of Career Development and past Associate Editor of the Journal of Counseling Psychology, and has served on the Editorial Boards of the Journal of Vocational Behavior, The Counseling Psychologist, Journal of Counseling
correlation with two factors and low correlation with the remainingfactors). The results indicate that changes to one factor by an educator may unintentionally makechanges to other factors that may have an unanticipated net effect on their motivational level.1. INTRODUCTION The demand for skilled engineers is increasing with the growing number of technologicaladvances, industries, and bolstering the economy [1]. The exponential rise in demand forinnovation, to meet the growing needs of the fourth industrial revolution is unlike anything theUnited States has experienced in the past [2]. Educators face new challenges in preparing the newgeneration of engineers with technical skills and overall readiness for the new industrial revolution(Industry 4.0
and universities.Keywords: Entrepreneurial mindset, hands-on module, skillset, real-world problems,stakeholder, engineering, technical skills1. IntroductionEntrepreneurial education is generally associated with start-ups, product commercialization orbusiness studies. However, there is a clear distinction between being an entrepreneur and havingan entrepreneurial mindset (EM). EM has been defined as cognitive behavior that allowsengineers to be curious about an opportunity, make connections and create value for a broadrange of stakeholders while recognizing their social and environmental responsibilities [1], [2].Incorporation of EM in engineering education is driven by the dynamic nature of the current jobmarket and the ‘skills gap
as a scholar, dedicated to their course of study, hasbeen in decline since the 1960’s [1], [2]. A Bachelor’s degree was a means of academicintegration and status [3], facilitated by conventional lecture where an expert addresses thestudents using authoritative lecture style [4]. In this paradigm, students benefit from the student-mentor relationship having prepared for the interaction with intensive study. This has beenshown to be less beneficial to non-traditional students [5]. Non-traditional students come frompopulations such as community college transfer students or people who work temporary jobs thatare unrelated to their course of study [6]–[8]. Heavy workloads—greater than part-time workobligations—hamper their ability to do well
Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of Immersive Training on Senior Chemical Engineering Students' Prioritization of Process Safety Decision CriteriaIntroductionProcess safety is becoming a greater focus of chemical plant design and operation due to thenumber of incidents involving dangerous chemical accidents [1]. Since its creation nearly 20years ago, the Chemical Safety Board (CSB) has investigated 130 safety incidents and providedover 800 safety recommendations to operating chemical facilities. Following a gas well blowoutin 2018, the CSB gave a recommendation to the American Petroleum Institute (API) to establishrecommended practice on alarm management [2]. Similarly, in 2017, the CSB gave arecommendation to Arkema Inc. to
%. The results from the hypothesis testing suggest that using iClickers in the method given did not significantly improve student performance in the class. This also suggests that changes to using iClickers will need to be made in subsequent semesters to improve student performance.* Email schuh4@illinois.edu, Phone +1(217)3007091 11 IntroductionPersonal response systems, or “clickers”, have been used extensively in the classroom by instructorsto gain feedback on student performance and identify misconceptions that the instructor can correctearly on [1–7]. Clickers have been used effectively in large lecture style courses, and have yieldedimproved student performance [2, 8]. One
success with decreased anxiety about design tasks as compared to freshman (Figure 1). T‐tests were used to statistically compare the data (Confidence t(58) = ‐2.28, p=0.013; Expectation of Success t(55) = ‐3.119, p=0.014; Anxiety t(57) = 1.529, p=0.066). Figure 1: Seniors have increased confidence, motivation, expectation of success and decreased anxiety about design tasks as compared to freshman. Seniors showed higher quality scores with respect to frequency of makerspace use, time spent in makerspaces, number of makerspace projects involved in, involvement level (voluntary vs. class‐only
logiccomponents such as AND/OR gates using Karnaugh maps.Traditionally, this course has been taught at Michigan Technological University with homework,lab assignments and exams. Since 2019 we have introduced inquiry-based worksheets to thiscourse. The worksheets are participation-based assignments for every session and constitute 5%of the students’ final grades. The intent of the worksheets is: 1- To keep them motivated to thinkand solve real-world problems 2- To assess students’ learning outcome every session and onevery subject. These worksheets are designed by the instructor and intend to include problemsthat students will face in the laboratory, real world, future jobs and industry. We also often usethese worksheets to help students draw interesting
transportation engineering with lecture and laboratorycomponents at the Pennsylvania State University. Specifically, the study seeks to determine howthe transition to remote instruction impacted student perceptions of the learning environment asit relates to the development of their professional expertise. Students’ perception on the learningenvironment was measured using the Supportive Learning Environment for ExpertiseDevelopment Questionnaire (SLEED-Q) [1]. The SLEED-Q was administered to students in Fall2018 and Fall 2019 (normal instruction) and compared with responses obtained from Fall 2020(remote instruction). Prior data (2018, 2019) was collected for baseline comparison as part of alarger curricular revision project to examine the impact of
Florida International University (FIU). Her research interests span the fields of Computing and Engineer- ing Education, Human Computer Interaction, Data Science, and Machine Learning. Previously, Stephanie received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Neuroscience from the University of Miami, in addition to B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from FIU.Dr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, designs research focused on broadening par- ticipation in computer science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline
Survey 1 Bala Maheswaran and 2Haridas Kumarakuru 1 College of Engineering, 2Department of Physics Northeastern UniversityAbstractTeaching engineering and engineering physics is always an interesting and challenging adventure.Especially, the virtual and hybrid form of teaching requires innovative approaches to increase thestudents’ motivation to learn fundamental engineering and engineering physics concepts. Thebasic concepts in engineering design are long-standing, for example, design process, problem-solving, graphics, modeling, prototyping, and importantly teamwork. Experiential and
been accepted by TeachEngineering.org to post on their nationalplatform. The evaluation of this program has been performed by analyzing responses from pre- andpost-surveys of the 2016 to 2019 cohorts. The main focus of this paper is investigating theinfluence of the program on increasing participants’ self-reported confidence in research skillsand self-reported confidence and comfort in teaching practices around science and engineering.The data analysis shows that teachers increased their knowledge and application of science andengineering concepts, improved awareness of engineering opportunities for their students, andbuilt confidence using open-ended problems and investigations.1. Introduction Teachers play an important role in
engineering project management while immersed intheir role as PMs. They are responsible for setting agendas, ensuring quality of deliverables,setting deadlines, and managing conflicts. Several studies have revealed that in industry, the roleproject managers take have significant impact on project success [1], [2] and that teamwork waspositively correlated with project performance. Project success can be achieved with strongercollaboration, team cohesiveness, and team communication [1]. However, project management israrely discussed or taught in undergraduate engineering programs. In this paper, we analyze how upper-class PMs influence first-year students’ perceptionson team dynamics and stress as they go through their semester long design
courses and professional practice. Seminar deliverables,including a culminative project, were included as part of the course grade. Students weresupported throughout the course with an academic coach and supplemental instructor. ExCELscholars, with a range of math preparedness, all received the “C” or higher required to progressto Calculus II and a group GPA of 3.33, as compared to 2.17 for mainstream Calculus I sections[1].During their freshmen year, ExCEL scholars completed Calculus II over two semesters toprovide flexibility to adapt to the rigorous of engineering courses in a military collegeenvironment. Similar to Calculus I, course structure included face-to-face and onlinecomponents, as well as a parallel civil engineering seminar. Also